[09:06] <ikonia> Almoullim: ?
[09:10] <Almoullim> yes ?
[09:10] <ikonia> hey there,
[09:10] <Almoullim> hello :)
[09:10] <ikonia> you've joined #ubuntu-ops
[09:10] <ikonia> welcome, what's up ?
[09:10] <ikonia> (you also appeared to be flooding out)
[09:11] <Almoullim> flooding out, you mean connecting and dis
[09:11] <ikonia> yes
[09:11] <Almoullim> yeah i had this channel by accident on the auto join list
[09:11] <ikonia> ahh
[09:11] <Almoullim> and i was having problem with the theme
[09:12] <Almoullim> so i had to con ad rec
[09:12] <Almoullim> to test things up
[09:12] <ikonia> no problem
[09:12] <Almoullim> sorry for that
[09:12] <ikonia> accidents happen
[09:12] <Almoullim> yup
[09:13] <Almoullim> if you excuse now, i think this channel is for ops so i should leave :P
[09:13] <Almoullim> have a good day
[15:07] <phunyguy> jirido in #lubuntu is a bot, fyi.
[15:35] <genii> @comment 65447 Reviewed, not lifted. Known problem user.
[15:35] <genii> @comment 65445 Reviewed, will not be removed.
[15:54] <phunyguy> genii: are you an op in #lubuntu?
[15:55] <genii> Dunno
[15:55] <genii> phunyguy: Yup
[15:56] <genii> phunyguy: At one point I had ops in ost of the *buntu channels but then didn't check my email for a long time and some of them lapsed. Not sure which ones exactly though
[15:56] <phunyguy> genii: that is a bot or something
[15:56] <genii> Not sure
[15:57] <genii> Finnish hostmask
[15:57] <phunyguy> well either way.... your call.  I removed them from #ubuntu
[15:57] <genii> phunyguy: Were they spamming the channel earlier?
[15:58] <genii> OK. So far I don't see anything in there that warrants it yet but I'll keep an eye open.
[15:58] <phunyguy> well someone did the !google factoid to a user for telling another user to google it, and then jirido ersponded as well.
[15:58] <phunyguy> responded*
[15:58] <phunyguy> not really supposed to have bots/scripts in the channels.
[15:58] <phunyguy> just not sure if lubuntu follows that.
[15:59] <genii> I'm pretty sure it's across all channels. Also if users do have a bot, they are supposed to get a hostmask for it showing that
[15:59] <phunyguy> ban all the things!
[16:00] <genii> Hehe
[16:00] <Pici> technically, bot hostmasks aren't required.
[16:02] <phunyguy> o
[16:02] <Pici> just nice to have if you do indeed run a bot
[16:03] <genii> Pici: Interesting, I guess I just assumed they were since most responsible bot owners get one. Does make it easier to spot them, for sure.
[16:03] <phunyguy> do bot hostmasks follow a pattern?  like *!*@*/bot/* ?
[16:04] <phunyguy> maybe a namespace ban on that will be a good idea at some point, with exceptions for approved bots.
[16:04] <phunyguy> if that is possible.
[16:04] <Pici> phunyguy: re pattern: yes
[16:04] <phunyguy> Probably not worth the effort though.
[17:28] <phunyguy> !packaging
[17:28] <phunyguy> Dead link on the first one....
[17:54] <genii> ubottu: packaging is <reply> The packaging guide is at http://packaging.ubuntu.com/html/ - See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/NewPackages for information on getting a package integrated into Ubuntu - Other developer resources are at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment - See also !backports and !sponsoring
[17:54] <genii> ubottu: no packaging is <reply> The packaging guide is at http://packaging.ubuntu.com/html/ - See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/NewPackages for information on getting a package integrated into Ubuntu - Other developer resources are at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment - See also !backports and !sponsoring
[17:55] <Pici> ah, good
[17:55] <Pici> I was just looking for the right page
[17:55] <genii> :)
[18:21] <phunyguy> thanks genii
[18:22] <genii> phunyguy: No problemmo
[20:07] <Pici> in my defense, sex is 6 in latin.
[20:08] <IdleOne> only when done right
[20:09] <IdleOne> I don't even know what the hell that was supposed to mean
[20:11] <Pici> I gave !fr to <?slimo_927> je cherche une femme pour relation sex a alger
[20:12] <Pici> er, nm
[20:19] <IdleOne> yeah that was a bad idea
[20:19] <IdleOne> lol
[20:28] <JackFrost> phunyguy: Thanks, does it only respond to !google?
[20:28] <JackFrost> CTCP VERSION reply from jirido: irssi v0.8.16 - running on Linux x86_64
[20:29] <phunyguy> JackFrost: I haven't tested further