[21:40] <robert_ancell> The Mir headers have no flag to check version right? I was looking how we can make GTK+ conditionally support new enum values
[21:43] <robert_ancell> Trevinho, you're making GTK+ depend on unreleased Mir code and you haven't added any checks to configure.ac
[22:34] <desrt> robert_ancell: i yelled at him for that a bit earlier :)
[22:35] <robert_ancell> desrt, ah good
[22:35] <desrt> (i think he's not around on account of it being sunday, though)
[22:35] <desrt> jhbuild is currently broken :/
[22:35] <desrt> also: not sure who acked Trevinho to push patches to gtk...
[23:31] <RAOF> robert_ancell: We do not have such a flag, no. This sounds like a reasonable idea.
[23:31] <robert_ancell> RAOF, I vote for the same as the GTK+ #defines for versions
[23:31] <robert_ancell> they seem to work
[23:38]  * RAOF shall whip up a branch providing such things.
[23:38] <RAOF> I was going to say “Hm, what about feature-flags”, but screw it. Versioning's simpler.
[23:45] <robert_ancell> RAOF, yeah, featuring flags gets a bit out of control