[00:46] <AceLan> henrix: got it
[09:02] <henrix> AceLan: thanks!
[09:03] <AceLan> henrix: np :)
[13:43] <smb> lamont, Re: dahdi: While preparing stuff yesterday I found that because of the other bug of not always compiling for the kernel version you thought you were compiling I missed that the patch to allow compiling for 3.11 was breaking builds for 3.2. :/ So there is no use in you trying what is in proposed now.
[13:47] <lamont> smb: good catch :?  thanks for the update - poke me again when it's a good time to try
[13:48]  * lamont generally does not have -proposed on that machine
[13:49] <smb> lamont, will do. Hopefully about the same time tomorrow +- a bit
[15:48] <smb> sforshee, I am not sure. Could we recently have done anything to Trusty which could cause bug 1401148 ?
[15:50] <sforshee> smb: not that I'm aware of. The bug doesn't say anything about this being a recent regression though, unless you have information that isn't in the bug.
[15:51] <smb> sforshee, No jamespage just mentioned it on #ubuntu-server
[15:52] <sforshee> smb: okay, I'll start paying attention there
[15:52] <smb> sforshee, ack. I just asked him about recentness