[12:55] <ybon> humm, I don't know how I edit the manifest.json data in QTCreator, I remember doing it through "publish" tab before, I think. Any hint?
[12:56] <ybon> (I can edit it from any editor, for sure, but wondering how I can do it from QtCreator)
=== chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun
[13:13] <popey> ybon: yeah, it moved...
[13:15] <popey> i can never find it either.
[13:20] <ybon> ok, lets do it the raw way for today :)
[13:58] <ybon> oh, a points of interest scope made by canonical \o/
[13:59] <ybon> Anyone know where is the source code?
[14:03] <popey> ybon: ping cwayne when he wakes, he will know I think
[14:07] <popey> ybon: is that a new scope on the nexus 4? I don't recall seeing it
[14:38] <ybon> popey: just found it while searching for "osm" in the store
[14:39] <ybon> the "sad" part is that "see on the map" opens the browser on here.com ;)
[17:59] <swordfish90> Hello everyone I just created a fat click package for the new terminal app. Could please test it on a non armhf architecture to make sure it works before submitting it to the store?
[18:01] <swordfish90> link: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B2KuANIptmZhaWU4azVaTVVLeUU/view?usp=sharing
[18:18] <Elleo> swordfish90: using pkcon on my desktop I get 'Fatal error: Wrong architecture 'multi''; using click directly I also get: 'dpkg: warning: package architecture (multi) does not match system (amd64)'
[18:18] <Elleo> should the arch not be 'all' instead of multi?
[18:19] <Elleo> swordfish90: it runs fine once installed though
[18:20] <Elleo> oh hang on, I might have just been running an old terminal version
[18:21] <Elleo> yeah, the new one doesn't run
[18:22] <Elleo> I'm running on utopic though, so maybe that just doesn't have support for 'multi' packages?
[18:23] <swordfish90> Elleo, thank you for testing it... mmmh... I've tried following the guide written by Nicholas http://www.theorangenotebook.com/2014/12/creating-mutli-arch-click-packages.html ... I can't promise I did everything right though :) ...
[18:24] <swordfish90> On the phone is working fine (with a signature error) do you have any idea what is wrong?
[18:49] <Elleo> swordfish90: I'm not really familiar with any of the multiarch stuff, it'd be good if you could find someone running vivid on their desktop to test it
[18:49] <Elleo> then at least you'd know whether it's simply not supported in utopic or not
[19:59] <swordfish90> Elleo, ok, thank you. I'm going to install a vivid vm to test it.. Cheers...
[20:08] <popey> swordfish90: will cooke has a laptop running unity8, I'm sure he'd love to test a fat package on that
[20:37] <swordfish90> popey, thank you Alan... I'm going to ask him...