[15:03]  * Laney arrives back just after time
[15:03] <Laney> !dmb-ping
[15:03] <bdrung_work> o/
[15:03] <ScottK> \o
[15:04] <xnox> o/
[15:04] <xnox> oh, i forget that UK is in-line with UTC this half of the year.
[15:04]  * xnox grabs coffee
[15:04] <stgraber> at a sprint today so only kinda around, sorry
[15:05] <ScottK> Who's chairing?
[15:06] <Laney> bdmurray / xnox
[15:07] <xnox> Laney: why two chairs? =) or is bdmurray not around?
[15:08] <xnox> stgraber: is bdmurray sprinting with you?
[15:08] <stgraber> xnox: nope
[15:09] <Laney> I didn't see him say anything yet
[15:10] <xnox> #startmeeting Developer Membership Board Meeting 2014-11-17
[15:10] <meetingology> Meeting started Mon Nov 17 15:10:32 2014 UTC.  The chair is xnox. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology.
[15:10] <meetingology> Available commands: action commands idea info link nick
[15:10] <xnox> From roll call - Laney, bdrung_work, ScottK, stgraber and xnox are present.
[15:11] <xnox> absent bdmurray and micahg
[15:11]  * xnox action to send micahg reminder about meeting and whether he still plans to participate in them
[15:11] <xnox> #action xnox to send micahg reminder about meeting and whether he still plans to participate in them
[15:11] <meetingology> ACTION: xnox to send micahg reminder about meeting and whether he still plans to participate in them
[15:11] <xnox> #topic Core Developer Application mitya57
[15:11] <mitya57> o/
[15:12] <xnox> mitya57: hello! How are you today? =)
[15:12] <mitya57> Fine, thanks. Though I am on an unreliable wlan connection, so if I suddenly disappear, blame Moscow University wifi :)
[15:13] <xnox> mitya57: gotcha, will prepare the pitch forks
[15:13] <xnox> mitya57: could please introduce yourself and your application today briefly? =)
[15:13] <mitya57> :)
[15:14] <mitya57> Well, I am Dmitry Shachnev, 20 year old, math student, python/c++/js programmer, etc
[15:14] <mitya57> Actually I have prepared something to paste
[15:14] <mitya57> Things I will do:
[15:14] <mitya57>  - Maintaining "my" packages. Look at http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mitya57
[15:14] <mitya57>    for the incomplete list of them.
[15:14] <mitya57>  - Doing changes in other packages that "my" packages need (recent example:
[15:14] <mitya57>    new gnome-flashback release needed a patch dropped in gnome-menus).
[15:14] <mitya57>  - Doing some QA work (fixing FTBFS, autopkgtests failures, uninstallable packages, etc).
[15:14] <mitya57>  - Doing myself and sponsoring syncs, merges from Debian and bug fixes.
[15:14] <mitya57>  - Continuing my work in l10n and docs teams.
[15:14] <mitya57> Things I won't do:
[15:14] <mitya57>  - Adding Ubuntu delta that is not a fix for important bug to packages
[15:15] <mitya57>    without existing delta.
[15:15] <mitya57>  - Include patches that haven't been forwarded, without a heavy reason.
[15:15] <mitya57> Things I won't do:
[15:15] <mitya57>  - Adding Ubuntu delta that is not a fix for important bug to packages
[15:15] <mitya57>    without existing delta.
[15:15] <mitya57>  - Include patches that haven't been forwarded, without a heavy reason.
[15:15] <mitya57> err
[15:15] <mitya57> Things I won't do despite being Qt (co)maintainer:
[15:15] <mitya57>  - Touch Ubuntu Touch stuff (for now) :)
[15:15] <mitya57>  - Touch KDE stuff (unless I start using it myself).
[15:15] <mitya57>    (unless I am asked to do that, once Kubuntu guys asked me to sponsor
[15:15] <mitya57>    a few uploads for them).
[15:15] <mitya57> ✈ EOF
[15:16] <mitya57> ^ that needs | uniq
[15:17] <Laney> Actually touch people are a bit better about people uploading that stuff now
[15:17] <Laney> If you see something which FTBFS, then fix/(MP and upload) is valid and I don't think you should be afraid of doing that
[15:18] <mitya57> I think if I ever want to contribute to something touch-related, I will go the MP/autoland way instead.
[15:19] <Laney> That's best if you can wait
[15:19] <Laney> s/autoland/CI train/ these days, but core-devs have power to use that anyway
[15:20] <mitya57> CI train is what I meant. And MPs usually need to be approved by someone else.
[15:20] <Laney> nod
[15:20] <ScottK> FWIW, I've seen enough of mitya57's work that I don't need to ask any questions.
[15:21] <ScottK> JFTR, you should also feel completely free to ignore CI train and just upload stuff.
[15:24] <Laney> I'm good now
[15:24] <xnox> mitya57: what's your favourite parts of C++ and JS? least?
[15:24] <Riddell> I also am all for mitya57's application, he's doing good stuff in Qt maintainance and working nicely with Debian Qt KDE team too
[15:26] <mitya57> xnox: C++. I don't much like programming anything that runs in a browser.
[15:26] <mitya57> (though I have to do that many times)
[15:26] <xnox> mitya57: ok.
[15:27] <xnox> #vote should mitya57 be granted core developer status in Ubuntu?
[15:27] <meetingology> Please vote on: should mitya57 be granted core developer status in Ubuntu?
[15:27] <meetingology> Public votes can be registered by saying +1, +0 or -1 in channel, (for private voting, private message me with 'vote +1/-1/+0 #channelname)
[15:27] <Laney> +1
[15:27] <meetingology> +1 received from Laney
[15:27] <ScottK> +1
[15:27] <meetingology> +1 received from ScottK
[15:27] <bdrung_work> +1
[15:27] <meetingology> +1 received from bdrung_work
[15:27] <xnox> +1
[15:27] <meetingology> +1 received from xnox
[15:28] <bdrung_work> mitya57, interesting to see Qt and GNOME flashback in the list of packages.
[15:29] <mitya57> Qt is something I like a lot (actually I've even contributed ~20 patches upstream), and GNOME Flashback is a thing I was asked to take over by someone else.
[15:29] <stgraber> +1
[15:29] <meetingology> +1 received from stgraber
[15:29] <bdrung_work> mitya57, what do you run on your desktop?
[15:29] <mitya57> GNOME Shell
[15:29] <xnox> #endvote
[15:29] <meetingology> Voting ended on: should mitya57 be granted core developer status in Ubuntu?
[15:29] <meetingology> Votes for:5 Votes against:0 Abstentions:0
[15:29] <meetingology> Motion carried
[15:30] <xnox> mitya57: congrats, you are a core dev now =)
[15:30] <mitya57> Thanks to you all!
[15:30] <ScottK> mitya57: Yes, congratulations.  It's about time.
[15:30] <Laney> Good stuff
[15:31] <xnox> I've added you to the team, now. And will deal with other post-meeting things later.
[15:31] <mitya57> The first thing I'll do is sponsor my own three items in the sponsorship queue :)
[15:31] <xnox> ;-)
[15:31] <xnox> #topic Any other business
[15:31] <Laney> I put an item on the agenda
[15:31] <mitya57> Thanks to xnox for being so fast
[15:32] <xnox> Laney: which is...? "Extend DD PPU to cover DM too (Laney)" not sure what that means?
[15:32] <ScottK> Makes sense to me.
[15:32]  * ScottK says yes.
[15:33]  * xnox requests verbosity++
[15:33] <Laney> #topic it and then I'll say
[15:33] <xnox> #topic Extend DD PPU to cover DM too (Laney)
[15:33] <xnox> Laney: floor is yours
[15:33] <Laney> I don't know how to link to the heading but https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DeveloperMembershipBoard/ApplicationProcess has a section for DDs who want to apply for upload rights to their packages
[15:34] <Laney> Currently you have to be an actual full fat DD
[15:34] <Laney> I was reminded by Laibsch's thread on devel-permissions, as he is a DM, that I wanted to see if we could make this be DM or DD.
[15:35] <Laney> then we could s/Developer/Uploader/ or something
[15:35] <ScottK> You can be a skinny DD as well.  Beard is not required either.
[15:35] <xnox> #link https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DeveloperMembershipBoard/ApplicationProcess
[15:35] <xnox> #url https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DeveloperMembershipBoard/ApplicationProcess
[15:35] <xnox> #help
[15:35]  * xnox gives up
[15:36] <bdrung_work> ScottK, you should have told me before growing a beard and eating many sweets. ;)
[15:36] <Laney> I cannot imagine bdrung_work with a beard
[15:36] <Laney> Anyway
[15:36] <Laney> Questions?
[15:36] <ScottK> Seems reasonable to me.
[15:37] <xnox> Laney: so looking at current uploading DMs in https://ftp-master.debian.org/dm.txt the list is not that large
[15:37]  * bdrung_work is fine with expanding the DD PPU to DM
[15:38]  * ScottK suggests a vote.
[15:38] <Laney> You'll still have to be approved normally one time
[15:38] <Laney> But then can extend it by mail later on
[15:38] <Laney> Yeah
[15:38] <bdrung_work> xnox, this file has 165 persons listed
[15:38] <ScottK> Compared to 1,000 DDs, it's not so many.
[15:39] <xnox> bdrung_work: some of them already have PPU rights in Ubuntu or will not want to seek them.
[15:39] <xnox> ScottK: well ~500 or so active.
[15:39] <ScottK> True.
[15:39] <xnox> whithin past year.
[15:39] <Laney> what's the concern?
[15:40] <xnox> So, imho any Debian Developer is an Ubuntu Developer.
[15:40] <xnox> however DMs are inherently less trusted within Debian itself.
[15:41] <ScottK> They are approximately equally trusted for specific packages however.
[15:41] <xnox> I do not feel that extending DMs to be PPUs is justified as is. There are no gurantees said people pass/know debian policies & procedures (both legal/dfsg and technical)
[15:41] <ScottK> The approximation being they can't upload through New.
[15:41] <xnox> how can one assert it would be easy enough for them to pick up Ubuntu quarks?
[15:42] <xnox> from the DMs that I have sponsored, I've been monitoring and spotting clearly broken uploads into Debian. =(
[15:42] <ScottK> xnox: If you'd seen some of the "not very good" stuff I see uploaded in Debian as a member of the FTP Team, you'd be much less sanguine about what DDs know.
[15:42] <xnox> (sponsored - that is granted DM rights)
[15:42] <xnox> ScottK: rolf =)
[15:42] <ScottK> It's true.
[15:42] <Laney> These people have to go through one round with the DMB
[15:42] <xnox> Laney: yeah,
[15:42] <Laney> at which we will check their understanding of Ubuntu things
[15:42] <xnox> ok.
[15:42] <xnox> I don't have any other questions, is everyone ready to vote on this?
[15:43] <ScottK> \o
[15:43] <Laney> I can only think of pocock and now Laibsch who actually take advantage of it atm
[15:43] <Laney> Let's go
[15:43]  * bdrung_work is ready.
[15:44] <xnox> #vote Extend DD PPU requirement to cover DMs too
[15:44] <meetingology> Please vote on: Extend DD PPU requirement to cover DMs too
[15:44] <meetingology> Public votes can be registered by saying +1, +0 or -1 in channel, (for private voting, private message me with 'vote +1/-1/+0 #channelname)
[15:44] <ScottK> +1
[15:44] <meetingology> +1 received from ScottK
[15:44] <xnox> -1
[15:44] <meetingology> -1 received from xnox
[15:44] <bdrung_work> +1
[15:44] <meetingology> +1 received from bdrung_work
[15:44] <Laney> +1
[15:44] <meetingology> +1 received from Laney
[15:45] <xnox> stgraber: ?
[15:47] <stgraber> +1
[15:47] <meetingology> +1 received from stgraber
[15:48] <xnox> #endvote
[15:48] <meetingology> Voting ended on: Extend DD PPU requirement to cover DMs too
[15:48] <meetingology> Votes for:4 Votes against:1 Abstentions:0
[15:48] <meetingology> Motion carried
[15:48]  * xnox is not sure if this motion is actually carried or not, and whether we need bdmurray and/or micah's vote here
[15:48] <xnox> Laney: ? ^
[15:48] <Laney> 4x+1 = carried
[15:48] <xnox> yeah
[15:48] <xnox> cool
[15:49] <xnox> thought about it after typing - the outcome is without a daubt.
[15:49] <Laney> My phone just alarmed to remind me about DMB
[15:49] <xnox> so
[15:49] <bdrung_work> Laney, no, +4 in sum is needed
[15:49] <Laney> No
[15:49] <Laney> It's why we can vote on applicants without everyone present
[15:50] <Laney> If something gets to +4 then -3 still leaves you with +1
[15:50] <bdrung_work> yes
[15:51] <xnox> #topic Any Other Business take #2
[15:51] <xnox> ....unless we want to continue discussing politics and voting systems
[15:51] <ScottK> So did we agree it passed?
[15:51] <Laney> There are 3 threads ongoing, please reply to them
[15:52] <bdrung_work> if someone from the absent members give a +1, it passes
[15:52] <xnox> ScottK: i believe it has passed, as the absolute majority is in favour.
[15:52] <xnox> ScottK: and there is no tie, even with extra votes from bdmurray & mica
[15:53] <ScottK> OK.
[15:53] <ScottK> I thought so too, but I wanted to make sure there's no confusion.
[15:53] <ScottK> bdrung_work seems to disagree.
[15:53] <xnox> Laney: what threats?
[15:53] <bdrung_work> if we use the same voting mechanism that we use for applicant
[15:54] <xnox> bdrung_work: given that we operate on 50%+1 majority (aka 1:1 majority) the outcome is without a daubt, and we do not require an 2:1 majority for applicant voting.
[15:54] <Laney> 1) Laibsch PPU 2) Noskcaj MOTU 3) input-methods packageset
[15:54]  * bdrung_work has to leave now.
[15:55] <xnox> bdrung_work: however, I'd like to know bdmurray's opinion.
[15:55] <xnox> Laney: isn't 1 & 2 requested to be processed via email
[15:55] <Laney> yes
[15:55]  * xnox looks at the input-methods packageset
[15:55] <Laney> that's why I said please reply to the threads :)
[15:55] <xnox> i have not actually followed that thread.
[15:55] <bdrung_work> xnox, the +4 requirement was to enable more fine grained declines (by voting +0 or -1)
[15:58] <xnox> Laney: i'll follow up on the email threats later over email.
[15:58] <Laney> ty
[15:58] <xnox> bdmurray: ditto needs follow up on the mailing list.
[15:58] <xnox> i guess that's it for today?
[15:58] <Laney> I think we had a similar conversation about voting systems a couple of years ago
[15:58] <Laney> maybe I remember the outcome wrong
[15:58] <Laney> would be helpful for bdrung to find the conclusion
[15:59] <Laney> (it went to the TB back then)
[16:01] <xnox> meh ok.
[16:02] <Laney> maybe #action him :)
[16:02] <xnox> #action cjwatson: as a returning officer: given 7 voters, and "Votes for:4 Votes against:1 Abstentions:0" collected to date, is the outcome without a doubt or do we need extra +1 votes?
[16:02] <meetingology> ACTION: cjwatson: as a returning officer: given 7 voters, and "Votes for:4 Votes against:1 Abstentions:0" collected to date, is the outcome without a doubt or do we need extra +1 votes?
[16:02] <Laney> *cough* or bdmurray could just vote
[16:02] <Laney> a "returning officer"?
[16:03] <xnox> Laney: yes, a standard practice in traditional british voting and polling mechanisms, where ex-members are invited to oversee the process as independent party ;-)
[16:04] <Laney> Haha.
[16:04]  * xnox thinks cjwatson would be an excellent returning officer given the history of the boards and committees he has been on (including the DMB)
[16:04] <Laney> We could just dig up the old thread
[16:04] <xnox> anyway, we are past the hour, follow up on the irc
[16:04] <xnox> #endmeeting
[16:04] <meetingology> Meeting ended Mon Nov 17 16:05:01 2014 UTC.
[16:04] <meetingology> Minutes:        http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2014/ubuntu-meeting.2014-11-17-15.10.moin.txt
[16:05] <Laney> thanks for chairing
[16:08] <xnox> Laney: kein problemo, mon senor
[16:09] <cjwatson> xnox,Laney: no doubt you should dig up the old thread; I'm having trouble seeing how this isn't carried though, unless every motion effectively has some kind of supermajority requirement
[16:11] <Laney> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.devel.technical-board/483 is certainly related
[16:16] <ScottK> That's the last message in the thread, so I think it's pretty clearly decided.
[16:17] <Laney> That's him sending it to the CC I think
[16:18] <Laney> but this list archive is private and I don't know where to look for the outcome
[16:18]  * ScottK takes it as "SABDFL has spoken" so we can move on.
[16:19] <Laney> :)
[16:19] <ScottK> BTW, TB vice CC.
[16:19] <Laney> See the message up-thread, the TB decided to have the CC decide
[16:20] <ScottK> Oh.
[16:21] <Laney> czajkowski: dholbach: could one of you please read that ^ thread in community-council@ and see if you can find the outcome?
[16:21] <Laney> I'm sure it is in public somewhere but I can't find it
[16:23] <dholbach> Laney, there was no further discussion in the thread on the CC list
[16:24] <Laney> Well, I guess that's that then
[16:35] <jjohansen> \o
[16:35] <jdstrand> hi!
[16:35]  * jdstrand is happy to start the meeting nearly on time this week
[16:35] <jdstrand> #startmeeting
[16:36] <meetingology> Meeting started Mon Nov 17 16:36:04 2014 UTC.  The chair is jdstrand. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology.
[16:36] <meetingology> Available commands: action commands idea info link nick
[16:36] <jdstrand> The meeting agenda can be found at:
[16:36] <jdstrand> [LINK] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/Meeting
[16:36] <jdstrand> [TOPIC] Announcements
[16:36] <jdstrand> Thanks to Jonathan Riddell (Riddell) who provided debdiffs for lucid-utopic for konversation (LP: #1389296) and debdiffs for precise-utopic for kde-workspace (LP: #1389665). Your work is very much appreciated and will keep our users secure. Great job! :)
[16:36] <jdstrand> [TOPIC] Weekly stand-up report
[16:36] <jdstrand> I'll go first
[16:36] <Riddell> jdstrand: got another one coming shortly..
[16:37] <chrisccoulson> hi!
[16:37] <jdstrand> Riddell: cool, thanks! mention it in #ubuntu-hardened (or just subscribe ubuntu-security-sponsors) and we'll get someone assigned
[16:38] <jdstrand> so, the good news is I actually got to quite a few updates last week, which was nice
[16:39] <jdstrand> the PM team wanted to get a couple of policy updates in for rtm though, so between that and some embargoed work, I didn't get to a number of things I set out to do last week
[16:39] <jdstrand> for this week
[16:39] <jdstrand> I have more embargoed work
[16:39] <jdstrand> I'm on triage
[16:39] <jdstrand> I need to finish up my apparmor-easyprof-ubuntu updates for vivid
[16:40] <jdstrand> finish the 0.3 click-apparmor upload
[16:41] <jdstrand> have more click-reviewers-tools updates that came up last week (I did get to a few fixes there, but need to add these new ones)
[16:41] <jdstrand> I think this is the week for me adding derivative branches support to UCT
[16:41] <jdstrand> I hope to finish my upstream patch for docker so it can apply policy based on parser capabilities
[16:42] <jdstrand> and then I will be attending the cloud sprint on wednesday since they are in town
[16:42] <jdstrand> that sounds like an awful lot-- 3 of those are close to done, so hopefully it is actually doable
[16:42] <jdstrand> mdeslaur: you're up
[16:43] <mdeslaur> \o
[16:43] <mdeslaur> I'm on community this week
[16:43] <mdeslaur> I'm currently working on sponsoring quassel updates
[16:43] <mdeslaur> I have an embargoed issue to test and release
[16:43] <mdeslaur> and have further updates beyond that, the list is growing again :P
[16:43] <mdeslaur> that's about it, sbeattie, you're up
[16:44] <tyhicks> I'll go and we can circle back to him
[16:45] <tyhicks> I need to publish an update for apparmor in trusty today (prep and testing is already done)
[16:45] <tyhicks> I'll have to knock off all the dust on the instruction manual before doing so
[16:46] <jdstrand> heh
[16:46] <mdeslaur> tyhicks: is that just for that particular bug, or does it have the tools updates in it too?
[16:46] <tyhicks> mdeslaur: it is only for that bug
[16:46] <mdeslaur> tyhicks: you mean re-learn the secret handshake :)
[16:46] <tyhicks> mdeslaur: it'll be going to -security
[16:47] <mdeslaur> ah, right, cool
[16:47] <tyhicks> mdeslaur: at least this handshake is well documented :)
[16:47] <tyhicks> after that, my focus for this week will be on fixing bug #1390592 and making the apparmor cache handling code a library
[16:47] <tyhicks> both of those were on my plate last week but the apparmor bug kept me from accomplishing much there
[16:47] <tyhicks> that's it for me
[16:47] <tyhicks> jjohansen: you're up
[16:48] <jjohansen> I need to finish up a kernel sync of apparmor for vivid, after which I will get back to working on apparmor stacking
[16:48] <jdstrand> tyhicks: isn't 1390592 the bug for the trusty update?
[16:49] <tyhicks> jdstrand: yes - I meant bug #1362469
[16:50] <jdstrand> jjohansen: didn't mean to interrupt, please continue
[16:50] <jjohansen> np
[16:51] <jjohansen> hopefully I will spend some more time poking at the upstreaming of apparmor's labeling bits this week as well
[16:52] <jjohansen> that is it for me, sarnold you're up
[16:53] <sarnold> I'm in the happy place this week
[16:53] <sarnold> last week, on community, otto provided a debdiff for trusty's mariadb-5.5, but I hadn't noticed that utopic didn't already have the 5.5.40 release. So, this week I'll be picking pu the pieces from that update
[16:54] <sarnold> I also have two MIRs to work on, thanks for submitting those nice and early in the cycle :)
[16:54] <sarnold> and I know there's some outstanding apparmor patches that need review. I'd like to make a sweep through that if there's time left over.
[16:54] <sarnold> that's it for me, chrisccoulson?
[16:54] <jdstrand> sarnold: I didn't pay attention on friday-- did you get to tvoss code review?
[16:55] <sarnold> jdstrand: yes, it looked good to me, I had some follow-up questions that I'm curious about but don't warrant blocking that update from being pushed in
[16:55] <jdstrand> nice, thanks
[16:55] <mdeslaur> sarnold: If you run out of things to do, I'd appreciate help with some updates
[16:55] <sarnold> mdeslaur: okay, thanks
[16:55] <chrisccoulson> this week, I've got an oxide update (and hopefully chromium too). Will also be reviewing updates to the mediahub branch. Other than that, it's business as usual
[16:56] <chrisccoulson> I'm done btw :)
[17:00] <chrisccoulson> I need to drop out btw. I've got to go to the chemist to pick up some antibiotics for one of my kids
[17:02] <jdstrand> chrisccoulson: thanks
[17:03]  * sbeattie is here
[17:05] <sbeattie> jdstrand: I can give my status update
[17:06] <sbeattie> I'm still working on gcc pie-by-default for amd64; I have gcc packages in https://launchpad.net/~sbeattie/+archive/ubuntu/gcc-pie-amd64/+packages along with a rebuilt glibc
[17:07] <sbeattie> I've been trying local builds against it, but keep running into FTBFS with packages (postgres, ruby, python) that aren't caused by my changes, the original build fails (usually in a testsuite) as well.
[17:08] <sbeattie> I've rebuilt a couple of packages successfully and verified the binaries are pie on amd64.
[17:08] <mdeslaur> cool
[17:08] <sbeattie> I need to clean up the gcc patch a bit, and look at its additional testsuite failures.
[17:09] <sbeattie> Other than that I have some apparmor patches to review.
[17:09] <sbeattie> That's pretty much it for me.
[17:09] <sbeattie> jdstrand: back to you.
[17:10] <jdstrand> [TOPIC] Highlighted packages
[17:10] <jdstrand> The Ubuntu Security team will highlight some community-supported packages that might be good candidates for updating and or triaging. If you would like to help Ubuntu and not sure where to start, this is a great way to do so.
[17:10] <jdstrand> See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/UpdateProcedures for details and if you have any questions, feel free to ask in #ubuntu-security. To find out other ways of helping out, please see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/GettingInvolved.
[17:10] <jdstrand> http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/pkg/gpw.html
[17:10] <jdstrand> http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/pkg/eet.html
[17:10] <jdstrand> http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/pkg/icecast2.html
[17:10] <jdstrand> http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/pkg/claws-mail-extra-plugins.html
[17:11] <jdstrand> http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/pkg/xbuffy.html
[17:11] <jdstrand> [TOPIC] Miscellaneous and Questions
[17:11] <jdstrand> Does anyone have any other questions or items to discuss?
[17:16] <jdstrand> mdeslaur, sbeattie, tyhicks, jjohansen, sarnold, chrisccoulson: thanks!
[17:16] <jdstrand> #endmeeting
[17:16] <meetingology> Meeting ended Mon Nov 17 17:16:56 2014 UTC.
[17:16] <meetingology> Minutes:        http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2014/ubuntu-meeting.2014-11-17-16.36.moin.txt
[17:16] <sbeattie> thanks, jdstrand
[17:16] <tyhicks> thanks!
[17:17] <jjohansen> thanks jdstrand
[17:17] <mdeslaur> thanks jdstrand!
[17:23] <sarnold> jdstrand: thanks!