[00:35] <slangasek> bdmurray: 1401390> as a regression-update bug, yes, I think that's reasonable provided that it's passed verification this time
[09:22] <Riddell> stgraber: can you turn off cron for images?
[09:33] <xnox> darn, can't slip a new ubiquity in.
[09:46] <Mirv> preNEW binary check for indicator-network-tools in https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/landing-006/+packages would be needed (packaging changes https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-006-2-publish/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/packaging_changes_indicator-network_0.5.1+15.04.20141216-0ubuntu1.diff)
[10:46] <Riddell> utlemming: is cloud in alpha 1? https://wiki.ubuntu.com/VividVermat/Alpha1
[10:46] <Riddell> knome elfy: is xubuntu in alpha 1? https://wiki.ubuntu.com/VividVermat/Alpha1
[10:47] <Laney> Vervet
[10:47] <doko> cjwatson, pitti: looka like we need some coordinated effort to get isl/gcc/ghc into -release
[10:48] <Riddell> ahem, https://wiki.ubuntu.com/VividVervet/Alpha1
[11:36] <Riddell> alpha 1 freeze in place for kubuntu, ubuntu gnome, ubuntu kylin
[11:37] <cjwatson> doko: isn't the problem just that gcc-4.9 is stuck at the excuses stage due to an autopkgtest regression?  I don't think ghc is actually directly involved, it's just that that stack all shows up in update_output because cpp is uninstallable with the current autohinted set
[11:38] <cjwatson> doko: can't do much with the alpha 1 freeze block though ...
[11:39] <cjwatson> doko: that autopkgtest failure looks transient as stated, retried, but it's been failing for a while
[12:25] <cjwatson> doko: here's the output if gcc-4.9 were included: http://paste.ubuntu.com/9539880/
[12:26] <cjwatson> doko: so I think you just need to rebuild gnat-mingw-w64
[12:30] <Laney> hint-tester, nice
[13:07] <elfy> Riddell: no - we are likely to start with a2 this time earliest
[13:07] <elfy> thanks
[13:07] <Riddell> gotcha
[13:47] <doko> cjwatson: right, already done. didn't see that it was built from a different source
[14:10] <stgraber> Riddell: so turn off for kubuntu, gnome and kylin?
[14:10] <Riddell> stgraber: yep
[14:11] <stgraber> doing
[14:12] <stgraber> Riddell: done
[14:12]  * stgraber looks at the tracker now
[14:19] <stgraber> Riddell: alright, the tracker should be good to go too
[14:19] <Riddell> stgraber: is that not something I (or whoever is on duty) can do?
[14:20] <stgraber> usually, yes but the first milestone is special as I need to copy some data over from the previous series in the DB
[14:20] <stgraber> (which I arguably should be done at series opening time, but well, that never quite happens)
[14:32] <cjwatson> Laney: Yeah, finally decided to try it
[15:10] <rcj> stgraber, cloud is in for alpha-1.  Odd_Bloke will be driving this time, with myself and utlemming as backup.
[15:11] <stgraber> Riddell: ^
[15:16] <Riddell> rcj: gotcha
[15:17] <rcj> Riddell, thanks.
[15:54] <knome> Riddell, no, xubuntu isn't in for alpha 1 if you're still wondering :) and our new project lead is ochosi, so you'll want to ping him in the future :)
[15:58] <Riddell> hi ochosi, congratulations on your promotion
[15:59] <Riddell> stgraber: can your turn off the kubuntu-plasma5 cron for good?
[16:00] <Riddell> real kubuntu is working nicely as plasma 5
[16:00] <stgraber> Riddell: sure
[16:00] <knome> Riddell, promotion... more work and more bureaucracy? yeah, congratulations ochosi ;]
[16:09] <Riddell> stgraber: how do we add builds to the vivid 1 milestone in iso qa?
[16:10] <stgraber> Riddell: if you want to rebuild anyway, just ask for a rebuild on the daily milestone and the build will get added to alpha 1 once it's done
[16:10] <stgraber> if you want to add an existing build, then it's a bit trickier :)
[16:10] <stgraber> (either need to manually add it through the UI using the exact same information as the existing one, or manually add the relation in the DB)
[16:11] <infinity> Less hassle to just rebuild all the dailies that are participating in A1 so they pop up on the milestone.
[16:12] <Riddell> groovy worked it out http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/328/builds
[17:11] <wxl> stgraber: lubuntu is in for alpha 1
[17:13] <stgraber> Riddell: ^ (I'll turn off cron, can you take care of the rest?)
[17:15] <Riddell> wxl: you're the lead?
[17:16] <Riddell> wxl: got a real name?#
[17:17] <wxl> Riddell: yep, Walter Lapchynski.
[17:17] <Riddell> wxl: ok let me know if you need anything added to iso tracker
[17:17] <stgraber> cron updated
[17:19] <stgraber> and enabled lubuntu in the vivid manifest
[17:19] <stgraber> Riddell: we have the IRC nicks of all the leads at: http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/series/47/manifest/full
[17:20] <wxl> i just disabled the ppcs as we're trying to stick with lts on those
[17:20] <stgraber> ok
[17:20] <Riddell> ah yes I always forget about that page
[17:25] <wxl> aw shoot what should the version string be? does it matter?
[17:26]  * Riddell freezes lubuntu packages from transitioning
[17:27] <wxl> ?
[17:27] <Riddell> wxl: 20141216 ?
[17:27] <wxl> really, that's what we use for milestone releases?
[17:27] <wxl> sorry i forget this every time :)
[17:28] <wxl> oh well
[17:28] <wxl> ic
[17:28] <wxl> so do i need to request a rebuild now?
[19:20] <arges> infinity: hey, i just did an 'sru-release utopic horizon', and ubuntu2 should have been copied to -updates, but alas it seems stuck in -proposed . Any ideas what I screwed up here?
[19:28] <arges> infinity: n/m
[19:47] <infinity> arges: Lack of patience?
[19:47] <arges> infinity: yea... the other ones were so quick.
[21:51] <arges> infinity: ok so I see https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/horizon/1:2014.2.1-0ubuntu2, yet rmadison -a source horizon | grep trusty-updates shows : 1:2014.1.3-0ubuntu1 . Its been like this for a while, not sure why this particular package is hung up
[22:06] <arges> ok its all good
[22:06]  * arges lays off the caffiene