=== sz0 is now known as sz0` | ||
al_exquemelin | what's the versioning rule for PPA packages that are brand new? (I mean, not present in Ubuntu's nor in Debian's repositories) | 01:15 |
---|---|---|
al_exquemelin | should some -XubuntuY suffix be added to the version number? | 01:15 |
al_exquemelin | I guess it should be -0ubuntu1, as it is the first release for Ubuntu, right? | 01:25 |
teward | al_exquemelin: i don't think there's PPA-specific packaging schemes, but that would work, appending ~ubuntu14.04 or similar based on the security team's versioning scheme | 01:27 |
teward | I use a slightly different one on my ppas, except when they're build tests of Ubuntu-destined packages... | 01:27 |
al_exquemelin | teward: I've got Ubuntu 14.10, and without the -XubuntuY part, bzr builddeb gives an error stating inconsistency between source format and version | 01:34 |
al_exquemelin | so I think -0ubuntu1 should work | 01:35 |
teward | al_exquemelin: well, you'll need -* so either -0 or -0ubuntu1 | 01:36 |
al_exquemelin | teward: ok, I'll stick with -0ubuntu1, thanks | 01:39 |
al_exquemelin | and yet another question. when entering the build directory, bzr builddeb tries to clean it, as far as I can see | 01:53 |
al_exquemelin | but there are no object files in it yet, so dh_auto_clean exits with an error | 01:54 |
al_exquemelin | what should I do to proceed with building? | 01:54 |
al_exquemelin | for now I changed rm *.o in my Makefile to -rm *.o, this should force the error to be ignored | 02:04 |
=== sz0` is now known as sz0 | ||
=== sz0 is now known as sz0` | ||
xnox | Noskcaj: tah. | 09:34 |
* xnox is not sure why i'm not getting notifications about highlights in this hexchat =( | 09:35 | |
xnox | Logan_: let me see. | 09:35 |
Logan_ | I have no idea what you're replying to :P | 09:35 |
xnox | Logan_: ari appears to have merged it already | 09:36 |
Logan_ | what package? | 09:36 |
xnox | Logan_> xnox: can you please sync or merge guayadeque? you're the TIL, and it's blocking a transition ;) | 09:36 |
Logan_ | ah | 09:37 |
Logan_ | I prefer notifying the TIL before taking a merge ;) | 09:37 |
xnox | Logan_: it is still stuck in -proposed, not sure if it needs another rebuild or not. | 09:37 |
Logan_ | looks like codelite would break if wxsqlite3 migrates | 09:40 |
Logan_ | but that doesn't make sense | 09:40 |
Logan_ | oh, it's because it loses ppc64el | 09:41 |
Logan_ | (I think) | 09:41 |
* Logan_ retries that build | 09:42 | |
Logan_ | xnox: hmm, looks like codelite needs liblldb-3.5-dev on ppc64el | 09:49 |
Logan_ | is there any progress on that? I see you were involved in https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=756380 | 09:49 |
ubottu | Debian bug 756380 in llvm-toolchain-3.5 "llvm-toolchain-3.5: Add support for ppc64el" [Normal,Fixed] | 09:49 |
Logan_ | although the title is misleading, as it just "supports" it by disabling lldb support | 09:49 |
xnox | Logan_: hm?! we have llvm-3.5+ on ppc64el everywhere.... | 09:50 |
xnox | what's the problem? | 09:50 |
Logan_ | liblldb-3.5-dev isn't built on ppc64el | 09:50 |
Logan_ | it's not in the architecture list | 09:50 |
xnox | Logan_: it appears that codelite might be able to build without lldb component. | 09:53 |
Logan_ | I was just about to test the same thing :) | 09:53 |
Logan_ | you built it locally without that build dep? and it was successful? | 09:53 |
Logan_ | yeesh, it takes 20 min on the buildds | 09:53 |
Logan_ | xnox: I'm going to sleep now, but feel free to upload another codelite with [!arm64 !ppc64el] for lldb if you find that it's fine locally | 09:57 |
Logan_ | I wonder what features would be lost | 09:57 |
* Logan_ shrugs | 09:57 | |
Logan_ | ah, it looks like it's just a plugin | 09:58 |
Logan_ | we should be fine :) | 09:58 |
Logan_ | g'night | 09:58 |
xnox | Logan_: night. | 09:59 |
xnox | doko: are you going to do an archive rebuild with gcc-5 this cycle? | 10:48 |
* xnox is excited about -std=gnu11 by default | 10:48 | |
mitya57 | What happened to Launchpad? It says it can't resolve two of pyqt5 build-dependencies, but they are clearly present (libenginio1-dev and libqt5websockets5-dev). | 15:04 |
mitya57 | Oh I see, someone demoted them to universe. | 15:05 |
mitya57 | Hmm, they were always in universe, but the previous version of pyqt5 was synced from a landing PPA where all builds are against universe... :-/ | 15:11 |
mitya57 | ScottK: do you think we should MIR qtwebsockets/qtenginio or disable that for Ubuntu? | 15:12 |
=== Noskcaj_ is now known as Noskcaj | ||
teward | question: where do i upload to for the ubuntu repositories now that I have approved upload access for the nginx package? There's a merge in the sponsorship queue, but since I have upload rights I can upload it myself, I just need a little bit of information to do so | 20:15 |
xnox | teward: $ dput *_source.changes | 20:16 |
Laney | https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/New | 20:16 |
xnox | Laney: oh, nice one =) | 20:16 |
xnox | Laney: next time i'm asking "how to upload a package into ubuntu" on the dmb meeting. | 20:16 |
teward | ahh, okay, so it's just dput. nice. | 20:16 |
Laney | good page | 20:16 |
Laney | xnox: "What is xnox's favourite drink?" | 20:17 |
teward | xnox: alternatively: put it on the FAQ list for what new uploaders frequently ask questions on :) | 20:17 |
teward | Laney: yes, that one is important. :) | 20:17 |
xnox | Laney: .... and if one responds beer they get declined to apply for another 12 months. | 20:20 |
Laney | a lovely pint of guinness | 20:20 |
xnox | Laney: i have never tried guinness =) i'm saving that for dublin. | 20:20 |
bekks | Write down your name and your address onto some note, before entiering the pub :D | 20:22 |
xnox | bekks: that's one reason why i have bussiness cards with me, when i'm going out. | 20:25 |
bekks | xnox: Well, it's kinda hard for the barkeeper to get you on a plane/train/bus to your home/business address ;) | 20:26 |
bekks | But I guess you got the point ;) | 20:26 |
teward | is it atypical for web server binaries to FTBFS on powerpc, and do I need to panic with this failing to parse ddeb data? | 21:26 |
nxvl | hi, i'm having a pretty weird issue with a package, when i try to build a package it's FTBFS with "undefined reference to" a function, but when i compile using make and the exact same compiler flags it works fine | 22:59 |
nxvl | any pointers on what could sbuild be adding that i'm missing? | 23:00 |
nxvl | http://paste.ubuntu.com/9642820/ | 23:01 |
mdeslaur_ | nxvl: you probably need libimobiledevice-dev as a build-depends | 23:15 |
mdeslaur_ | just guessing | 23:15 |
mdeslaur_ | nxvl: also, go buy an android :) | 23:16 |
mdeslaur_ | nxvl: is libimobiledevice what you're actually trying to build? | 23:17 |
nxvl | mdeslaur_: i'm building libimobiledevice | 23:18 |
nxvl | mdeslaur_: what i've found is that on plain make configure status i get "dependency style of gcc... gcc3" and on sbuild i get "dependency style of gcc... none" | 23:19 |
nxvl | which seems to be the one bit producing the issue | 23:19 |
mdeslaur_ | are you rebuilding the package from the archive? what release? what version of package? | 23:20 |
nxvl | mdeslaur_: new upstream version, on trusty | 23:21 |
mdeslaur_ | and you used the trusty package as a base, or the utopic/vivid package? | 23:22 |
nxvl | vivid | 23:22 |
nxvl | but that one builds just fine | 23:22 |
nxvl | so, i first updated to 1.1.7+git20140505.1be575f8 | 23:23 |
nxvl | that worked fine | 23:23 |
nxvl | now that i'm updating to the final 1.1.7, i'm having the issue | 23:23 |
mdeslaur_ | hrm | 23:23 |
nxvl | what i don't understand is why on sbuild the gcc dep method is none | 23:24 |
nxvl | and not gcc3 too | 23:24 |
mdeslaur_ | where did you get 1.1.7+git20140505? is that your own tarball? | 23:24 |
nxvl | yup | 23:24 |
nxvl | git pull and re-tarball | 23:24 |
mdeslaur_ | hrm...would have to diff the two tarballs to see what changed | 23:26 |
mdeslaur_ | my guess would be it's because of this: http://cgit.sukimashita.com/libimobiledevice.git/commit/?id=4c4bbd31f52845de70f5b828121eeea62f8b4514 | 23:33 |
mdeslaur_ | but I don't know what the fix would be, and have to go | 23:34 |
nxvl | mdeslaur_: thanks! | 23:34 |
mdeslaur_ | it's just a quick hunch, but may point you in the right direction | 23:35 |
* mdeslaur_ goes away | 23:35 | |
mdeslaur_ | perhaps disable Use-symbol-script-to-exclude-private-symbols.patch | 23:36 |
mdeslaur_ | (wild guess) | 23:36 |
* mdeslaur_ goes away for real | 23:36 | |
nxvl | mdeslaur_: yes, that did the trick, now you can go in piece! | 23:45 |
nxvl | peace* | 23:45 |
sladen | libimobiledevice ... that's a familiar name | 23:52 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!