[09:26] Noskcaj, please test build before uploading to staging [09:26] if you can't test locally then upload to your own ppa, and then copy binaries across one its successful [09:28] that said I should probably get my sbuild ppa patches upstream, that is gold! [09:34] darkxst, ok, i'll go back to test building in my PPA. That will be fixed in the morning [09:35] Noskcaj, that is better [09:35] you shouldnt be uploading anything without a test build, either jhbuilder/sbuild locally or a ppa ;) [09:36] and binary copies between ppa's are quick anyway just takes 5-10mins for publishing [09:38] sbuild is the best solution though, atleast when you have decent internet on dev machine [09:40] I can build most things in a few minutes, provided all packages are cached (via apt-cacher-ng) [09:41] though that is building on a tmpfs(ramdisk) [09:48] Noskcaj, also can you copy any of the few remaing 3.14 packages to gnome3 before replacing them with 3.15 ones [10:19] ricotz, you have a gtk 3.15 you can upload? [11:09] darkxst, there is a snapshot which can be copied, i guess [11:10] (still some issues with those hiding scrollbars) [11:10] ricotz, no end of issues with scrollbars [11:10] larsu wants to switch to the upstream ones. but they look completely different [11:11] darkxst, i meant the upsteam "hiding-scrollbars" ;) [11:11] (not those overlay-something) [11:11] ricotz, oh, but they are meant to be touch only? [11:12] the overlay things are evil, break CSS inheritance, whoever wrote them should be fired ;) [11:12] not sure [11:13] uploading the old 3.15.3 release makes not sense though [11:13] ricotz, would be fine to either upload a snapshot, or wait for next weeks update? [11:15] idk when the next one is scheduled [11:15] be back after lunch [11:19] ricotz, I'll be off to bed, snapshot seems fine to me [13:15] Hi, can i ask you a question? i can install propriatary drivers for my AMD card on both Ubuntu, Kubuntu, xubuntu with no issues but when running Gnome it wont work. In the tty it jus says "fglrx: no module was found" Why would it be different when using gnome rather than unity/xfce? [13:24] darkxst, copied glade, gtk+ and valac snapshots === prth is now known as prth|away [18:53] darkxst, Unfortunately, I don't have the ability to "Nominate for series" [19:09] nvm, figured it out. Had to be in the ubuntu-gnome project to nominate :P [19:15] sigh, I can only nominate for stable or development. I think I need to be a member of the Gnome 3 Team to choose a release. [20:20] octoquad, you probably need to be a member of bugsquad for that [20:22] Noskcaj, core update is still stuck in proposed [20:23] :( [20:23] darkxst, looks like it got caught in the libical transition [20:27] ok [20:29] ricotz, thanks [20:43] Thanks darkxst. If I nominate a bug for series it says "Bug nominations are evaluated by release managers and accepted or declined for fixing in a series. The Ubuntu GNOME release manager is GNOME3 Team. " This is at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-gnome/+bug/1218322/+nominate [20:43] Launchpad bug 1218322 in gnome-settings-daemon (Ubuntu) "Can't set keyboard layout change to alt+shift, ctrl+shift, etc." [High,Triaged] [20:44] I don't have the nominate for series option if I view the bug here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-settings-daemon/+bug/1218322 [20:44] Launchpad bug 1218322 in gnome-settings-daemon (Ubuntu) "Can't set keyboard layout change to alt+shift, ctrl+shift, etc." [High,Triaged] [20:45] octoquad, Do you have triage rights? They are needed to nominate for series, IIRC [20:45] Yes I do, for Ubuntu Gnome, not Ubuntu though [20:46] octoquad, we don't use "nominate for series" on the ubuntu gnome project, since we can always set it on the ubuntu package [20:47] you can assign trusty milestone though [20:49] Ok, I currently have "Nominated for Stable... " under Ubuntu Gnome. I was thinking it would give me a list of stable releases in the next step, but it didn't. I can't remove it, can someone remove it for me. Sorry about that... [20:51] thanks darkxst [20:51] np [20:52] btw, is the core3.14 ppa still needed once the updates land in vivid? [20:53] no, it was just for testing before we updated [20:57] I've been running it for a few days now and it's pretty solid. Nice work :) [22:11] darkxst, Could you please add http://paste.ubuntu.com/9684553/ to ppa_versions [22:12] Noskcaj, don't use the silly ubuntu paste! [22:12] What's wrong with it? [22:12] it requires login to get the raw text [22:14] oh [22:20] anyway done now [22:21] and gave it a new home so you can push trivial stuff like that yourself (then I can just scp across to server) [22:21] lp:~ubuntu-gnome-packaging/ppa-versions/trunk