/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2015/01/08/#ubuntu-ci-eng.txt

robrucamako: oh were you having trouble with device-upgrade? can you tell me what happened? was there an error message?00:07
veeberscihelp, what's the easiest way to check the difference complained by this error? https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-rtm-landing-008-1-build/84/console as far as I'm aware the branch I'm proposing for rtm is the most up to date and rtm shouldn't contain anything not in it02:21
veebersunless I missunderstood the error message02:21
thomiveebers: I believe it just goes by version numbers?02:22
thomiI don't think it actually compares contents, but I could be wrong02:22
thomiso, check version number in RTM, and version number in d/changelog02:22
veebersthomi: ah, I think you;re right02:22
thomimy bet is that someone has (yet again) uploaded a version of ap without contributing it to lp:autopilot02:22
veebersthomi: the message is a clue :-P A version (1.5.0+14.10.20141022~rtm-0ubuntu1) is available at the destination archive for that component but is not in the destination branch which is still at 1.5.0+14.10.20140806-0ubuntu102:22
thomiwhich... grrrrr...02:22
thomithere you go02:23
veebersthomi: I need to grab the change for RTM so I can see what happened (and merge them in I guess02:23
veebers)02:23
thomiexactly02:23
thomithen find o0ut who uploaded it and ask them not to do that again02:24
veebersthomi: ack02:25
veebersthomi: ugh, I'm pretty sure it's because I screwed it up. I took it from trunk and not the 1.5 release (which is what was released into RTM originally anyway)02:30
veebersthomi: I'll fix that up right now02:30
thomiahhh well, at least it's not another case of someone else uploading for you02:31
veebersthomi: aye02:31
veebersUgh, screwed it up again02:51
veeberscihelp/trainguards: For the error of generating an empty changelog file, I should be able to force that through (or use a different option) right? I'm trying to sync what was released into vivid into RTM: https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-rtm-landing-008-1-build/85/console02:56
imgbot=== IMAGE RTM 186 building (started: 20150108-03:05) ===03:05
robruveebers: no you can't force that one. You need to either fix your changelog or not touch changelog in your mp. Why are you even doing an mp? Shouldn't it be a sync silo?03:12
veebersrobru: um, oh. I'm doing a MP as that's what I thought I needed to do :-P What's the process for a sync silo? :_)03:13
robruveebers: well I'm not sure, it depends on the project and what you're doing. If you're cherry picking, you need an mp. If you've done mps before then i guys you breed to keep doing mps. Has rtm diverged from vivid?03:15
robruUgh, phone. "I guess you need"03:16
veebersrobru: as far as I'm aware rtm hasn't diverged. I'm trying to get changes into RTM that went into vivid at the end of the year but only went into vivid03:16
veebersNo, rtm hasn't diverged03:18
robruveebers: is there an rtm branch that has different versions than the trunk branch?03:19
robruIn the Debian/changelog03:19
veebersrobru: no, up until this release what was in rtm is what was in the release branch. (I created an rtm branch in an attempt to do the MP release into rtm)03:20
robruveebers: oh OK, if you creatures the rtm branch just now, i don't think it's necessary ;-)03:21
veebersrobru: heh creatures. RIght so you're saying the rtm branch isn't needed and we should do a sync of some sort for rtm?03:21
robruveebers: change your spreadsheet row, blank out the mp, set the sources as "sync:ubuntu,vivid autopilot" then I'll reconfigure03:22
veebersrobru: ack, awesome thanks03:22
veebersrobru: sources as in "Additional source packages to land"?03:24
robruveebers: yeah03:24
veebersrobru: awesome, done :-)03:24
robruveebers: ok try building now03:26
* veebers does so03:26
veebersrobru: ugh, perhaps I screwed something else up again? https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-rtm-landing-008-1-build/86/console03:54
veebers2015-01-08 03:49:51,226 ERROR Versions in PPA did not match our expectations.03:54
robruWell shit03:56
robruThe build job uploaded two different versions... Wtf? The build job is supposed to delete crap before building new crap03:56
veebersheh03:57
robruveebers: i can't fix this... At least not anytime soon. The only thing to do is dump the silo and start a new one. Hang on, and sorry.03:58
veebersrobru: no worries, thanks for sorting it out03:58
robruveebers: ok you're in rtm 9 now, please try again04:02
veebersrobru: coolio will do now04:02
robruveebers: and, bug filed https://bugs.launchpad.net/cupstream2distro/+bug/140854304:10
ubot5Launchpad bug 1408543 in CI Train [cu2d] "Build job uploads stale packages." [Undecided,Triaged]04:10
veebersrobru: sweet thanks04:11
robruveebers: not sure when I'll have time to get to that one, lots of other stuff going on right now. but I do intend to rewrite the build job Soon-ish(TM) and that would get fixed along the way.04:11
veebersrobru: heh, awesome. Well hopefully next time I do something similar I won't screw up the first couple of attempts to I won't trigger this bug again :-)04:12
veebersrobru: sweet, looks like that's worked this time04:22
imgbot=== IMAGE RTM 186 DONE (finished: 20150108-04:25) ===04:25
imgbot=== changelog: http://people.canonical.com/~ogra/touch-image-stats/rtm/186.changes ===04:25
robruveebers: sweet, glad that works04:27
veebersrobru: hey one more silly question, if I'm testing this for rtm I should use the channel 'ubuntu-touch/stable' as opposed to 'ubuntu-touch/vivid-proposed' right?04:39
veebersugh nvm answered my own question. Time for food I think04:41
Mirvmornings05:41
camakocihelp, is there a way to delete the older version of a package in a silo? I.e. I only want the most recently build version of mir ---> https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/landing-01706:34
Mirvcamako: that's a trainguards question, and those will disappear from sight automatically after that "Published" column gets filled in a few minutes06:37
Mirvtechnically the older versions are still there, but after the archive information gets updated about 20 minutes after build is ready, only the latest version is available to PPA users06:38
camakoMirv, which published column?06:39
camakoAnd the newer version has been available for hours now but the older version is still visible06:40
Mirvcamako: oh, sorry, on the "View package details page"06:42
Mirvcamako: but you're right, there's something wrong06:43
Mirvso, that's what normally happens. I believe something is now truly broken in that PPA or in general06:43
camakoMirv, ok I see06:43
Mirvbasically the publisher run does not seem to happen06:43
MirvI can't help with that level of infrastructure, so calling out a bit..06:44
camakoMirv, thanks for your help06:45
camakoMirv, I'm about to go to bed.. Will you be following this up? If not, who do you think I should talk to tomorrow to get this fixed?06:59
Mirvcamako: I will be looking at this, since it probably affects others too. I'm currently building myself in a silo so first I'll see if all silos are affected.07:23
=== Mirv changed the topic of #ubuntu-ci-eng to: Need a silo? ping trainguards | Need help with something else? ping cihelp | Train Dashboard: http://bit.ly/1mDv1FS | QA Signoffs: http://bit.ly/1qMAKYd | Known Issues: sil2100 off week of January 5th, a gap of ~3h in trainguard availability between (early) EU and US timezones. PPA publisher jobs somehow broken.
Mirvconfirming that the PPA:s are broken at the moment and filed an issue ticket07:37
mardyI'm a bit confused, why are the tests run twice here? (and why do they fail the second time?) https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-system-settings-online-accounts-vivid-amd64-ci/3/consoleFull08:51
Mirvmvo: how did it go with the oxide/clickchroot?09:15
Mirvmardy: you'd need cihelp for that - the other run is after package building, some coverage related job that probably doesn't use xvfb-run for its tests09:16
vilamardy, Mirv : looking09:17
mvoMirv: finished last night successfully, I will publish09:17
Mirvmvo: \o/09:18
Mirvhey vila! :)09:18
vilaMirv: o! (<- holding a pen)09:19
Mirvvila: oh, right..09:20
vilaMirv: They can't kill humor (and now I'm armed too which is nice ;)09:21
Mirvuh, what's up with hangouts..09:30
vilamardy: the history for that job shows the last succesfull run was on 12 November last year. Then on 24 November, I see a commit in the branch that control those jenkins jobs: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~cupstream2distro-maintainers/cupstream2distro-config/trunk/revision/121609:30
vilamardy: so in addition to Mirv comment above, you may get more feedback from envandine and seb128 ? I'll talk to fginther when he comes online too.09:31
vila*kenvandine09:31
seb128?09:31
Mirvjust some multiaccount problem09:31
vilaseb128: Disable the desktop tests for lp:ubuntu-system-settings as the test environment no longer appears to support this (agreement from kenvandine and seb128). Want to get a better desktop environment in place before spending more effort on this.09:32
vilaseb128: that's the commit message so I thought you may know something ;) Sorry for the noise if I'm wrong09:32
seb128vila, I'm not sure what we are talking about09:32
seb128but yeah we disabled desktop tests since there is no proper desktop testing infrastructure and those were creating noise rather than being useful09:33
vilahttp://s-jenkins.ubuntu-ci:8080/job/ubuntu-system-settings-online-accounts-vivid-amd64-ci/3/consoleFull09:33
vilaseb128: may be I'm misleading by mixing ubuntu-system-settings-online-accounts and ubuntu-system-settings ...09:34
seb128vila, yeah, probably, those are different components09:34
seb128dunno about the online accounts09:34
mardyvila: but anyway, that commit seems rather harmless; it's disabling tests, not adding them09:35
mardyvila: what I see, is that those tests are run with QPA_PLATFORM=minimal, and the qml tests raise some kind of GL error...09:36
mardyvila: I'm not doing anything fancy with GL myself, but maybe it's required in order to run the QML tests; in that case, using QPA_PLATFORM=minimal is probably wrong09:36
vilamardy: yeah, sorry for the mix.09:37
vilamardy: is this something that is under your control ? I'm having trouble understanding if the issue exist *before* your MP09:40
vilathis == QPA_PLATFORM=minimal09:41
mardyvila: I don't think that my MP chaned anything... I'd expect that trunk fails in the same way09:44
vilamardy: ha, thanks, capital information ;)09:45
Mirvvila: mardy: for me it looked like the coverage job thing has its own "make check" run separate from anything mardy is doing, ie it's running it manually and then fails09:47
Mirvthat's only a guess though09:48
Mirvvila: mardy: FWIV my latest "correct" way of doing it is xvfb-run -a -s "-screen 0 1024x768x24" dh_auto_test -- QT_PLUGIN_PATH=$(CURDIR)/plugins LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$(CURDIR)/lib QML2_IMPORT_PATH=$(CURDIR)/qml09:49
Mirvinside packaging, though09:49
* vila pulls hairs09:49
MirvQPA_PLATFORM=minimal tests "less" as it doesn't actually draw anything09:49
vilaMirv: I'm way behind your understanding ;) Is there something ci can/should do here or is it defined inside the package ?09:51
Mirvvila: looking at the log that's happening by a ci jenkins job unrelated to the packaging. the packaging finishes, then something related to coverage counting runs make check by itself.09:52
Mirvand mardy's original question was of course if it's relevant to rerun the same tests that the package anyway runs09:52
Mirvbut somehow they're run and they're run differently from what the packaging is running, and fail09:54
vilaMirv: so ubuntu-system-settings-online-accounts shouldn't require coverage ? (Or something along those lines)09:55
* vila stills tries to find *where* the "second" run starts in the log...09:55
vilaI: user script /var/cache/pbuilder/build//24619/tmp/hooks/B09qmakecoverage starting ?09:57
Saviqtrainguards, can I have a silo for line 65 please09:59
MirvSaviq: you can, but PPA:s are currently broken10:00
vilaMirv, mardy: I'll followup with fginther later today and keep you posted10:00
=== psivaa_ changed the topic of #ubuntu-ci-eng to: Need a silo? ping trainguards | Need help with something else? ping psivaa | Train Dashboard: http://bit.ly/1mDv1FS | QA Signoffs: http://bit.ly/1qMAKYd | Known Issues: sil2100 off week of January 5th, a gap of ~3h in trainguard availability between (early) EU and US timezones. PPA publisher jobs somehow broken.
cjwatsonMirv: They should be fixed now/shortly10:01
cjwatsoncron.ppa is catching up on the backlog10:01
Mirv\o/10:01
cjwatson(was a crash due to a librarian outage overnight, and squid helpfully cached the 500 error for us)10:01
Saviqnice :)10:02
cjwatsonGiant backlog though.10:03
mardyvila, Mirv: thanks10:05
cjwatsonMirv,camako: https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/landing-017/+packages has published now10:05
Mirvnice10:06
dbarthtrainguards, hi i'm checking silo 14 which doesn't seem necessary10:44
dbarthie, silo rtm 000 is only a backport, and the rest of the changes are already in vivid10:45
=== vrruiz_ is now known as rvr
Mirvdbarth: so, vivid 014 could be freed?10:58
dbarthMirv: yes11:02
dbarthMirv: we already landed things on vivid11:02
dbarthMirv: sorry my comment implied we needed a sync, but it had been done already11:03
satorisping trainguards, could someone check that I filled line 55 correctly and get it siloed if I did?11:05
=== chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk
Mirvsatoris: one comma too much, now assigned11:31
satorisCool, thanks.11:31
=== chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun
SaviqUrsinha, hey, I filed bug #1408626 so that it's not lost, and also bug #140862711:52
ubot5bug 1408626 in Ubuntu CI Services "Builder jobs should build and collect dbgsym packages" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/140862611:52
ubot5bug 1408627 in Ubuntu CI Services "Cancelling a -ci job should not vote "Needs fixing"" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/140862711:52
=== chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk
Ursinhathanks Saviq11:53
Ursinhathat helps11:53
Mirvcjwatson: were you able to kick vivid image builds or is that completely in the past for you? we might try one now.11:54
cjwatsonMirv: I can11:57
cjwatsonMirv: Have the build failures been fixed then?11:58
Mirvcjwatson: they should, by a oxide-qt revert that now could be done with click better handling the chroot creation12:02
Mirvso the apt conflict/replaces are back to the state before the problems started12:02
cjwatsonMirv: ok, it's running12:04
Mirvthanks, let's see12:05
=== chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun
=== psivaa_ changed the topic of #ubuntu-ci-eng to: Need a silo? ping trainguards | Need help with something else? ping cihelp | Train Dashboard: http://bit.ly/1mDv1FS | QA Signoffs: http://bit.ly/1qMAKYd | Known Issues: sil2100 off week of January 5th, a gap of ~3h in trainguard availability between (early) EU and US timezones. PPA publisher jobs somehow broken.
=== Mirv changed the topic of #ubuntu-ci-eng to: Need a silo? ping trainguards | Need help with something else? ping cihelp | Train Dashboard: http://bit.ly/1mDv1FS | QA Signoffs: http://bit.ly/1qMAKYd | Known Issues: sil2100 off week of January 5th, a gap of ~3h in trainguard availability between (early) EU and US timezones.
=== MacSlow is now known as MacSlow|lunch
=== alan_g is now known as alan_g|lunch
om26erdbarth, around ?13:26
Saviqtrainguards, rtm silo for line 67 please?13:29
=== MacSlow|lunch is now known as MacSlow
MirvSaviq: rtm-00313:31
SaviqMirv, thanks!13:31
om26ermardy, Hi!13:31
mardyom26er: hi!13:32
om26ermardy, regarding silo 0, there is one bug that is not approved by Olli13:32
dbarthom26er: yes13:32
dbarthom26er: i'm brining the absent bug on the radar, clear the way for the landing13:33
dbarthbringing13:33
om26erdbarth, ok, once the bug gets approved we can proceed further.13:33
dbarthok13:34
om26erdbarth, also... the changelog on the silo ppa is not enough, it should perhaps mention the bug numbers13:34
om26erright now all it says is: 'Backport of two bugfixes:'13:34
imgbot=== IMAGE 59 DONE (finished: 20150108-13:35) ===13:35
imgbot=== changelog: http://people.canonical.com/~ogra/touch-image-stats/59.changes ===13:35
popeyooh!13:36
popeyoh, no changes ☹13:36
rsalvetihow could, we didn't have image for days13:37
rsalvetifor vivid13:37
Mirvyeah! I'm upgrading.13:37
rsalvetidiff is probably wrong13:37
Mirvthe diff is broken, but the image is now there13:37
rsalvetiPackage changes between 20150108.1 and 20150108.113:37
rsalvetiyeah13:37
rsalvetiawesome13:37
rsalvetiright on time13:38
Mirvthe oxide think worked13:38
Mirvs/think/thing/13:38
dbarthmardy: ^^ can you update the chnage log for silo 000 please?13:38
Mirvbzoltan: we're good now on vivid, and according to mvo's testing you should (still) be as well13:39
mardyom26er: isn't the changelog automatically generated?13:49
om26ermardy, not really familiar with citrain.13:50
dbarthom26er: afaik the changelog will be updated by the landing process13:54
MirvI'm e-mailing the mailing list with a bit of summary for this week13:54
mardyom26er, dbarth: OK, just to be sure I'll write a changelog into the MP13:55
pmcgowanom26er, silo 0 fixes fine to land13:55
om26erpmcgowan, thanks13:55
dbarthpmcgowan: thanks13:56
=== alan_g|lunch is now known as alan_g
mardydbarth: done, I guess you'll have to rebuild the silo13:59
MirvI'm doing a quick landing e-mail14:01
=== oSoMoN_ is now known as oSoMoN
om26ermardy, can you help me identifying bug fixes ?14:07
om26ermardy, except for bug 1384314 I am not sure how to verify other bugs.14:08
ubot5bug 1384314 in The Savilerow project "two applications mixed into one in OA applications screen" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/138431414:08
om26erdbarth, ^ can you help ?14:13
mardyom26er: the steps for another bug are here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-system-settings-online-accounts/+bug/139423214:15
ubot5Launchpad bug 1394232 in Online Accounts setup for Ubuntu Touch "Notification from OA refers to the YouTube scope as "Ubuntu"" [High,In progress]14:15
mardyom26er: as for the password prompt, it's the "password-query" step from https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlan/ubuntu-system-settings-online-accounts14:18
om26ermardy, re: 1394232 I see the dialog that says 'youtube wants to access...' but when i tap authorize, in the background I see the google login page again.14:22
om26eris that old bug ?14:22
mardyom26er: no, that's expected: the first question is about our policy, the google login page is google's requirement14:25
om26ermardy, what about bug 1380914 is that covered by a unittest ?14:27
ubot5bug 1380914 in Online Accounts setup for Ubuntu Touch "OnlineAccountsClient::Setup::exec() should execute a signon auth session" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/138091414:27
mardyom26er: yes, that's the testRequestDelay unit test; unfortunately it's not very easy to verify that bug, otherwise14:31
mardyom26er: marcustomlinson might be able to give you steps to verify it in real life14:32
om26erwell I guess we can trust our engineering with a unittest :p14:34
* Mirv waits for om26er move the card to "Passed" :)14:38
ogra_popey, rsalveti, Mirv, the changelog diff mechanism uses the old manifest from cdimage ... these are only kept for 3 weeks or so ...14:38
om26erMirv, now I did :)14:38
Mirvogra_: ack.14:38
ogra_(so there is no old manifest to diff against anymore on cdimage ... with a bit of fiddling i can pull it from the librarian though)14:39
bzoltanMirv: \o/14:41
Mirvmardy: since rtm, please (get) top-approve(d) https://code.launchpad.net/~mardy/ubuntu-system-settings-online-accounts/rtm-fixes/+merge/24313414:42
Mirvor dbarth ^14:43
rsalvetiogra_: right, you're alive :-)14:57
ogra_nah, i'm a bot :P14:57
dbarthMirv: yes15:07
bregmacihelp, my s-jenkins jobs have been failing miserably for months now, most recently due to what looks like a network configuration error, can anyone take a look?15:32
fgintherbregma, can you point us to an example to use as a starting point?15:37
bregmafginther, gladly, https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/compiz-0.9.11-trusty-amd64-ci/74/console15:41
camakotrainguards, ubuntu-vivid silo 17 (mir 0.10) is now fully tested, package issues addressed (by RAOF, a core dev). Please publish.15:45
camakoor was that for cihelp ^^15:45
Ursinhacamako: that is trainguards :)15:46
camakoUrsinha, thanks the title of this IRC chatroom makes you think trainguards only assign silos  :-)15:47
davmor2john-mcaleely: Mirv: custom tarball is good15:49
john-mcaleelydavmor2, \o/ Mirv15:49
john-mcaleelywho do I ping about making sure there's a good time to push it for a build?15:49
john-mcaleelyogra_, still?15:50
davmor2john-mcaleely: Mirv/robru15:50
john-mcaleelyaha15:50
rsalvetijust push it, don't need to be in sync with the rootfs16:00
=== chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk
=== Ursinha changed the topic of #ubuntu-ci-eng to: Need a silo or CI Train support? ping trainguards | Need help with something else? ping cihelp | Train Dashboard: http://bit.ly/1mDv1FS | QA Signoffs: http://bit.ly/1qMAKYd | Known Issues: sil2100 off week of January 5th, a gap of ~3h in trainguard availability between (early) EU and US timezones.
Ursinhacamako: I was never able to phrase it in a way it's clear what a trainguard does :)16:01
john-mcaleelyrsalveti, the issue is whether the machines are busy making a build16:02
john-mcaleelyrobru, Mirv ? is there an image being built already?16:02
rvrIs there any problem with the image server? 2015/01/08 16:28:36 Get https://system-image.ubuntu.com/gpg/image-master.tar.xz: http: can't write HTTP request on broken connection16:29
rvrfginther: Hey, happy new year. Is image server down?16:36
camakotrainguards, anyone around to land vivid silo 17 (mir 0.10)? It's good to go.16:38
fgintherrvr, happy new year to you as well. Appears to be working, I can get to https://system-image.ubuntu.com/channels.json16:48
rvrfginther: 2015/01/08 16:46:54 Get https://system-image.ubuntu.com/gpg/image-master.tar.xz: EOF16:49
fgintherrvr, I can't help you there, perhaps ogra_ knows if something is broken16:51
rvrogra_: ^^16:51
rvrfginther: Thanks anyway16:51
popeyrvr: 2015-01-08 16:53:28 ERROR 404: Not Found.16:54
popeyoh, hang on16:54
popeyyeah, fine here16:54
rvrpopey: On channel=ubuntu-touch/ubuntu-rtm/14.09-proposed?16:56
popeyi just did a wget of that file16:56
popeyto prove its there16:56
popeyUh, I just got an alarm with no buttons in it17:00
popeyseems to have broken since updating to latest image17:00
rvrOk, the problem is the ubuntu-device-flash available in the ubuntu-sdk ppa17:19
camakotrainguards, anyone around to land vivid silo 17 (mir 0.10)? It's good to go.17:23
camakorobru ^^17:23
bzoltanrvr: is there an ubuntu-device-flash in the SDK PPA?17:44
bzoltanrvr:  of course there is ...17:45
rvrbzoltan: Yes, there is17:45
bzoltanlet me see the version17:45
rvrbzoltan: 0.4+15.04.20141125-0ubuntu117:45
bzoltanrvr:  sorry I forget that it comes from the goget-ubuntu-touch17:45
bzoltanrvr:  we have the same version in the SDK PPA as in the phablet tools .. for Utopic and Trusty. It seems that the Vivid release was not yet backported ... let me see17:48
bzoltanrvr:  in Vivid we have 0.8-0ubuntu117:50
Mirvjohn-mcaleely: no image being built, next automated ones in 10h or so17:53
=== charles_ is now known as charles
Mirvcamako: done, based on RAOF having given the packaging acks for those that I cannot myself give17:55
camakoMirv, Thanks. Much appreciated.17:55
john-mcaleelyMirv, thanks. will push now then18:10
john-mcaleelyMirv, pushed. should be a new build on rtm shortly18:11
boikotrainguards: can I get a silo for row 62?19:47
robruboiko: ah yes, I saw that earlier but I was waiting for silo 18 to merge. one sec19:48
boikorobru: thanks!19:51
robruboiko: you're welcome!19:52
jdstrandpmcgowan: hey, so regarding bug #1392368. Please read this comment for rtm: https://bugs.launchpad.net/camera-app/+bug/1392368/comments/320:03
ubot5Launchpad bug 1392368 in gallery-app (Ubuntu RTM) "Support storing and viewing photos on an SD card" [High,In progress]20:03
jdstrandpmcgowan: Kaleo tells me that is for rtm. do you approve this for rtm?20:04
pmcgowanjdstrand, indeed, although do we know why the "real" approach wasnt possible20:04
jdstrandpmcgowan: this means the custom tarball will need to be regenerated20:04
jdstrandpmcgowan: I do not. Kaleo, can you comment? ^20:05
pmcgowanoh right, crap20:05
jdstrandpmcgowan: does that 'crap' mean I should not proceed?20:06
* jdstrand isn't sure what is going on with the custom tarball these days20:06
Kaleojdstrand, pmcgowan, the API to retrieve the path to the SD card does not exist yet20:07
Kaleojdstrand, pmcgowan, there is one in Qt5.4 that should work when we switch to it20:07
pmcgowanKaleo, so no way to implement something short term? or just as easy to make the profile change20:08
Kaleopmcgowan, the short term cheap solution is the profile change20:09
jdstrandI don't see cwayne here. he is who normally regenerates the custom tarball20:09
pmcgowanok lets go ahead then20:10
Kaleopmcgowan, thanks20:10
jdstrandpmcgowan: do you know who should regenerate the custom tarball?20:10
jdstrand(in cwayne's absence)20:11
pmcgowanjdstrand, no but he was arround earlier20:11
pmcgowanjohn-mcaleely, might know20:11
jdstrandah, ok, if he was around that's ok. I wasn't sure if he was still on holiday20:15
jdstrandKaleo: I took over your initial bug and am using it to remove this rule now20:34
jdstrandKaleo: also, you will see a vivid upload with the fix, the 14.09 one won't be until later20:35
tedgtrainguards, Can I get a vivid silo for line 72 please?22:57
robrutedg: ok silo 323:05
tedgrobru, Cool, thanks!23:05
robrutedg: you're welcome23:11
jdstrandpmcgowan, Kaleo: ok, uploaded the fix for bug #1392368 to vivid and it is in rtm silo 10. tests passed. Needs QA signoff and custom tarball rebuilt.23:22
ubot5bug 1392368 in gallery-app (Ubuntu RTM) "Support storing and viewing photos on an SD card" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/139236823:22
jdstrandpmcgowan, Kaleo: I'll followup with cwayne tomorrow to make sure he is aware (I did note ir in the landing spreadsheet)23:23

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!