[06:46] <pitti> alesage: yes, I think dbus-mocking NM/upower (i. e. the system D-BUS services) is the right layer for indicator testing
[07:25] <pitti> alesage: wrt. bug 1087887 -- you know that dbusmock has shipped templates for NM, upower, bluez 4, bluez 5, ofono, logind, polkitd, notification-daemon, and some more?
[07:25] <pitti> alesage: if we need another one, I'm happy to look into it, but these should cover the most important system services
[16:08] <alesage> pitti thanks for that, wasn't aware there we so many templates (only aware of upower)--pitti are you aware of a way to fake the RTC?  I see that there's a timedated in systemd D-Bus
[16:10] <pitti> alesage: we have a template for timedated indeed, but that's for setting the timezone and setting the local RTC (faking it)
[16:11] <pitti> alesage: if you actually want to fake a different time, use the faketime package/tool
[16:12] <alesage> pitti, so libfaketime, ok thx we've looked into that a little
[16:20] <alesage> pitti actually reviewing your two lines above, what's the difference between setting the local RTC (faking it) and using the faketime tool?
[16:22] <pitti> alesage: the dbusmock doesn't actually change the RTC (of course; it can't), it just provides the timedated D-BUS call
[16:23] <pitti> alesage: not sure, but faketime mostly just fakes the system clock; someting which actually queries the hardware RTC can't be faked I'm afraid
[16:23] <pitti> well, it could of course, but not sure if libfaketime does that too
[20:11] <Letozaf_> balloons, hello
[20:11] <balloons> Letozaf_, howdy
[20:12] <Letozaf_> balloons, I was checking the next bug to fix: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-filemanager-app/+bug/1385364
[20:12] <Letozaf_> balloons, I think this problem does not occur anymore as there is palces page now
[20:12] <Letozaf_> balloons, well at least on the phone
[20:13] <balloons> Letozaf_, yep should be all fixed now due to the changes
[20:13] <Letozaf_> balloons, o
[20:13] <Letozaf_> balloons, sorry ... pressed enter
[20:13] <Letozaf_> balloons, so is that bug to be marked invalid or what ?
[20:16] <balloons> Letozaf_, ohh I thought it was this one: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-filemanager-app/+bug/1379943
[20:16] <balloons> Letozaf_, I would ask arto about that one
[20:17] <Letozaf_> balloons, ok I will
[20:24] <elopio> thomi: https://code.launchpad.net/~canonical-platform-qa/ueqa-code-proposals/indicator-messages-open_message/+merge/242284
[20:24] <Letozaf_> balloons, what about this one: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-filemanager-app/+bug/1393973   can I do something, I mean do you mean each test has to be launched once without any switch, once with -p and once with -t  ?
[20:32] <balloons> Letozaf_, I would create 2 seperate launchers. One that uses -p, the other than uses -t
[20:33] <balloons> it's possible jenkins will still hate us, let me see
[20:38] <balloons> Letozaf_, I'm guessing since we have the screen resolution set it might not work out actually on jenkins
[20:39] <Letozaf_> balloons, oh, now I understand
[20:41] <balloons> Letozaf_, I will update the bug and let's leave it for now
[20:41] <Letozaf_> balloons, ok
[20:42] <Letozaf_> balloons, so if I am not mistaken filemanager app has no autopilot bugs to fix now
[20:42] <Letozaf_> balloons, I will move on to telegram then
[20:43] <balloons> Letozaf_, there's actually https://code.launchpad.net/~nikwen/ubuntu-filemanager-app/zips/+merge/239662 and https://code.launchpad.net/~nikwen/ubuntu-filemanager-app/tars/+merge/240986
[20:43]  * Letozaf_ is looking
[20:45] <balloons> Letozaf_, it's a new feature and would be good to get some tests for it :-)
[20:46] <Letozaf_> balloons, ok, but do I have to wait for it to be merged, or do I just pull these branches and try to work on those ?
[20:47] <balloons> Letozaf_, you could ask Niklas to make it a common branch so you can edit along with him
[20:47] <balloons> I think that makes it better. Or simply create a new branch
[20:47] <balloons> you can then propose to merge it into his branch
[20:48] <balloons> i'd like to see everything go in at the same time
[20:49] <Letozaf_> balloons, maybe it's better I create a new branch and propose to merge into his
[20:51] <balloons> Letozaf_, sure you might be correct
[20:51] <balloons> anyways, it should be interesting to get right
[20:52] <Letozaf_> balloons, yes I am reading to see how it works so I can think of a test
[20:52] <balloons> Letozaf_, I would say you could create zips and just add them as resources to the tests instead of making them on the fly
[20:53] <Letozaf_> balloons, yes I suppose that's because you just want to see if they get opened and not created, right ?
[21:06] <Letozaf_> balloons, so I can put some zips in a directory named "content" as music-app does
[21:07] <balloons> Letozaf_, yep
[21:07] <balloons> Letozaf_, and yes.. file manager is just adding extraction capabilities, so that's all we want to test
[21:07] <balloons> and we want to make sure they are good files. better to have known good stuff
[21:08] <Letozaf_> balloons, what should I zip as resource ?
[21:09] <Letozaf_> balloons, I mean anything or something particular
[21:11] <balloons> Letozaf_, lol, I would just create a tiny one locally
[21:11] <balloons> zip a text file and a little picture maybe
[21:12] <Letozaf_> balloons, you want two zip files or one containing the text and picture ?
[21:14] <balloons> Letozaf_, keep it simple for now.. but sure we could go a little nuts I suppose
[21:19] <dkessel> Letozaf_: you could add one file to the root folder, and one file in a subfolder
[21:19] <dkessel> to check if subfolders are extracted
[21:20] <Letozaf_> dkessel, yes sounds good if balloons approves :)
[21:20] <dkessel> buona sera btw ;)
[21:20] <Letozaf_> dkessel, buona sera :)
[21:23] <balloons> dkessel, good idea
[21:23] <balloons> so yea, more than 1 file, more than 1 type of file, more than 1 folder
[21:23] <balloons> create a file or two in subfolders as well
[21:24] <Letozaf_> balloons, dkessel ok so let's do it :-P
[21:24] <dkessel> mama mia
[21:24] <Letozaf_> dkessel, lol I'm the one who should say mamma mia ! :-P I am writing the test :-P
[21:24] <dkessel> i can create a zip file... sure :)
[21:25] <Letozaf_> dkessel, with "let's do it" I meant only me :-P
[21:25] <Letozaf_> dkessel, I should have wrote "let me do it" :D
[21:26] <dkessel> probably. if you do not have multiple personalities
[21:26]  * balloons watches
[21:27]  * Letozaf_ should think before writing :-P
[21:32]  * dkessel continues the /me round
[21:32] <Letozaf_> :)
[21:34]  * dkessel tries "update-manager -d" today
[21:35] <dkessel> hah. it still says upgrading "Kubuntu" on Xubuntu
[21:36] <knome> :||
[21:37] <balloons> dkessel, did you ever install kubuntu?
[21:38]  * balloons wonders what that is keying off of
[21:38] <dkessel> balloons: never
[21:39] <dkessel> it would be funny if it just checked for some qt package...
[21:40] <dkessel> yay, it did not crash today
[21:43] <Letozaf_> balloons, https://code.launchpad.net/~nikwen/ubuntu-filemanager-app/zips/+merge/239662  has not got the latest tests, what should I do not to mess things up ?
[21:43] <balloons> Letozaf_, ohh.. well, he should merge trunk. You can do the same
[21:43] <Letozaf_> balloons, ok
[21:53] <Letozaf_> balloons, I understand reading that unzip landed in rtm image and not in devel-proposed, it I launch filemanager in vivid I suppose it's like I am on devel-proposed, right ?
[21:53] <Letozaf_> it -> if
[21:53] <Letozaf_> balloons, so to see the changes work I have to launch it on my device with rtm flashed
[21:55] <dkessel> oh noes.
[21:56]  * dkessel wishes he had not tried to upgrade his real machine today
[21:56]  * dkessel watches package upgrade failures rain
[21:56] <balloons> dkessel, :-( utopic to vivid?
[21:57] <dkessel> balloons: yup
[21:58] <dkessel> "triggers form a loop" (or something like that in english).... heh. gonna report that one
[22:00] <Letozaf_> oops getting late, good night everyone, going to bed :) see you tomorrow
[22:11] <dkessel> elfy will be proud - so many bugs in one test run
[22:47] <dkessel> night