tsdgeos | Saviq: are we going to land stuff soon ? https://code.launchpad.net/~unity-team/unity8/trunk/+activereviews is getting crowded again | 09:21 |
---|---|---|
Saviq | tsdgeos, yeah, I'll prep a silo today | 09:21 |
tsdgeos | :) | 09:21 |
=== vrruiz_ is now known as rvr | ||
Saviq | pstolowski, hey, you had a silo for bottom edge in dash didn't you? | 09:53 |
Saviq | damn mterry has all the tags again | 09:54 |
mzanetti | :) | 09:54 |
Saviq | pstolowski, hmm or was it kgunn's silo | 09:55 |
Saviq | in any case, what's the status there from your PoV? | 09:55 |
pstolowski | Saviq, I had last week, but had to pull that feature off for a moment from that silo | 10:08 |
Saviq | pstolowski, ok | 10:08 |
pstolowski | Saviq, because of the issues with search (and we had to unblock and land other stuff) | 10:08 |
Saviq | pstolowski, I'm landing unity8 soon, but without the bottom menu then | 10:08 |
pstolowski | Saviq, we're waiting for green light fro search changes from design today. when we get it, i'll request a new silo | 10:09 |
pstolowski | Saviq, ok, sure | 10:09 |
Saviq | pstolowski, yup, I should be hopefully done by then | 10:09 |
=== dandrader is now known as dandrader|afk | ||
=== greyback_ is now known as greyback | ||
tsdgeos | Cimi: https://code.launchpad.net/~cimi/unity8/fix-1368778-2/+merge/242942 ? | 11:10 |
tsdgeos | mzanetti: why are you marked as reviewer in https://code.launchpad.net/~mzanetti/unity8/spread-opacity-changes/+merge/242915 ? | 11:10 |
=== _salem is now known as salem_ | ||
tsdgeos | MacSlow: how is https://code.launchpad.net/~macslow/unity8/swipe-dismiss-snap-decisions/+merge/233347 going? | 11:10 |
mzanetti | tsdgeos: wrong click in launchpad... I wanted to "request another review" but accidentally clicked on "claim review" | 11:11 |
tsdgeos | mzanetti: ah, ok | 11:11 |
tsdgeos | i'll top approve then | 11:11 |
mzanetti | tsdgeos: cool, thanks | 11:11 |
MacSlow | tsdgeos, almost...I'll poke you when it's ready | 11:13 |
tsdgeos | MacSlow: cool :) | 11:13 |
tsdgeos | Saviq: why didn't CI run in https://code.launchpad.net/~nick-dedekind/unity8/lp1385331.led/+merge/241417 ? | 11:14 |
Saviq | tsdgeos, good queston | 11:14 |
Saviq | +i | 11:15 |
* Saviq needs to talk to fginther | 11:15 | |
tsdgeos | Saviq: if you have the vpn setup can you trigger it? | 11:15 |
Saviq | tsdgeos, yeah doing | 11:15 |
tsdgeos | tx | 11:15 |
Saviq | tsdgeos, ah, think I found the reason... | 11:15 |
Saviq | tsdgeos, jobs are blocked for 2 days now | 11:15 |
tsdgeos | oh | 11:15 |
Saviq | on autopilot | 11:16 |
tsdgeos | all to the red! | 11:16 |
Saviq | yeah | 11:16 |
tsdgeos | that's bad :/ | 11:16 |
=== dandrader|afk is now known as dandrader | ||
tsdgeos | Saviq: so what do you want to do with https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity8/+bug/1384776 ? The root cause is fixed in Qt but we can still make it "better" (i.e. less dbus handling) with https://code.launchpad.net/~aacid/unity8/networkingstatus in our side | 11:29 |
ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1384776 in unity8 (Ubuntu) "Occasional hang in unity 8 dash on the phone" [High,In progress] | 11:29 |
tsdgeos | want to keep it open or just mark it as invalid? | 11:29 |
tsdgeos | since it isn't really an unity8 bug? | 11:29 |
Saviq | tsdgeos, invalidated | 11:29 |
facundobatista | Holas | 11:29 |
tsdgeos | Saviq: oki | 11:30 |
tsdgeos | Saviq: hola hola | 11:30 |
Saviq | tsdgeos, ? | 11:31 |
tsdgeos | er | 11:31 |
tsdgeos | facundobatista: hola hola | 11:31 |
tsdgeos | Saviq: wrong mind autocompletion | 11:31 |
Saviq | tsdgeos, "hola hola" is ~"waaaait a minute" in PL ;D | 11:31 |
facundobatista | tsdgeos, :) | 11:31 |
tsdgeos | Saviq: really? | 11:31 |
tsdgeos | lol | 11:31 |
Saviq | tsdgeos, yeah, it's a sound you'd make when someone would get ahead of themselves | 11:32 |
Saviq | not a real word I think | 11:32 |
Saviq | actually it is, means "stop doing that!" according to the dictionary | 11:33 |
alan_g | greyback: as promised I've been hacking at qtmir - would you take a look at https://code.launchpad.net/~alan-griffiths/qtmir/new-migrate-to-mir-Server-API/+merge/243177 when you have the time? | 11:36 |
greyback | alan_g: certainly | 11:37 |
mzanetti | Saviq: hey, seeing you unassign RTM targets from yourself, should I stop assigning them to you? | 11:38 |
Saviq | mzanetti, yeah, someone else might be landing after all | 11:39 |
mzanetti | ok | 11:39 |
Saviq | mzanetti, I'll be leaving them New until we know when to land, Triaged when they have a milestone into RTM, and assign them, and make In Progress, when I actually want to silo them | 11:39 |
mzanetti | ok | 11:39 |
Cimi | tsdgeos, fixed | 11:43 |
tsdgeos | Cimi: ok | 11:44 |
mzanetti | dandrader: what's the ETA for the rotation stuff? | 11:45 |
dandrader | mzanetti, I guess late next week. | 11:50 |
dandrader | mzanetti, code is pretty much done. but the last 3% can be slow. like coordinating changes with SDK | 11:52 |
tsdgeos | Cimi: why all that commenting code? | 11:52 |
Cimi | tsdgeos, because mzanetti says we will need something similar for desktop | 11:52 |
mzanetti | dandrader: well, I hoped that desktop stuff would have landed a week ago... by now it's so many branches chained that I stopped working on it because it's becoming a pain | 11:52 |
mzanetti | Saviq: is there something that prevents us from landing the desktop stuff? | 11:53 |
Cimi | tsdgeos, we have option of making the timer do nothing (but still running it), or comment code | 11:53 |
Saviq | mzanetti, they're not reviewed? ;) | 11:53 |
mzanetti | Saviq: well, the first one is, by gerry | 11:53 |
* greyback gonna have a review day, so can look at them | 11:54 | |
Saviq | mzanetti, not acked though https://code.launchpad.net/~mzanetti/unity8/desktop-stage/+merge/242140 | 11:54 |
greyback | mzanetti: ^^ | 11:54 |
mzanetti | greyback: cool | 11:54 |
Saviq | mzanetti, one thing I'd add there - a minimum GU size for desktop stage | 11:55 |
Saviq | mzanetti, not sure we want desktop stage on phone even if you enable it... | 11:55 |
greyback | but but convergence! | 11:56 |
Saviq | maybe we do, after all The Hypothesis Generator™ will take it into account | 11:56 |
mzanetti | Saviq: yeah... but that's the kind of stuff that will change a lot... | 11:56 |
mzanetti | exactly the HG will come into place | 11:56 |
mzanetti | for now I'd say lets keep disruptive changes in Shell.qml as small as possible | 11:56 |
Saviq | kk | 11:56 |
mzanetti | (imho) | 11:56 |
Saviq | mzanetti, you know, though, we'll need this all to become a single stage in the end? for nice transitions between modes? ;) | 11:57 |
mzanetti | I was thinking about that yeah... | 11:57 |
mzanetti | really not sure how to do that yet | 11:58 |
Saviq | seb128, I just grepped through /usr for Ubuntu.Connectivity, looks like you guys are using it but not depending on it | 11:58 |
Saviq | and we just dropped our dep | 11:58 |
=== MacSlow is now known as MacSlow|lunch | ||
Saviq | mzanetti, unity8.application_lifecycle.tests.test_application_lifecycle.ApplicationLifecycleTests.test_app_moves_from_unfocused_to_focused fails with your spread changes (I expect the spread threshold change, as it's getting into spread when it shouldn't) | 12:06 |
Saviq | silo 3 for reference | 12:06 |
mzanetti | ack, will check | 12:07 |
Saviq | tsdgeos, small one for you https://code.launchpad.net/~saviq/ubuntu-system-settings/add-connectivity-dep/+merge/243273 | 12:09 |
Saviq | tsdgeos, but also, unity8.shell.tests.test_emulators.GenericScopeViewEmulatorTestCase.test_open_preview fails | 12:10 |
Saviq | tsdgeos, it seems with all your branches it takes a really long time for the dash to load the fake scopes | 12:10 |
Saviq | mzanetti, tsdgeos, it's all in silo 3 for reference | 12:10 |
* Saviq is running qml tests on it then | 12:10 | |
Saviq | http://people.canonical.com/~platform/citrain_dashboard/#?distro=ubuntu&q=landing-003 | 12:11 |
mzanetti | tsdgeos: sorry, vesar just found an issue with this: https://code.launchpad.net/~mzanetti/unity8/spread-opacity-changes/+merge/242915 | 12:11 |
tsdgeos | Saviq: that's autopilot, right? | 12:11 |
mzanetti | tsdgeos: I fixed it already, but requires another approval I guess | 12:11 |
Saviq | tsdgeos, yes | 12:11 |
tsdgeos | Saviq: doesn't make sense it takes more time, but i'll check | 12:11 |
Saviq | tsdgeos, yeah, I know, but I can see it sit there for a really long time | 12:12 |
tsdgeos | ok | 12:14 |
tsdgeos | mzanetti: pushed? | 12:15 |
mzanetti | tsdgeos: I'd say yes | 12:15 |
tsdgeos | mzanetti: don't se it in the mr page | 12:15 |
mzanetti | tsdgeos: rev 1452 | 12:15 |
mzanetti | tsdgeos: diff looks good too | 12:16 |
mzanetti | not sure why it doesn't show up in the comments history | 12:16 |
Saviq | tsdgeos, looks like the failure first showed up in https://code.launchpad.net/~aacid/unity8/photoscopeimprovements/+merge/239834 | 12:16 |
Saviq | tsdgeos, CI phones are dead until someone goes there and reflashes them, so for another few hours still | 12:16 |
tsdgeos | ok | 12:16 |
Saviq | tsdgeos, yeah, same failure I got https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/generic-deb-autopilot-runner-vivid-mako/334/testReport/junit/unity8.shell.tests.test_emulators/GenericScopeViewEmulatorTestCase/test_open_preview_Nexus_4_/ | 12:17 |
tsdgeos | oki, will check | 12:17 |
Saviq | we need more reliable AP tests, both of the tests I just saw fail failed in CI, too :? | 12:21 |
Saviq | /food | 12:21 |
tsdgeos | Saviq: approved https://code.launchpad.net/~saviq/ubuntu-system-settings/add-connectivity-dep/+merge/243273 | 12:21 |
Saviq | tsdgeos, tx | 12:21 |
Saviq | Cimi, hey, could you help dandrader and greyback testing shell rotation today? | 12:35 |
Saviq | dandrader, greyback, what device btw? | 12:35 |
greyback | Saviq: phone for first pass | 12:35 |
greyback | then tablet after, N7, then N10 is possible | 12:36 |
Saviq | greyback, maybe we can parallelize then | 12:38 |
greyback | sure, if anyone else available | 12:39 |
Saviq | MacSlow|lunch, when you swallow, could you help the guys test shell rotation ↑ | 12:41 |
Saviq | https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Unity8/FullShellRotation | 12:41 |
MacSlow|lunch | Saviq, noted | 12:42 |
seb128 | Saviq, hey, could be, can you open a bug about that? | 12:44 |
Saviq | seb128, already building in my silo, want a bug nevertheless? | 12:45 |
seb128 | Saviq, no, it was for tracking, you have a mp coming that works too ;-) | 12:45 |
Saviq | seb128, https://code.launchpad.net/~saviq/ubuntu-system-settings/add-connectivity-dep/+merge/243273 | 12:45 |
seb128 | Saviq, why did you guys stop depending on it? Is it buggy/should we stop using it as well? | 12:46 |
Saviq | tsdgeos, ↑ | 12:47 |
tsdgeos | we did and then we did not | 12:47 |
Saviq | seb128, ah no, we just didn't need it | 12:47 |
tsdgeos | lunch calling, i'll give a longer answer later :D | 12:47 |
* Saviq conflates it with QNAM stil | 12:47 | |
Saviq | l | 12:47 |
Saviq | mzanetti, testPhoneStage fails for me here, too | 12:51 |
mzanetti | really | 12:52 |
Saviq | in test_enterSpread | 12:52 |
Saviq | and test_selectAppFromSpread | 12:52 |
mzanetti | strange... I did test/fix that | 12:52 |
mzanetti | will check again | 12:52 |
Cimi | Saviq, sure | 12:52 |
Saviq | mzanetti, it passed fine in jenkins, at least a while ago | 12:53 |
Saviq | mzanetti, but it might be some interaction with the other MPs | 12:54 |
Saviq | although nothing seems related | 12:54 |
* Saviq tries trunk + reversible | 12:55 | |
Saviq | mzanetti, yeah in ↑I get 4 failures | 12:57 |
Saviq | 5 from the silo | 12:57 |
mzanetti | Saviq: ap test fixed. looking into qmltests now | 12:58 |
Saviq | tx | 12:58 |
mzanetti | Totals: 25 passed, 0 failed, 0 skipped | 12:59 |
mzanetti | yeah, fails after merging | 13:00 |
Saviq | mzanetti, aha, lp:~dandrader/unity8/fixTestCaseTouchFlick impacts that, too | 13:01 |
Saviq | got 6 fails now | 13:01 |
Saviq | with yours + ↑ | 13:01 |
Saviq | need food | 13:01 |
=== MacSlow|lunch is now known as MacSlow | ||
mzanetti | Saviq: should all work again now | 13:23 |
Saviq | mzanetti, okies | 13:43 |
tsdgeos | seb128: Saviq: so we were using it for something, we don't need it anymore since we changed the feature, so it's gone, *but* it will be back once https://code.launchpad.net/~aacid/unity8/networkingstatus/+merge/239694 is merged | 13:51 |
seb128 | tsdgeos, ok, good to know, thanks | 13:51 |
Saviq | well, back but in a different way | 13:51 |
Saviq | not the qml module | 13:51 |
Saviq | but the Qt lib | 13:51 |
tsdgeos | seb128: so no, it's not "bad", it's just that we're not using it for what we used to be because we don't do that anymore | 13:52 |
tsdgeos | Saviq: true | 13:52 |
seb128 | k | 13:52 |
=== dandrader is now known as dandrader|afk | ||
larsu | tsdgeos: is this the thing using the new nm property that desrt added? | 14:07 |
tsdgeos | larsu: i don't know | 14:08 |
larsu | tsdgeos: you proposed the branch, no? | 14:08 |
tsdgeos | larsu: yes, i am not the coder of libconnectivity-qt1-dev, just the user | 14:08 |
mterry | mzanetti, hey, remember when you were looking at that branch that loaded the greeter async, and I had some weird problems with the infographic that were solved by an empty Connections object? Where did we leave that? Did you end up having any thoughts of where I should look? | 14:09 |
mzanetti | mterry: not really, sorry... I do agree something weird is going on, but couldn't figure what | 14:09 |
larsu | tsdgeos: hm, seems to use com.ubuntu.connectivity1... | 14:10 |
mterry | mzanetti, I guess I should play with timing (which was what originally exposed the problem) and see if I can make it go away | 14:10 |
tsdgeos | Saviq: is there a branch with all those branches in silo3? | 14:10 |
mzanetti | mterry: yeah... there are different ways of making it go away, still a bit unsatisfying that we've no idea what's going on | 14:11 |
larsu | pete-woods: what supplied com.ubuntu.connectivity1? | 14:11 |
larsu | sorry, *supplies | 14:11 |
Saviq | tsdgeos, not a branch, but you can take the tarball from https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/landing-003/+sourcepub/4596048/+listing-archive-extra | 14:11 |
Saviq | mterry, you got tags all over the place again | 14:11 |
mterry | Saviq, ugh do you have a branch list? | 14:12 |
Saviq | mterry, ./strip-tags.py `grep lp: | cut -d" " -f1` | 14:12 |
Saviq | mterry, and paste the whole of https://code.launchpad.net/unity8/+activereviews | 14:13 |
Saviq | mterry, and Ctrl+D | 14:13 |
mterry | hah | 14:13 |
mzanetti | still doesn't work for me :D | 14:13 |
Saviq | mterry, but really, you must have them locally somewhere, just make sure you run the script on all your local checkouts too | 14:13 |
mzanetti | look at that. it does work now | 14:15 |
mterry | Saviq, yup. Just sometimes it seems like the remotes ones hold on to tags even after I've cleaned things locally | 14:15 |
mterry | So I need to make sure I do a clean sweep of both at the same time | 14:15 |
Saviq | mterry, they *always* do hang to the tags | 14:22 |
Saviq | mterry, you have to run the strip tags script on lp:~foo | 14:22 |
=== jgdxx is now known as jgdx | ||
pete-woods | larsu: I think that's the connectivity API | 14:26 |
pete-woods | larsu: maintained by Wellark | 14:26 |
larsu | pete-woods: no, that just uses it. Looks like indicator-network (of all places?) supplies it | 14:26 |
larsu | pete-woods: I wonder why it's not using the property desrt added to network-manager | 14:27 |
pete-woods | larsu: maybe it should? maybe Wellark doesn't know about this new property? maybe it's not what he needed? (I have no context here) | 14:27 |
larsu | pete-woods: me neither. Trying to find out right now. Just pinged you because you wrote connectivity-api, but that seems to be the qt wrapper only | 14:28 |
larsu | pete-woods: I thought we talked to the relevant people in DC, but apparently it didn't trickly through or something | 14:29 |
pete-woods | larsu: I didn't write connectivity API. I generated some Qt bindings that the indictor secret-agent uses | 14:29 |
pete-woods | perhaps they are also used for connectivity API now | 14:29 |
larsu | pete-woods: ah, might be. Saw your name on launchpad on some page associated with it. Sorry :) | 14:30 |
pete-woods | larsu: yeah, I created the project on LP for Antti, as he was v. busy at that point | 14:30 |
larsu | :) | 14:31 |
pete-woods | :) | 14:31 |
mterry | Saviq, fyi, all my branches are clean of tags now | 14:51 |
tedg | larsu, I think that long term we won't be able to use that as we want to move applications off of talking to the system bus. | 14:55 |
tedg | larsu, When we loose fine grained control of dbus with kdbus we won't be able to do confinement of specific attributes. | 14:56 |
larsu | tedg: it still talks to the bus via an API and we don't lose anything with kdbus, it's just that the service does the enforcing now instead of the daemon | 14:59 |
tedg | larsu, No, the service does the enforcing not the security module… which is designed to enforce policy. | 15:03 |
tedg | larsu, It does it via the daemon, but it can't in the future as there's not enough information available. | 15:04 |
larsu | tedg: what information is missing? The kernel supplies all the necessary bits, no? | 15:04 |
tedg | larsu, Nope, the headers were removed as "redundant" | 15:05 |
larsu | tedg: I don't think that's true, but I also don't care enough to have this argument now | 15:05 |
=== karni is now known as karni-afk | ||
tsdgeos | Saviq: i can reproduce the problem, trying to find out if i can see why is it so much slower in autopilot or at least just make it pass | 15:26 |
=== dandrader|afk is now known as dandrader | ||
=== alan_g is now known as alan_g|tea | ||
attente_ | mzanetti: hi | 15:46 |
attente_ | mzanetti: how did you implement this (window positioning)? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MXHulRlq10s, is it using the mir client api? | 15:47 |
mzanetti | attente_: it's using that api through qtmir | 15:49 |
mzanetti | so in the end it's just moving QtQuick items around | 15:49 |
attente_ | mzanetti: how does qtmir tell mir where to place the surfaces? is there a way? | 15:52 |
attente_ | mzanetti: also, could you point me to the branch where your window management code is? | 15:52 |
tsdgeos | Saviq: i pushed a change that makes the test pass | 15:53 |
tsdgeos | i'll now revert to trunk and see if it's really slower or just more async (and that's why i need wait_select_single instead of select_single) | 15:53 |
=== karni-afk is now known as karni | ||
mzanetti | attente_: this is the branch in unity8: https://code.launchpad.net/~mzanetti/unity8/desktop-stage | 15:57 |
mzanetti | attente_: and this is the qtmir code, the one that does the interaction with mir: https://code.launchpad.net/~mir-team/qtmir/trunk | 15:57 |
attente_ | mzanetti: thanks! i'll take a look | 15:59 |
mzanetti | attente_: so what happens is that qtmir maps the client buffer to a QQuickItem | 16:02 |
mzanetti | attente_: based on the position and size of that QQuickItem in the shell, qtmir tells Mir where to draw the buffer | 16:02 |
mzanetti | maybe even draws it on its own, not exactly sure | 16:02 |
attente_ | mzanetti: but there isn't any client api for specifying the position of the surface is there? | 16:03 |
mzanetti | attente_: ah, hmm... not sure if we support that yet. definitely not up to the unity8 level yet. it's on our todo | 16:05 |
mzanetti | attente_: the plan is to use the toolkit's apis. so in Qt you would resize your QApplicationWindow (or what it's called) | 16:05 |
attente_ | mzanetti: oh. forgot to mention, we're need to implement this in the gdk-mir backend :) | 16:06 |
mzanetti | attente_: right... so I don't know much about gdk, but I assume there is some sort of MainWindow class there too | 16:07 |
mzanetti | greyback: do you know about the state of the client positioning/sizing api? | 16:08 |
attente_ | mzanetti: right, but we can't implement it at all if we don't have a way to position surfaces in the client api, no? | 16:08 |
mzanetti | attente_: good question. I don't know about the state of that in Mir. I'm mostly looking at it from the shell perspective. You might want to ask in #ubuntu-mir about the client side apis | 16:09 |
greyback | attente_: Mir will not allow clients to position themselves in general. But it will allow clients to request position & dimensions for a surface on creation, but that's not implemented yet unfortunately | 16:09 |
greyback | it will be up to the shell to decide whether to do what the client asks or not. | 16:10 |
attente_ | greyback: so if a gtk app asks to set the position of the window, we have to request it from the shell? | 16:11 |
greyback | attente_: you can ask for x:100, y:200. The shell might honor it, it might not, depending on its policy (e.g. on a phone, those coordinates would not be respected) | 16:12 |
mzanetti | I guess you still request it from Mir, that one will forward it to the shell and the shell then does it (or not) | 16:12 |
greyback | attente_: for menus, shell is very likely to respect the position | 16:12 |
greyback | but that position will be relative to the parent surface | 16:12 |
=== alan_g|tea is now known as alan_g | ||
dandrader | mzanetti, I'm purging that ApplicationManager.ExecFlags in the shellRotation branches as it's no longer needed (as we now have separate Phone and Tablet stages) | 17:21 |
mzanetti | dandrader: +1 | 17:21 |
mzanetti | dandrader: I think qtmir shouldn't on which stage some surface is | 17:22 |
mzanetti | dandrader: I think qtmir shouldn't know on which stage some surface is | 17:22 |
mzanetti | or at least it shouldn't care about it | 17:22 |
mzanetti | maybe for convenience some flag is to be stored in there, but it shouldn't actually do anything with it | 17:22 |
mzanetti | dandrader: greyback is purging focus handling from there currently, you might want to sync with him as he probably killed that flag too | 17:23 |
dandrader | greyback, hmmm, do you plan to land that branch before shellRotation? | 17:24 |
greyback | dandrader: after | 17:24 |
greyback | dandrader: if you're making changes that aren't essential to shell rotation, please keep them in separate branches to minimize diffs | 17:25 |
dandrader | greyback, there are quite a few cases like this in the shellRotation branches | 17:28 |
greyback | dandrader: ok well use your judgement | 17:28 |
dandrader | greyback, I would like to put them all in separate MPs | 17:28 |
dandrader | greyback, but the work involved in creating and testing them all is just too much | 17:28 |
dandrader | too time consuming | 17:28 |
=== dandrader is now known as dandrader|afk | ||
greyback | dandrader: sure I see that. But just consider the reviewers | 17:31 |
=== greyback is now known as greyback|afk | ||
=== dandrader|afk is now known as dandrader | ||
=== alan_g is now known as alan_g|EOD | ||
cwayne | blargh, after installing fglrx my cursor is huge -- changing /org/gnome/desktop/interface/cursor-size doesnt seem to stick.. | 19:08 |
cwayne | anyone have any idea why setting a setting in dconf-editor wouldn't stick across reboots? | 19:45 |
cwayne | Trevinho: ping | 19:58 |
cwayne | bregma: also ping | 20:03 |
davmor2 | cwayne: it hates you? | 20:10 |
davmor2 | cwayne: check your resolution in the catalyst admin app | 20:11 |
=== broder__ is now known as broder | ||
bregma | cwayne, no idea, dconf is dconf | 20:11 |
cwayne | so there's something weird re: scaling and my cursor | 20:12 |
cwayne | if im in chrome/pidgin its one size, then as soon as i go to the launcher, cursor gets huge | 20:13 |
cwayne | driving me completely insane | 20:13 |
Saviq | mterry, all your local checkouts, too? :) | 21:16 |
mterry | Saviq, yes :) | 21:16 |
Saviq | mterry, coolz | 21:18 |
=== Pici is now known as Guest74903 | ||
=== Zhenech_ is now known as Zhenech | ||
=== Trevinho_ is now known as Trevinho | ||
=== robru_ is now known as robru | ||
=== salem_ is now known as _salem |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!