[18:15] <eliasps> Is this a thing? http://people.ubuntu.com/~eliasps/files/icon.png I haven't yet checked if it happens on Vivid or any other flavour. This is on Ubuntu GNOME 14.10 with GNOME 3.14.1 from the gnome3-staging PPA.
[19:51] <octoquad> eliasps, Yes I get the same thing but much smaller (64px) for E-book viewer (Calibre) on UG 14.10 and staging ppa
[19:52] <octoquad> Does not exist on 14.10 stock
[19:52] <darkxst> eliasps, just replied to your email
[19:52] <darkxst> it should be reported upstream
[19:52] <darkxst> octoquad, its due to changes in GTK 3.14
[19:53] <octoquad> No problem darkxst, it doesn't bug me, I know this is still in progress...
[19:56] <octoquad> So darkxst, that fglrx & wine problem lol
[19:58] <octoquad> Is there anything further we can do on that? It's probably minor considering everything else that needs to get done for the next release.
[20:03] <eliasps> Hey guys, sorry for the delay, I was afk.
[20:03] <eliasps> darkxst I read your reply. I'll report this
[20:03] <eliasps> octoquad thanks for checking!
[20:05] <darkxst> octoquad, larsu is working on a more generic fix that doesnt require patching all applications, but upstream want the applications fixed
[20:06] <darkxst> oh you are talking about fglrx
[20:07] <darkxst> the fglrx packaging needs to be fixed
[20:10] <octoquad> no problem eliasps :)
[20:11] <darkxst> octoquad, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wine1.6/+bug/1313123/comments/50
[20:16] <octoquad> Thanks darkxst, busy reading the comments
[20:17] <darkxst> also https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fglrx-installer/+bug/1129409
[20:19] <octoquad> Interesting. So, I normally mark bugs as duplicates, however for the one reported: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fglrx-installer/+bug/1382563 should I leave it as is or perhaps mark it as a duplicate of 1320217 or 1129409. I think 1129409 makes slightly more sense since it covers Nvidia and AMD
[20:21] <octoquad> oh my gosh another one: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wine1.6/+bug/1376587
[20:22] <octoquad> sorry I meant: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wine1.6/+bug/1376587
[20:25] <octoquad> pff fail lol
[20:29] <darkxst> octoquad, not sure, its a complete mess of inter-tangled bugs
[20:29] <octoquad> yeah
[20:32] <heyess> @noskcaj
[20:32] <meetingology> heyess: Error: "noskcaj" is not a valid command.
[20:34] <octoquad> I can see the fglrx-installer and fglrx-installer-updates are currently in progress and their is mention of a workaround. Perhaps for those that have found #1382563, if we mark it as a duplicate, they can at least see there is progress and a workaround to try and not get despondent due to no progress in #1382563.
[20:42] <darkxst> octoquad, yes, I guess bug 1129409 is the best
[20:42] <octoquad> done
[20:43] <octoquad> darkxst, Dark Theme and Ubuntu Software Centre. That's been around since 13.10 of UG are you aware of that?
[20:44] <darkxst> octoquad, what do you mean? using dark theme with software center?
[20:44] <octoquad> yes
[20:45] <darkxst> probably not supported
[20:45] <octoquad> not usable really due to text colors. Let me send you a screenshot
[20:46] <octoquad> I see Gnome Software Centre is coming along nicely but only available for RPM based distros
[20:46] <darkxst> it has nothing to do with RPM
[20:47] <darkxst> it requires appstream to provide metadata, DEP-11 is in progress in debian
[20:47] <darkxst> but we will need that in Ubuntu before we can ship gnome software
[20:48] <eliasps> darkxst should I build the latest version of gnome to check out if the issue with the icon still exist as per bugzilla guidelines? It might take a while.
[20:50] <octoquad> ah, I read article about it only working with RPM's at the moment, but thanks for clarifying.
[20:51] <octoquad> darkxst, do you need help with anything? I'm not sure what to do on the QA side at the moment
[20:52] <darkxst> octoquad, in interim we will likely switch to LSC, https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/115870/Screenshot%20from%202014-11-02%2015%3A43%3A37.png
[20:54] <darkxst> eliasps, pretty sure it does exist, I was messing around with it last week
[20:55] <darkxst> octoquad, the one thing we are really missing from the QA team is someone to track the main bugs
[20:55] <darkxst> octoquad, https://launchpad.net/ubuntu-gnome/+milestone
[20:56] <octoquad> I can't open dropbox links atm.
[20:56] <octoquad> I get "Lost Something?" when opening https://launchpad.net/ubuntu-gnome/+milestone
[20:56] <darkxst> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu-gnome/+milestone/vivid
[20:56] <octoquad> ta
[20:57] <darkxst> there are similar pages for ppa's and utopic
[20:57] <octoquad> ok
[20:57] <darkxst> first link should have been https://launchpad.net/ubuntu-gnome/+milestones
[20:58] <octoquad> yeah that works
[20:58] <darkxst> octoquad, http://imgur.com/B8mj9Lb
[20:59] <octoquad> Ooh, I likey! haha
[21:00] <darkxst> eliasps, still exists in git master
[21:02] <octoquad> Do we have a Wiki page for milestones? I'm a bit lost on the role and responsibilities required for this.
[21:03] <octoquad> I'll definitely add myself as affected to this one: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/1386133
[21:08] <darkxst> octoquad, no wiki, they just track bugs that need to be fixed in the various releases
[21:09] <darkxst> currently pretty incomplete though
[21:09] <octoquad> ok, so do I scour launchpad to find these and to the milestone?
[21:09] <octoquad> sorry ...add to the milestone?
[21:10] <darkxst> pretty much look for bugs that are widespread and/or 100% reproducible
[21:10] <octoquad> got it
[21:11] <darkxst> you need special access to add milestones, but I can give you that
[21:11] <darkxst> with that you select "Also affects project" > ubuntu-gnome
[21:11] <darkxst> then select the milestone in the last column of the ubuntu-gnome row at top of bug
[21:12] <octoquad> ok
[21:12] <octoquad> Is there anybody else doing this as well at the moment?
[21:12] <darkxst> no
[21:12] <octoquad> alrighty then
[21:14] <darkxst> bugs with the ppa packages go here https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-gnome
[21:14] <darkxst> though probably best to tag 3.14 bugs with vivid now, even if they are in the utopic staging ppa
[21:15] <octoquad> ok
[21:19] <octoquad> out of curiosity what do you with bugs like this: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-gnome/+bug/1218322 Someone said won't fix, but it's still in the list?
[21:19] <octoquad> I've never seen so much heat on a bug report before.
[21:20] <darkxst> octoquad, its only marked won't fix for saucy which is EOL
[21:21] <darkxst> I believe however that bug is fixed in the 3.14 packages on ppa
[21:22] <octoquad> Should I add this to the milestone?
[21:22] <octoquad> I can test tomorrow, to confirm.
[21:22] <darkxst> octoquad, sure
[21:29] <darkxst> octoquad, also feel free to mark duplicates within the ubuntu-gnome project ;)
[21:30] <octoquad> Will do. I think it might be a good idea to write this process down and put it up on the wiki at some point.
[21:30] <darkxst> the retracer should pick up crash duplicates, but it doesnt always, and just realised its be stuck for the last while!
[21:42] <darkxst> octoquad, great
[21:49] <octoquad> :)
[21:49] <octoquad> Pretty late this side, going to call it a night. Chat tomorrow!
[21:51] <darkxst> night octoquad
[22:09] <eliasps> darkxst it is indeed reported
[22:09] <eliasps> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=737096
[23:48] <james0r> loving how greybird looks on an out of the box ubuntu gnome install. looking for a dark theme that does the same thing with the window decs, borders, etc, but is dark.
[23:48] <james0r> any recommendations?