[01:16] <[Neurotic]> Hi! I'm looking for the source for http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v3.17.1-utopic/ - I *think* I found it in git://kernel.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ubuntu-utopic.git under the unstable branch (I see there is a commit to rebase against 3.17). Is that correct? === [1]vncm is now known as vncm [08:46] [Neurotic], nope, there is no branch for the mainline builds; they are made from the base commit (see COMMIT) and the patches there [08:46] in the same directory with the binaries [09:32] <[Neurotic]> apw: Sorry, not understanding what the "base commit" is - is that in the kernel.ubuntu git repository? or are you referring to the mainline linux kernel repository? [09:33] [Neurotic], the base commit is the commit listed in COMMIT which is found in either linus' tree or the stable tree in those (mostly) [09:33] <[Neurotic]> apw: (thanks for answering though) [09:33] for v3.17.1 clearly that is a stable version, which is therefore in the stable tree [09:34] <[Neurotic]> apw: But there is no tag for v3.17.1 in the utopic git repo [09:34] <[Neurotic]> I am looking at the cloned git repository now, and I can't see anything to match it up to [09:35] <[Neurotic]> (thanks for your help btw, much appreciated apw ) [09:35] <[Neurotic]> ...so I'm guessing it's a v3.17.1 tag in linus's tree then? [09:36] <[Neurotic]> Which I'm assuming is this: https://github.com/torvalds/linux/tree/v3.17 [09:39] nope, v3.17.1 which is in the stable tree [09:40] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git [09:41] <[Neurotic]> aaah [09:42] <[Neurotic]> I would never have found that on my own - much appreciaed [10:19] hi, does anyone have concerns if I remove some kernels (like linux-dove, details under http://paste.ubuntu.com/8800923/) from platform.vivid ? AFAICT these kernels are no longer in utopic or vivid and some not even in trusty. [10:20] mvo: Go nuts. Just make sure there are no transitional metapackages you're removing. [10:20] mvo: Though, if there are (for, say, omap or highbank), that would be a bug, as they should have been dropped post-trusty. [10:20] infinity: ok, I check. [10:21] mvo: That said, that file is pretty much a lie anyway, as we don't build any bootable images for armhf. [10:21] infinity: while you are here … ogra_ suggested that I ask if you might have a idea why https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/vivid/ubuntu-core-system-image fails to build armhf - well, it fails because it tries to install linux-mx5 and linux-omap [10:21] mvo: The icky regex in supported-kernel-common is more interesting. [10:22] infinity: the linux-omap might come from the seeds, but I can't find anything linux-mx5 rleeated [10:22] thats long gone [10:22] infinity: oh, I haven't touched this one yet :) [10:22] was mx5 even there for more than one release ? [10:22] (in the archive i mean) [10:22] iirc that was just to please linaro [10:23] mvo: That failure has nothing to do with seeds at all. [10:23] infinity: all livecd-rootfs releated? [10:23] mvo: It's because you're not selecting a kernel (or "none") [10:23] mvo: And live-build is picking a default for you. [10:23] functions/defaults.sh: LB_LINUX_FLAVOURS="${LB_LINUX_FLAVOURS:-mx5 omap}" [10:24] woah, thanks [10:24] silly me for not looking into live-build and only into livecd-rootfs [10:24] thanks infinity \o/ [10:24] mvo: See livecd-rootfs config. [10:25] mvo: ubuntu-server|ubuntu-core|ubuntu-touch) [10:25] KERNEL_FLAVOURS=none [10:25] mvo: That's what you want if you want to be kernel-free. Just add your flavour to that case. [10:25] mvo: Or if you want a kernel, specify one there. [10:26] infinity: hm, our flavor is ubuntu-core, but I think I know enough to fix it now, thanks again [10:26] mvo: There's already a system-image sub-case in that case. [10:26] * ogra_ wishes the livecd-sh script back ... live-build is such a beast [10:26] mvo: You just didn't add KERNEL_FLAVOURS=generic [10:26] *livecd.sh [10:26] mvo: (Assuming you want a kernel, which seems to have been your intent) [10:27] infinity: right, I think I did in the PPA but we don't have arm support in the ppa yet, I will use the archive until we get that. (and yes, we want a kenrel :) [10:27] kernel even [10:28] mvo: Anyhow, clean up the cruft in the seeds if you want, but it won't make a difference here, that's all no-ops. [10:28] * mvo nds [10:28] * mvo nods [10:34] mvo: You might want "add_package install flash-kernel u-boot-tools" too. [10:35] infinity: thanks, I will add that! [10:35] mvo: The armhf case that would naturally follow the amd64 case for grub-pc. [10:36] infinity: right [10:37] infinity: thanks for your help here, my arm experience is still limited, so I'm thankful for those hints [13:22] hi, is there a git for linux-firmware-nonfree? [13:33] Kano, do not believe so [13:33] why not [13:34] did you try overlayfs for live? [13:42] because the archive is definative for that package [13:42] we default to overlayfs for live [13:43] so casper already boots with it? [13:43] yes [13:44] where is the git? [13:44] for? [13:44] casper [13:44] what to see the changes [13:44] i believe that is in bzr, in the udd branches [13:46] ubuntus website is really bad compared to debian, there you see git/svn directly [13:47] could be [13:47] i mean the packages.ubuntu.com [13:49] and fully outdated, vivid is not mentioned, utopic not default and if that is the right bzr it has no 1.345 [13:49] http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-branches/ubuntu/vivid/casper/vivid/changes/1144?start_revid=1144 [13:50] cant you use git... [13:50] not yet === jsalisbury changed the topic of #ubuntu-kernel to: Home: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/ || Ubuntu Kernel Team Meeting - Tues November 4th, 2014 - 17:00 UTC || If you have a question just ask, and do wait around for an answer! If the question is should I file a bug for something, likely you can assume yes. === roadmr is now known as roadmr_afk [19:42] apw: holy cow. i only just noticed that overlayfs has been merged. woot [19:43] stgraber: ^ [19:44] hallyn: oh, I heard about the pull request, didn't realize it was actually accepted this time, nice! [19:44] now maybe more people will care about making it suck less :) === roadmr_afk is now known as roadmr [21:41] stgraber, yep maybe