[14:25] <jrwren> kadams54: would you take py3 compat pr's on switchboardpy?  again, for my own time, not work time :)
[14:26] <kadams54> jrwren: yup
[14:27] <urulama> jrwren: why your own time? this helps, so it's UI time :)
[14:31] <jrwren> urulama: *shrug* itty bitty side project. I don't think we run python3 in our web apps.
[15:12] <hatch> uiteam need one more review and qa https://github.com/juju/juju-gui/pull/676
[15:12] <kadams54> hatch: looking
[15:12] <hatch> thanks - grab a coffee
[15:12] <hatch> it's big
[15:12] <hatch> :)
[15:52] <hatch> uiteam call in 8
[16:00] <urulama> frankban, jcsackett call
[17:23] <hatch> urulama: I have a working version of the 'featured' results lists and it all works so it won't block release once this lands
[17:23] <hatch> just fyi
[17:23] <hatch> (even if the results are a little suspect :)
[17:24] <urulama> hatch: big difference?
[17:25] <hatch> huge heh
[17:25] <hatch> speed is super nice though :)
[17:25] <hatch> urulama: it'll be fine for now - but there are certain 'top' results that don't make any sense
[17:25] <hatch> like why do you need to see the gui charm in the gui :)
[17:25] <urulama> hatch: like?
[17:25] <hatch> it'll always be on the top
[17:25] <hatch> _always_
[17:25] <hatch> :)
[17:26] <urulama> shameless self-promotion?
[17:26] <urulama> :)
[17:26] <hatch> haha 
[17:26] <urulama> but, yeah, it's not "featured"
[17:26] <hatch> yeah, and some will always be on top so I'm not sure how much I like the results...but whatever it's fast and works for now
[17:29] <urulama> i expect to have that solved by mid-January. and i guess that search is more important than just featured. we can do that if it is really really needed
[17:29] <urulama> (the featured)
[17:30] <hatch> yeah I think that sidebar is still in a bit of flux right now as to what should be the default view and whatnot so it'll be fine until we resolve what we want it to do
[17:58] <hatch> urulama: do we have an eta on the removal of the duplicate results of promulgated charms/bundles? I just added the filter in the FE but would like to make a note as to when this may be removed
[17:59] <urulama> hatch: same 2nd half of Jan
[17:59] <hatch> got it thx
[18:02] <hatch> urulama: featured results list is done, just writing/fixing tests now :) looks like I did something correct when writing the new api :D
[18:03] <urulama> accidents happen :)
[18:03] <hatch> lol
[18:04] <hatch> got to reboot - something is holding on to ports
[18:09] <rick_h_> hatch just manually filter the gui out. It's specific to the client in this case
[18:09] <rick_h_> the client can be smart asbout stuff
[18:12] <urulama> rick_h_: http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_ly977cNcFM1qg6fobo1_500.jpg
[18:12] <urulama> :)
[18:12] <rick_h_> I cant get link out of mt tablet irc client :P
[18:12] <hatch> urulama: lol!
[18:13] <rick_h_> well ssh to irssi client I think it haytes either tmux or irssi
[18:13] <rick_h_> so :P
[18:14] <hatch> so pumped that this conversion of the featured list was so easy
[18:14] <rick_h_> :)
[18:14] <hatch> love it when things work out like planned
[18:16] <hatch> stepping away for lunch 
[20:36] <hatch> lazyPower: mbruzek looks like the version of Ghost with the email provider support has made it through review https://jujucharms.com/ghost/precise/2
[20:37] <lazyPower> hatch: bazinga
[20:37] <mbruzek> booyah
[20:37] <mbruzek> Nice job hatch
[20:37] <hatch> now I just have to get on that darn haproxy redirect 
[20:37] <hatch> haproxy docs suck the big one lol
[21:10] <mbruzek> rick_h_: Are you there?
[21:12] <hatch> uiteam lf two reviews and a qa on https://github.com/juju/juju-gui/pull/677
[21:12] <hatch> mbruzek: he is gone
[21:12] <mbruzek> hatch: OK thanks
[21:12] <hatch> anything I can help with?
[21:12] <mbruzek> hatch: why does the juju-gui charm fail proof?
[21:12] <mbruzek> not proof, automated testing
[21:12] <kadams54> hatch: 677 is the one you wanted me to QA?
[21:12] <hatch> kadams54: yup plz
[21:13] <hatch> mbruzek: can you point me to the log?
[21:13] <hatch> aiui it should pass
[21:13] <mbruzek> http://reports.vapour.ws/charm-tests-by-charm 
[21:14] <mbruzek> hatch http://reports.vapour.ws/charm-tests/charm-bundle-test-10545-results
[21:15] <hatch> mbruzek: juju-test CRITICAL: /var/lib/jenkins/.juju/environments.yaml file does not exist
[21:16] <hatch> and that one you linked looks like it was abandoned?
[21:20] <mbruzek> hatch I can re-run the tests, but the critical one looks like the test is not compatible with the way CI runs tests
[21:22] <hatch> hmm that's possible - if you wouldn't mind re-running just to be sure
[21:29] <hatch> kadams54: lots of removed code in this branch to accomplish almost the identical functionality :)
[21:33] <kadams54> yay
[21:36] <kadams54> hatch: in the charmbrowser I see "Recommended" and "Other"
[21:39] <kadams54> hatch: is that correct? I was expecting "Recommended" to be gone and "Other" to be "Popular" or something similar
[21:39] <hatch> nope they are just ones which are promulgated and ones which aren't
[21:40] <kadams54> hatch: here's the recommended I see: http://cl.ly/image/2c2P3b1G221Y
[21:40] <hatch> yeah
[21:40] <kadams54> And here are the others: http://cl.ly/image/0w0d351V1E0C
[21:41] <kadams54> I realize mysql is precise for recommended and trusty for others, but it seems potentially confusing
[21:41] <hatch> very
[21:41] <hatch> :)
[21:41] <hatch> not much else we can do until we get better endpoints to work with unfortunately
[21:41] <kadams54> And juju-gui/precise is actually duplicated between recommended and others
[21:41] <hatch> oh it is isn't it
[21:41] <hatch> that's odd...
[21:41] <hatch> ohh right
[21:42] <hatch> gui isn't owned by charmers
[21:42] <kadams54> I know there's some dupe removal code in there… wasn't sure if it was supposed to be catching that
[21:42] <hatch> ok that's a bug
[21:42] <hatch> I'll remove the gui entirely from the search results
[21:42] <hatch> well...
[21:42] <hatch> nah 
[21:42] <hatch> i'll just remove the duplication
[21:43] <kadams54> OK, commented in the PR
[21:44] <hatch> thank yas
[21:45] <hatch> uiteam anyone else still around able to do the other review?
[21:46] <kadams54> hatch: Gotta run now. Once that dupe bug is fixed, I'm fine with landing.
[21:46] <hatch> thanks
[22:44] <rick_h_> hatch: we have denormalized api data now right?
[22:47] <rick_h_> hatch: and I vote we only pull the promulgated most popular, and we talked at one point of pulling extra so we could randomize them a bit?
[22:55] <hatch> rick_h_: oh is there a promulgated flag?
[22:55] <hatch> I guess I could do 'owner charmers'
[22:56] <hatch> rick_h_: https://api.jujucharms.com/charmstore/v4/search?limit=10&sort=-downloads&owner=charmers&limit=30&include=charm-metadata&include=bundle-metadata&include=extra-info&include=stats
[22:58] <hatch> that seems like a pretty reasonable result set
[23:01] <rick_h_> hatch use owners=
[23:01] <rick_h_> (blank)
[23:01] <rick_h_> that'll only get promulgated
[23:01] <hatch> oh?
[23:01] <hatch> ahh
[23:01] <rick_h_> it's what we use for the /solutions page
[23:01] <rick_h_> hatch standup real quick?
[23:02] <hatch> sure
[23:03] <hatch> doing this will result in a little more work because I'll need a new template but no biggy
[23:03] <rick_h_> daily ot friday?
[23:03] <hatch> i'm in daily now
[23:03] <rick_h_> k sec