| === kadams54_ is now known as kadams54 | ||
| === kadams54 is now known as kadams54-away | ||
| === kadams54 is now known as kadams54-away | ||
| mbruzek | rick_h_ ping | 14:29 |
|---|---|---|
| rick_h_ | mbruzek: pong | 14:33 |
| mbruzek | rick_h_: https://github.com/CanonicalLtd/jujucharms.com/issues/33 | 14:34 |
| mbruzek | I am having some problems with jujucharms.com and I created an issue. | 14:34 |
| rick_h_ | mbruzek: yep, we're on it. We've got a request for logs into webops | 14:34 |
| mbruzek | This is related to a new charm that I just pushed so I was not sure if you have seen this problem before. | 14:35 |
| rick_h_ | mbruzek: landscape folks brought it to our attention yesterday and we've been bug hunting but unable to dupe locally so chasing down prod | 14:35 |
| rick_h_ | ty for the bug report | 14:35 |
| rick_h_ | yes, basically ingestion isn't happening on prod atm | 14:35 |
| rick_h_ | the logs say it is, but none of them are getting pulled in | 14:35 |
| mbruzek | Most welcome, if there is anything I can do to help, please let me know. | 14:36 |
| === kadams54 is now known as kadams54-away | ||
| === kadams54-away is now known as kadams54 | ||
| marcoceppi | rick_h_: is bundle inheritence still going to work in the new store/juju? | 15:43 |
| rick_h_ | marcoceppi: /me is processing | 15:45 |
| rick_h_ | so you cannot have more than one bundle per file, there was talking of inheritance via other means | 15:45 |
| rick_h_ | rogpeppe2: might recall better what we ended up doing vs talked about, I'm looking for the doc atm | 15:46 |
| rogpeppe2 | marcoceppi: the idea was that a single bundle means a single bundle, and that people could use tooling to resolve inheritance before publishing | 15:47 |
| rick_h_ | marcoceppi: yep see https://docs.google.com/a/canonical.com/document/d/1SF8hTBi6oVbki8V__beNij6wnQU-5cm6PZsy5gf0j_Y/edit and go down to "changes from the original format" | 15:47 |
| rogpeppe2 | marcoceppi: we already have code that can parse the old bundle format and produce the new format | 15:48 |
| rick_h_ | marcoceppi: so basically 'no, not until we write something to help do that for us' | 15:48 |
| === rogpeppe2 is now known as rogpeppe | ||
| marcoceppi | rick_h_ rogpeppe ack, ta | 15:48 |
| rogpeppe | marcoceppi: in my view, the added functionality that inheritance provided wasn't worth the complexity that it added to the whole tool chain | 15:49 |
| marcoceppi | rogpeppe: I only ask because there's talk of some kind of bundle on bundle activity from server team and I wanted to amke sure they understood inheritence as it was today won't be there | 15:50 |
| rogpeppe | marcoceppi: i like the idea of bundle composition better than i do bundle inheritance | 15:51 |
| rogpeppe | marcoceppi: it would be nice to be able to put a bunch of bundles together into a larger one | 15:51 |
| rogpeppe | marcoceppi: but again, that's perhaps something that could be accomplished with appropriate tools | 15:52 |
| marcoceppi | sure, again just wanted to make sure those working on these concepts had a complete deck of cards | 15:52 |
| marcoceppi | no jokers floating around ;) | 15:52 |
| rogpeppe | marcoceppi: :) | 15:52 |
| rogpeppe | marcoceppi: good plan | 15:52 |
| rick_h_ | uiteam call in 5 kanban please | 15:56 |
| === kadams54 is now known as kadams54-away | ||
| === kadams54-away is now known as kadams54 | ||
| rick_h_ | mbruzek: can you push an update to your charm please? | 17:16 |
| rick_h_ | mbruzek: a small something so we can watch the log as it goes by? | 17:16 |
| mbruzek | rick_h_: In standup now, but you want me to push something to mellanox? | 17:16 |
| rick_h_ | yes, please, at your convienence | 17:16 |
| mbruzek | rick_h_: OK should be done in 15 minutes | 17:17 |
| === kadams54 is now known as kadams54-away | ||
| === urulama is now known as urulama_ | ||
| mbruzek | hi rick_h_ just getting something to push | 18:00 |
| mbruzek | hi rick_h_ ready to push when you are | 18:06 |
| * mbruzek is going to head to lunch | 18:08 | |
| mbruzek | back | 18:37 |
| Makyo | uiteam Need reviews + QA for the two release blockers: https://github.com/juju/juju-gui/pull/688 | 18:54 |
| kadams54 | Makyo: Taking a look | 18:55 |
| mbruzek | rick_h_: ready when you are if you want me to push | 18:55 |
| === kadams54 is now known as kadams54-away | ||
| === kadams54-away is now known as kadams54 | ||
| === urulama_ is now known as urulama | ||
| urulama | mbruzek: should there be new mellanox char BZR revision available? looks like bzr rev 7 is still last one | 19:46 |
| mbruzek | urulama: not yet I was waiting to push one | 19:46 |
| mbruzek | urulama: rick_h_ asked me to push so he could watch the logs | 19:46 |
| mbruzek | I can do that now if you like | 19:47 |
| mbruzek | I just didn't hear back from rick_h_ | 19:47 |
| mbruzek | urulama: I *just* pushed now. | 19:49 |
| mbruzek | revision 8 | 19:49 |
| urulama | mbruzek: thanks. much appreciated. | 19:54 |
| kadams54 | Makyo: Trying to QA your issue but I've re-created my EC2 env twice. Both times server.go (juju API?) keeps reporting an "error writing response: EOF". Trying a third time… | 20:13 |
| kadams54 | uiteam: any ideas why I'd be seeing this? ^^ | 20:13 |
| Makyo | kadams54, I haven't seen that before. Did all my testing in LXC, but will try EC2 | 20:14 |
| kadams54 | Makyo: I see it show up in debug-log. On the client, I get things like badly formed HTML or a broken charm icon. | 20:15 |
| kadams54 | And the charmstore never replies. | 20:15 |
| Makyo | kadams54, oh, right. | 20:16 |
| Makyo | kadams54, that's because the charmstoreURL property isn't set. | 20:16 |
| urulama | kadams54: looks like it drops rpc connection somehow ... https://github.com/juju/juju/blob/master/rpc/server.go | 20:16 |
| kadams54 | Makyo: I thought that had a default value? | 20:17 |
| Makyo | do `juju set juju-gui juju-gui-debug=true`, then juju ssh to that machine and edit /var/lib/juju-gui/release/.../build-debug/juju-ui/assets/config.js and add charmstoreURL: 'https://api.jujucharms.com/charmstore/v4/' | 20:17 |
| Makyo | kadams54, Not in the config.js in the older version of the charm. | 20:18 |
| Makyo | We haven't released the charm with that in there yet | 20:18 |
| Makyo | Sorry that's convoluted. That work has been done in the charm, but not released yet | 20:18 |
| kadams54 | Makyo: Hmm, is charmstoreURL the new version of charmworld-url? | 20:19 |
| Makyo | kadams54, yes | 20:19 |
| kadams54 | Makyo: made the change, but still having problems… is this correct? | 20:43 |
| kadams54 | charm_store_url: 'https://api.jujucharms.com/charmstore/v4/', | 20:43 |
| kadams54 | charmworldURL: "https://manage.jujucharms.com/", | 20:43 |
| kadams54 | (In config.js) | 20:43 |
| === kadams54 is now known as kadams54-away | ||
| === kadams54-away is now known as kadams54 | ||
| === kadams54 is now known as kadams54-away | ||
| === kadams54-away is now known as kadams54 | ||
| urulama | mbruzek: https://jujucharms.com/mellanox/trusty/2 | 21:24 |
| mbruzek | Thank you | 21:25 |
| mbruzek | What was the problem? | 21:25 |
| urulama | mbruzek: still problems with BZR revisions | 21:25 |
| urulama | mbruzek: bug not found yet :S | 21:25 |
| mbruzek | oh thank you | 21:25 |
| urulama | mbruzek: as you can see, it states that it is at bzr revision 7, although it should be at bzr revision 8 | 21:25 |
| mbruzek | weird | 21:26 |
| mbruzek | I am just glad to have it on the website. | 21:26 |
| urulama | mbruzek: so, fyi, even though the charms look like they have old revisions, the actual code/archive is the latest ones. we have a bug in providing bzr info. | 21:27 |
| mbruzek | urulama: Is there anything I can help with in the diagnosis? | 21:28 |
| urulama | mbruzek: getting closer thanks to your mellanox charm :) | 21:28 |
| urulama | mbruzek: not for now, thanks | 21:28 |
| mbruzek | urulama: happy to help if you need something. | 21:28 |
| urulama | mbruzek: btw, safari does not show the svg icon properly | 21:29 |
| urulama | (for mellanox) | 21:29 |
| urulama | it's completely white | 21:29 |
| mbruzek | weird. | 21:29 |
| mbruzek | It shows OK for me. | 21:30 |
| mbruzek | But Yeah the icon may not have been written correctly. | 21:30 |
| urulama | looks fine https://api.jujucharms.com/v4/trusty/mellanox-2/archive/icon.svg | 21:32 |
| urulama | anyway, thanks. | 21:33 |
| === urulama is now known as urulama__ | ||
| === kadams54 is now known as kadams54-away | ||
| === kadams54-away is now known as kadams54 | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!
