robru | that was a quick qa signoff ;-) | 00:12 |
---|---|---|
robru | kenvandine: ok finally landed the nicer error pretty printing in production, you should break another silo so we can enjoy the enhanced clarity of the error message ;-) | 00:32 |
kenvandine | robru, i'll pass :) | 00:51 |
kenvandine | robru, silo 3 has passed QA, can i publish that? | 00:52 |
robru | kenvandine: I dunno I thought we were in some kinda mega-super-freeze? I don't understand why that was approved. but if you want to publish it, I guess go ahead | 00:52 |
kenvandine | it was supposed to be in last thursday's image :) | 00:53 |
robru | ah | 00:53 |
kenvandine | but qa verification took nearly a week :/ | 00:53 |
robru | kenvandine: ok well it doesn't bother me if you publish it. I'm just worried about management approval | 00:54 |
kenvandine | management approved it :) | 00:54 |
imgbot | === trainguards: IMAGE 25 building (started: 20141118 02:05) === | 02:03 |
imgbot | === trainguards: IMAGE 25 DONE (finished: 20141118 03:25) === | 03:23 |
imgbot | === changelog: http://people.canonical.com/~ogra/touch-image-stats/25.changes === | 03:23 |
=== chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
Mirv | bzoltan: first time since 5.3.2 yes, but note that uitk was landed with 5.3.2 too so it worked | 04:50 |
Mirv | bzoltan: oh, the qtc plugin, right. qtc itself + remotelinux plugin were landed as part of 5.3.2, but not the ubuntu plugin | 04:58 |
bzoltan | Mirv: Ok, Qt was not the problem... for some reason the vivid builder was missing the pkg-config | 05:11 |
bzoltan | Mirv: I am running the UITK AP tests against silo16 | 05:11 |
bzoltan | Mirv: I could not figure out better way to validate the new qtbase ... unless if if you have an indea | 05:12 |
bzoltan | Mirv: I am confused ... the silo22 is marjed as failed ... but I see the deb packages in the PPA. I just tested them and they are good to land. | 05:21 |
Mirv | bzoltan: I don't have better ideas, only the qmake changed | 05:35 |
Mirv | bzoltan: possible ci train regression | 05:35 |
Mirv | checking watch only | 05:35 |
bzoltan | Mirv: yes, but some test must be run :) so to check if n regression is introduced | 05:36 |
Mirv | better safe than sorry | 05:36 |
bzoltan | Mirv: after all we run the configure twice :) | 05:36 |
Mirv | robru: we may have some sort of build job problem(s) | 05:40 |
robru | Mirv: got a log? | 05:41 |
Mirv | robru: https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-022-1-build/26/console + https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-022-1-build/27/console + any failed from http://people.canonical.com/~platform/citrain_dashboard/#?q= | 05:41 |
Mirv | robru: unping 27, it succeeded ie watch_only still works, was just very slow | 05:42 |
Mirv | robru: but then a lot of like https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-001-1-build/98/console where everything seems correct but ends with failure status. but it's good if the next watch_only works, nothing fatal. | 05:42 |
Mirv | bzoltan: please mark the 022 now as tested | 05:43 |
robru | Mirv: https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-022-1-build/26/console was one of the issues I discovered and already fixed during my shift | 05:43 |
Mirv | robru: oh, excellent! that was already some time ago indeed, not a recent build. | 05:43 |
bzoltan | Mirv: done | 05:43 |
Mirv | robru: the 001/98 is also quite old, maybe that would also work now already. well, good job then, fixing all the bugs :) | 05:44 |
bzoltan | Mirv: I have tested it with emulator, I assume that in the case of SDK tools, that qualifies | 05:44 |
robru | Mirv: in fact there's two parts to that fix, one to make it actually read the ppa properly, and one to make it report that error in a much more readable way when there is a legitimate problem with the ppa contents ;-) | 05:44 |
Mirv | bzoltan: it should | 05:44 |
Mirv | robru: human readable errors in ci train, that'd be the first! :) usually it's "I exploded, file/network/everything error" which means "oh you forgot a space character from changelog" | 05:45 |
robru | Mirv: hehe, yeah | 05:46 |
robru | Mirv: yeah, silo 1 build run 98 also looks quite old, it doesn't even include my log-print-ordering fixup, looks like that run was from even before my shift started this morning | 05:47 |
robru | (definitely before I deployed) | 05:47 |
Mirv | robru: yes, it seems everything is in order, watch_only build works, publish works.. thanks! | 05:48 |
robru | Mirv: no worries! I'm super glad to have deleted literally 400+ lines of untested code and replaced it with tested code ;-) | 05:49 |
* Mirv runs build watch_only for all "failed" silos | 05:49 | |
Mirv | robru: sounds excellent | 05:49 |
bzoltan | Mirv: we will need a jedi's eye onthe new qtc plugin package as we had to add two new build deps | 06:01 |
bzoltan | Mirv: the qtbase from silo16 is good to go | 06:34 |
Mirv | bzoltan: I was the jedi (or, master of the universe) as it's not in main | 06:36 |
Mirv | bzoltan: an dok | 06:36 |
bzoltan | Mirv: \o/ small step for a man and giant leap for qmake users | 06:37 |
=== mlankhor1t is now known as mlankhorst | ||
=== chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
=== chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
tvoss | trainguards, can I haz silo for line 59? | 08:12 |
sil2100 | tvoss: looking at it now | 08:13 |
tvoss | sil2100, thanks | 08:13 |
tvoss | sil2100, also, could someone take a look at an MP that does not get Jenkins love? | 08:13 |
sil2100 | tvoss: you mean, CI is not running for it? | 08:14 |
tvoss | sil2100, yup | 08:14 |
sil2100 | tvoss: ok, this might require cihelp then | 08:17 |
tvoss | sil2100, ack | 08:17 |
robru | tvoss: i already talked to ci about that, apparently Jenkins is just slammed by a large rush of mps all at once... Give it some time | 08:21 |
tvoss | robru, ack, but the MP has been up for a few days :) | 08:22 |
robru | tvoss: Hmmmmmmm then definitely ping ci ;-) i had an mp today take 45 minutes when it normally takes 15. | 08:22 |
tvoss | robru, ack | 08:23 |
tvoss | cihelp, hey there :) | 08:23 |
=== Ursinha_ is now known as Guest58037 | ||
Mirv | ogra_: a couple of topblocker fixes went in in the morning, you'll probably want to build an image | 08:37 |
brendand | Mirv, good morning | 08:48 |
sil2100 | Mirv: do you know which ones? | 08:51 |
ogra_ | Mirv, for silo2 we need a custom tarball landing at the same time, i want to know the status of the QA testing for it before kicking one ... | 08:51 |
ogra_ | (for the tarball that is) | 08:51 |
sil2100 | Oh, silo 2 and 6 I see | 08:52 |
ogra_ | right, but 2 cant land alone | 08:52 |
sil2100 | When does cwayne1 start his day? | 08:53 |
sil2100 | Or do we have also someone else that can upload the tarball? | 08:53 |
ogra_ | oh, the uploading ... heh ... i was so focused on signoff info that i forgot about that small bit :) | 08:53 |
ogra_ | i guess then we should push 006 in and roll one :) | 08:54 |
ogra_ | oh, err | 08:54 |
* ogra_ just notice that both are landed | 08:55 | |
ogra_ | +s | 08:55 |
ogra_ | hmm | 08:55 |
Mirv | brendand: morning | 08:56 |
Mirv | sil2100: rotation lock + apparmor fix, but ogra is right about the tarball | 08:57 |
sil2100 | ogra_: yeah... | 08:59 |
sil2100 | ogra_: so we need to wait for the tarball before we can proceed | 08:59 |
ogra_ | right | 08:59 |
ogra_ | unless you like 10min boots :) | 09:00 |
brendand | Mirv, did anyone follow up with you about silo 22 yesterday? | 09:00 |
ogra_ | brendand, afaik the bug couldnt be reproduced even without the silo | 09:00 |
brendand | ogra_, yeah. i'm not sure i can even test it since it has to do with roaming | 09:01 |
ogra_ | send me your sim ;) | 09:02 |
tvoss | sil2100, ping | 09:02 |
sil2100 | tvoss: pong | 09:03 |
tvoss | sil2100, hey, could you have a look here: https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-014-1-build/111/console | 09:03 |
tvoss | sil2100, seems like vivid has got a version released that is not in sync with trunk | 09:03 |
jibel | has silo 3 been published o rtm ? | 09:03 |
jibel | *to | 09:03 |
sil2100 | tvoss: yeah, see it - it seems to be a no-change rebuild from Brian, I guess we can force ignoring this | 09:04 |
ogra_ | jibel, was that system-settings ? | 09:04 |
ogra_ | (if so, yes) | 09:05 |
sil2100 | tvoss: in this particular case, you can use the FORCE_REBUILD flag during build | 09:06 |
sil2100 | tvoss: or, if you prefer, we can simply sync this change to trunk and build normally | 09:06 |
sil2100 | tvoss: it's cleaner, but not required | 09:06 |
jibel | ogra_, ok, I didn't receive the notification. thx | 09:07 |
sil2100 | jibel: btw. do we have someone doing sanity testing of newly created images right now? | 09:12 |
jibel | sil2100, yes rhuddie and rvr | 09:13 |
sil2100 | jibel: are they also doing vivid sanity testing? | 09:14 |
jibel | sil2100, yes on mako | 09:14 |
sil2100 | Ok, thanks | 09:15 |
Mirv | brendand: I had a lot of followups, but none that answer directly the most important question "do we still need it?" | 09:21 |
Mirv | brendand: I did 5+ new builds yesterday evening and this morning, and I have a good feeling about this last one now building that it could succeed on all three archs while keeping the tests enabled (aside from disabling four new known faulty ones) | 09:22 |
Mirv | so that'd be a candidate for landing, if we just know we want to land it or not.. | 09:23 |
Mirv | brendand: if you have any further followups from QA side, feel free to share. victor at least was not able to reproduce the original problem anymore. | 09:25 |
brendand | Mirv, i'm not sure what he tried though, i'll have to talk to him first | 09:26 |
Mirv | and here's the discussion between pat and lorn that does not answer directly whether we need it or not: https://pastebin.canonical.com/120606/ | 09:26 |
Mirv | brendand: I believe he tried (after a few iterations) my updated test steps from https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlans/Qt#Testing_networking_code_in_Qt_Base | 09:26 |
Mirv | and there's the "Without the PPA..." line especially | 09:27 |
brendand | Mirv, the bug mentions roaming though | 09:27 |
Mirv | which I thought I was still able to reproduce | 09:27 |
brendand | Mirv, is that roaming like data roaming, or a different kind of roaming? | 09:27 |
Mirv | brendand: I'm not sure if that was a guess from Victor why scopes didn't work. the roaming word was noticed in comment #63... | 09:28 |
Mirv | "only on Symbian" | 09:28 |
Mirv | brendand: the whole QNAM (short for the QtNetworkAccessManager) and how we use it is completely unknown to me, and I'm not even sure who to ask. | 09:29 |
Mirv | brendand: it seems important/useful that QNAM works as it should, but the effect of it depends on how much we control network directly and how much via Qt, I'd think | 09:29 |
ogra_ | olli, pmcgowan, please see popey's mail from last night "Cannot approve Music 2.0.744 to store" ... i consider bug 1393606 a topblocker (at least until music app couold land somehow) | 09:49 |
ubot5 | bug 1393606 in Software Center Agent "Store inconsistent after rolling back an app" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1393606 | 09:49 |
popey | just mentioned it to them in #phablet | 09:50 |
ogra_ | ah ... i dont go to the office channels until after the meeting :) | 09:50 |
pmcgowan | yep | 09:53 |
sil2100 | ;) | 09:58 |
bzoltan | ogra_: just out of curiosity ... do you know where is the kernel source? | 10:22 |
ogra_ | bzoltan, for what ? mako, flo and friends are on kernel.ubuntu.com | 10:22 |
bzoltan | ogra_: ohh, that is perfect. for mako only | 10:23 |
ogra_ | there is also a source package | 10:23 |
om26er | when will the new image build be kicked ? | 10:29 |
=== Guest58037 is now known as Ursinha | ||
=== Trevinho_ is now known as Trevinho | ||
popey | ogra_: music app approved into store now, thanks to bueno and team. | 11:32 |
popey | cc olli & pmcgowan ^ | 11:32 |
pmcgowan | popey, awesome | 11:33 |
ogra_ | popey, yay ! | 11:33 |
sil2100 | \o/ | 11:39 |
sil2100 | popey: thanks! | 11:39 |
sil2100 | popey: but is this bug resolved in the end, or did it get worked-around? | 11:39 |
popey | well the bug in the store still exists I guess | 11:41 |
popey | it was worked around | 11:41 |
=== MacSlow is now known as MacSlow|lunch | ||
jgdx | cihelp: hi, it seems that otto has issues passing USS CI[1]. Seems related to the regression fginther fixed a couple of days ago. [1] https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/autopilot-testrunner-otto-vivid/146/console | 12:13 |
psivaa | jgdx: let me take a look | 12:13 |
sil2100 | cwayne1: ping, give us a sign when you're around | 12:17 |
sil2100 | brendand, ogra_: just in case - we don't have the tarball around already for testing, or do we? | 12:17 |
ogra_ | i thought cwayne1 had prepared it last night | 12:18 |
brendand | sil2100, how would i land a new version of reminders-app? | 12:22 |
brendand | sil2100, it's required to fix those tests | 12:22 |
brendand | sil2100, not the click package you see, but the debian source package | 12:22 |
brendand | sil2100, any idea who's responsible? or do i need to become a lander (dun dun dun!) | 12:23 |
jgdx | psivaa, thanks | 12:24 |
=== alan_g is now known as alan_g|lunch | ||
cwayne1 | sil2100: heya | 12:32 |
cwayne1 | ogra_: we were missing one update we needed in the custom tar so I couldn't get it fully prepared last night, checking now if it's been fixed | 12:33 |
sil2100 | brendand: wait, reminders is a typical click package, right? | 12:39 |
sil2100 | brendand: at least I always remembered it being that - why do you need to fix the debian source package? | 12:39 |
sil2100 | cwayne1: hey! Wanted to poke you about the same thing, since we landed the silo that needs the new custom tarball | 12:41 |
sil2100 | So we're waiting before we can build a new image :) | 12:42 |
ogra_ | sil2100, and pray that tthe tarball passes QA :P | 12:44 |
cwayne1 | :) | 12:45 |
cwayne1 | sil2100: so is the new apparmor-easyprof-ubuntu in the archive now? | 12:46 |
cwayne1 | or did you just publish | 12:46 |
ogra_ | was published a few hours ago | 12:47 |
om26er | ogra_, I just signed in, when does the new image get build ? | 12:48 |
om26er | *t | 12:48 |
om26er | I was expecting it to be EU morning. | 12:48 |
ogra_ | om26er, well, apparmor-easyprof-ubuntu... so now we have to wait for the new custom tarball first | 12:49 |
ogra_ | else we cause 10min boot time uf we build without it | 12:49 |
om26er | ouch, ok. | 12:49 |
sil2100 | cwayne1: it should be in the archive since long, yes | 12:57 |
cwayne1 | sil2100: ack,thanks | 12:58 |
cwayne1 | just preparing the last bits now, then will build and test, then hand off to QA | 12:58 |
cwayne1 | but need to run a quick unexpected errand first, bbiab | 12:58 |
psivaa | jgdx: i still see those failures, was digging what the fix would have been in the previous runs, will ping fginther when he comes online | 13:06 |
cjwatson | ogra_,wgrant: https://code.launchpad.net/~cjwatson/canonical-is-puppet/ppa-symlinks/+merge/242069 FYI | 13:07 |
ogra_ | Error ID: OOPS-1c13fefbd94d1b1e5178737a674fae10 | 13:08 |
ogra_ | :) | 13:08 |
* ogra_ reloads | 13:08 | |
ogra_ | \o/ | 13:08 |
ogra_ | cjwatson, thanks !! | 13:08 |
jgdx | psivaa, thanks so much. | 13:09 |
brendand | sil2100, it has a binary package for the account provider | 13:13 |
sil2100 | brendand: oh? | 13:14 |
sil2100 | hm, ok, nice then | 13:14 |
sil2100 | Let me try finding who was landing it before | 13:14 |
sil2100 | One moment | 13:14 |
ogra_ | i think thats dpm | 13:15 |
dpm | hi, what's up? | 13:15 |
ogra_ | new reminders :) | 13:16 |
dpm | ? | 13:16 |
ogra_ | (teh matching deb for your recent click upload) | 13:16 |
brendand | dpm, are you able to do a landing for reminders-app in RTM? the source package provides a fake account provider | 13:16 |
sil2100 | brendand: ok, last person was dpm | 13:16 |
sil2100 | ogra_: right! | 13:16 |
sil2100 | ;) | 13:16 |
ogra_ | ;) | 13:16 |
brendand | dpm, so we need the source package updated, as opposed to the click | 13:16 |
ogra_ | well, along with ... | 13:16 |
dpm | brendand, sil2100, why do you need the .deb package? | 13:16 |
brendand | dpm, i just did my best to explain :) | 13:17 |
brendand | dpm, it has account-plugin-evernote-sandbox | 13:17 |
* brendand actually isn't sure reminders-app ever landed in RTM | 13:18 | |
dpm | brendand, right, but what is it needed for? | 13:18 |
ogra_ | which i assume AP will pull from the archive for the AP tests | 13:18 |
brendand | dpm, to make the tests work | 13:18 |
dpm | brendand, is that not pulled from the core apps PPA? | 13:18 |
brendand | dpm, hmm, could be | 13:18 |
brendand | dpm, do any other core-apps AP tests do the same? | 13:19 |
brendand | dpm, which ppa is that? | 13:19 |
dpm | brendand, https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-touch-coreapps-drivers/+archive/ubuntu/daily?field.series_filter=vivid | 13:20 |
dpm | I thought Jenkins published and used the .debs there, but the best person to ask is fginther | 13:20 |
brendand | dpm, ahhhh | 13:22 |
brendand | dpm, what about RTM? | 13:23 |
brendand | dpm, i guess you don't have a PPA for that | 13:23 |
brendand | certainly looks like that's the case | 13:28 |
brendand | sil2100, so we probably don't need a landing | 13:29 |
brendand | sil2100, but i don't think what we do need is any simpler | 13:29 |
=== MacSlow|lunch is now known as MacSlow | ||
sil2100 | brendand: yeah... I think we need to get some answers on what happens for rtm in this case | 13:36 |
* brendand waits for fginther | 13:37 | |
cwayne1 | sil2100: hi, whos going to be doing the custom testing? | 13:39 |
brendand | cwayne1, that'll be me | 13:39 |
sil2100 | cwayne1: I would point at brendand ;) | 13:40 |
cwayne1 | brendand: cool beans, thanks. just wanted to know who to include on the changelog email :) | 13:40 |
=== alan_g|lunch is now known as alan_g | ||
jibel | cwayne1, please cc me | 13:46 |
popey | sil2100: we planning on cranking another image out today? | 13:50 |
sil2100 | popey: yes | 13:50 |
sil2100 | popey: we need the new custom tarball landed though | 13:50 |
popey | ah okay | 13:51 |
cwayne1 | jibel: done | 13:51 |
cwayne1 | brendand: sil2100: custom tarball(s) ready, email sent | 13:52 |
jibel | cwayne1, thanks | 13:52 |
sil2100 | cwayne1: excellent, thanks! | 13:53 |
sil2100 | brendand: ^ | 13:53 |
* cwayne1 crosses fingers | 13:53 | |
* ogra_ crosses more | 13:53 | |
cwayne1 | also good news is we got many of these into the store, so we can now update individual scopes independently of the custom tar if needed :) | 13:53 |
sil2100 | oSoMoN: ping :) | 13:54 |
brendand | cwayne1, turns out om26er will test it | 13:55 |
sil2100 | alecu: hello! | 13:57 |
cwayne1 | brendand: coolio, would you mind fwd'ig that changelog over? | 13:58 |
jibel | cwayne1, done | 13:58 |
cwayne1 | thanks | 13:58 |
alecu | hi sil2100 | 13:59 |
om26er | cwayne1, Hi! Can you tell how to get started with testing the custom tarball ? | 14:00 |
brendand | om26er, i think the instructions were in the email | 14:01 |
sil2100 | alecu: so, I was wondering how far from landing is silo 11 for RTM | 14:01 |
cwayne1 | om26er: hiya, it should be in the email, but tl;dr flash ubuntu-touch/ubuntu-rtm/14.09-proposed-customized | 14:01 |
alecu | sil2100: I think it's not far from landing... I'm following the test plan again on it now. | 14:03 |
* jdstrand wonders if it still is 10 minutes-- I would think it would be closer to 4 now if it used to be 10 | 14:03 | |
sil2100 | alecu: excellent, thanks :) | 14:05 |
ogra_ | jdstrand, it is definitely less if you dotn have any apps from the store installed :) | 14:08 |
oSoMoN | sil2100, pong | 14:09 |
sil2100 | oSoMoN: hey! Wanted to get some info related to the fix for LP: #1391230 | 14:10 |
ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1391230 in oxide-qt (Ubuntu RTM) "[TOPBLOCKER] web audio, pulse runs at 6% and screen will not blank on idle" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1391230 | 14:10 |
sil2100 | oSoMoN: is the fix for oxide-qt ready? Do we also need a fix for pulseaudio for RTM for this to be fixed? | 14:10 |
jdstrand | ogra_: well, I meant that we made a rather important compile improvement a few weeks back (~65% faster on krillin) | 14:11 |
=== plars is now known as plars-sprint | ||
ogra_ | jdstrand, bah, now that nobody hits the issue anymore you made it fast :P | 14:11 |
ogra_ | :) | 14:11 |
oSoMoN | sil2100, my understanding is that the fix for oxide is sufficient, not sure if someone is working on an additional patch for pulseaudio | 14:12 |
sil2100 | oSoMoN: do we have that fix in a silo already? | 14:14 |
oSoMoN | sil2100, not in a silo yet, but it should be built in the security-team PPA, let me check | 14:15 |
oSoMoN | chrisccoulson, is the oxide 1.3 build ready in the security-team PPA? | 14:16 |
brendand | fginther, ping | 14:16 |
fginther | brendand, hey | 14:20 |
chrisccoulson | oSoMoN, it is https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mozilla-security/+archive/ubuntu/ppa | 14:21 |
chrisccoulson | although, I still don't know if chrome 39.0.2171.62 will be the actual release. so there's still a possibility of doing another upload | 14:21 |
oSoMoN | chrisccoulson, when do you reckon the stable release will be announced? | 14:22 |
chrisccoulson | oSoMoN, I'm not sure, as we don't have that information. But I'm guessing it will be today | 14:23 |
chrisccoulson | it's usually tuesday | 14:23 |
sil2100 | I would like the fix for the topblocker to be available in a silo till EOD today | 14:24 |
sil2100 | So that it can make it for our milestone this week | 14:24 |
oSoMoN | sil2100, we can copy it in a silo now, but if the chromium version is bumped, we’ll need another build | 14:25 |
sil2100 | Let's maybe wait - the PPA builds for ubuntu-rtm as well? Or will we need a source copy? | 14:26 |
oSoMoN | sil2100, the PPA builds for regular trusty, utopic and vivid, not for RTM | 14:26 |
oSoMoN | I guess that means a source copy is needed | 14:26 |
sil2100 | oSoMoN: ok, thanks for all the info :) | 14:26 |
sil2100 | Let's just try at least having a silo for it today | 14:27 |
oSoMoN | sil2100, how about we request a silo now, do a source copy, and cancel the build later if a version bump is needed? | 14:27 |
sil2100 | ogra_, olli: so far we seem to have all the topblockers under control | 14:27 |
ogra_ | sil2100, yeah | 14:27 |
sil2100 | ogra_, ogra_: too bad the file corruption one doesn't have a definite fix yet from what I saw on #phablet... | 14:28 |
sil2100 | But this one is *optional* for this milestone from what I saw | 14:28 |
ogra_ | well, it has a possible easy fix by changing the default mount options | 14:28 |
brendand | fginther, we were wondering, do the ci jobs install dependencies from the core-apps ppa for click apps? | 14:28 |
ogra_ | but we're not sure about the impact yet | 14:28 |
ogra_ | (speed etc) | 14:28 |
ogra_ | GRRR ! | 14:29 |
sil2100 | ogra_: so the change to data=journal helps in the end? | 14:29 |
* ogra_ struggles a bit with his part of the file corruption bug | 14:29 | |
ogra_ | sil2100, yes, but it might have some performance impact | 14:29 |
fginther | brendand, the core-apps daily PPA has been used by the jenkins jobs that do the MP testing for the core-apps. It has never been used for image smoke testing. The PPA was intended to just be a convience for the core-apps developers and not an official publishing mechanism | 14:30 |
brendand | fginther, ah right | 14:30 |
brendand | dpm, ^ | 14:30 |
brendand | sil2100, so maybe we still use the landing route | 14:30 |
sil2100 | fginther, dpm, brendand: so we need to release it to the archive then? | 14:30 |
brendand | sil2100, i would, but i'd like to hear what dpm thinks | 14:31 |
fginther | sil2100, right, if the test needs the package for smoke testing, then it needs to be in the archive. | 14:31 |
sil2100 | I suppose we could, I can set-up a landing for you brendand if you give me the merge | 14:31 |
sil2100 | brendand: or is it already merged in trunk? | 14:31 |
brendand | sil2100, yeah | 14:32 |
brendand | sil2100, i hope none of those packages are seeded in the image | 14:33 |
oSoMoN | sil2100, I’ve filed a landing request for the oxide fix, feel free to go ahead with the source copy | 14:34 |
sil2100 | oSoMoN: o/ thanks! Let me assign and do that indeed | 14:34 |
bfiller | sil2100: can you create a silo for line 63 when you have a chance please? thanks | 14:35 |
sil2100 | bfiller: sure thing, will be assigning silos in a moment :) | 14:35 |
sil2100 | brendand: just checked, and none seem to be seeded in our images | 14:36 |
brendand | sil2100, good so landing it can do no harm then | 14:36 |
jgdx | psivaa, hey, how'd it go? | 14:40 |
psivaa | jgdx: just came back from lunch, will have a chat with fginther | 14:40 |
jgdx | psivaa, great | 14:41 |
fginther | psivaa, jgdx, I think we can try the same fix as last week. Working with someone to get it tested | 14:42 |
psivaa | fginther: thanks | 14:43 |
brendand | sil2100, is there anything i need to do? | 14:43 |
sil2100 | brendand: hm, currently not, I'll be thinking how to release this in a moment, since I don't want to mix up the 'click' release process with the normal ubuntu one and make a mess in trunk | 14:44 |
sil2100 | hmmm | 14:45 |
sil2100 | Crap... | 14:45 |
sil2100 | Come to think of it, we'll need to re-package the oxide-qt source with a different version number for ubuntu-rtm ;/ | 14:46 |
* sil2100 does that now | 14:46 | |
sil2100 | hm, or maybe since it builds for utopic, maybe a binary copy would be sufficient? | 14:48 |
oSoMoN | sil2100: I’d be tempted to think so, let’s ask chrisccoulson for confirmation ^^ | 14:49 |
sil2100 | This would save us A LOT of work, and we could instantly check if that's true on an ubuntu-rtm device | 14:49 |
wgrant | cjwatson: Thanks. | 14:50 |
sil2100 | oSoMoN, chrisccoulson: let's try this, I'm pretty sure that since we used binary-copies previously, the dependencies didn't change much in the meantime to make this impossible | 14:50 |
sil2100 | We can rebuild by source copy if it's broken or something | 14:50 |
cjwatson | sil2100: Seems likely | 14:51 |
cjwatson | And would be nice to avoid big rebuilds | 14:51 |
jgdx | fginther, thanks! | 14:59 |
sil2100 | brendand: just to make sure - the same reminders-app tests fail on vivid, right? | 15:13 |
ogra_ | no | 15:14 |
ogra_ | on rtm | 15:14 |
ogra_ | oh, ignore me :P | 15:14 |
sil2100 | ogra_: btw. I was supposed to go to practice today, but I seem to have a slight fever an will be skipping that, so I'll be around for the meeting | 15:36 |
sil2100 | (most probably) | 15:36 |
sil2100 | ogra_: if this changes, I'll give you a sign | 15:36 |
=== cyphermox_ is now known as cyphermox | ||
ogra_ | sil2100, oki | 15:49 |
jibel | sil2100, silo 11 is the fix for bug 1393410 ? | 15:57 |
ubot5 | bug 1393410 in unity-scope-click (Ubuntu RTM) "[TOPBLOCKER] Apps with prices are not shown by default" [Critical,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1393410 | 15:57 |
sil2100 | jibel: yes | 15:57 |
jibel | sil2100, ok, rhuddie ^ can you test it | 15:57 |
rhuddie | jibel, ok, starting silo 11 | 15:58 |
sil2100 | jibel, om26er: how's the custom tarball testing going? | 15:59 |
om26er | sil2100, I told cwayne1 that unity8-dash crashes the first time I try to open a scope from 'Manage scope' --> 'All' | 16:00 |
sil2100 | ugh | 16:00 |
sil2100 | :< | 16:00 |
om26er | logs are useless https://errors.ubuntu.com/oops/9f6e4d6a-6f3a-11e4-a1d2-fa163e525ba7 | 16:00 |
cwayne1 | huh? i wasn't aware of that | 16:01 |
cwayne1 | let me try a fresh flash | 16:01 |
=== chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
brendand | sil2100, yes it does fail in vivid | 16:02 |
cwayne1 | om26er: which scope? | 16:05 |
ogra_ | chrisccoulson, was oxide already released upstream ? | 16:06 |
om26er | cwayne1, BBC News | 16:06 |
cwayne1 | this is the first i'm hearing of this btw | 16:07 |
cwayne1 | but doing a fresh flash now, will check | 16:07 |
cwayne1 | om26er: can you reproduce this reliably? | 16:10 |
om26er | cwayne1, yes, reproduced 4 times, right now it has crashed again. | 16:11 |
om26er | Well it could be that its not related to the custom tarball, would need to check. | 16:11 |
cwayne1 | i don't see how it could be to be honest | 16:11 |
cwayne1 | especially since bbc scope hasn't changed in over a month.. | 16:11 |
cwayne1 | and I cannot reproduce on a fresh flash | 16:11 |
om26er | cwayne1, here is the way: open bbc scope, scroll to the bottom. now flick so that it scrolls back to the top, tap on the back button twice. | 16:12 |
cwayne1 | om26er: can't reproduce | 16:14 |
rvr | om26er: Just opened "Manage scopes" ... no crash | 16:18 |
kgunn | om26er: so are you seeing unity8 crash files in /var/crash ? | 16:19 |
cwayne1 | om26er: yeah so, a) can't reproduce, b) that scope certainly hasn't changed | 16:19 |
om26er | kgunn, yes, but its useless. http://errors.ubuntu.com/oops/7778a022-6f3e-11e4-bd6f-fa163e78b027 | 16:20 |
victorp | cwayne1, what sope? | 16:20 |
victorp | scope | 16:20 |
om26er | cwayne1, ok lets just assume its an old issue then. | 16:20 |
cwayne1 | so it seems unlikely that this has anything to do with custom | 16:20 |
cwayne1 | victorp: bbc | 16:20 |
kgunn | Saviq: if om26er is seeing a crashing dash is there anything else he could do (load debug libs or gdb) | 16:20 |
victorp | ugh.. | 16:20 |
victorp | yeah nothing changed there | 16:21 |
rvr | cwayne1: I can't reproduce that in the Spanish image | 16:21 |
cwayne1 | yeah, bbc hasn't changed in months | 16:21 |
cwayne1 | rvr: yeah, i can't reproduce here in english | 16:22 |
rvr | Ah, just did | 16:22 |
rvr | om26er: But scrolling very very quickly | 16:22 |
jdstrand | I'm sure this is probably unrelated, but Istarted seeing several scopes using translated entries for description, searchhint and displayname in the store. these were queued up and they are now available. I mention it only because the timing seems odd | 16:23 |
om26er | a flick that is. | 16:23 |
victorp | om26er, but what crashes? | 16:23 |
victorp | unity8? | 16:23 |
rvr | _usr_bin_unity8-dash.32011.crash | 16:23 |
om26er | victorp, unity8-dash | 16:23 |
jdstrand | (they were previously blocked because click-reviewers-tools was complaining, but I fixed that and let them go in. it was just a few scopes though | 16:23 |
victorp | om26er, you know that there is a bug reported that unity8-dash crashes sometimes when switching scopes rights? | 16:24 |
victorp | right? | 16:24 |
pmcgowan | https://bugs.launchpad.net/barajas/+bug/1386638 | 16:24 |
ubot5 | Error: launchpad bug 1386638 not found | 16:24 |
victorp | om26er, rvr ^^ | 16:24 |
victorp | so, I am not sure we should be blocking the new custom on this | 16:25 |
om26er | victorp, no, didn't know about that one. but this crash is different and yes as cwayne1 said it may not be related to this custom tarball. | 16:26 |
victorp | om26er, so let raise a bug and move on with custom testing so we can release the new image? | 16:27 |
om26er | victorp, sure, the testing is mostly done. | 16:27 |
jibel | rvr, while om26er is finishing the review of the custom tarball if everything looks ok on your side can you reflash latest proposed and try to reproduce. | 16:28 |
brendand | sil2100, did you do that landing already? | 16:29 |
rvr | jibel: When I'm finished with the current image, I'll do that | 16:30 |
sil2100 | brendand: had a meeting, but doing the landings now :) | 16:34 |
brendand | sil2100, it might not be necessary, just hold on | 16:39 |
sil2100 | brendand: k, landings are prepared if anything | 16:40 |
sil2100 | brendand: should I assign..? | 16:44 |
=== chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
om26er | cwayne1, I tap on 'Add google account' it actually opens the system settings app and then I have to select account type there. Same for evernote. Is that supposed to be like that | 16:56 |
pstolowski | trainguards, hello, can i ask for a silo for #61, #60, #55 (in that order of priority)? | 16:59 |
ogra_ | sil2100, just finishing up another meeting .. i'll be there in 5 | 17:00 |
sil2100 | pstolowski: hey, tried assigning for 61/60 but there's already a landing for -scopes-api | 17:00 |
sil2100 | ogra_: k | 17:00 |
pstolowski | sil2100, where is it? i couldn't find it | 17:03 |
robru | pstolowski: http://people.canonical.com/~platform/citrain_dashboard/#?distro=ubuntu&q=scopes-api | 17:11 |
pstolowski | robru, ah, but that one is for testing purposes atm. kgunn is that right? | 17:12 |
robru | pstolowski: yeah seems so | 17:12 |
robru | pstolowski: sil2100: I'll assign it | 17:12 |
robru | well as soon as the spreadsheet wakes up | 17:13 |
pstolowski | heh, thanks | 17:13 |
robru | pstolowski: ok vivid 25 for starters | 17:15 |
robru | pstolowski: and rtm 6 | 17:16 |
pstolowski | robru, thanks! | 17:16 |
robru | pstolowski: and vivid 26 for line 55. you're welcome! | 17:16 |
kgunn | robru: you can dump me outta that silo 18 | 17:17 |
robru | kgunn: thanks | 17:21 |
sil2100 | robru: btw.! Did you do anything to fix the dashboard? Since it seems to work fine now | 17:25 |
robru | sil2100: nope I didn't do a thing. must have been some kind of transient google issue | 17:26 |
* sil2100 curses google | 17:26 | |
robru | sil2100: yeah it was pretty awful. I looked over the code, looked over the spreadsheet, couldn't find a single thing wrong. Even tried downloading the CSV from the spreadsheet to see if google was giving incomplete info. everything looked fine. then suddenly it fixed itself | 17:33 |
sil2100 | ogra_: btw. next time let's make sure that the landing has a big DO NOT LAND THIS! in the landing comments | 17:39 |
sil2100 | I'm sure Timo would have noticed it then :) | 17:39 |
brendand | sil2100, i guess we should do the landing | 17:41 |
brendand | sil2100, theoretically i could hack the tests to work with the old version in the archive, but probably better to move forward than backwards | 17:42 |
brendand | sil2100, will you do the landing for both vivid and RTM | 17:42 |
brendand | ? | 17:42 |
sil2100 | brendand: sure, let me assign a silo for those then - I'll first build the vivid one and then build the sync for ubuntu-rtm | 17:43 |
=== alan_g is now known as alan_g|EOD | ||
ogra_ | sil2100, importer is off, rootfs build started ... cwayne1 is currently putting the tarballs in place | 18:11 |
sil2100 | \o/ | 18:13 |
imgbot | === trainguards: RTM IMAGE 163 building (started: 20141118 18:15) === | 18:13 |
sil2100 | ogra_, cwayne1: thanks! | 18:13 |
cwayne1 | wait i haven't pushed yet! see the discussion in #phablet | 18:15 |
sil2100 | cwayne1: ok, I see the issue... since QA says it won't pass sanity testing, then it means we need this fix | 18:17 |
sil2100 | ogra_: you kicked a new image anyway, right..? | 18:17 |
sil2100 | This probably can't be stopped? :| | 18:17 |
sil2100 | We could have an image anyway, but this needs to be fixed for this milestone anyway | 18:21 |
ogra_ | right | 18:23 |
ogra_ | freeze is only tomorrow morning :) | 18:24 |
ogra_ | pleanty of time | 18:24 |
cwayne1 | oh man i thought today was wednesday | 18:24 |
ogra_ | :) | 18:24 |
brendand | sil2100, silo 11 signed off. make sure it's in tonights image | 18:26 |
sil2100 | brendand: o/ | 18:27 |
* ogra_ watches https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu-rtm/14.09/ubuntu-touch/ and twiddles thumbs | 18:27 | |
sil2100 | Let's publish that in a few moments, don't want to partially land it in the image we're building now | 18:27 |
ogra_ | i dont mind doing a back to back build if needed | 18:28 |
=== chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
alecu | brendand: thanks for the review | 19:06 |
imgbot | === trainguards: RTM IMAGE 163 DONE (finished: 20141118 19:35) === | 19:33 |
imgbot | === changelog: http://people.canonical.com/~ogra/touch-image-stats/rtm/163.changes === | 19:33 |
ogra_ | brendand, do you immediately want one on top ? | 19:34 |
ogra_ | hmm, no notification yet ... | 19:37 |
=== boiko_ is now known as boiko | ||
brendand | ogra_, umm yeah it would be good to have the paid apps change in the image we test | 19:49 |
ogra_ | ok, i'll trigger a new one | 19:49 |
ogra_ | probably my phone decides to notify me about that one then :P | 19:49 |
oSoMoN | trainguards: I need a reconfigure of RTM silo 3, I added a webbrowser-app MR to it (required to fix a regression in autopilot tests with oxide 1.3) | 19:49 |
robru | oSoMoN: done | 19:51 |
oSoMoN | robru, thanks! | 19:51 |
robru | oSoMoN: you're welcome! | 19:51 |
imgbot | === trainguards: RTM IMAGE 164 building (started: 20141118 19:55) === | 19:53 |
ogra_ | hmpf | 19:57 |
ogra_ | that first boot didnt take 10 but surely 4 minutes :/ | 19:58 |
cwayne1 | hrm | 19:59 |
cwayne1 | did it actually copy over the caches? | 19:59 |
ogra_ | geez ... all that stuff on the home scope now ... | 20:00 |
cwayne1 | just first boot | 20:00 |
cwayne1 | OOBE :) | 20:00 |
ogra_ | yeah | 20:00 |
oSoMoN | robru, can you advise on what failed here? https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-rtm-landing-003-1-build/96/console | 20:18 |
robru | oSoMoN: well the upload failed. I don't have access to the rejection message but cjwatson might be able to look that up for you if he's around. | 20:19 |
robru | oSoMoN: might be worth trying again, we had a transient upload failure yesterday | 20:19 |
robru | oSoMoN: wgrant might also be able to help. but yeah just retry the job for now | 20:21 |
robru | brb, lunc | 20:21 |
robru | lunch | 20:21 |
oSoMoN | robru, ok, thanks (and enjoy the lunch) | 20:21 |
cjwatson | 2014-11-18 19:56:16 DEBUG Rejected: | 20:24 |
cjwatson | 2014-11-18 19:56:16 DEBUG PPA exceeded its size limit (2303.00 of 2048.00 MiB). Ask a question in https://answers.launchpad.net/soyuz/ if you need more space. | 20:24 |
cjwatson | robru,oSoMoN: ^- | 20:24 |
cjwatson | let me fix that for you | 20:24 |
cjwatson | robru,oSoMoN: ok, retry please | 20:25 |
oSoMoN | cjwatson, thanks, it’s now building in the PPA (I hadn’t checked the size of the PPA) | 20:26 |
oSoMoN | this one keeps biting us everytime we put oxide in a silo | 20:27 |
cjwatson | roll on ephemeral PPAs which we might be able to have sensible per-package configuration for | 20:27 |
wgrant | What on earth are you building that exceeds 2GB in a silo? | 20:41 |
cjwatson | wgrant: $ grep-aptavail -XS oxide-qt -nsSize | numsum | 20:55 |
cjwatson | 1178574260 | 20:55 |
cjwatson | and that's just one arch | 20:55 |
cjwatson | oh, wait, that's twice what it should be because two versions in my apt cache, but still | 20:56 |
cjwatson | oxideqt-dbg is half a gig | 20:56 |
wgrant | Oh, -dbg, of course. | 21:00 |
imgbot | === trainguards: RTM IMAGE 164 DONE (finished: 20141118 21:05) === | 21:03 |
imgbot | === changelog: http://people.canonical.com/~ogra/touch-image-stats/rtm/164.changes === | 21:03 |
popey | \o/ | 21:04 |
tedg | trainguards, can I get silos for lines 69/70 please? | 21:04 |
popey | does #164 add payments? | 21:04 |
tedg | popey, If you wire your money directly to me we can work something out. | 21:05 |
popey | ;D | 21:05 |
popey | * Enable purchases by default (LP: #1393410) | 21:05 |
ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1393410 in unity-scope-click (Ubuntu) "[TOPBLOCKER] Apps with prices are not shown by default" [Critical,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1393410 | 21:05 |
popey | looks that way | 21:05 |
robru | tedg: rtm 13 and vivid 7 | 21:09 |
tedg | robru, Great, thanks! | 21:10 |
robru | tedg: you're welcome | 21:14 |
ahayzen | Hey, where do the latest rtm ci results appear, the latest i can see is #134 http://ci.ubuntu.com/smokeng/utopic/touch_stable/ ? | 21:24 |
ToyKeeper | cwayne1: Could you provide info on getting the custom tarball installed? I'm having trouble finding info on it. | 21:25 |
ToyKeeper | cwayne1: Nevermind, looks like you already answered. :) | 21:26 |
cwayne1 | ToyKeeper: :) i'd have put more info and mailed you, but i didn't know who'd be doing the testing (or when) | 21:27 |
jgdx | fginther, psivaa, hey, any progress on the uss ci? :) | 21:39 |
fginther | jgdx, yep. Performed another update and the tests are passing again - https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/autopilot-testrunner-otto-vivid/156/ | 21:49 |
fginther | jgdx, I've also requested that we automate the update process to better avoid this problem in the future | 21:50 |
jgdx | fginther, awesome, thanks. So the update is the cause of all this? | 21:55 |
fginther | jgdx, it's the 'lack' of an update. The test environment is base on a daily iso that appears to be getting stale very quickly. | 22:02 |
jgdx | fginther, right. Is it possible to follow the request you made somewhere? RT? | 22:03 |
fginther | jgdx, I added it to our backlog, I'll send you a link | 22:04 |
jgdx | fginther, thanks! | 22:08 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!