=== roadmr is now known as roadmr_afk
=== roadmr_afk is now known as roadmr
[09:09] <Abhijit> hello
[09:10] <Abhijit> anyone plaease care to add libmpfr1ldbl to proper repo? it cant be installed via repo in 12.04? needs to download manually.
[09:10] <Abhijit> http://packages.ubuntu.com/lucid/amd64/libmpfr1ldbl/download
[09:20] <Abhijit> is it safe to rm -rf /var/crash/* and rm /tmp/apport.* when i get No apport report written because MaxReports is reached already
[09:21] <Abhijit> wrong channel.
=== Guest6771 is now known as balloons
[20:30] <erle-> current proposed xserver-xorg-video-intel breaks suspend to RAM
[20:30] <erle-> just saying
[20:31] <erle-> don't release it, it will result in burnt laptops
[20:31] <erle-> too busy to file a bug today
[20:31] <erle-> macbook wakes up while lid closed
[20:55] <balloons> ping bdmurray
[20:57] <bdmurray> balloons: hi
[20:58] <balloons> bdmurray, howdy. Can we talk for a second about scripts -- do you know if this is a script and how it's triggered? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/parole/+bug/1389840/comments/4
[20:58] <ubot5> Ubuntu bug 1389840 in parole (Ubuntu) "parole crashed with SIGSEGV in packspu_VBoxPackSetInjectID()" [Undecided,Invalid]
[20:59] <bdmurray> looking
[21:00] <bdmurray> balloons: I'd guess its a script but think only penalvch can answer that
[21:01] <balloons> bdmurray, ahh, k. I assume all the blessed scripts are done under a separate lp id.
[21:02] <balloons> that's been my experience anyway. Regardless I'm asking as I know different triagers work differently. Sounds like it's something to talk to penalvch directly about then
[21:02] <balloons> there's a question about the legitimacy of the bug being marked as invalid in these cases
[21:03] <bdmurray> well, it isn't very useful without a retraced crash
[21:04] <bdmurray> and it seems rather trivial to reproduce
[21:06] <bdmurray> having said that I'd go look in the crash database for crashes like that Launchpad bug
[21:07] <bdmurray> https://errors.ubuntu.com/?package=parole&period=week
[21:07] <balloons> I believe the user was concerned about privacy in this case.. he wanted the bug public and not containing his data..
[21:07] <balloons> But I agree..