=== Lcawte is now known as Lcawte|Away === zmoylan-1i is now known as zmoylan-pi [05:49] hm === Hornet- is now known as Hornet === Lcawte|Away is now known as Lcawte [09:01] morning [09:02] man what the hell [09:03] sudo fsck -b 98304 -L bad-blocks /dev/sda [09:03] fsck from util-linux 2.20.1 [09:03] e2fsck 1.42.9 (4-Feb-2014) [09:03] fsck.ext2: Bad magic number in super-block while trying to open /dev/sda [09:03] not good [09:03] nope [09:03] backup? [09:04] will not work on any supa block its my cloud nas drive [09:04] sudo e2fsck /dev/sda [09:04] e2fsck 1.42.9 (4-Feb-2014) [09:04] ext2fs_open2: Bad magic number in super-block [09:04] e2fsck: Superblock invalid, trying backup blocks... [09:04] e2fsck: Bad magic number in super-block while trying to open /dev/sda [09:07] That's not a happy filesystem [09:09] Model: ATA WDC WD30EFRX-68E (scsi) [09:09] Disk /dev/sda: 3001GB [09:09] Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/4096B [09:09] Partition Table: gpt [09:09] Number Start End Size File system Name Flags [09:09] 3 15.7MB 528MB 513MB primary [09:09] 1 528MB 2576MB 2048MB ext3 primary raid [09:09] 2 2576MB 4624MB 2048MB ext3 primary raid [09:09] 5 4624MB 4724MB 99.6MB primary [09:09] 6 4724MB 4824MB 101MB primary [09:09] 7 4824MB 4826MB 1049kB primary [09:09] 8 4826MB 4828MB 2097kB primary [09:09] 4 4828MB 3001GB 2996GB ext4 primary [09:13] plasmaxbox, Whoa, hold on [09:13] You're trying to fsck the whole disk [09:13] fsck on /dev/sda? [09:13] fsck the partitions, not the whole disk [09:13] the partition table appears to contain nonsense anyway [09:14] likely mangled by previous fsck attempts [09:14] I dunno, I've seen some pretty stupid looking partition tables that worked just fune [09:15] That one is a bit wacky though [09:15] partitions beyond the end of the disk though? [09:15] Ah yes [09:15] last time i tried that i heard the read head slamming against the side of the case [09:15] That's pretty screwed up [09:15] its gpt system and has a raid on the first 2 parttions [09:16] Ok, so partitions 1 and 2 might still be OK [09:16] But you're running fsck against the whole disk as a block device, which isn't going to work [09:16] oh wait, those values are MB not GB [09:16] /dev/sda1 not /dev/sda [09:16] that's even more bizarre, but whatever [09:16] Yeah, that last partition is pretty big [09:17] Why the tiny 2GB RAID? [09:17] https://drive.google.com/?authuser=0#folders/0B_6OlQ_H0PxVRXF4aFpYS2dzMEE [09:17] it runs arm linux [09:18] Are 1 and 2 mirrors of the same filesystem? [09:18] ive done the hole thing the disk f/s is intact [09:18] Or are they different file systems? [09:18] awilkins, indeed [09:18] RIght, so there will be another device that is NOT a raw disk that represents that filesystem (if it's mounted) [09:18] Doing operations on one half of a RAID mirror will screw it up [09:19] do `mount -l ` [09:19] no matter its screwed anyway === Lcawte is now known as Lcawte|Away [09:20] Good morning peeps :) [09:20] i have the img file to replace the hole disk setup anywho [09:20] it just has bad blocks [09:20] and i cant update it [09:20] then you can't use an image file [09:21] what you need to do instead is tell the HD to reallocate the bad blocks [09:22] hey everyone :) [09:22] Morning bigcalm [09:22] morning knightwise [09:22] morning everyone else [09:22] Could I have your opinion on something ? [09:23] No [09:23] :) [09:23] I would like to setup an owncloud server ,but i'm not sure what the best way to go is. [09:23] I have a router from my ISP, [09:23] and it does NAT and hands out 192 range addresses [09:24] because i don't trust them I have my own router setup behind it , behind which I have my personal network 172 *** range [09:24] Now I want to run owncloud as a vm on my home server (in the 172***) range [09:24] there is an Owncloud variant of Freedombone [09:24] This server has 2 network cards. (one Wifi , one wired) [09:24] The wired one is connected to the 172*** network [09:25] would it be better to : A [09:25] has anyone had recruiter emails from google lately? [09:25] Host the Owncloud machine on a vm in the 172*** network and forward a port from my router [09:25] foobarry: no [09:25] foobarry: i had one about 4 months ago [09:25] i wondered what the text in the email was, [09:26] do they copy paste the same guff every time? [09:26] OR to connect up the second network card of my server to the 192*** network and connect the Owncloud VM via that card. [09:26] hang on [09:26] (making my server multihomed but NOT forwarding any ports through my router) [09:26] knightwise: see the install_owncloud function to get some idea of how to configure it with nginx https://raw.githubusercontent.com/bashrc/freedombone/master/install-freedombone.sh [09:28] foobarry: http://paste.ubuntu.com/9568144/ [09:28] I had a Google recruiter email about a year ago. If they had sent it years earlier I would have paid attention, but I don't have much interest in them now and am becoming more anti-Google [09:28] knightwise: just see if their router has a dmz if it does point it to your router, then on the dmz for your router point it to the server you want to run own cloud on [09:28] ali1234: thanks. thats a different text. [09:28] so its safer to do a double nat then to multi home my Server to connect the Owncloud VM directly to the 192 network ? [09:29] i think the google emails are just invitation to apply [09:29] rather than invitation to interview [09:29] hence the same chance as applying "cold" [09:30] i have a family, so i try to be productive between 9-5 and then go home [09:30] so working at google probably wouldn't fit that idea [09:31] do Googlers not work 9-5? [09:31] bashrc : i'm installing Owncloud from a Turnkey Vm. [09:31] its probably frowned upon [09:31] bashrc Google is the nicest looking concentration camp workplace there is [09:31] from my previous years in the city, i used to work much longer than contracted hrs [09:31] I bet they have an opt-out-of-European working time directive clause in the contract [09:32] especially when food is prvoided onsite [09:32] Food, laundry, massages [09:32] THere were googlers who took to living in the car park in an RV [09:32] breakfast lunch and tea [09:32] The only thing they couldn't get was shampoo [09:33] I don't disagree with Google's workplaces - they are apparently quite cushy - it's more that I don't like the spying business model, the total lack of interest in securing email, the "real names" debacle and such [09:33] meh [09:33] If I was younger, and if there was still a chance of big fat stock options, I'd go for it [09:33] ethically i am ok with google. [09:33] But there isn't anymore. No more tales of company massage therapists that got millions in stock [09:33] not ok with cig and gambling companies [09:33] I don't htink I'd want to be a cog in the spy machine [09:34] i'd even work for gchq if they paid more than pittance. i hear its worse than som epublic sector roles [09:35] Any final opinions on my setup ? Do I Forward a port to my owncloud VM in my LAN , or Do I Multi Home my VM Hypervisor to have one card in my LAN and one card in my DMZ ? [09:35] when i've been the all knowing sysadmin in medium sized business, i've been the spy [09:35] in effect, since i had control over internet and email data [09:35] thats the sysadmins job :D [09:36] My old office (gov org, but not any kind of high-security place) was snooping everything [09:37] I mean EVERYTHING - MITM SSL proxy with locally install root CA [09:37] personally I wouldn't want to sell out like that, but everyone has their own beliefs/priorities [09:37] Internal chat server [09:37] And the icing on the cake, they were running all our phone calls through a SIGINT program [09:38] depends on yr def of selling out [09:39] my wife would think working at a newspaper (partic. the guardian) is selling out [09:41] Why particularly the Guardian? [09:42] I would have thought that was the least odious? [09:42] some personal reasons involving some spiteful libel involving a family member that couldn't be fought [09:42] and also their world view stinks a bit [09:43] as do all newspapers [09:43] Occupational hazard really. Ex-wife is a paediatric oncologist. Sees scary childhood illness behind every sniffle. [09:43] * knightwise loves Xforwarding [09:48] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tRxcSNaVCPA [09:53] Good morning all; happy Friday, and happy Underdog Day! :-D [09:53] I need a JamesTait API. [09:53] to tell me which day it is :D [09:54] nigelb, I'm hoping to implement a REST API over the Christmas period. ;) [09:54] :D [10:02] * awilkins may get as far as REST [10:04] awilkins, I'm sincerely hoping I make it that far. [10:04] sudo fsck -L baddbadd /dev/md127 [10:04] booo [10:05] directhex: nice vid [10:05] The bass sounds good with my soundbar :) [10:06] jamestait.rest(days=17) === Lcawte|Away is now known as Lcawte [10:16] morning boys and girls. [10:19] bigcalm: I thought you weren't allowed a soundbar [10:19] he told them it was a defective toblerone :-P [10:20] davmor2: not in the sittingroom. I have one in my office [10:21] bigcalm: man you need help if you can't convince the woman you love to move it into the livingroom [10:23] Wah, I'm keeping my soundbar [10:23] Does it provide good positional separation for games [10:24] What I want in a sound system ; 1) Good 3D positional location 2) Can plug in a headset without crawling around the back of the PC [10:24] (before you say "plug it into the front panel" the front panel sockets have TERRIBLE crosstalk with the motherboard traces) [10:44] I just listen to music on mine and it's connected via fibre optic [10:47] I think I have a FO connector [10:48] There are gaming peripheral companies selling soundbars... [10:48] Which probably means they are not very good soundbars with a pretty logo... [11:01] morning [12:01] instagram has had an instapurge - apparently people who paid for subscribers are angered at the loss of subscribers they paid for [12:02] ....people pay to be spammed/spam other people....? [12:04] sadly, paying for subscribers/followers/likes seems to be a thing [12:04] hence unpopular organisations can appear popular online [12:04] bashrc, and celebrities [12:04] yes [12:05] justin beiber lost 3.5million subscribers overnight [12:05] :) [12:06] Some people are just mugs [12:07] like justin beiber - believing those 3.5 million were real people [12:07] I mean does he really think he's popular enough to have that many in the first place? [12:08] I really shouldn't be mean about him, but he is a moron afterall [12:08] I doubt it, probably doesn't even know what instagram is, just pays a PR Manager to spam his face everywhere [12:10] I don't even get what it is he's supposed to be famous for [12:10] "Singing", allegedly [12:11] I think he's supposed to be famous because his sponsors paid heavily to make it happen [12:11] Maybe Miley Cyrus' meltdown is basically her bid for freedom [12:11] If she's no longer commercially viable she can relax with her millions [12:12] if miley is no longer viable it's her own doing by trying to be "outragous" [12:13] Egg throwing, drink driving, taking drugs, resisting arrest, dangerous driving [12:13] Basically being a pratt [12:13] she was fine when she was owned by disney because they wouldn't let her go off the rails [12:14] then she decided to dress like a prostitute and seduce men old enough to be her grandad live on stage [12:14] diddledan: That'll have changed now, don't forget they've just bought the rights to a cold blooded murder...Han shot first :) [12:15] lol [12:15] Disney doesn't have a good record for sane child stars [12:15] Miley. Lindsey. [12:17] I'm not sure how I feel about this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=11VGDAOVEag [12:17] Heh, googling "disney stars gone bad" brings this up http://www.thehollywoodgossip.com/2014/06/13-disney-stars-gone-wild-when-good-kids-go-bad/ [12:17] Britney. Zac. [12:19] wow that picture of lindsey is bad [12:19] she looks ancient [12:20] She's the one I actually think is the biggest shame. Wasn't a terrible actress [12:21] dear god, number 9 in the list [12:21] Are there any Disney child stars who remained sane? [12:21] brian bonsall [12:21] There's another article for ones that didn't go mad [12:22] http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/01/03/good-disney-stars_n_4538410.html [12:22] http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/01/03/good-disney-stars_n_4538410.html [12:22] heheheh [12:22] Was just looking at that [12:22] Its interesting that all the stars going bad/not going bad are from the late 80's/90's and onwards [12:34] disney only made cartoons before that [12:40] Good point, that said, even the cartoon voices went bad, Peter Pan's voice ended up a drug addict & in jail and died young due to effects of long term drug abuse [12:42] Not just a new phenomenan anyway, probably just a case of a lot of people in the public life getting taken along & losing track of whats important [12:44] ali1234: Did you see the video of Notch's new house [12:44] Spending his Microsoft money http://www.pocket-lint.com/news/132105-take-a-look-inside-the-70-million-la-mansion-minecraft-paid-for-it-ll-blow-you-away [12:44] yeah but nobody would recognise the peter pan voice actor if you put their picture on a website so....... [12:45] Can't argue with that [12:47] i wouldn't buy that house [12:47] it's like a car showroom [12:48] It looks nice, but a bit too "shiny" for my liking [12:48] i mean, i might buy it as an investment, but i wouldn't live in it [12:49] i would rent it out to rockstars with more money than sense [12:50] I don't think I'd let rockstars in without a very large security deposit to cover the cost of repairs when they leave [12:50] that goes without saying [12:50] that's where you'd make most of the money [12:51] 3 month rental, 9 month rebuild period and start again [12:51] i reckon you oculd turn it around faster than that [12:53] i mean you can pretty much remove the windows and just sweep everything outside and off the cliff [12:54] :) [13:01] I think I might pop over the cafe and order a burger and chips [13:01] * diddledan like having a cafe over the courtyard from me [13:04] :) [13:05] Man likes his Bond. And jellybeans. [13:06] Is that a Rolls Royce like Goldfinger has in his garage? [13:21] sweet [13:21] my boss decided I was worth a bonus [13:22] I wasn't expecting one because I'm freelance [13:27] Probably more likely to get one because you're freelance [13:27] Don't have to give bonuses to the wage slaves, they get to _keep their job_ that's their bonus [13:28] teehee [13:50] Morning all. [13:51] morning popey [14:01] tried making a tree: http://imgur.com/kebjMDv [14:02] relevant since it's made of of copper from cat5 cable [14:02] covered in plaster, then painted [14:06] was expecting a christmas tree [14:06] sorry to disappoint :D [14:06] what is that green stuff? [14:07] woodland scenics foliage. [14:07] its part done [14:07] gonna fill it out properly but the glue is not very sticky [14:11] * popey just got a fruit hamper in the post \o/ [14:11] (also contains booze) [14:12] nice [14:12] gonna add the tree to my dio http://imgur.com/bs52EiU [14:12] popey: from an admirer? [14:12] So are UbuntuPhones going to be shipping in 2015? [14:13] http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2014/12/bq-ubuntu-phone-launches-in-europe-this-february [14:13] from my dads widow [14:13] thats nice [14:13] yeah, fresh stuff for mulled wine recpipe too [14:13] -typo [14:27] popey, window? [14:27] bad typo if so :-p [14:27] your dad might wonder why you've suddenly killed him off [14:29] microsoft's latest communications seem to echo google's material styling [14:29] I wonder who was first [14:29] seems bold colours and solid blocks are the rule du jour [14:30] rounded corners seem to have been forgotten [15:22] http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-30539198 [15:23] how to redirect example.com to www.example.com ubuntu please guide me [15:23] err [15:24] you don't own example.com [15:25] and you need to specify what you want to be redirected [15:25] who? what? [15:25] i.e. what protocol [15:26] yes, and as MartijnV1S asks, who do you want to redirect === MartijnV1S is now known as MartijnVdS [15:26] I think I'm only seeing one side of a conversation [15:27] oh [15:27] [15:23:42] how to redirect example.com to www.example.com ubuntu please guide me [15:27] that's what I'm replying to [15:27] do you have him ignored? [15:27] it wouldn't surprise me if you do [15:28] example.com some functionalities not working [15:28] dvrr, you don't own example.com [15:28] no [15:28] example [15:28] dvrr, so you can't do anything with it [15:29] in mydomain with out www some functionalities not working [15:29] tomcat server [15:31] dvrr, I think you need to find a document that explains how to ask for help [15:32] dvrr, this is a good document: http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html [15:34] duh, it's an example [15:34] dvrr, in response to my assumption that you want some http page to redirect to another http page then you need to return a response code of "301" or "302" to the browser from the server/app [15:35] http://serverfault.com/questions/262927/apache-tomcat-url-without-app-name [15:39] IMO obscuring details of a request for help is never useful - the only time it is ok to do so is when removing a password or other credentials that are supposed to be secrert [15:40] domain names are public so there's no reason to keep them secret [15:43] if you're worried about them being logged in a public forum then too late. they're in whois already. [15:46] also explain what you've already tried [15:46] and what the effect was (and waht you expected it to do) [15:47] what I expected it to do: "not fail" [15:47] :-p [15:47] Why come to an Ubuntu forum to get help with Apache (Java) Tomcat.....? [15:47] "hi, how do i make my website work when i got to example.com instead of www.example.com. i tried going to example.com but it didn't work. i expected it to work" [15:47] ali1234, that's a completely unhelpful question [15:48] "my website uses apache tomcat" [15:48] this is exactly the question that was asked, and it's enough information to give a partial answer [15:48] You put an Apache server in front of Tomact and have it re-write the URL. <- One way [15:48] TwistedLucidity: right, and that's exactly what the stack exchange question i posted says [15:49] ali1234: Ha ha ha! Not read it yet, just went with the most obvious answer [15:49] It's one of these things. It's very easy, but can get very complicated depending on how things are set-up. [15:53] diddledan: They're in whois with your home address too, unless you're using domain privacy [15:53] unless you are working on someone else's server [15:53] Or a company [15:53] yes, this is true - and expands my point [15:54] ali1234: That too. "Sure, I can fix that. Pay me $quillions"...5 minutes later..."Uh, IRC peeps who do I...?" :-) [16:29] adele dazeem and some bubbles: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6bbuBubZ1yE [16:30] .. and some dancing kids [16:45] closed it :P [16:51] dammit, I'm sat in the dark again [16:52] :D [16:52] no sign of my Sopranos bluray set yet [16:52] how will i have fun with makemkv over the Christmas period if it doesn't arrive in time? ;) [16:53] :-p [16:53] http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-30555997 [16:54] popey, I've been waiting for a linkable story about that [16:54] Hold on, didn't I see something earlier that said that they DIDN'T have evidence that NK did it? [16:54] popey, rory cellen jones tweeted earlier but the beeb hadn't written it up === Nexus is now known as Guest33786 [16:55] I think it's very unlikely to be NK. The trolls know that if they push certain buttons US bigwigs go insane [16:59] "White House spokesman Josh Earnest told reporters US officials had held daily discussions about the Sony cyber-attack and were considering an "appropriate response"." [17:00] I think it's more likely to be Anonymous or a related group trolling Sony [17:00] the sheer volume of data indicates an inside job [17:01] ali1234, several security bloggers have suggested that as a theory too [17:01] more money for cybercommand? [17:01] I say we should declare cyber-war [17:02] I want there to be hackers in a darkened bunker furiously typing at keyboards in attempt to defend in real-time as well as launch cyber-nukes [17:02] heh [17:02] ali1234: or just a totally negligent piss poort job at security [17:03] my guess would be NK sleeper agents infiltrating corporate IT [17:03] what you mean is military personnel who have been trained to use metasploit [17:03] intrbiz, I think piss poor security has been overshadowed by the sheer volume of exfiltrated data [17:03] bashrc, yeah [17:04] diddledan: indeed [17:04] yes, hte biggest foe here is really just Sony's security cluelessness [17:04] if it actually was a sleeper then they would know, but they wouldn't tell you [17:04] mainly cos the guy would now have mysteriously vanished [17:05] Naah, for my money it's another Bradley or Snowden [17:05] but tracking through employee records takes time [17:05] bashrc, there obviously needs to be an underground movement of civilian hackers living in abandoned warehouses equipped with high-end computer equipemnt and internet links who are working to prevent both sides from killing normal people [17:05] I suspect that whoever is behind it is just playing the NK angle for the lulz [17:05] the said warehouses need to be wired to self-destruct, obviously [17:05] I bet the whole naked actresses thing was just a sysadmin at Apple who had access to their cloud storage and a penchant for naked actresses [17:05] the FBI wouldn't say it's definitely NK if they had zero evidence [17:05] they are not politicians [17:06] they wouldn't say there were WMD if they had zero evidence either [17:06] plus nobody actually wants to start a war with NK, there's no point [17:06] Was just going to say that. Oh snap. [17:06] WTH... no point to war? [17:06] bashrc, they had evidence provided by the security services - the evidence was false [17:06] Of course there are people that want to start a war with NK [17:06] Or anyone [17:07] "sexy evidence" [17:07] no, there arent, not unless you are a crazy conspiracy theorist [17:07] I want to take evidence to bed [17:07] It's not crazy at all [17:07] There's always a motive for war - people make lots of money [17:07] they wouldn't make lots of money in a war against NK [17:07] Of course they would [17:08] the government won't [17:08] Much of the money is made just supplying combat troops with the things they need to have a base [17:08] no it isn't. the money is made rebuilding the country afterwards [17:08] money goes round in a circle between government and subcontractors [17:08] NK is already broken [17:08] if the country has no money and no natural resources that isn't possible [17:08] or in this case, it wouldn't be REbuild, just build [17:09] the only infrastructure in NK is government self perpetuation [17:09] the civil society doesn't have squat [17:10] It's hard to know what capability NK had, but they don't seem very technologically sophisticated in terms of internet [17:10] CIA world factbook on NK : mining (coal, iron ore, limestone, magnesite, graphite, copper, zinc, lead, and precious metals) [17:10] There must be a load of underexploited resources there [17:10] i don't see oil in that list [17:10] the rest are meh [17:11] not to mention that war against NK would really piss off china [17:11] They don't export or produce oil or natural gas [17:11] and you don't want to go there [17:11] Doesn't mean there isn't any [17:12] the US isn't going to invade a country on the basis that they don't know for sure there's no oil under it [17:13] surely they wouldn't invade if they were sure, would they? :-p [17:14] north korea basically only exists because it is incredibly inhospitable and nobody else wants it [17:14] Invading countries on the basis of oil wasn't for the oil [17:14] It was to stop them trading oil in Euro [17:14] Trying to invade NK would be dumb. They failed the last time [17:14] Iran makes noises about trading oil in Euro - OH suddenly the US hates you again [17:15] If people start wanting the value back for all those dollars they trade oil with, the US is stick-a-fork-in-it done [17:16] Iraq was nothing special in terms of oil production, but Saddam wanted to trade it for Euros [17:18] http://jalopnik.com/dopey-old-couple-almost-dies-after-13-hours-trapped-in-1672832892 [17:21] why does the bbc news homepage not provide any way to get a live stream of news24? [17:21] it does [17:21] where? [17:21] right on the front page [17:22] http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/ on the right [17:22] "LIVE BBC News Channel" [17:22] nope [17:23] it probably thinks you aren't in the uk [17:24]