[01:02] <bdmurray> infinity: it seems to me it could be a part of the point release process
[01:04] <infinity> bdmurray: No point tying it to point releases, IMO.
[01:04] <infinity> bdmurray: But not a bad idea for people to check occasionally.
[01:04] <bdmurray> infinity: check occasionally if they remember? my thought was the point release would be a back-up plan
[01:05] <infinity> bdmurray: Yeah.  The problem with making it part of the point release process is that most of that process happens a week before the point release, and this should ideally happen earlier, so it goes through normal SRUness.
[01:06] <infinity> bdmurray: But wouldn't hurt to add it to the wiki checklist anyway to see if it's been done "recently".
[01:07] <bdmurray> infinity: ah, because you'd want it on the new isos.
[08:25] <mlankhorst> infinity: yeah :p
[09:23] <tjaalton> is there an sru admin available to ack mesa for trusty-proposed? it's been on the queue since dec 19th
=== lamont` is now known as lamont
[14:38] <tjaalton> bdmurray: hey, could you review sru bug 1404217 and ack it?
[15:22] <jamespage> the sahara upload I just made to vivid NEW is in effect a sync from experimental with immediate fixes and changes for Ubuntu
=== G4MBY is now known as PaulW2U
[18:28] <Laney> arges: hey, nice work on the SRU queues today
[18:29] <arges> Laney: thanks!
[18:56] <infinity> ^--- Self accepting that, it's just an ABI bump.