[06:59] <RAOF> infinity: Hey, you around for a little impromptu mentoring? :)
[07:12] <Mirv> it seems Oxide didn't get forward during US Friday - if there's a coredev to ack https://launchpadlibrarian.net/191910301/debdiff_4_6.txt it'd hopefully help unblocking the various things stuck in -proposed because of autopkgtests failing to install packages as described in bug #1399597
[07:12] <ubot2> bug 1399597 in oxide-qt (Ubuntu) "The last oxide upload breaks autopkgtests with a package installation failure" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1399597
[07:14] <Mirv> (the package is built in landing-003 since Friday)
[07:14] <RAOF> Mirv: That's a somewhat odd change?
[07:15] <RAOF> Mirv: More specifically, that looks like a fix in the wrong place.
[07:15] <RAOF> Mirv: I take it that oxideqt-codecs-extra conflicts with oxideqt-codecs?
[07:16] <Mirv> RAOF: right, that was the thing discussed. the problem is as seen in the bug that among else the touch image has a hard dependency on the extra codecs package, while oxide itself has this preferral of the non-extra package. somehow this leads to the autopkgtest failure when it first installs Oxide's preferred package and then notices the extra is required.
[07:16] <Mirv> RAOF: yes, they conflict
[07:17] <Mirv> RAOF: and the problem appeared when the conflicts were made arch specific which possibly increased apt complexity too much. this was needed so that even though they conflict, cross compilation chroot needs to be able to install them..
[07:17] <Mirv> RAOF: the problem appeared with this https://code.launchpad.net/~bzoltan/oxide/packaging.vivid-improved-conflicts/+merge/243515
[07:17] <Mirv> which was not wanted to be reverted since then SDK vivid Click cross-compilation would start to fail again
[07:20] <RAOF> Hm, odd. I suppose that also arch-specifying the Replaces: was tried?
[07:21] <RAOF> Anyway, ack. The change is odd, not wrong.
[07:22] <Mirv> RAOF: the arch-specific replaces was not tried. we also couldn't reproduce the autopkgtest machines' problem locally (well, sure we should with proper adt usage).
[07:26] <Mirv> added a note in case arch-specific replaces would be wanted to be experimented with
[08:27] <infinity> RAOF: Not in this timezone, I'm not.  Just heading off to bed.
[10:11] <RAOF> infinity: Well, that's lucky, as I'm EOD anyway :)
[14:58] <mlankhorst> who's doing the 14.04.2 release?
[17:42] <Laney> Are the autopkgtest runners down?
[21:48] <sil2100> infinity: hey! Are you around to upload a quick revert-package for me? :)
[21:49] <sil2100> infinity: there was some trouble with one of the things we released through a silo, but it's in main so I can't upload this revert directly
[21:49] <sil2100> It's a standard revert as per our revert script for CI Train released packages
[21:52] <sil2100> infinity: nevermind my earlier request, but I have another one: once you find a free moment, I would also appreciate if you (or any other archive admin) could drop upower and ubuntu-system-settings from 14.09-proposed in ubuntu-rtm
[21:53] <sil2100> infinity: those are b0rken and need to be uploaded
[21:53] <sil2100> Thanks in advance!
[21:54] <infinity> ... and he didn't stick around for questions.
[23:25] <ScottK> infinity: You mean because CI Train isn't an adequate answer to all teh questions.
[23:26] <infinity> ScottK: It's more of a question for all the answers.
[23:26] <ScottK> There is that.
[23:27] <infinity> When one of your thumbs is twice the size of the other, and moving it makes you want to stab puppies, that's a bad sign, right?
[23:27]  * infinity really has no idea what he did to this thumb...
[23:28] <ScottK> Depends on your perspective on puppies, but I guess it's generally bad.
[23:28] <infinity> ScottK: I'm not a dog person.  Stabbing puppies is still wrong. :P
[23:29] <ScottK> Are they not delicious?  (dunno myself)