[16:21] <gQuigs> I'm trying to clean up the wiki, and I'd like to use the special pages to help https://wiki.ubuntu.com/WantedPages  /OrphanedPages /AbandonedPages, but they never load
[16:22] <developerpenguin> hey everyone :)
[16:23] <developerpenguin> im new to the team :)
[19:46] <VelhoP4_> man apt-get manual has translation deficiencies. the portuguese version in very complicated to read. Ive noticed that the english version is nice and simple. The translations seems to be done by google translate... can I check the manual in english, in my portuguese system?
[19:47] <VelhoP4_> also, hos can I report bad translations, and help to translate this (debian?) manual?
[19:49] <pleia2> VelhoP4_: looks like we pull that in directly from debian, you'll want to work with the debian translations team
[19:49] <pleia2> this page seems to document how translations are done in debian: https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/l10n.html
[19:49] <pleia2> I don't know anything about it
[19:50] <pleia2> Ubuntu's procedure is via Launchpad, very different from Debian
[21:06] <sotiredofthesest> w/r/t the email from Peter: isn't the point of setting a bug to "triaged" to indicate that someone trusted has looked at the bug, ensured that it's correct, and set a priority?
[21:07] <belkinsa> pmatulis, ^^^
[21:09] <sotiredofthesest> Because 1327173 doesn't have a priority set, but I think it is relatively clear what the next step is, so does it matter if it's not confirmed?
[21:10] <sotiredofthesest> Phrased differently: is confirmation a prerequisite for triage?
[21:13] <sotiredofthesest> I'd say that the line "A member of UbuntuBugControl believes that the report describes a genuine bug in enough detail..." from https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Bug%20statuses doesn't necessarily imply that, but
[21:15] <sotiredofthesest> ...ultimately,  does it matter for the sake of documentation?  Presumably people writing documentation are going through step by step in a clean VM and writing the steps they take.
[21:15] <belkinsa> sotiredofthesest, you can also send this to the mailing-list.  There might be more people there to reply.
[21:16] <sotiredofthesest> So that they would effectively be the people confirming it at they same time that they're fixing it.
[21:17] <sotiredofthesest> belkinsa, not worth an email IMO, I'm just spitballing
[21:17] <belkinsa> It is, because a discussion can evolve from it.
[21:18] <sotiredofthesest> That was my subtle way of saying that I don't feel comfortable broadcasting it on a mailing list. ;)