=== Mohi is now known as IAmNotThatGuy
[17:28] <hggdh> Ubuntu IRC meeting in 30 minutes
[17:54] <hggdh> IRC meeting in 5 minutes
[20:20] <genii> @expire 50720 1m
[20:20] <rww> itym @duration
[20:22] <genii> @duration 50720 1m
[20:22] <ubottu> Failed to set duration time on 50720 (not a ban or quiet)
[20:30] <genii> @duration 63778 1m
[20:30] <ubottu> 63778 will be removed after 1 minute.
[20:35] <genii> @duration 59931 1m
[20:35] <ubottu> 59931 will be removed after 1 minute.
[20:36] <genii> @duration 59742 1m
[20:36] <ubottu> Failed to set duration time on 59742 (not a ban or quiet)
[20:37] <genii> @duration 58336 1m
[20:37] <ubottu> Failed to set duration time on 58336 (unknow id)
[20:37] <genii> Hm.
[20:39] <Jordan_U> That's odd.
[20:39] <Jordan_U> And while we're on the subject of odd problems with ubottu...
[20:39] <Jordan_U> @duration 59201 1 minute
[20:39] <ubottu> Failed to set duration time on 59201 (bans not in sync)
[20:41] <genii> rww: All of my other ones which could have been lifted, other ops already removed long ago.
[20:42] <rww> the "bans not in sync" error means the ban is in bantracker but not on the actual channel banlist. to fix thise:
[20:42] <rww> @help clearban
[20:42] <ubottu> (clearban <id>[,<id> ...] [<comment>]) -- Marks the ban with <id> as removed with <comment>, if no comment is given it defaults to "Cleared by $nick".
[20:44] <Jordan_U> @clearban 59201
[20:44] <ubottu> Removed 59201
[20:44] <Jordan_U> rww: Thanks.
[20:46] <genii> rww: Any idea what the "unknow id" is?
[20:46] <rww> @btlogin
[20:46] <rww> hrm
[20:46] <rww> @duration 58336 1m
[20:46] <ubottu> 58336 will be removed after 1 minute.
[20:47] <rww> silly bot
[20:47] <genii> Weird
[20:47] <rww> and then "not a ban or quiet" is because it was a kick
[20:47] <rww> or remove, one or the other
[20:47] <rww> or mark, i guess
[20:47] <genii> Yeah, I finally caught on after I tried that twice and then re-checked BT
[20:49] <genii> The majority of my other actual bans are mostly stuff like HFS and similar which have to stay
[20:50] <rww> tbqh i think we need a big red "this ban needs to stay until something remarkable happens" button on bantracker :3
[20:50] <rww> although IP-based bans on HFSPLUS can probably go if they're more than a few days old. he changes it constantly
[20:50] <rww> (nick and what not should stay, obv)
[20:50] <rww> s/what not/such/
[20:53] <DJones> I changed my mind about that, if HFSplus joins & isn't banned he trolls, if he is banned he changes nick and still trolls, if HFSplus isn't banned, its obvious when its himand easier to kick wothout thinking  is it hfsplus
[20:55] <DJones> What seems to work best for him, is just removing from the channel & he stops (as far as I can see anyway)
[20:56] <rww> changed your mind about nickbans, I think that means?
[20:56] <rww> if so, yeah, that's the downside of them. I don't tend to set them because it makes it harder to notice the trolls
[21:03] <DJones> Not so much nickbans as a whole, but more for persitent trolls, we may as well make it easy for them to hilight themselves
[21:04]  * rww nods
[21:04] <DJones> Rather than forcing them to use a random unknown nick
[21:11] <Jordan_U> k1l: You're still op'd in #ubuntu.
[23:00] <babyspice> hfsplus is drunk
[23:00] <babyspice> yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
[23:00] <elky> you're always drunk
[23:00] <babyspice> elky, no shitttttt
[23:00] <babyspice> noooooooo waaaaaaaaaa