[00:08] * [cholby[]] (~cholby]@50.97.232.163): cholby[] obvious one [00:31] where is he this time? [00:46] elky: got kicked out of #ubuntu === Mohi is now known as IAmNotThatGuy [05:39] !ops [05:39] Thanks for letting us know you are here, someone will be along presently [05:39] amana called the ops in #ubuntu-ops () [05:50] amana: What's your current concern? [05:51] well i have a slight problem with my ubuntu [05:52] That would be a support question, which you should ask in #ubuntu and not here [05:52] i forgot my user password and the terminal boots up with esperanto as default during recovery [05:53] genii: i was banned from ubuntu because my nick was "inappropriate" i changed it and they said if i change it they'll unban me, that didn't happen [05:53] amana: Let me look into it. Please wait. [05:53] my nick was nggafriedchkn [05:54] OK, thanks for the info [05:57] amana: Please try to enter now [05:57] thank you so much! [06:00] oh well i [06:00] i'm still baned [06:00] i guess i deserve it [06:00] later, im going to format my hard drive [06:01] amana: Perhaps try again tomorrow. I unbanned*!42b075c0@gateway/web/freenode/ip.66.176.117.192 but it may be your hostmask is still getting caught by another filter which was used. [06:04] amana: I have adjusted it, please try again [06:05] it's okay ;) [06:05] i'm going to format the drive [06:05] i hope you have a good day! [06:31] genii: you missed the *!43b075c0@gateway/* ban but they're enough of a pain everywhere, it's no real loss [06:32] elky: When I checked the log on BT, didn't show the exact +b line, was the Idle One [06:49] it does for me, in the "nick/mask" line on the results page for both #u and -ot [06:49] s/line/column/ [06:56] * genii makes a note [11:03] TopologyProdigy> and I want to delete sys 32 [11:03] windows engineer eh? [18:14] using 6.06 because of the hardware? o_O === Mamarok_ is now known as Mamarok === tsimpson_ is now known as tsimpson === chu_ is now known as chu === valorie_ is now known as valorie [22:00] nasty person in #ubuntu-women-project [22:00] Rob, Rob, Rob of the Freenode One big stupid fuck! AH EEH AH EEAHH EEYA EYAH EEYAH!! WATCH OUT FOR THAT TRUCK!!! [22:00] * valorie haz no ops there [22:01] call !ops ? [22:04] mikaela did [22:05] thanks, k1l [22:07] i did ask in the #ubuntu-ops-team channel too but then checked that its already sorted [22:40] cool === bazhang_ is now known as bazhang === jayne_ is now known as jayne [23:28] belkinsa just did !ops in #ubuntu-women-project -- and it did nothing [23:28] are we lacking a bot or something? [23:29] yep,no bot there [23:33] if a jason or j4s0n or jasonmchristos wants to get unbanned, better htink twice and take a look into bantracker with all that nick variations [23:35] very much so [23:35] jasonmchristos is a HUGE issue network wide [23:36] ah ok. [23:47] how do we get the bot back? [23:47] the good one? or unopaste [23:47] valorie: which bot was there? ask in #ubuntu-irc to get a bot back there [23:48] whichever bot responds to !ops [23:48] Was there a bot at some point? [23:49] I assume so [23:49] It'd be ubot# (whichever one ends up going there) as it's a team channel. [23:49] that would be ubottu, right? [23:49] No [23:49] ah [23:49] ubot2 ubot3 ubot4 ubot5 [23:49] we don't have that either which seems odd [23:49] or whatever [23:49] (so, a clone of ubottu) [23:49] got it [23:50] valorie: -women-project is the less-official-ish (chat?) channel for -women right? or do I have that backwards? [23:51] that's backwards - -project is official, and logged [23:51] and where meetings are help [23:51] Right, I figured I probably did ;) [23:51] -women is for chat [23:52] some of us were strongly against logging, so this arrangement was the compromise [23:52] I agree that having logging foisted upon you is unfortunate and divisive. [23:53] valorie: does -women have a bot? [23:53] since if that does, -w-project probably would have the same one [23:53] it has ubottu [23:53] Mmm, right, which explains the bantracker. [23:54] I like having an official logged chan; that said I want the chat chan to be a safe space for people [23:54] so I liked the compromise [23:54] So, /that/ is actually a remnant of something that hasn't been updated. Back when -women was the more-official of the two (and probably should've been switched over or something) [23:55] we use ubottu sometimes [23:55] So, at this point, I'm personally going to throw my hands in the air and say "I don't know". I expect ubottu probably will move into -project (and possibly get removed from -women) [23:55] and -women is the chan where the attacks usually occur [23:55] :( [23:55] Maybe that's why -women is still in the BT then. [23:55] that would be not optimal [23:56] is there a problem having the bot in both chans? [23:56] valorie: Well, a clone is just as good as ubottu, has all the factoids, etc, it doesn't use the bantracker. [23:56] got it [23:57] So its a question of: How (or more specifically: who) handles the bans for each channel? is it here? or in -irc? [23:57] (and this is where my memory of our policy is fuzzy, because it has quite the history) [23:58] I don't have ops in either channel [23:59] I'll ask belkinsa to come in here? [23:59] bazhang: I hate unopaste