[05:05] <bluesabre> ochosi: made some progress on the xfpm/light-locker integration, should wrap up tomorrow.  lines 14, 308, 1914 (sorry, editor configured to drop trailing spaces) http://paste.ubuntu.com/9586039/
[05:06] <bluesabre> be back in the morning
[06:18] <JackFrost> ubiquity has been merged.
[10:01] <ochosi> JackFrost: yup, received the email. good stuff.
[10:02] <ochosi> bluesabre: hmm, those indenting changes really make that diff hard to read
[10:04] <ochosi> bluesabre: i wonder whether we could put the ll stuff in a separate file, sort of a "plugin" for the settings dialog
[10:04] <ochosi> it is quite massive and messy already
[10:04] <ochosi> i guess we should clean up all those callbacks and replace them with xfconf-binds, then it'd be easier on the eyes...
[10:05] <ochosi> also, have you talked to anyone regarding ll1.5.1 yet?
[10:05] <ochosi> in terms of getting it uploaded i mean
[10:42] <bluesabre> ochosi: can't do binds, the logic is special
[10:43] <bluesabre>  autolock is disabled if screensaver timeout is 0, etc
[10:43] <bluesabre> I'll clean up the diff later, and get rid of everything that was because of trailing spaces
[10:49] <bluesabre> ochosi: cleaner diff http://paste.ubuntu.com/9587493/
[12:24] <ochosi> bluesabre: i wasn't thinking of light-locker stuff for binds, but all the other cruft of xfpm's settings
[12:33] <bluesabre> ah, gotcha
[12:33] <bluesabre> :)
[15:58] <elfy> ochosi: yep - synaptic looks better now :)
[16:12] <bluesabre> ochosi: this should do it... please give it a spin.  http://paste.ubuntu.com/9589233/
[16:13] <bluesabre> let me know if you have any questions, I should be aroundish
[16:13] <ochosi> hey bluesabre 
[16:13] <ochosi> only here for a few mins now
[16:14] <ochosi> hmpf, parole's buttons still don't look nice. meh.
[16:14] <ochosi> but yeah, good to see that at least synaptic is back to normal
[16:14] <ochosi> elfy: ^
[16:15] <bluesabre> ochosi: have not uploaded the latest greybird commit yet
[16:15] <ochosi> yeah, but elfy uses -daily
[16:15] <bluesabre> gotcha
[16:15] <ochosi> and i just looked myself too to be sure
[16:15] <bluesabre> and the diff I gave depeneds on the light-locker 1.5.1 package currently in vivid
[16:15] <ochosi> have you talked to anyone about getting ll 1.5.1 to the archive?
[16:15] <ochosi> woot? already uploaded?
[16:16] <bluesabre> should be
[16:16] <bluesabre> !info light-locker vivid
[16:16] <bluesabre> hm
[16:16] <bluesabre> thought I did
[16:17] <ochosi> i thought you uploaded it to the staging PPA only
[16:17] <bluesabre> maybe it got frozen along the way
[16:18] <bluesabre> seems that way
[16:18] <bluesabre> was pretty sure I uploaded it, will do that next
[16:18] <bluesabre> anyway, also in staging
[16:18] <bluesabre> :)
[16:18] <bluesabre> ochosi: ^
[16:18] <ochosi> yup
[16:19] <ochosi> wasn't sure anymore whether it was part of the packageset
[16:20] <bluesabre> that one should be
[16:20] <ochosi> humm, also need to write that patch for xdg-screensaver 
[16:21] <bluesabre> you or me?
[16:21] <ochosi> i guess either of us
[16:21] <ochosi> it should be a single elif in "detectDE"
[16:22] <ochosi> with a dbus-testcall to see whether light-locker is around
[16:22] <ochosi> and then run the screensaver_freedesktop part
[16:24] <ochosi> that should pretty much be it anyway
[16:24] <ochosi> gotta take off now
[16:24] <ochosi> ttyl
[16:29] <elfy> not looked at parole tbh - I always end up forgetting to reset the blank screen
[16:31] <bluesabre> alrighty, I'll see if I get to it
[16:32] <bluesabre> ochosi: let me know once you've had a chance to test my patch out, then I'll package it for -staging for wider testing before pushing it to the archive
[18:47] <ochosi> bluesabre: looks good in general, small issue i encountered: the first checkbox (enable ll) doesn't seem to have any effect. locking with ll still works
[18:48] <ochosi> so apart from that it's ready i guess
[18:48] <ochosi> oh, plus, drop the security-frame from the system-tab if the ll tab is there
[18:48] <ochosi> otherwise that locking option is there twice
[18:48] <ochosi> i mean lock on suspend
[18:48] <ochosi> g2g
[23:19] <bluesabre> ochosi: ah, good point. the issue there is that we do not kill the running light-locker instance
[23:19] <bluesabre> I'll try to find a nice way to do that