=== roadmr is now known as roadmr_afk === roadmr_afk is now known as roadmr === dkessel_ is now known as dkessel === roadmr is now known as roadmr_afk === Jikai is now known as Jikan === roadmr_afk is now known as roadmr === roadmr is now known as roadmr_afk === roadmr_afk is now known as roadmr === roadmr is now known as roadmr_afk === roadmr_afk is now known as roadmr === ara is now known as Guest56698 === greyback__ is now known as greyback [16:32] Can I manipulate the status of bugs' release pockets? [16:32] IOW, set all karmic bugs to wontfix [16:32] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/karmic/+bugs [16:33] I want to do this with the e-mail API: https://help.launchpad.net/Bugs/EmailInterface [16:38] AIUI "Won't Fix" is a unique, controlled-access status... [16:41] does that answer my question in any way? [16:41] if it is relevant, I can set that status without any problem via the web interface [16:45] Laibsch: that's the first thing I was checking, yes. :P [16:46] then I do not understand the answer [16:46] -v, please [16:46] * teward never gave you a full answer [16:49] are you playing games with me? [16:49] * Laibsch is starting to get annoyed [16:49] no, i'm not sure of the answer, so i'm searching too [16:51] so patience, or wait for someone who knows the system better to answer (I asked #launchpad as well since they may know even more) [16:54] bbl [20:25] well i haave an answer to Laibsch's initial question - thanks to cjwatson in #launchpad for it, because the documentation didn't show the functionality [21:50] going to put out a serious question: is there any reason the bugs listed at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/karmic/+bugs should be left open, or can we mark them as "Won't Fix" if we have the rights to? [22:00] I don't see why they should remain open - obviously only the karmic part of bugs that have parts for multiple versions [22:01] correct [22:01] I'd be tempted to kill off the new and confirmed and see what's left [22:01] i've already made a huge list of commands to send to edit@bugs to close them all... I'mma redo it to target new and confirmed for now... [22:01] maybe triaged. [22:02] new confirmed and incomplete actually [22:04] yeh [22:07] hggdh: ^ (related to the PM I sent) [22:07] in case you want to loop in your opinion publicly :) [22:09] heh [22:10] they can be either invalid or wontfix, provided that a blurb is given asking to open a new bug on a supported release [22:10] heh. a lot of these appear to be Fix Released for the main bug task... [22:11] so it would be a backport -- which will not happen. As such, safe to close wontfix. [22:13] mhm [22:18] i'm going to close the 6 karmic bugs against amsynth all at once as "Won't Fix", so lets see if I did this right... I'll add a form comment manually after... too bad there's no email interface for staging, then i would be able to test this a lot more thoroughly... [22:26] well, goody, it worked.