[01:24] celery's build should be fixed by a retry [03:35] * lpotter wonders where libqt5multimedia5-dev package is [03:37] lpotter: You probably want qtmultimedia5-dev [03:38] ahh indeed. ta [03:38] * lpotter grumbles about package naming [11:32] could someone do a rebuild on a https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-greenlet/0.4.5-1/+build/6525041 please? [12:26] Anyone know why https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/cfitsio hasn't made it into vivid (https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cfitsio)? Couldn't find it in the sync blacklist. [17:32] hjd: Anything that used to be in Ubuntu but has since been deleted requires manual attention rather than being automatically synced (there are a few other similar checks, but that's the relevant one here). I've synced cfitsio now. [17:34] Previous history here: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cfitsio/+publishinghistory [18:48] Noskcaj: it was my intention [18:49] cyphermox, What did i ask you? I've forgotten [18:49] bluez5 merge [18:50] oh yep, hopefully that will happen this cycle [18:50] yes, definitely [18:50] but for now we're still block on pulseaudio as I understand it, otherwise we'd regress HSP [18:50] (ie. headset and mic for hangouts, etc.) [18:50] ok [18:51] I'm in house cleaning right now, but once I'm done I'll write up an email on u-devel, ask when we'll be ready with pulse [18:52] I know diwic mentioned it before in email [18:53] hmm.. we'll need a formal release of pulse before it can happen, I see some pretty critical bits in git [18:53] eg. bluetooth: Implement org.ofono.HandsfreeAudioAgent.Release() [18:55] Noskcaj: in any case, we'll go to bluez5 this cycle regardless of the decision for touch, if it comes to it touch can downgrade back to bluez 4, and it's also only blocking on pulse and ofono [18:55] ofono being a fairly straightforward job of porting the patches on the latest ofono upstream [18:56] ok [20:01] cjwatson: Thank you. :) I suspected it might have been removed but I didn't find a bug report on it. Will make a note of the publishinghistory link. [20:05] The reason I discovered it is that some packages on the FTBFS page failed because they depended on a dev-package from cfitsio. So these packages can presumably be rebuilt once cfitsio is included (I don't remember if the builders have access to packages in -proposed or not) [20:05] I don't think this happens automatically, so in case someone are able to trigger it the packages in question are ccfits, cpl, esorex, pyxplot, wcslib, wcslib-contrib and python-astropy (at least, might be more) [20:13] it should happen automatically [20:17] jtaylor: Depends on if they are depwait or failed. If they are failed, they need a manual retry. [20:17] missing build dep should be depwait [20:19] but you can ping me on issues with these packages [21:18] infinity: i don't know. perhaps the makefile is messed up. i recall we had some issues a few months ago with it being statically linked, bu ti thought we'd fixed all that [21:18] added to my todo list to look into [21:40] any tips on getting patches accepted? I have a fix ready for review/merging on bug #1358966 [21:40] bug 1358966 in bcmwl (Ubuntu) "bcmwl-kernel-source 6.30.223.248+bdcom-0ubuntu1: bcmwl kernel module failed to build [error: macro "alloc_netdev" requires 4 arguments, but only 3 given]" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1358966 [22:31] cfp_: Subscribe ubuntu-sponsors to the bug if you haven't. Other than that, no. [22:56] ScottK: thanks