[01:01] xnox: I did the initial copies without --silent, so you would have gotten some mails, sorry about that. [01:07] infinity: i see. ok. thanks. [04:28] arges, hi, are you SRU vanguard today? === wgrant_ is now known as Guest29210 [09:14] can someone drop mesa 10.3.1-1ubuntu1 ? superceeded by 10.3.2-0ubuntu0.1 [10:15] infinity, do ou happen to have any idea why debootsrap fails for armhf builds ? [10:18] infinity, for reference ... https://launchpadlibrarian.net/188468913/buildlog_ubuntu_vivid_armhf_ubuntu-touch_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz [10:19] SRU team, can you please release xfce4-weather-plugin into trusty-updates? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfce4-weather-plugin/+bug/1377612 [10:19] Launchpad bug 1377612 in Xfce4 weather plugin "[SRU] Plugin needs updated for locationforecast-1.2" [Medium,Confirmed] [10:20] it has now been sitting in -proposed with verification-done for well over a week [10:22] also, please accept xfdesktop4 into trusty-proposed, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfdesktop4/+bug/1365965 [10:22] Launchpad bug 1365965 in xfdesktop4 (Ubuntu) "[MRE] Please update xfdesktop4 to 4.11.8 in Trusty" [Undecided,In progress] [11:03] could someone take a look at ubuntukylin-theme in trusty queue? [12:15] ypwong: yes [12:16] arges, hey, ubuntukylin-theme is in the sru queue for some time, could you please take a look? [12:17] ypwong: I'll take a look at it now [12:18] thanks! [13:06] can someone reject the sahara upload please [13:40] thanks to whoever handling the trusty SRU:s [13:41] Mirv, that would be arges I think [13:41] Mirv: np : ) [13:42] :) [14:07] infinity: hey, can I get a second review of bug 1384355 before I accept it, I know there was a lot of discussion on the ML [14:07] bug 1384355 in owncloud (Ubuntu) "ownCloud should be removed" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1384355 [15:24] infinity, ! [15:24] (dont hide, i saw you talking in the other channel :) ) [15:24] lol [15:27] infinity, is anyone looking into debootstrap in armhf livefs builds ? i had like 30 pings already about vivid touch images (and cant really make out what the error is) [15:33] ogra_: Maybe? [15:34] thats a precise statement :) [15:35] ogra_: I just woke up. :P [15:35] takke your time (and coffee ... ) :) [15:35] I'll kick off a debootstrap on a local machine so I can see the log. [15:36] cool ... i wonder if we couldnt store that somewhere accessible via LP nowadays [15:36] infinity: be more precise for ogra_ say perhaps instead :) [15:36] davmor2, nah, its fine, i understand his canadian slang [15:36] ogra_: We could cat it from live-build if we detect a failed debootstrap. [15:36] yeah [15:37] i guess that would be really helpful in such cases [15:37] And I will do just that if I can't make it fail locally. ;) [15:37] But let's see. [16:10] ogra_: And, of course, I can't reproduce that issue locally. [16:11] dang [16:32] anyone know why 4 of the 7 powerppc builders have a status of "Manual"? [16:33] kenvandine: Because they're lazy. [16:34] slackers :) [16:34] did they file a vacation request at least ? [16:34] kenvandine: Those are the slow/old machines, I prefer to keep them off unless there's a backlog. [16:34] no PTO for builders :) [16:34] ah [16:34] kenvandine: When I finish off a few more installs, they'll go away, but right now they sit in reserve for emergencies. [16:34] i see you enabled some more, thanks :) [16:37] (and who granted that ... they can be lazy later :P ) === chorrell is now known as chorrell-away [17:21] soooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo how about those daily images? :) [17:29] arges: can you please take a look at bug 1365965 ? the package needs to be accepted into -proposed, so that we can start verifying it [17:29] bug 1365965 in xfdesktop4 (Ubuntu) "[MRE] Please update xfdesktop4 to 4.11.8 in Trusty" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1365965 [17:49] brainwash: ok [17:50] brainwash: can you ensure its fixed in v/u? [17:50] i'm guessing if its a backport is it. but i'd like to see that task marked as such [17:50] arges: yes, it's a backport from utopic [17:51] a simple bugfix update [17:51] to improve the quality of the xubuntu/xfce desktop environment in trusty :) [17:54] brainwash: done [17:55] arges: thank you :) [18:21] wxl: they're meant to be enabled; if they aren't working, debug why [18:21] wxl: just repeatedly asking about it isn't helpful at this point :) [18:21] cjwatson: well i'm not sure what i can do to debug further [18:21] look at the build logs [18:21] start from http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/cd-build-logs/, may need to follow links through to livefs build logs [18:22] there's something odd that's been causing some builds to fail with "An identical build of this live filesystem image is already pending"; I haven't yet worked out why [18:22] due to being on vacation [18:23] yeah that's what i see too [18:23] so I don't know, if nobody else works it out I'll look tomorrow, but I'm not going to look further just now [18:23] cjwatson, we seem to have debootstrap issues on armhf ... i wonder if thats somehow related [18:23] ogra_: no [18:23] spectacularly unrelated [18:23] (interesting only on the builders ... not reproducable at home) [18:24] also for debian-installer images [18:24] File "/srv/cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-archive-tools/isotracker.py", line 130, in get_milestone_by_name raise KeyError("Milestone '%s' not found" % milestone) [18:24] wxl: ah well that I can fix in ten seconds, done [18:24] (tweaked ~cdimage/.isotracker.conf, now that iso.qa's been set up [18:25] ) [18:27] beautiful [18:27] added the builds to the tracker and now we have images [18:28] of course the desktop images are messed up still, no? [18:28] see above. [18:28] "already pending" etc. [18:28] yeah well i'm not sure how to interpret that, but i'll take it as a fail ;) [18:28] cjwatson, since your blog doesn't support comments... thank you for everything so far, all the best for the future, and waiting excitedly for your LP contributions (and sorry for interrupting the ontopic channel activity) [18:29] wxl: needs investigation [18:29] knome: thanks, hopefully it'll work out well :) [18:29] yep :) [18:29] ok i'll let you recover from vacation. thanks cjwatson :) [18:29] wxl: but yes it is apparently a build failure as currently set up [18:30] arguably it should only fail that arch, though maybe it's just as well to force us to sort this out [18:30] arguably it would also be a good idea for somebody who isn't me to figure this out, since youse are going to have to soon enough :) [18:30] whaaa? ;) [18:30] you leaving us? [18:31] moving to Launchpad engineering, end of year [18:31] hopefully you will not stand in the middle of a crowd of pings in the future if you get online during vacations :) [18:31] will still be around but pretty limited involvement in Ubuntu release work, basically just where it involves fixing Launchapd [18:31] (go away and enjoy !!) [18:31] also apparently learning to type Launchpad. [18:31] wow super cool [18:31] congrats cjwatson! [18:32] heh, yeah, I was just online impatiently waiting for unrelated personal mail :) [18:32] :) [18:32] but guest arriving soon, so [18:32] thanks again [19:25] ogra_: Son of a... [19:25] what ? [19:25] ogra_: Running a fill lp-buildd buildlivefs test locally on armhf still didn't fail. [19:25] ogra_: So, the issue might have been transient. [19:25] ogra_: Want to kick off another build attempt and see? [19:25] well, it is there since days already [19:25] i can, indeed [19:26] ogra_: Yeah, I know, I saw the history. And if it's still broken on another try, I'll dig deeper, but reproducing production any closer than what I've already done will be "fun". [19:26] infinity, ubuntu-core has it too ... (all armhf/arm64 in fact) [19:27] ubuntu-core looks "stuck"... The PPC builds haven't happened. Weird. [19:27] fired [19:27] Might need a poke on nusakan to tell it to give up. [19:28] But thanks for pointing out core has/had the same bug, that's a much faster reproducer at least. [19:35] * ogra_ twiddles thimbs ... lb_clean ... [19:35] *thumbs too [19:37] * infinity goes to find a bit of breakfast. [19:46] infinity, failed :( [19:46] https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/vivid/ubuntu-touch/+build/9831 [19:52] ogra_: Waitaminute. Why are those building on PPA builders? This might be a hint. :P [19:52] Would also explain why ppc* were never happening. [19:53] ogra_: I'll look into this immediately after "breakfast". [19:53] ok [19:53] oh [19:54] I probably just need one twiddle, actually. [19:54] ogra_: Try another set? [19:54] sure, what should i do ? [19:54] just fire off another one ? [19:55] ogra_: Actually, I'll test with -core. [19:55] hmm, i386 seems unhappy as well now though [19:55] crap [19:55] ogra_: For entirely different reasons, though. [19:55] yeah [19:55] passwd changed [19:55] ogra_: Hence why I'm testing with core, since it won't have those hooks. :) [19:56] ogra_: If I can make core happy everywhere, I'll leave flavour issues up to the flavours. :P [19:56] that will be awfully hackish to fix on a per distro basis ... [19:56] (vivid vs rtm) === ogasawara_ is now known as ogasawara === ogasawara is now known as Guest32914 [20:35] ogra_: Alright, core was happy everywhere, and I made the same change to touch, the ball's in your court for the passwd fun. [20:35] oh my [20:35] well, let me do a build to see we get past the issue [20:36] i guess the passwd stuff is more for tomorrow morning [20:36] building ... [20:51] infinity, looks good, both arches got past debootstrap