| === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
| === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
| sergiusens | robru: can you help me out with https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-009-1-build/146/console ? | 02:01 |
|---|---|---|
| imgbot | === trainguards: IMAGE 40 building (started: 20141202 02:05) === | 02:04 |
| rsalveti | sergiusens: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/goget-ubuntu-touch | 02:17 |
| rsalveti | sergiusens: dual changes are not yet in release | 02:17 |
| rsalveti | and the other MR is probably not yet merged | 02:17 |
| rsalveti | actually, no | 02:18 |
| rsalveti | weird, an older version is stuck in proposed | 02:18 |
| rsalveti | how could that happen | 02:18 |
| sergiusens | rsalveti: I don't know... | 02:18 |
| rsalveti | sergiusens: both seems to be the same upload | 02:19 |
| rsalveti | https://launchpadlibrarian.net/191444158/goget-ubuntu-touch_0.5-0ubuntu1_0.4%2B15.04.20141128-0ubuntu1.diff.gz | 02:19 |
| sergiusens | rsalveti: hmm, seems someone "published" line 43 in the sheet | 02:19 |
| rsalveti | sergiusens: it seems train did 2 uploads at the same time? | 02:19 |
| sergiusens | rsalveti: but it was never set to testing yes :( | 02:19 |
| rsalveti | that is an interesting behavior | 02:19 |
| rsalveti | infinity: around? | 02:19 |
| rsalveti | infinity: if so, check https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/goget-ubuntu-touch | 02:19 |
| rsalveti | sergiusens: hm, right | 02:20 |
| rsalveti | sergiusens: do you remember the ppa number for that one? | 02:20 |
| rsalveti | lp might say that | 02:21 |
| rsalveti | one is from ppa 03 | 02:21 |
| sergiusens | 03 | 02:21 |
| robru | sergiusens: ah, you should be able to just FORCE_REBUILD that silo and it'll plow over that other wrong version | 02:21 |
| rsalveti | and the other seems to be a dput? | 02:21 |
| rsalveti | sergiusens: did you do a dput manually? | 02:21 |
| sergiusens | rsalveti: yes, the train was broken on Friday | 02:21 |
| rsalveti | oh, right, then that explains one piece | 02:21 |
| robru | sergiusens: sorry I gotta run, but yeah after you dput'd I fixed up your silo and then did a normal publish. your dput "won" because of the higher version. should be safe to just disregard and force the build job | 02:22 |
| rsalveti | one interesting thing though is that the other upload (one in proposed) should, in theory, be refused by lp | 02:22 |
| sergiusens | robru: my dput won because it was 2 hours before ;-) | 02:22 |
| rsalveti | and that's clearly not the case | 02:22 |
| robru | sergiusens: that too ;-) | 02:22 |
| sergiusens | robru: and I didn't set 'testing' to yes either ;-) | 02:22 |
| robru | sergiusens: if you hadn't bumped the version though my secondary publish would have overwritten yours. | 02:22 |
| rsalveti | guess because the upload done by the train is actually a package sync | 02:24 |
| rsalveti | still, maybe we just found a race, not sure | 02:24 |
| rsalveti | an archive admin should be able to give a proper answer | 02:24 |
| robru | rsalveti: shouldn't be a race, I manually triggered a publish there. | 02:25 |
| rsalveti | robru: right, but sergiusens did a dput before that, and with a version that's higher than the one you did | 02:25 |
| rsalveti | which was migrated just fine for release | 02:25 |
| rsalveti | but then the now older version is stuck in proposed | 02:25 |
| robru | rsalveti: yeah, that's why my version got stuck in proposed, because it was too low to get through to release ;-) | 02:25 |
| robru | rsalveti: the next silo to publish it should safely overwrite the one in proposed and then also migrate to release just fine if the new version is higher. | 02:26 |
| rsalveti | robru: right, but I believe the right thing here is lp refusing your upload | 02:26 |
| rsalveti | you can't upload something that is older | 02:26 |
| robru | rsalveti: but why would it refuse an upload to proposed if the package wasn't in proposed? | 02:26 |
| rsalveti | robru: because there was a newer one in release :-) | 02:26 |
| rsalveti | guess a package copy directly into -proposed made that happen | 02:27 |
| robru | rsalveti: but does it check that? wouldn't it just say 'oh this package doesn't exist in proposed, i'll accept it' | 02:27 |
| rsalveti | robru: not with dput | 02:27 |
| rsalveti | at least afaik | 02:27 |
| robru | rsalveti: the train doesn't use dput, it uses copyPackage | 02:27 |
| rsalveti | robru: that's what I'm saying :-) | 02:28 |
| rsalveti | I think dput would cover that, but as the train is doing a package copy, that check might not necessarily happen | 02:28 |
| robru | rsalveti: either way, proposed did it's job by holding it there! ;-) | 02:29 |
| robru | alright I gotta run, back in a couple hours. | 02:29 |
| rsalveti | right, still something to check | 02:29 |
| rsalveti | the main problem though is that it got published without testing as 'done' | 02:30 |
| rsalveti | sergiusens: so just force and let's see how it goes :-) | 02:30 |
| sergiusens | rsalveti: I bet the changelog would look ugly :-P | 02:31 |
| rsalveti | right :-) | 02:31 |
| * rsalveti another dist-upgrade & reboot | 02:36 | |
| === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
| === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
| infinity | rsalveti: Well done (re: goget-u-t going back in time) | 03:26 |
| rsalveti | yeah, first time I saw that :-) | 03:27 |
| === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
| === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
| seb128 | hum | 09:18 |
| seb128 | is there something wrong with the CI setup? | 09:18 |
| seb128 | e.g on https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/generic-deb-autopilot-runner-vivid-mako/382/console | 09:18 |
| seb128 | fginther, ^? | 09:37 |
| jibel | ogra_, is it the right version of cgmanager in silo 3? | 09:53 |
| ogra_ | jibel, yep, i just set it to testing done | 09:55 |
| ogra_ | ah, cool | 09:55 |
| tsdgeos | fginther: any idea what's wrong in https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/generic-deb-autopilot-runner-vivid-mako/386/console ? | 10:49 |
| tsdgeos | cihelp ↑ | 10:49 |
| Ursinha | tsdgeos: hmm, I'll have a look | 10:52 |
| vila | tsdgeos: plars / psivaa_ may know better, there are some connectivity issues being worked on AFAIK | 10:53 |
| psivaa_ | tsdgeos: vila: Ursinha: this is an issue with the wifi network in the lab, it was *thought to be fixed yesterday but we still see the issue | 10:54 |
| psivaa_ | i've reported it back to the IS to have a look, we probably need to wait for them to fix it | 10:55 |
| Ursinha | psivaa_: thanks for the information | 10:55 |
| === greyback__ is now known as greyback | ||
| vila | psivaa_: thanks, well done | 10:57 |
| ev | psivaa_: are you able to get into a device and confirm it cannot connect to the wifi network? | 10:57 |
| psivaa_ | ev: yes, i was able to login and connection from the device to the wifi appears working but can not go outside. | 10:58 |
| * ev nods | 10:58 | |
| ogra_ | cgmanager is in ... i'm starting an image build for rtm | 11:07 |
| seb128 | ogra_, are we resuming landings for ota? ;-) | 11:08 |
| ogra_ | seb128, yes, after this image has built we will start landing the already signed off silos that have ota-1 bugs | 11:08 |
| seb128 | ogra_, great ;-) | 11:08 |
| ogra_ | (and QA is actively testing the others) | 11:08 |
| ogra_ | i'll also resume the nightly cron jobs ... | 11:09 |
| * seb128 is looking forward seeing fixes landing again ;-) | 11:09 | |
| imgbot | === trainguards: RTM IMAGE 170 building (started: 20141202 11:10) === | 11:09 |
| seb128 | wooot | 11:10 |
| Mirv | an image! | 11:13 |
| ogra_ | not yet, not yet :) | 11:14 |
| === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
| brendand | pstolowski, marcustomlinson - either of you there? | 11:32 |
| pstolowski | brendand, hey | 11:33 |
| brendand | pstolowski, rtm silo 006 | 11:33 |
| brendand | pstolowski, it mentions 3 bugs in the description but only one in the changelog | 11:33 |
| === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
| alf__ | cihelp: Hi! The last few Mir CI runs are failing, see https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/mir-mediumtests-runner-mako/3622/console . Any ideas? | 11:36 |
| alf__ | alan_g: ^^ | 11:36 |
| psivaa_ | alf__: i think this was due to a wifi issue in the lab | 11:37 |
| psivaa_ | let me take a look anyway | 11:37 |
| psivaa_ | alf__: alan_g: yea, the wifi network in the lab is broken at the, we have a ticket open with the IS for this, will follow it up with them | 11:38 |
| alf__ | psivaa_: Thanks. Note that this is a new problem, it started this morning. The jobs were working fine yesterday (after the last lab issue was fixed). | 11:39 |
| pstolowski | brendand, is it ok if I just update the changelog for this rtm version 0.6.8? in vivid we already have 0.6.9 | 11:39 |
| pstolowski | brendand, (in other words, the changlog in vivd would not list these bugs) | 11:40 |
| psivaa_ | alf__: ok, if that's the case the issue has reappeared again. | 11:46 |
| === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
| === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
| oSoMoN | trainguards: can silo 6 be published, please? | 12:12 |
| oSoMoN | trainguards: would anyone know why webbrowser-app fails to build in RTM silo 11? It seems the source package never reaches the PPA: https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-rtm-landing-011-1-build/67/console | 12:13 |
| Mirv | oSoMoN: ok | 12:14 |
| Mirv | oSoMoN: hmm. I don't see anything wrong in the output or a reason why the PPA would reject the upload. let's point that log https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-rtm-landing-011-1-build/67/console to robru. | 12:17 |
| cjwatson | 2014-12-02 09:50:17 DEBUG PPA exceeded its size limit (2071.00 of 2048.00 MiB). Ask a question in https://answers.launchpad.net/soyuz/ if you need more space. | 12:19 |
| cjwatson | Mirv,oSoMoN,robru: I've bumped that PPA's quota. Please retry the job. | 12:20 |
| ogra_ | building vivid too now ... | 12:20 |
| cjwatson | Though I'm a little confused as to why it shows as 2GiB used and 0 packages published. Maybe needs GC ... | 12:21 |
| === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-brb | ||
| === Ursinha-brb is now known as Ursinha | ||
| Mirv | cjwatson: oh, well spotted, thanks! it didn't occur to me to look at that figure given the PPA was "empty" | 12:22 |
| imgbot | === trainguards: RTM IMAGE 170 DONE (finished: 20141202 12:25) === | 12:24 |
| imgbot | === changelog: http://people.canonical.com/~ogra/touch-image-stats/rtm/170.changes === | 12:24 |
| ogra_ | damn | 12:25 |
| Mirv | "doesn't sound good" | 12:25 |
| Mirv | no package changes :( | 12:25 |
| ogra_ | no no ... there were package channges | 12:25 |
| ogra_ | the script got mad because cdimage flushed all old builds (and manifests) so there is nothing to compare against | 12:26 |
| ogra_ | :( | 12:26 |
| ogra_ | http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-touch/ubuntu-rtm/14.09/daily-preinstalled/ | 12:26 |
| ogra_ | cgmanager0.32-4ubuntu2rtm1 is in the manifest | 12:26 |
| cjwatson | It's not meant to do that ... | 12:28 |
| oSoMoN | cjwatson, thanks! | 12:28 |
| === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
| pstolowski | Mirv, hey, can you advice what to do about what I asked brendand earlier? here is the backlog http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/9344148/ | 12:28 |
| cjwatson | The manifest's on LP, so still technically accessible, but that's annoying | 12:29 |
| ogra_ | cjwatson, the last build was over a week ago ... | 12:29 |
| ogra_ | iirc we only keep 1 week currently | 12:29 |
| cjwatson | Ah, yeah | 12:30 |
| Mirv | pstolowski: so you're asking if it's ok if you edit the rtm's 0.6.8 branch's changelog by hand? I guess so, although I wonder why it already isn't what it says at https://code.launchpad.net/~unity-team/unity-scopes-api/staging-rtm/+merge/242050 since it should pick the changelog entires from that commit message. | 12:32 |
| pstolowski | Mirv, yes, i'm asking if I can edit by hand and if it's ok that the changlog for same version in vivid stays as is. | 12:35 |
| Mirv | pstolowski: right, sure they can differentiate since the rtm branch is separate anyhow and the rtm build has the ~rtm in the version number | 12:36 |
| cjwatson | Something is odd. ~ci-train-ppa-service/ubuntu-rtm/landing-011 has a bunch of packages with status Deleted, a scheduled deletion date set, but dateremoved None and they're still on disk, e.g. https://api.launchpad.net/devel/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu-rtm/landing-011/+sourcepub/4381101 | 12:36 |
| cjwatson | I thought death-row ran on PPAs at some point ... | 12:37 |
| * cjwatson attempts to educate himself further from the code | 12:37 | |
| cjwatson | 2014-12-02 07:59:04 INFO Processing http://ppa.launchpad.net/ci-train-ppa-service/landing-011/ubuntu | 12:39 |
| cjwatson | 2014-12-02 07:59:04 INFO Removing 0 files marked for reaping | 12:39 |
| cjwatson | 2014-12-02 07:59:04 INFO Total bytes freed: 0 | 12:39 |
| ogra_ | 170 changelog fixed ... | 12:39 |
| * cjwatson pokes about on dogfood | 12:41 | |
| === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
| === alan_g is now known as alan_g|lunch | ||
| === ogra_ changed the topic of #ubuntu-ci-eng to: Need a silo? ping trainguards | Need help with something else? ping cihelp | Train Dashboard: http://bit.ly/1mDv1FS | QA Signoffs: http://bit.ly/1qMAKYd | Known Issues: RTM Archive open for ota-1 (and only ota-1 !!) landings | ||
| ogra_ | Mirv, ^^ if you like to ... land whats signed off by QA | 12:48 |
| cjwatson | Ah! Nothing ever runs death-row on derived distributions. | 12:48 |
| Mirv | ogra_: \o/ | 12:50 |
| * Mirv updates the spreadsheet too | 12:50 | |
| cjwatson | I'm looking into the PPA quota issue, though it's no longer best handled on this channel. | 12:58 |
| cjwatson | oSoMoN: thanks for alerting me to what turned out to be a broader issue | 12:59 |
| Mirv | davmor2: is QA still happy with rtm-015? (for ota-1). just checking since it very barely missed the original topblocker deadline and has been sitting in the PPA for 3 weeks. | 13:02 |
| oSoMoN | cjwatson, glad that turned out to be helpful | 13:07 |
| davmor2 | Mirv: talk to rvr and jibel, and see if it is in the list of silos to test :) | 13:08 |
| oSoMoN | trainguards: can I have a silo for line 55, please? | 13:08 |
| Mirv | davmor2: rvr: jibel: rtm-015 already QA signed off, it was just weeks ago. I guess I hesitate because the bug is not specifically retargeted to ota-1, and I'm unsure if it's automatically ok to land previous topblocker fixes now to ota-1. | 13:09 |
| rvr | Mirv: I don't know yet which silos are ok to land, but if it was tested weeks ago, then it's out of date. Silo needs to be retested with latest image. | 13:12 |
| Mirv | rvr: hmmkay. could you then maybe set up the rtm-015 for retesting if that's the way to go? not that of course much was landed during the last three weeks. | 13:15 |
| === alan_g|lunch is now known as alan_g | ||
| imgbot | === trainguards: IMAGE 40 DONE (finished: 20141202 13:50) === | 13:49 |
| imgbot | === changelog: http://people.canonical.com/~ogra/touch-image-stats/40.changes === | 13:49 |
| davmor2 | \o/ | 13:49 |
| popey | woah | 13:50 |
| pstolowski | Mirv, hey, so I've pushed updated changelog, but it refuses to rebuild it? ^ | 13:52 |
| Mirv | pstolowski: try the force option | 13:52 |
| pstolowski | Mirv, that didn't help | 13:54 |
| Mirv | pstolowski: oh right, it's unintuitive. I kicked it too, now it seems do be continuing. | 14:00 |
| Mirv | pstolowski: you generally need to specify the package name in there. if the MP is updated, there is not even need for the force option. | 14:00 |
| rsalveti | wow, many updates | 14:00 |
| pstolowski | Mirv, ah, ok, thanks! | 14:00 |
| === pstolowski is now known as pstolowski|lunch | ||
| rsalveti | ogra_: what is the current vivid top most blocker? | 14:01 |
| rsalveti | sence the seeds got reverted | 14:01 |
| rsalveti | hm, no sound indicator with 39 | 14:03 |
| rsalveti | let me update to 40 | 14:03 |
| rsalveti | might be that other bug that happens after wizard | 14:04 |
| ogra_ | rsalveti, there is no top blocker in vivid ... its vivid :P | 14:08 |
| === fginther changed the topic of #ubuntu-ci-eng to: Need a silo? ping trainguards | Need help with something else? ping fginther | Train Dashboard: http://bit.ly/1mDv1FS | QA Signoffs: http://bit.ly/1qMAKYd | Known Issues: RTM Archive open for ota-1 (and only ota-1 !!) landings | ||
| ogra_ | i dont think anyone even tracks "blockers" there | 14:08 |
| alexabreu | trainguards could you republish silo 005? | 14:49 |
| === pstolowski|lunch is now known as pstolowski | ||
| === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
| pstolowski | brendand, hey, silo rtm 6 has been rebuilt with updated changelog | 15:05 |
| brendand | pstolowski, ok | 15:06 |
| rsalveti | ogra_: thought sil was tracking that :-) | 15:09 |
| === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
| ogra_ | not anymore i think ... all focus was shifted to rtm ... but i might be wrong ... ask him once he is not sick anymore :) | 15:10 |
| mterry | robru, hey man, if I have a silo | 15:14 |
| mterry | whoops | 15:14 |
| mterry | robru, if I have a silo and it wants an associated seed change, do we still just manually upload the seed change and hope everything lands around the same time? | 15:15 |
| Saviq | trainguards ↑ please | 15:27 |
| ogra_ | mterry, yes | 15:29 |
| ogra_ | (and no, we dont operate based on "hope" :) ... we can disable image builds til both is in the archive if needed) | 15:30 |
| seb128 | bah | 15:30 |
| ogra_ | woudl you prefer hope ? | 15:30 |
| seb128 | rtm 169, my phone is ringing an alarm reminder but unity8 is not responding | 15:31 |
| seb128 | can't stop the ringing | 15:31 |
| ogra_ | use a hammer | 15:31 |
| ogra_ | should not take more than five hits to quieten it ... else it's a bug | 15:31 |
| ogra_ | :P | 15:31 |
| seb128 | oh, ubuntu logo | 15:31 |
| seb128 | sound stopped | 15:31 |
| seb128 | but phone keeps vibrating | 15:32 |
| seb128 | interesting :p | 15:32 |
| seb128 | unity8 segfault I guess | 15:32 |
| ogra_ | yeah | 15:32 |
| ogra_ | you should have some nice .crash files | 15:32 |
| seb128 | bah, back to a working phone | 15:32 |
| seb128 | with vibrating in endless loop mode | 15:32 |
| ogra_ | we had good bunch of scoperunner crashes recently ... that can tear down unity8 along it seems | 15:33 |
| ogra_ | *a good bunch | 15:33 |
| * seb128 reboots | 15:34 | |
| seb128 | does anyone if the CI infra is known to have issues? | 15:34 |
| seb128 | https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/generic-deb-autopilot-runner-vivid-mako/393/console | 15:34 |
| seb128 | seems the settings tests don't even run | 15:34 |
| seb128 | the phablet-network setup fails | 15:34 |
| seb128 | who should be pinged about that? | 15:34 |
| seb128 | ogra_, Mirv, fginther, ^ somebody knows? | 15:37 |
| ogra_ | seb128, IS | 15:37 |
| seb128 | it's not the qa or ci teams? | 15:37 |
| ogra_ | Ap issues ... started on the weekend | 15:37 |
| seb128 | k, so it's not only settings? | 15:37 |
| ogra_ | we have them in smoketesting too | 15:37 |
| seb128 | is there a ticket/bug about it? | 15:37 |
| ogra_ | seems to be the whole lab | 15:37 |
| ogra_ | i think psivaa_ opened an RT | 15:37 |
| fginther | seb128, the problem is back again. Let me send out an email notice | 15:38 |
| seb128 | fginther, thanks | 15:38 |
| seb128 | is anyone working on resolving it? | 15:38 |
| fginther | seb128, yes, IS support has acknowledged the problem | 15:39 |
| psivaa_ | seb128: https://rt.admin.canonical.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=77057 is the ticket, | 15:39 |
| seb128 | psivaa_, thanks | 15:39 |
| === fginther changed the topic of #ubuntu-ci-eng to: Nseeed a silo? ping trainguards | Need help with something else? ping fginther | Train Dashboard: http://bit.ly/1mDv1FS | QA Signoffs: http://bit.ly/1qMAKYd | Known Issues: Lab networking issues (being triaged). RTM Archive open for ota-1 (and only ota-1 !!) landings | ||
| psivaa_ | fginther: thanks for sending out the email | 15:39 |
| seb128 | ogra_, bah, unity8 apport file doesn't have a dump, no useful info of what happened then | 15:42 |
| ogra_ | to bad | 15:43 |
| seb128 | the media-hub-server crashed as well | 15:43 |
| ogra_ | any scoperunner file ? | 15:44 |
| seb128 | that as well | 15:44 |
| ogra_ | yeah, i think i had the same issue here too then | 15:44 |
| ogra_ | scoperunner, media-hub and unity8 crashing together | 15:44 |
| seb128 | did you open a bug about it? | 15:45 |
| ogra_ | nope, no data and i was on the road when it happened | 15:45 |
| oSoMoN | trainguards: can silo 6 be published, please? | 15:49 |
| seb128 | ogra_, the media-hub-server bt seems to be code from /android/system/lib/libmedia_compat_layer.so | 15:54 |
| seb128 | so no symbols | 15:54 |
| ogra_ | yeah | 15:55 |
| ogra_ | but you can at least add an oops pointer (grep it from whoopsie.log) to the bug | 15:55 |
| mterry | trainguards, may I please have a silo for spreadsheet line #57? | 15:55 |
| brendand | ogra_, i need to raise the topic of possibly being able to update apps in the store only for vivid | 16:01 |
| ogra_ | raise it then :) | 16:02 |
| brendand | ogra_, consider it raised! | 16:02 |
| ogra_ | :) | 16:03 |
| brendand | ogra_, so right now if i order an app to be updated to fix a test in vivid, then it will also update in RTM | 16:03 |
| brendand | ogra_, not such a big deal if it's test code only changed | 16:03 |
| brendand | ogra_, but if there are app changes since before the test code was updated, that also gets pulled in | 16:04 |
| brendand | ogra_, even worse if those are quite big changes | 16:04 |
| balloons | brendand, apart from getting support on the store side (which needs to happen), I suspect the simpliest way around this is to not pull from the store to build the image | 16:05 |
| brendand | balloons, yeah - that decision seems to be chewing on our posteriors at the moment | 16:05 |
| balloons | we have other reason we'd like to be able to push things to the store, but for now the differentiation seems to be based on the framework required | 16:06 |
| balloons | which may indeed make enough sense that more support on the store side for filtering uploads never materializes | 16:06 |
| john-mcaleely | rsalveti, do you know who's waiting for the rtm device tarball? | 16:06 |
| john-mcaleely | (it's ready with test results, etc) | 16:06 |
| rsalveti | john-mcaleely: mostly me atm :-) | 16:08 |
| rsalveti | john-mcaleely: still stuck in the bq's screen though | 16:09 |
| rsalveti | wonder wtf is happening here | 16:09 |
| rsalveti | oh, there you go | 16:09 |
| rsalveti | ubuntu logo | 16:09 |
| john-mcaleely | it looks good for me on #170 | 16:10 |
| === om26er is now known as om26er|dinner | ||
| ogra_ | balloons, brendand, the proper solution is to simply judge all core apps as rtm | 16:32 |
| brendand | ogra_, anything that stops us from freely developing apps on a *development* release is not a proper solution | 16:46 |
| brendand | ogra_, there's absolutely no reason to treat core apps differently from any other part of the system | 16:47 |
| ogra_ | brendand, well, then we need a devel-store | 16:47 |
| ogra_ | official store should be for rtm | 16:47 |
| ogra_ | we have the ability to sideload clicks for developers ... i dont see why in-development core-apps need to go to the store | 16:48 |
| brendand | ogra_, well what about the image? | 16:48 |
| brendand | ogra_, that's really the issue | 16:49 |
| ogra_ | (especially since they are most likely developed against a framework we do not even ship yet) | 16:49 |
| ogra_ | brendand, rtm is the measure ... | 16:49 |
| ogra_ | sil2100, ! | 16:49 |
| ogra_ | alive !!! | 16:49 |
| brendand | ogra_, let's think about the end goal here - i want to be able to update e.g. reminders or weather app in order to fix test failures in vivid, without impacting on RTM | 16:50 |
| ogra_ | brendand, well, you cant ... the official store should be tied to the official release which is rtm | 16:50 |
| ogra_ | if there is a way to have a devel store where the devel release can build from we should use that ... | 16:51 |
| brendand | ogra_, i can't isn't really good enough. there has to be a way | 16:51 |
| brendand | ogra_, or don't have the devel release pull from the store at all | 16:51 |
| ogra_ | then there needs to be made a way ... there isnt one today | 16:51 |
| sil2100 | ugh! | 16:51 |
| ogra_ | and i dont think we can decouple the official store from rtm | 16:51 |
| brendand | ogra_, okay that's two different things - 'can't' and 'can't right now' | 16:52 |
| ogra_ | well, i doubt we can do it in the vivid release timeframe | 16:53 |
| ogra_ | (setting up a second store that is) | 16:53 |
| sil2100 | New core app version needed for vivid? | 16:53 |
| brendand | ogra_, well no, but that's not the only way right? | 16:53 |
| ogra_ | the only fasable one i see | 16:54 |
| ogra_ | *feasable | 16:54 |
| brendand | ogra_, so the core-apps developers are doomed to not land anything for the next 6 months that is not eligible for RTM? | 16:56 |
| ogra_ | brendand, well, why would they push anything to the store that you cant install (due to unsupported frameworks) | 16:57 |
| brendand | ogra_, i didn't suggest they should | 16:57 |
| ogra_ | they should be able to provide clicks for testing etc ... and we should consider having a test-store but as i said, the official store needs to be tied to rtm | 16:58 |
| ogra_ | and setting up a devel store wont be a small task i guess | 16:58 |
| ogra_ | which is why i said above that i dont belive it is doable in vivid timeframe | 16:59 |
| sil2100 | ogra_: if you could lead the meeting today one last time I would be grateful ;) I'll take care of the e-mail once I get all the updates I need | 17:01 |
| ogra_ | sil2100, no prob, nothing to discuss anyway | 17:01 |
| ogra_ | we re-started cron builds and had an image with cgmanager today ... | 17:01 |
| ogra_ | the lab has still wifi issues so we dont get proper results yet | 17:02 |
| ogra_ | plars, meeting ? | 17:03 |
| plars | ogra_: on the way | 17:03 |
| ahayzen | brendand, we with the music-app are bracing ourselves for this exact issue when vivid has an updated media-hub/mediascanner that we cannot then support in rtm :/ | 17:15 |
| brendand | pete-woods, thostr_ - silo 007 is *7000* lines of diff.... | 17:16 |
| brendand | woah | 17:17 |
| ogra_ | tiny | 17:17 |
| sil2100 | brendand: only 7k? Come on | 17:17 |
| brendand | pete-woods, thostr_ - okay 6200 actually - slight exaggeration for effect :P | 17:17 |
| sil2100 | Isolated bugfix, land it! | 17:17 |
| brendand | seems to remove some tests too | 17:18 |
| brendand | this is using citrain-diff too so i'm sure it's not launchpad mischief | 17:18 |
| brendand | well i'll test it a bit anyway, but i'm somewhat uncomfortable with how big that diff is. and supposedly it's only fixing one bug | 17:19 |
| brendand | which by the looks of it is 'unity-scope-mediascanner needz moar codez!!!!' | 17:19 |
| thostr_ | brendand: that's interesting | 17:19 |
| thostr_ | brendand: as the single MPs alltogether are just 1500 loc | 17:20 |
| brendand | thostr_, unity-scope-mediascanner_0.2%2B15.04.20141110%7Ertm-0ubuntu1.dsc vs unity-scope-mediascanner_0.2%2B15.04.20141117.1%7Ertm-0ubuntu1.dsc | 17:21 |
| brendand | thostr_, doesn't show grooveshark results | 17:23 |
| brendand | thostr_, was that intended | 17:23 |
| thostr_ | it should only add stuff | 17:24 |
| brendand | thostr_, it shows vimeo in settings but no results for it | 17:24 |
| brendand | thostr_, i just see youtube features | 17:24 |
| brendand | thostr_, think of something fast or i'll have to fail this silo :P | 17:25 |
| thostr_ | what do you mean by vimeo in settings? | 17:25 |
| thostr_ | do you have vimeo scope installed? | 17:26 |
| thostr_ | brendand: but if you have grooveshark and vimeo scope installed it'll just show those | 17:27 |
| brendand | thostr_, no i don't have vimeo installed | 17:29 |
| brendand | thostr_, i do have grooveshark though | 17:29 |
| brendand | thostr_, and it doesn't show in Music scope anymore | 17:29 |
| thostr_ | brendand: is it checked in the settings? | 17:30 |
| brendand | thostr_, i have 7digital, Songkick and Youtube | 17:30 |
| brendand | thostr_, yes also SoundCloud - which again isn't in the scope | 17:30 |
| brendand | thostr_, although like vimeo i don't have that scope | 17:31 |
| thostr_ | brendand: so which ones have you installed and which ones are checked in settings? | 17:31 |
| brendand | thostr_, everything is still checked in settings | 17:31 |
| brendand | thostr_, i haven't unchecked anything | 17:31 |
| thostr_ | brendand: there is still an issue around settings showing scopes that are not installed, but htat is something we'll fix very shortly | 17:31 |
| thostr_ | brendand: and grooveshark scope is still working on it's own? | 17:32 |
| brendand | thostr_, yes | 17:33 |
| brendand | thostr_, ftr once i install vimeo and soundcloud they are fine | 17:35 |
| brendand | thostr_, grooveshark still doesn't show up | 17:35 |
| thostr_ | brendand: is grooveshark the newest version? | 17:36 |
| brendand | thostr_, it should be this is the latest rtm-proposed image | 17:36 |
| thostr_ | brendand: that is strange, especially since no code around grooveshark aggregation was changed | 17:37 |
| thostr_ | brendand: we'll investigate... can you put this on ice for time being | 17:37 |
| brendand | thostr_, well given the 6200 line diff maybe some code has been changed that you didn't think would be | 17:37 |
| thostr_ | brendand: that might be... investigation is first where this big diff comes from | 17:38 |
| thostr_ | brendand: it should really be only a fraction of this | 17:38 |
| brendand | thostr_, ok i need to have dinner anyway | 17:38 |
| brendand | thostr_, thanks | 17:38 |
| thostr_ | brendand: how can I see the diff you're seeing? | 17:38 |
| brendand | thostr_, i put it here - http://people.canonical.com/~brendan-donegan/landing-007.diff | 17:39 |
| thostr_ | brendand: thanks | 17:39 |
| === om26er|dinner is now known as om26er | ||
| mterry | Mirv, for spreadsheet line 57, is your comment why it hasn't gotten a silo yet? I still wouldn't mind a silo to prep for landing in the meantime... Unless we're short | 17:48 |
| robru | mterry: yeah unity8 is migrating, best to wait for that to finish before assiging a silo, otherwise you just have to rebuild right away anyway. | 17:59 |
| === alan_g is now known as alan_g|EOD | ||
| davmor2 | ogra_, awe_: so image 39 mako vivid mms is working with my contract sim in both directions, I think it might be the new udev at fault maybe? | 18:15 |
| davmor2 | now I need food | 18:16 |
| ogra_ | davmor2, or apparmor, did you check for denials ? | 18:16 |
| davmor2 | ogra_: no damn it I'll have a look again tomorrow I just want to get 39 passed on 5 devices at 1 hour per device :P | 18:20 |
| ogra_ | yeah | 18:21 |
| ogra_ | take your time | 18:21 |
| robru | mterry: lol, tried to assign your silo. need the MP though, not the branch. | 18:33 |
| mterry | robru, kenvandine just told me that he's waiting on a ubuntu-system-settings rtm-backport branch to land, before he wants to land my silo so maybe hold off after all | 18:36 |
| mterry | robru, but I will fix that MP | 18:36 |
| robru | mterry: ok no worries | 18:36 |
| mterry | robru, also this silo would need an associated seed change -- do we still just make those in parallel or do we have a way of tying them together with the silo? | 18:37 |
| kenvandine | mterry, well i have a pile of backport branches, at least one of them touches the wizard | 18:37 |
| kenvandine | i'm going through the bugs now trying to prioritize them for ota-1 landing | 18:37 |
| robru | mterry: I'm not very familiar with seed changes, talk to ogra_ for that | 18:37 |
| robru | kenvandine: oh if you land anything today please let me hit publish on it, I need to test something ;-) | 18:38 |
| mterry | kenvandine, wait, how would that affect me landing drop-wizard in vivid? | 18:38 |
| kenvandine | robru, it won't be today :) | 18:38 |
| robru | darn! ;-) | 18:39 |
| kenvandine | mterry, because i want to make sure we have cherry-picked everything | 18:39 |
| kenvandine | just to be safe | 18:39 |
| kenvandine | mterry, i know something later than what i cherry-pick should be fine | 18:39 |
| kenvandine | mterry, well, i guess dropping the wizard will ensure we don't have any more wizard fixes :) | 18:40 |
| mterry | heh | 18:40 |
| kenvandine | and if there are issues, we can just fix them in the rtm branch | 18:41 |
| mterry | ogra_, do you know how we handle seed changes that are associated with a silo? Just make them in parallel around the same time? | 18:42 |
| kenvandine | mterry, ok... i've convinced me... do you have a silo request already? | 18:42 |
| kenvandine | you could just add your uss branch to it | 18:42 |
| kenvandine | s/i've/you've/ | 18:42 |
| mterry | kenvandine, yeah I have, line 57 of the spreadsheet | 18:43 |
| kenvandine | ok, add your uss branch there | 18:43 |
| kenvandine | it'll be easier to test in the silo anyway | 18:43 |
| mterry | robru, OK if you want to make a silo for line 57 now, I'd be obliged | 18:52 |
| mterry | robru, sorry for turnaround :) | 18:52 |
| robru | mterry: no worries. do you think you'll publish it today? | 18:53 |
| robru | mterry: vivid 3 | 18:53 |
| mterry | robru, um... depends on if Cimi presses the approve button on my tests branch in short order. So probably no | 18:53 |
| robru | mterry: darn it! I went my entire shift yesterday without a single publication. I have experimental train changes I need to make, but the last thing I want to do is land them and then go to sleep and let the europeans discover all the fun regressions. I need a real live publish I can test it on myself while I'm awake. | 18:54 |
| mterry | robru, :) | 18:55 |
| robru | mterry: I think it's a conspiracy... nobody wants to be my guinea pig ;-) | 18:55 |
| mterry | robru, didn't we just publish a unity8 silo? | 18:55 |
| robru | mterry: that was before I woke up | 18:56 |
| dobey | cihelp: ping. who best to set up jenkins ci job for monitoring MPs and running the tests on them, for a new branch? | 19:02 |
| === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
| fginther | dobey, we can do that, what's the branch? | 19:04 |
| dobey | fginther: lp:unity-scope-click/rtm-14.09 | 19:05 |
| fginther | dobey, ack | 19:06 |
| dobey | fginther: thanks | 19:07 |
| kenvandine | fginther, oh... i have some rtm branches i'd like to see CI run for :) | 19:07 |
| kenvandine | fginther, lp:content-hub/rtm-14.09 and lp:ubuntu-system-settings/rtm-14.09 | 19:08 |
| fginther | kenvandine, got it | 19:08 |
| === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
| kenvandine | fginther, thx | 19:23 |
| fginther | dobey, kenvandine, I just realized that this request is a lot more involved then adding a few configuration entries. I'll have to get back to you on this after investigating a little | 19:26 |
| kenvandine | fginther, cool, thanks | 19:26 |
| kenvandine | not urgent, but it would be nice to have CI run on the backport MPs for rtm | 19:27 |
| dobey | fginther: ok, thanks | 19:33 |
| kenvandine | Chipaca, you have settings in rtm 14 silo for testing, are you done with that? | 19:41 |
| kenvandine | Chipaca, if so, mind freeing it? | 19:41 |
| Chipaca | kenvandine: i can think about it :-p | 19:52 |
| Chipaca | kenvandine: i am done with that, in fact the tests went so well we decided to land it and have landed it. weeks ago :( sorry i forgot about the silo | 19:53 |
| robru | bfiller: oooooh you wanna publish that today? publish publish publish | 20:10 |
| davmor2 | ogra_, sil2100: image 39 is as wonderful as it was yesterday, my issue now is I am out of day, so I'll finish the others tomorrow but none of the issues plaguing 40 are present in 39 | 20:14 |
| kenvandine | Chipaca, cool, thanks | 20:19 |
| bfiller | robru: testing now then will publish :) | 20:20 |
| kenvandine | bfiller, robru really wants to push a button for you :) | 20:20 |
| sil2100 | davmor2: thanks! | 20:25 |
| sil2100 | davmor2: I need to fix the commitlog-generating machines to see what landings got into #40 | 20:25 |
| sil2100 | davmor2: right now the openstack machine seems to be 'out of free space', but it seems I can't free any space myself | 20:25 |
| sil2100 | So I'll take care of it tomorrow | 20:26 |
| robru | hm | 20:31 |
| === greyback_ is now known as greyback | ||
| robru | *phew* | 20:50 |
| robru | brb, lunch. nothing is allowed to explode until I get back. | 21:04 |
| kenvandine | robru, i'll find something to go boom | 21:13 |
| robru | kenvandine: nuh uh! I only deleted problems this time, I swear! | 21:35 |
| kenvandine | :) | 21:48 |
| robru | whooooooooooo | 22:06 |
| robru | mterry: https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-007-2-publish/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/packaging_changes_ubuntu-keyboard_0.99.trunk.phablet2+15.04.20141202-0ubuntu1.diff any love for a packaging ack? looks like a nice python2->3 port. | 22:08 |
| * mterry looks | 22:08 | |
| mterry | robru, what's the story with python:any in build-deps? I know it's a multiarch thing, I'm just not sure why it's used for build-deps? In the switch to python3, the :any is dropped | 22:12 |
| robru | mterry: not sure. barry? ^ | 22:12 |
| barry | robru, mterry sorry, please ping doko in #ubuntu-devel (though he's probably eod) | 22:13 |
| robru | mterry: hm, no doko I guess. is there no documentation for this? | 22:26 |
| mterry | robru, oh right I forgot | 22:26 |
| mterry | robru, let me look real quick -- diff looks fine, I just thought it was a weird drop | 22:26 |
| robru | mterry: yeah I have no idea but presumably bfiller tested it in his silo and it was working. | 22:26 |
| bfiller | robru: silo 7? yes it's tested | 22:27 |
| robru | bfiller: any thoughts on the switch from 'python:any' to 'python3' (without the :any?) | 22:28 |
| mterry | robru, ok, it's because python is just an interpreter, and it doesn't matter which arch version you have installed | 22:28 |
| mterry | robru, so I think it's to enable crossbuilding | 22:28 |
| bfiller | robru: not sure, Elleo made that change to support python3 autopilot tests | 22:29 |
| robru | mterry: should that not get kept then? | 22:29 |
| mterry | robru, so looks like this diff will make crossbuilding harder. Which isn't good, but I don't *think* it's a blocker, just an annoyance | 22:29 |
| robru | mterry: fair. so you approve? | 22:29 |
| mterry | robru, sure... but Elleo ^ | 22:30 |
| robru | alright, moment of truth... will the package make it to proposed ;-) | 22:32 |
| Elleo | mterry: would it be better to set that as python3:any? | 22:34 |
| Elleo | debian packaging isn't my strong suit, so am more than happy to be corrected :) | 22:34 |
| mterry | Elleo, I think so. I don't quite understand all the requirements of cross-building, but I believe that helps with doing that. It was python:any before you changed it to python3, so I suspect it should be python3:any. But no big deal | 22:35 |
| mterry | Elleo, i.e. not urgent. Just next time you touch the packaging, maybe make that edit | 22:35 |
| Elleo | mterry: I could add it to the MR now if it's not going to cause issues with the building, landing, etc.? | 22:36 |
| robru | sweeeet | 22:37 |
| Elleo | maybe simplest to just make a new MR for that change | 22:37 |
| * mterry shrugs | 22:37 | |
| robru | Elleo: oh yeah no, way too late to make that change. you'd have to rebuild and retest and it would be a waste of bfiller's whole afternoon. | 22:37 |
| Elleo | robru: okay | 22:38 |
| robru | Elleo: next time you have a branch for ubuntu-keyboard just sneak that in with it ;-) | 22:38 |
| Elleo | heh | 22:38 |
| bfiller | Elleo, robru : it's fine with me if you want to update the MR. I don't mind retesting it | 22:38 |
| robru | bfiller: no it's published already ;-) | 22:38 |
| bfiller | oh, in that case, rock on :) | 22:39 |
| Elleo | bfiller: I'll be making a new branch for some extra autopilot tests soon, so I'll just fix it in that one | 22:40 |
| bfiller | Elleo: ack | 22:40 |
| sergiusens | mterry: Elleo it's sort of explained here: https://wiki.debian.org/Multiarch/HOWTO | 23:01 |
| Elleo | sergiusens: thanks | 23:03 |
| * mterry never deals with crossbuilding | 23:10 | |
| robru | mterry: yeah I prefer happybuilding. | 23:14 |
| mterry | :p | 23:14 |
| mterry | charles, testing fix now | 23:16 |
| charles | mterry, the brightness slider and settings menuitems seem to do the Right Thing in the greeter, which is nice | 23:18 |
| mterry | charles, huh, I get nothing... | 23:19 |
| mterry | maybe I typo'd | 23:19 |
| mterry | charles, I flashed latest vivid, installed my branch, then made your change | 23:19 |
| mterry | charles, anything else I need? | 23:19 |
| charles | mterry, make sure you have r274 instead of r273, I had a typo a couple of minutes ago | 23:19 |
| charles | I'm buildding a test deb with r274 now | 23:20 |
| mterry | charles, ah! | 23:20 |
| mterry | charles, I wondered why there would be a phone_greeter profile just sitting there unused :) | 23:20 |
| charles | ya... :) | 23:20 |
| charles | I thought about adding one, but there's nothing in the phone menu that makes sense to remove in the greeter | 23:21 |
| charles | so it's perfect as-is | 23:21 |
| charles | (mterry, ordinarilly I would test from a builddeb before pinging, but I wanted to catch you before you EODed :) | 23:22 |
| mterry | charles, yeah thanks :) | 23:22 |
| mterry | charles, works for me | 23:23 |
| charles | mterry, same here | 23:23 |
| mterry | charles, do we still do https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/Checklists/indicator-power ? | 23:24 |
| mterry | because I notice you haven't.... ;) | 23:24 |
| charles | well, let's do this properly | 23:25 |
| mterry | charles, I mean I don't care | 23:25 |
| mterry | charles, just didn't know if I should fill it out when I add my approve comment | 23:25 |
| charles | mterry, IMO it's not a big deal for this one | 23:27 |
| mterry | sure | 23:27 |
| mterry | charles, approved | 23:27 |
| charles | mterry, thanks | 23:27 |
| charles | mterry, do you want to handle siloing in with your unity8 greeter changes? | 23:28 |
| charles | mterry, since your changes are blocked on this | 23:30 |
| mterry | charles, don't block on me yet, I'm going to have design look at everything together and OK landing the unity8 side that enables all this | 23:31 |
| mterry | charles, but yeah i won't land mine without including yours, if yours doesn't land first | 23:31 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!