[07:30] <mlankhorst> ok re-uploaded mesa
[11:30] <tkamppeter> I want to do a hardware enablement SRU in Trusty, letting Trusty fully support IPP Everywhere printing as Utopic does. So I backported all appropriate changes from Utopic's cups-filters to Trusty's including ippusbxd (the IPP-over-USB support), only problem is that ippusbxd introduced the new cups-filters-ippusbxd binary package and if I put ippusbxd into the cups-filters binary package in the SRU I would also need a Utop
[11:30] <tkamppeter> ic SRU for assuring correct Trusty->Utopic update. What should I do?
[11:32] <xnox> tkamppeter: best to introduce the new package in trusty, as packaged in later releases.
[11:32] <xnox> tkamppeter: we add new packages all the time for hardware support, see all the -lts- packages
[11:34] <tkamppeter> xnox, OK, thanks. As the whole SRU has also a part in system-config-printer (for auto setup of IPP-over-USB printers) I will let system-config-printer-udev depend on cups-filters-ippusbxd and so the IPP-over-USB support will get into Trusty.
[11:45] <xnox> tkamppeter: i'm no SRU team member though, so your miledge may vary =) but, in general, hw-enablement is attempted to be closer to parity with future release.
=== txspud` is now known as txspud
=== kirkland` is now known as kirkland
[16:08] <tkamppeter> xnox, thanks, SRU bug 1386241.
[16:08] <ubot2> bug 1386241 in system-config-printer (Ubuntu Trusty) "Add the full IPP Everywhere support from Utopic to Trusty" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1386241
[16:26] <wxl> cjwatson: any new news on dailies? i've seen posts about vivid being available for download out on the internets…
[16:32] <teward> wxl: FYI: cjwatson's in vacation mode :)
[16:32] <wxl> aw shoot
[16:32] <wxl> teward: you know who's taking care of making sure our dailies get up there?
[16:33] <wxl> or do we only care about upgrades and netboot now? XD
[16:33] <teward> wxl: no idea, i'm not on the release team, I just lurk everywhere :)  (I'm not sure who manages what, either).  Just thought i'd give you that FYI :)
[16:33] <elfy> wxl: it'll get sorted :)
[16:33] <wxl> elfy: thank you :)
[16:35] <wxl> elfy: ping me if you need any help and/or if you get it all figured out thx :)
[16:35] <elfy> I'm not doing it ... I'm just sure that it'll not get forgotten and I'm not too worried about a few days at the beginning of a cycle
[16:36] <elfy> I'd be less laid back last fortnight of April ;)
[16:41] <teward> elfy: in theory, couldn't a Utopic build just have `vivid` substituted for `utopic` in the sources.list to set up a vivid environment...?  That is, if we're not testing dailies, of course.
[16:42] <elfy> teward: oh you can do all sorts of things to actually run vivid
[16:43] <elfy> this isn't that - there are no images at the image tracker yet :)
[16:43] <teward> elfy: may as well clone my Utopic VM so I have a vivid environment to beat with a stick :P
[16:43] <teward> elfy: and true.
[16:43]  * elfy changed over to vivid on Friday
[16:43] <elfy> kind of necessary with this hat on
[16:43] <teward> elfy: my systems stay on LTSes, I don't have any testing hardware unfortunately
[16:43] <teward> so VMs are useful
[16:43] <teward> at least, for what I test and do :0
[16:43] <elfy> yep
[21:27] <tumbleweed> those two builds on fischer look very unhappy
[21:29] <wgrant_> Indeed. Cancelled them both.
=== wgrant_ is now known as Guest43514
[22:53] <xnox> is it normal for me to receive a bunch of rejects (things related to libav9) and a bunch of accepts (toolchain / cross compilers) from the time of archive opening?
[22:55] <Guest43514> xnox: You may have received a few binary rejects (looking like "The following files are already published in Primary Archive for Ubuntu: suchandsuch_blah_all.deb") for packages that were in utopic-proposed at release, due to a Soyuz bug triggered by the nominatedarchindep change.
=== Guest43514 is now known as wgrant