[09:26] <darkxst> Noskcaj, please test build before uploading to staging
[09:26] <darkxst> if you can't test locally then upload to your own ppa, and then copy binaries across one its successful
[09:28] <darkxst> that said I should probably get my sbuild ppa patches upstream, that is gold!
[09:34] <Noskcaj> darkxst, ok, i'll go back to test building in my PPA. That will be fixed in the morning
[09:35] <darkxst> Noskcaj, that is better
[09:35] <darkxst> you shouldnt be uploading anything without a test build, either jhbuilder/sbuild locally or a ppa ;)
[09:36] <darkxst> and binary copies between ppa's are quick anyway just takes 5-10mins for publishing
[09:38] <darkxst> sbuild is the best solution though, atleast when you have decent internet on dev machine
[09:40] <darkxst> I can build most things in a few minutes, provided all packages are cached (via apt-cacher-ng)
[09:41] <darkxst> though that is building on a tmpfs(ramdisk)
[09:48] <darkxst> Noskcaj, also can you copy any of the few remaing 3.14 packages to gnome3 before replacing them with 3.15 ones
[10:19] <darkxst> ricotz, you have a gtk 3.15 you can upload?
[11:09] <ricotz> darkxst, there is a snapshot which can be copied, i guess
[11:10] <ricotz> (still some issues with those hiding scrollbars)
[11:10] <darkxst> ricotz, no end of issues with scrollbars
[11:10] <darkxst> larsu wants to switch to the upstream ones. but they look completely different
[11:11] <ricotz> darkxst, i meant the upsteam "hiding-scrollbars" ;)
[11:11] <ricotz> (not those overlay-something)
[11:11] <darkxst> ricotz, oh, but they are meant to be touch only?
[11:12] <darkxst> the overlay things are evil, break CSS inheritance, whoever wrote them should be fired ;)
[11:12] <ricotz> not sure
[11:13] <ricotz> uploading the old 3.15.3 release makes not sense though
[11:13] <darkxst> ricotz, would be fine to either upload a snapshot, or wait for next weeks update?
[11:15] <ricotz> idk when the next one is scheduled
[11:15] <ricotz> be back after lunch
[11:19] <darkxst> ricotz, I'll be off to bed, snapshot seems fine to me
[13:15] <ljunggren> Hi, can i ask you a question? i can install propriatary drivers for my AMD card on both Ubuntu, Kubuntu, xubuntu with no issues but when running Gnome it wont work. In the tty it jus says "fglrx: no module was found" Why would it be different when using gnome rather than unity/xfce?
[13:24] <ricotz> darkxst, copied glade, gtk+ and valac snapshots
[18:53] <octoquad> darkxst, Unfortunately, I don't have the ability to "Nominate for series"
[19:09] <octoquad> nvm, figured it out. Had to be in the ubuntu-gnome project to nominate :P
[19:15] <octoquad> sigh, I can only nominate for stable or development. I think I need to be a member of the Gnome 3 Team to choose a release.
[20:20] <darkxst> octoquad, you probably need to be a member of bugsquad for that
[20:22] <darkxst> Noskcaj, core update is still stuck in proposed
[20:23] <Noskcaj> :(
[20:23] <Noskcaj> darkxst, looks like it got caught in the libical transition
[20:27] <darkxst> ok
[20:29] <darkxst> ricotz, thanks
[20:43] <octoquad> Thanks darkxst. If I nominate a bug for series it says "Bug nominations are evaluated by release managers and accepted or declined for fixing in a series. The Ubuntu GNOME release manager is GNOME3 Team. " This is at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-gnome/+bug/1218322/+nominate
[20:44] <octoquad> I don't have the nominate for series option if I view the bug here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-settings-daemon/+bug/1218322
[20:45] <Noskcaj> octoquad, Do you have triage rights? They are needed to nominate for series, IIRC
[20:45] <octoquad> Yes I do, for Ubuntu Gnome, not Ubuntu though
[20:46] <darkxst> octoquad, we don't use "nominate for series" on the ubuntu gnome project, since we can always set it on the ubuntu package
[20:47] <darkxst> you can assign trusty milestone though
[20:49] <octoquad> Ok, I currently have "Nominated for Stable... " under Ubuntu Gnome. I was thinking it would give me a list of stable releases in the next step, but it didn't. I can't remove it, can someone remove it for me. Sorry about that...
[20:51] <octoquad> thanks darkxst
[20:51] <darkxst> np
[20:52] <octoquad> btw, is the core3.14 ppa still needed once the updates land in vivid?
[20:53] <darkxst> no, it was just for testing before we updated
[20:57] <octoquad> I've been running it for a few days now and it's pretty solid. Nice work :)
[22:11] <Noskcaj> darkxst, Could you please add http://paste.ubuntu.com/9684553/ to ppa_versions
[22:12] <darkxst> Noskcaj, don't use the silly ubuntu paste!
[22:12] <Noskcaj> What's wrong with it?
[22:12] <darkxst> it requires login to get the raw text
[22:14] <Noskcaj> oh
[22:20] <darkxst> anyway done now
[22:21] <darkxst> and gave it a new home so you can push trivial stuff like that yourself (then I can just scp across to server)
[22:21] <darkxst> lp:~ubuntu-gnome-packaging/ppa-versions/trunk