[00:08] <k1l> * [cholby[]] (~cholby]@50.97.232.163): cholby[]      obvious one
[00:31] <elky> where is he this time?
[00:46] <rww> elky: got kicked out of #ubuntu
[05:39] <amana> !ops
[05:50] <genii> amana: What's your current concern?
[05:51] <amana> well i have a slight problem with my ubuntu
[05:52] <genii> That would be a support question, which you should ask in #ubuntu and not here
[05:52] <amana> i forgot my user password and the terminal boots up with esperanto as default during recovery
[05:53] <amana> genii: i was banned from ubuntu because my nick was "inappropriate" i changed it and they said if i change it they'll unban me, that didn't happen
[05:53] <genii> amana: Let me look into it. Please wait.
[05:53] <amana> my nick was nggafriedchkn
[05:54] <genii> OK, thanks for the info
[05:57] <genii> amana: Please try to enter now
[05:57] <amana> thank you so much!
[06:00] <amana> oh well i
[06:00] <amana> i'm still baned
[06:00] <amana> i guess i deserve it
[06:00] <amana> later, im going to format my hard drive
[06:01] <genii> amana: Perhaps try again tomorrow. I unbanned*!42b075c0@gateway/web/freenode/ip.66.176.117.192 but it may be your hostmask is still getting caught by another filter which was used.
[06:04] <genii> amana: I have adjusted it, please try again
[06:05] <amana> it's okay ;)
[06:05] <amana> i'm going to format the drive
[06:05] <amana> i hope you have a good day!
[06:31] <elky> genii: you missed the *!43b075c0@gateway/* ban but they're enough of a pain everywhere, it's no real loss
[06:32] <genii> elky: When I checked the log on BT, didn't show the exact +b line, was the Idle One
[06:49] <elky> it does for me, in the "nick/mask" line on the results page for both #u and -ot
[06:49] <elky> s/line/column/
[06:56]  * genii makes a note
[11:03] <bazhang> TopologyProdigy> and I want to delete sys 32
[11:03] <bazhang> windows engineer eh?
[18:14] <k1l_> using 6.06 because of the hardware? o_O
[22:00] <valorie> nasty person in #ubuntu-women-project
 Rob, Rob, Rob of the Freenode One big stupid fuck! AH EEH AH EEAHH EEYA EYAH EEYAH!! WATCH OUT FOR THAT TRUCK!!!
[22:00]  * valorie haz no ops there
[22:01] <k1l> call !ops ?
[22:04] <valorie> mikaela did
[22:05] <valorie> thanks, k1l
[22:07] <k1l> i did ask in the #ubuntu-ops-team channel too but then checked that its already sorted
[22:40] <valorie> cool
[23:28] <valorie> belkinsa just did !ops in #ubuntu-women-project -- and it did nothing
[23:28] <valorie> are we lacking a bot or something?
[23:29] <k1l> yep,no bot there
[23:33] <k1l> if a jason or j4s0n or jasonmchristos wants to get unbanned, better htink twice and take a look into bantracker with all that nick variations
[23:35] <bazhang> very much so
[23:35] <bazhang> jasonmchristos is a HUGE issue network wide
[23:36] <k1l> ah ok.
[23:47] <valorie> how do we get the bot back?
[23:47] <bazhang> the good one? or unopaste
[23:47] <k1l> valorie: which bot was there? ask in #ubuntu-irc to get a bot back there
[23:48] <valorie> whichever bot responds to !ops
[23:48] <Flannel> Was there a bot at some point?
[23:49] <valorie> I assume so
[23:49] <Flannel> It'd be ubot# (whichever one ends up going there) as it's a team channel.
[23:49] <valorie> that would be ubottu, right?
[23:49] <Flannel> No
[23:49] <valorie> ah
[23:49] <Flannel> ubot2 ubot3 ubot4 ubot5
[23:49] <valorie> we don't have that either which seems odd
[23:49] <Flannel> or whatever
[23:49] <Flannel> (so, a clone of ubottu)
[23:49] <valorie> got it
[23:50] <Flannel> valorie: -women-project is the less-official-ish (chat?) channel for -women right? or do I have that backwards?
[23:51] <valorie> that's backwards - -project is official, and logged
[23:51] <valorie> and where meetings are help
[23:51] <Flannel> Right, I figured I probably did ;)
[23:51] <valorie> -women is for chat
[23:52] <valorie> some of us were strongly against logging, so this arrangement was the compromise
[23:52] <Flannel> I agree that having logging foisted upon you is unfortunate and divisive.
[23:53] <Flannel> valorie: does -women have a bot?
[23:53] <Flannel> since if that does, -w-project probably would have the same one
[23:53] <valorie> it has ubottu
[23:53] <Flannel> Mmm, right, which explains the bantracker.
[23:54] <valorie> I like having an official logged chan; that said I want the chat chan to be a safe space for people
[23:54] <valorie> so I liked the compromise
[23:54] <Flannel> So, /that/ is actually a remnant of something that hasn't been updated.  Back when -women was the more-official of the two (and probably should've been switched over or something)
[23:55] <valorie> we use ubottu sometimes
[23:55] <Flannel> So, at this point, I'm personally going to throw my hands in the air and say "I don't know".  I expect ubottu probably will move into -project (and possibly get removed from -women)
[23:55] <valorie> and -women is the chan where the attacks usually occur
[23:55] <valorie> :(
[23:55] <Flannel> Maybe that's why -women is still in the BT then.
[23:55] <valorie> that would be not optimal
[23:56] <valorie> is there a problem having the bot in both chans?
[23:56] <Flannel> valorie: Well, a clone is just as good as ubottu, has all the factoids, etc, it doesn't use the bantracker.
[23:56] <valorie> got it
[23:57] <Flannel> So its a question of: How (or more specifically: who) handles the bans for each channel? is it here? or in -irc?
[23:57] <Flannel> (and this is where my memory of our policy is fuzzy, because it has quite the history)
[23:58] <valorie> I don't have ops in either channel
[23:59] <valorie> I'll ask belkinsa to come in here?
[23:59] <valorie> bazhang: I hate unopaste