| === _salem is now known as salem_ | ||
| === salem_ is now known as _salem | ||
| === Malsasa_ is now known as Malsasa | ||
| liuxg | zbenjamin, ping | 07:37 |
|---|---|---|
| zbenjamin | liuxg: yes | 07:38 |
| liuxg | zbenjamin, an armhf click pacakge can only be deployed to a armhf emulator, right? | 07:39 |
| zbenjamin | liuxg: what else would you do with it | 07:39 |
| liuxg | zbenjamin, if the developer does not have a phone yet, he can use the armhf emulator to try an armhf click package. is this OK? | 07:40 |
| tsdgeos | landing \o/ | 08:23 |
| tsdgeos | Saviq: doh, CI still on utopic :/ | 09:12 |
| tsdgeos | FAILURE everywhere | 09:12 |
| tsdgeos | because libunity-api-dev can't be found | 09:13 |
| Saviq | tsdgeos, it should switch soon | 09:13 |
| Saviq | tsdgeos, like tonight | 09:13 |
| tsdgeos | ok | 09:13 |
| === Saviq is now known as Saviq-codedive | ||
| tsdgeos | Cimi: Saviq-codedive: so i have these changes for the croppedimagesizer to make it more async, question is, do we want it as a third branch on top of the other two (croppedimagesizer->photoscopeimprovements->asyncroppedimagesizer) | 09:53 |
| tsdgeos | or not? | 09:53 |
| tsdgeos | because the two branches as we have it are already an improvement | 09:53 |
| tsdgeos | and this new one introduces more improvements but also more complexity | 09:54 |
| tsdgeos | wonder if we want it separate just in case we want to eventually only land the first two and this one later | 09:54 |
| Cimi | tsdgeos, I just want someone to test it | 09:54 |
| tsdgeos | Cimi: that doesn't asnwer my question :D | 09:58 |
| Cimi | tsdgeos, if branch works, we can have them together | 09:58 |
| Cimi | tsdgeos, however, thinking on how management rejects stuff | 09:59 |
| Cimi | tsdgeos, is probably better to split them, so if async breaks things, we won't revert *all* | 09:59 |
| tsdgeos | Cimi: that was my thinking | 10:05 |
| tsdgeos | i'll do a separate branch | 10:05 |
| Cimi | sorry - back | 10:37 |
| Saviq-codedive | tsdgeos, separate, yeah | 10:54 |
| Saviq-codedive | tsdgeos, we might land it all together, but it'll be nice to have some granularity | 10:54 |
| tsdgeos | can someone remind me how to get the wizard to run again? | 10:56 |
| tsdgeos | Saviq-codedive: ↑ ? | 10:57 |
| Saviq-codedive | tsdgeos, phablet-config --help | 10:57 |
| Saviq-codedive | grr | 10:59 |
| MacSlow | Is anyone seeing these errors with bzr under vivid ? -> http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/8834245 | 11:14 |
| === Malsasa_ is now known as Malsasa | ||
| Saviq-codedive | MacSlow, yes | 11:23 |
| Saviq-codedive | MacSlow, bug #1366684 | 11:23 |
| ubot5 | bug 1366684 in bzr (Ubuntu) "breaks with newer versions of configobj" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1366684 | 11:23 |
| Saviq-codedive | MacSlow, you need to downgrade configobj | 11:25 |
| Saviq-codedive | MacSlow, let me get you a package | 11:25 |
| Saviq-codedive | MacSlow, it will build soon in https://launchpad.net/~saviq/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+sourcepub/4552771/+listing-archive-extra | 11:30 |
| Saviq-codedive | MacSlow, you'll need to downgrade and hold it | 11:30 |
| MacSlow | Saviq-codedive, ah... thanks | 11:31 |
| Saviq-codedive | MacSlow, it's because of your surname, and my first name | 11:31 |
| MacSlow | Saviq-codedive, *sigh* still such issue in 2014 | 11:32 |
| Saviq-codedive | MacSlow, it's built in the PPA now | 11:55 |
| === _salem is now known as salem_ | ||
| dandrader | mzanetti, you there? | 12:02 |
| mzanetti | dandrader: yes | 12:03 |
| dandrader | mzanetti, so, if I change unity-api, and then unity8 to depend on this newer, unreleased, unity-api. How will that work with recipes in a PPA? | 12:04 |
| dandrader | mzanetti, ie, how to make the unity8 recipe use this unity-api from another recipe. will that just work as they land on the same PPA? how does that work? | 12:04 |
| greyback | dandrader: PPA will build against the newest version of the package. If the PPA contains that new version, it'll use that over those in the archive. | 12:05 |
| greyback | dandrader: so just have unity-api in the PPA (bumped package version), and to be sure, make unity8 depend on that version | 12:06 |
| dandrader | greyback, so the new unity-api must have been uploaded to the ppa before I trigger the unity8 recipe, right? | 12:07 |
| mzanetti | yes | 12:07 |
| mzanetti | dandrader: actually, its clever enough to wait for it | 12:07 |
| greyback | dandrader: yes. unity8 will sit in a "package dependency wait" until unity-api ready | 12:07 |
| mzanetti | if the ppa has a older version then the required one | 12:07 |
| dandrader | greyback, mzanetti hmm, nice. thanks! | 12:07 |
| tsdgeos | that's because it's based in utopic | 12:08 |
| tsdgeos | same problem all our CI jobs are having | 12:08 |
| === dandrader is now known as dandrader|afk | ||
| === dandrader|afk is now known as dandrader | ||
| mzanetti | MacSlow: hey, we're missing you in the team channel | 13:11 |
| MacSlow | mzanetti, hm... what channel am I missing from? | 13:12 |
| mzanetti | #unity | 13:12 |
| facundobatista | Hola | 13:12 |
| MacSlow | mzanetti, oh... indeed...that's odd... | 13:12 |
| MacSlow | mzanetti, thanks for the heads-up | 13:12 |
| === MacSlow is now known as MacSlow|errand | ||
| === jgdxx is now known as jgdx | ||
| mterry | MacSlow|errand, I have questions about how to stop a PIN unlock dialog from appearing in some cases when you get back | 14:12 |
| greyback | mzanetti: just minor comment on https://code.launchpad.net/~mzanetti/qtmir/sg-imagenode/+merge/240583 | 14:24 |
| mzanetti | greyback: cool, thanks | 14:24 |
| mzanetti | greyback: what about the jenkins failure? think its a real one? | 14:24 |
| mzanetti | greyback: some test segfaulted, but I don't really see how it's related | 14:25 |
| greyback | mzanetti: I didn't check it out, assumed it might be the vivid switch that might screw stuff up | 14:25 |
| greyback | none of our tests exercise the code you touched anyway | 14:25 |
| === MacSlow|errand is now known as MacSlow | ||
| MacSlow | mterry, stop it from appearing? don't trigger the notification! :) | 14:27 |
| mterry | MacSlow, I'm looking at a situation where we get two SIM unlock dialogs, enter emergency mode via the first one, and thus don't want to see the second one... | 14:28 |
| mterry | MacSlow, actually, let me confirm whether we get both notifications at same time or serially | 14:30 |
| mterry | MacSlow, looks like serially. So yeah, I'd like someway to skip incoming notifications... | 14:31 |
| MacSlow | mterry, well you can use the close-method | 14:34 |
| MacSlow | mterry, see lp:unity-notifications/examples/sd-example-incoming-call-canceled.py for an example | 14:35 |
| === karni is now known as karni-afk | ||
| mzanetti | greyback: fixed | 14:58 |
| greyback | mzanetti: ta | 14:58 |
| greyback | dandrader: hey just trying our your rotation stuff while I wait for desktop to compile, am loving the animation! | 15:04 |
| greyback | dandrader: panel icons are wrongly placed after the animation though, aware of that? | 15:04 |
| dandrader | greyback, yes, added a work item to the doc | 15:05 |
| dandrader | greyback, also, Elleo just fixed ubuntu-keyboard. new package should arrive soon (https://code.launchpad.net/~unity-team/+recipe/ubuntu-keyboard-shellrotation) | 15:05 |
| dandrader | greyback, if you interact with the indicator panel, the icons shift back to their proper places | 15:06 |
| greyback_ | dandrader: stupid NM - "oh even though you're connected to an AP, I'm gonna move you to another AP for no bloody reason" | 15:08 |
| === karni-afk is now known as karni | ||
| === broder_ is now known as broder | ||
| pete-woods | hello unity8 people! if I want to do a gradient, e.g. in a scope header, has the syntax / namespace changed? | 15:53 |
| pete-woods | oh wait | 15:54 |
| pete-woods | it's just the error message that's confusing | 15:55 |
| pete-woods | I had gradient:///#aarrggbb/#aarrggbb | 15:55 |
| === dandrader is now known as dandrader|lunch | ||
| pete-woods | and instead of saying the gradient was invalid, it told me the gradient schema was unknown | 15:55 |
| mterry | MacSlow, what would be the best way to fake notifications in the shell during a test? I see some tests that use a fake model for a custom Notifications object... But the actual mock Unity.Notifications plugin seems empty | 16:27 |
| MacSlow | mterry, need to mock in a qmltest or an autopilot-test? | 16:27 |
| mterry | MacSlow, I was thinking qmltest | 16:28 |
| mterry | MacSlow, I *could* do some testing of just the menuitemfactory using a fake model, but had been planning on doing a full shell test | 16:28 |
| MacSlow | mterry, hm... a full test like that only has been implemented on the autopilot-side | 16:29 |
| mterry | MacSlow, I've been avoiding autopilot these days :) | 16:30 |
| MacSlow | mterry, the mocks (for notifications) on the qmltest-side are just for exercising the pure rendering/layout features | 16:30 |
| MacSlow | mterry, I totally understand :) | 16:30 |
| MacSlow | mterry, there are very simplistic action/button-invocation checks on the qmltest-side of things... but nothing is doing full shell-integration testing | 16:31 |
| mterry | MacSlow, seems like a gap! But a bit involved for me to implement from scratch for this one small rtm bugfix | 16:31 |
| mterry | Maybe I'll just go for more targetted testing for now | 16:32 |
| MacSlow | mterry, well the "gap" is still served by the autopilot-based tests | 16:32 |
| mterry | MacSlow, right, not that we have no testing. Just a gap on qmltest side :) | 16:32 |
| mterry | MacSlow, fair... I could do an autopilot test anyway | 16:33 |
| mterry | they won't be dead forever | 16:33 |
| MacSlow | mterry, you can borrow from lp:unity8/tests/autopilot/unity8/shell/tests/test_notifications.py | 16:33 |
| robotfuel | mterry: I'd be happy to help you with problems you have when writing autopilot tests, let me know if you'd like a review if you have an issue. | 16:35 |
| mterry | robotfuel, well it's more about our autopilot test framework giving sketchy results in jenkins | 16:38 |
| mterry | robotfuel, but will do! | 16:38 |
| robotfuel | mterry: I am working on fixing the failing tests in the dashboard. so hopefully they will be less sketchy soon | 16:38 |
| mterry | nice! :) | 16:39 |
| === dandrader|lunch is now known as dandrader | ||
| dandrader | dednick, hey | 16:56 |
| dandrader | dednick, how busy are you? working on any RTM task? | 16:56 |
| dednick | dandrader: howdy | 16:56 |
| dednick | dednick: none of the uber critical ones at the moment. | 16:57 |
| dandrader | dednick, I need some help with the indicators in the shellRotation branch | 16:57 |
| dednick | dandrader: sure | 16:57 |
| dandrader | dednick, let me push the branch to ~unity-team so that you can work on it as well... | 16:58 |
| dandrader | dednick, it's here. lp:~unity-team/unity8/shellRotation and this is the ppa: https://launchpad.net/~unity-team/+archive/ubuntu/demo-stuff | 16:59 |
| dandrader | dednick, the problem is that when unity8 rotates, the icons in the indicator shift to a weird position | 17:00 |
| dandrader | dednick, they come back into place only once you interact with then again | 17:00 |
| dednick | dandrader: right | 17:00 |
| dandrader | dednick, when unity8 rotates it resizes Shell.qml, which resizes the indicators | 17:00 |
| dednick | dandrader: able to do it on desktop? | 17:00 |
| dandrader | dednick, unfortunately I couldn't reproduce it in "make tryOrientedShell" :-/ | 17:01 |
| dednick | dandrader: ok. i'll take a look | 17:01 |
| dandrader | dednick, thanks! | 17:01 |
| dednick | dandrader: is the ppa for rtm image? | 17:02 |
| dednick | dandrader: i take it that silo is not for rtm image? ie devel-proposed? | 17:09 |
| dandrader | dednick, this PPA has packages for both utopic (thus rtm?) and vivid | 17:14 |
| dandrader | dednick, but the feature is not targeted for RTM at all | 17:15 |
| dednick | dandrader: i meant 14.09 | 17:15 |
| dandrader | dednick, so it makes sense to use on top of devel-proposed | 17:15 |
| dednick | dandrader: but nevermind. just using devel | 17:15 |
| dednick | dandrader: where does unity-shell-launcher come from? | 17:15 |
| dednick | dandrader: can never remember... | 17:15 |
| dednick | libunity-api ? | 17:15 |
| dandrader | dednick, you mean in the cmake files? yeah, comest from unity-api | 17:16 |
| dednick | dandrader: hm. package 'unity-shell-launcher=5' not found | 17:17 |
| dandrader | dednick, where do you get it? | 17:22 |
| dednick | dandrader: on the desktop. | 17:22 |
| dandrader | dednick, did you "apt-get update && apt-get dist-ugprade"? | 17:24 |
| dandrader | dednick, is your desktop on vivid? | 17:24 |
| dandrader | dednick, if all fails, built and install unity-api from trunk | 17:24 |
| dednick | dandrader: no, still on utopic | 17:24 |
| dandrader | dednick, that explains it then I guess | 17:24 |
| dednick | dandrader: but you just said there are packages for both :) | 17:25 |
| dandrader | dednick, take the leap! :) | 17:25 |
| dednick | never! | 17:25 |
| dandrader | dednick, on the PPA there are utopic and vivid packages of the project modified for shell rotation | 17:25 |
| dandrader | dednick, and unity-api is not one of them yet | 17:25 |
| dednick | dandrader: ah. the u8 in the ppa does not include your rotation stuff? | 17:26 |
| dandrader | dednick, it does, of course | 17:26 |
| dednick | dandrader: well then! | 17:26 |
| dednick | :) | 17:26 |
| dandrader | now you confused me | 17:26 |
| dednick | me too | 17:27 |
| dednick | it shouldnt build utopic packages for u8 if i can't do it on my utopic machine. | 17:27 |
| dandrader | dednick, right | 17:27 |
| Saviq-codedive | we only bumped unity-api overnight | 17:27 |
| Saviq-codedive | dednick, ↑ | 17:27 |
| dandrader | dednick, now I'm thinking about removing the utopic builds from the recipes. greyback_? | 17:28 |
| dednick | ah | 17:28 |
| Saviq-codedive | yeah, utopic is old news! | 17:28 |
| dednick | dandrader: guess that the silo hasn't rebuilt since then | 17:28 |
| greyback_ | dandrader: if you wish. Can enable it again if we really need them | 17:28 |
| dednick | fek. i'll do an upgrade in the morning. dont have time now! | 17:31 |
| dednick | dandrader: ok, i see the problem. | 17:33 |
| dednick | dandrader: stupid flickable is re-asserting it's control over contentX | 17:42 |
| dednick | sigh. | 17:42 |
| dandrader | dednick, are you able to reproduce it in qml tests or only on the device? | 17:42 |
| dednick | dandrader: only on device now. i havent been able to build on destop | 17:43 |
| dandrader | ah, right | 17:43 |
| dednick | dandrader: flickable doesnt really like me messing around with contentX. it's a bit of a hack | 17:44 |
| mzanetti | mterry: hey, will you add the test here? https://code.launchpad.net/~mterry/unity8/skip-second-sim-unlock/+merge/240737 | 17:44 |
| mterry | mzanetti, I was looking into it, seems we don't have a great framework for adding a qmluitests, but an autopilot test may work. But then I got distracted by an important ongoing wizard bug and lunch. I don't want to block the above MP on a test unless reviewers feel it's necessary | 17:45 |
| dednick | dandrader: i've got to go for the eve. i'll take some more look at it tomorrow | 17:48 |
| mterry | mzanetti, (I mean, I want to add that test anyway, but just if I don't get to it today, I don't want to block that MP for the next several days just on that) | 17:49 |
| mzanetti | mterry: https://code.launchpad.net/~mterry/unity8/skip-second-sim-unlock/+merge/240737/comments/592058 | 17:50 |
| mterry | mzanetti, awesome -- yeah as you mention, apparently we don't test the SIM unlock dialog at all right now in our tests, let alone this special case of it | 17:50 |
| mzanetti | mterry: did you ever notice that weird bug if you use the emergency dialer and then return to normal operation, the first right edge swipe animation is somewhat broken | 17:53 |
| mzanetti | not sure yet what causes it | 17:55 |
| mterry | mzanetti, no haven't noticed that | 17:58 |
| === alan_g is now known as alan_g|EOD | ||
| === Saviq-codedive is now known as Saviq | ||
| Saviq | om26er, just quick feedback: onClicked: checkBox.checked = !checkBox.checked | 19:14 |
| Saviq | om26er, not that I like having this in the first place (remember we talked that this should be an SDK feature) | 19:15 |
| om26er | Saviq, oh, I have probably forgot our last conversation then ;) | 19:16 |
| om26er | Saviq, also thanks for the simpler version :) | 19:17 |
| === karni is now known as karni-afk | ||
| === karni-afk is now known as karni | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!