| rsalveti | robru: just a heads up that the next image might be broken | 01:46 |
|---|---|---|
| rsalveti | rtm one | 01:46 |
| rsalveti | flashed latest + dist-upgrade and now unity8 doesn't even start | 01:46 |
| rsalveti | unity8: tpp.c:62: __pthread_tpp_change_priority: Assertion `new_prio == -1 || (new_prio >= __sched_fifo_min_prio && new_prio <= __sched_fifo_max_prio)' failed. | 01:46 |
| rsalveti | let me reflash | 01:46 |
| robru | rsalveti: oh, is there any way to pull that before it goes live? | 01:47 |
| rsalveti | we might just not create the next image | 01:48 |
| rsalveti | I'm reflashing and will try to reproduce my problem | 01:48 |
| rsalveti | robru: worked fine after a reflash, so we should be good | 01:56 |
| rsalveti | will try to reproduce a few more times | 01:56 |
| rsalveti | might be just a broken env here | 01:56 |
| robru | rsalveti: heh, ok. well you can disable the cron job if you find a problem right? I can't and I'm expecting company in a few minutes. | 01:58 |
| rsalveti | yeah, will start one in a few | 01:58 |
| rsalveti | will wait and see :-) | 01:58 |
| rsalveti | yeah, it's a combination with the media-hub I had in my landing | 01:59 |
| rsalveti | really weird | 01:59 |
| rsalveti | so all is good :-) | 01:59 |
| robru | rsalveti: cool, thanks for figuring that out ;-) | 02:01 |
| rsalveti | sorry for the noise :-) | 02:01 |
| imgbot | === IMAGE 60 building (started: 20150109-02:05) === | 02:05 |
| imgbot | === IMAGE RTM 188 building (started: 20150109-03:05) === | 03:05 |
| imgbot | === IMAGE 60 DONE (finished: 20150109-03:25) === | 03:25 |
| imgbot | === changelog: http://people.canonical.com/~ogra/touch-image-stats/60.changes === | 03:25 |
| imgbot | === IMAGE RTM 188 DONE (finished: 20150109-04:15) === | 04:15 |
| imgbot | === changelog: http://people.canonical.com/~ogra/touch-image-stats/rtm/188.changes === | 04:15 |
| === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
| === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
| satoris | ping trainguards. Line 55 has been "ready to build" for almost a full day now. Is there something holding it up or are things just busy? | 08:06 |
| Mirv | satoris: the lander clicks the build button also in case of sync silos... | 08:17 |
| satoris | Mirv: huh, I've never clicked the build button before and yet my packages have built automatically. | 08:19 |
| satoris | And jenkins tells me I don't have build permission. | 08:21 |
| Saviq | satoris, sometimes the trainguard who assigned a silo just kicks a build, too | 08:24 |
| bzoltan | Mirv: who is the QA sherif around this time? | 08:24 |
| satoris | Saviq: yes, that seems reasonable. If you have a silo ready to build, why would you _not_ want it built immediately when possible. | 08:25 |
| Mirv | satoris: huh? have you just recently started your own landings? robert added some autobuild functionality for some cases. anyway, it's building now but you should have access too. | 08:26 |
| Saviq | satoris, sometimes I preempt to get a silo early while MPs are being prepped and such | 08:26 |
| satoris | Mirv: no, I have done my own landings for ages. Never had a problem before. | 08:27 |
| Mirv | satoris: for example if sync target is not ready yet. but yes that's why there's the auto function now. | 08:27 |
| Mirv | bzoltan: soon brendand or davmor | 08:27 |
| satoris | Mirv: so if I in the future need building (as I don't seem to have rights to start them myself) should I just ask someone here to do it or what is the correct procedure? | 08:29 |
| vila | mardy, Mirv : http://s-jenkins.ubuntu-ci:8080/job/ubuntu-system-settings-online-accounts-ci/186/console \o/ | 08:34 |
| mardy | vila: looks like I cannot open the link, not even with the VPN on | 08:37 |
| mardy | vila: anyway, I guess that you did it :-) | 08:37 |
| mardy | vila: what was it? | 08:37 |
| Mirv | satoris: yes you can just ask trainguards, but next week we can ask sil2100 what needs to be done for permissions | 08:38 |
| vila | mardy: remove the hook that was running the coverage part, it's not needed anymore. | 08:38 |
| satoris | Mirv: check, thanks. | 08:38 |
| vila | mardy: it's annoying that you can't access with a working vpn :-/ | 08:39 |
| vila | mardy: do you have a way to validate your VPN to access something else ? | 08:39 |
| vila | mardy: better explanation: https://pastebin.canonical.com/123071/ | 08:41 |
| satoris | ping trainguards, please start build of line 58 (landing-001). Thanks. | 08:46 |
| Saviq | satoris, done | 08:47 |
| satoris | ty | 08:47 |
| Saviq | satoris, in any case, you should get build permissions if you've been landing already | 08:48 |
| Saviq | not sure who has the power... | 08:48 |
| popey | Mirv: morning. could you please upload http://s-jenkins.ubuntu-ci:8080/job/calendar-app-click/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/generic-click-builder-utopic-armhf/output/com.ubuntu.calendar_0.4.565_all.click when you get a chance. Thanks. | 09:15 |
| Mirv | popey: morning. | 09:26 |
| Mirv | popey: done, this time without any hassle too | 09:28 |
| === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
| popey | Mirv: thanks | 09:41 |
| popey | davmor2: bug i mentioned, could you reproduce if you get a moment please? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/indicator-datetime/+bug/1408958 | 09:52 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1408958 in indicator-datetime (Ubuntu) "Calendar alarm notifications have no buttons, on screen for short while" [Undecided,New] | 09:52 |
| davmor2 | popey: man now I got to install the calendar app and sign into to google and everything | 09:54 |
| popey | new calendar app in store! | 09:55 |
| popey | :D | 09:55 |
| davmor2 | popey: yeah I thought that was the new behaviour. Maybe I was wrong. | 10:00 |
| davmor2 | popey: there was meant to be a difference between calendar and alarm notifications maybe I read the bug wrong though | 10:02 |
| popey | that may be the case, but this is a calendar event | 10:03 |
| davmor2 | popey: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-calendar-app/+bug/1320880 | 10:03 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1320880 in Ubuntu Calendar App "Calendar notifications are treated the same as an alarm notification" [High,In progress] | 10:03 |
| davmor2 | popey: does that give you some feedback | 10:05 |
| === karni is now known as karni-away | ||
| popey | davmor2: hmmm | 10:13 |
| popey | 2 seconds still isn't long enough to pull phone out of pocket and actually read the notification | 10:13 |
| ev | how are we doing with all things CI? Any issues to report? | 10:13 |
| === karni-away is now known as karni | ||
| Saviq | trainguards, can someone please delete unity8 20150109 from rtm landing 003 https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu-rtm/landing-003/+packages | 10:38 |
| Saviq | I must've inadvertently pressed the build button on the wrong silo :/ | 10:39 |
| Saviq | and 20150108.1 is what I tested | 10:39 |
| Mirv | Saviq: sure | 10:42 |
| Mirv | saamight be too late if you want to keep the old.. | 10:42 |
| Mirv | saamight.. :) | 10:42 |
| Saviq | saamight, let's see | 10:43 |
| Mirv | Saviq: so the 08.1 already disappeared from sight, do you want to try what happens if I delete the 09? | 10:43 |
| Mirv | the package is of course there, but I don't know how the archive data is set up | 10:43 |
| Saviq | Mirv, let's see, worst case I need to retest anyway :/ | 10:43 |
| Mirv | indeed | 10:44 |
| Mirv | so now 09 is Deleted and 08.1 is Superseded... | 10:44 |
| Mirv | and if not going to the Copy/Delete packages page, the PPA looks like it'd be empty | 10:44 |
| Saviq | I wonder if I can copy | 10:45 |
| davmor2 | popey: sorry didn't mean to ignore you didn't see your reply, I agree but that isn't my call, it fit the criteria of behaving differently personally for calendar events I would have it only ring for a second or 2 and then just leave the osd displayed until it accepted with a button press maybe | 10:45 |
| davmor2 | popey: I don't know though if the alert is tied into the osd which might be the issue | 10:46 |
| Saviq | Mirv, think you could bin-copy to the same (or a different?) silo? | 10:46 |
| Mirv | Saviq: yeah! I've done that before, and it seems to work. | 10:47 |
| Mirv | Saviq: so, copied a superseded 08.1 to the same PPA now | 10:47 |
| Saviq | Mirv, awesome, thank you | 10:47 |
| Saviq | now a watch_only and we're back in business | 10:47 |
| Saviq | Mirv, is it expected that watch_only takes so long https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-rtm-landing-003-1-build/113/console ? | 10:58 |
| Saviq | it's been going for 10 mins now | 10:58 |
| ev | elopio, cihelp: http://s-jenkins.ubuntu-ci:8080/job/ubuntu-system-settings-ci/1889/console looks like a job is broken. My shift is about to end, but if we can get confirmation, the next vanguard can pick it up. | 10:59 |
| cjwatson | mardy: Perhaps you're using the old batuan-based VPN. https://wiki.canonical.com/InformationInfrastructure/IS/HowTo/CompanyOpenVPN is the way forward, if so | 11:05 |
| Mirv | Saviq: I think it's a bug, I've noticed it too, but only 5 mins | 11:06 |
| Saviq | Mirv, 18 mins and counting :/ | 11:06 |
| Mirv | Saviq: oh right I think I noticed this new behavior too. it waits at that "Checking" until the indexes it expects are there | 11:06 |
| Mirv | I don't know how it feels about that deleted newer version.. | 11:06 |
| Saviq | wonder if they will show up... | 11:06 |
| Saviq | yeah, that's what I was afraid of, too | 11:07 |
| mardy | cjwatson: yes, I'm still on the old one; I'll read that page and update, thanks! | 11:07 |
| Saviq | Mirv, let's see what happens, we can always move to a different silo | 11:07 |
| Mirv | yes | 11:07 |
| cjwatson | mardy: I think some of the network rearrangements towards the end of last year basically broke the batuan VPN (although I hadn't been using it for several months before that, so I'm inferring this from other reports) | 11:08 |
| cjwatson | mardy: Fortunately the new company-wide VPN AFAIK gives you access to a strict superset of what the batuan VPN did | 11:09 |
| === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
| mardy | cjwatson: yep, now it works, thanks a lot! :-) | 11:14 |
| Saviq | Mirv, yeah, so... it did expect the new version, the job failed, now whether that's a bug in citrain or not - you tell me | 11:14 |
| Saviq | Mirv, but, can we please bincopy to a different silo then | 11:14 |
| cjwatson | mardy: Great | 11:20 |
| Mirv | Saviq: it does not seem the http://ppa.launchpad.net/ci-train-ppa-service/landing-003/ubuntu-rtm/dists/14.09/main/ information is going to get right either, so doing the silo dance | 11:25 |
| Saviq | Mirv, thank you, and sorry for the pain | 11:26 |
| Mirv | Saviq: no problem. it seems build watch_only still doesn't work immediately so let's wait again. | 11:28 |
| Saviq | Mirv, doesn't wanna work :/ | 11:53 |
| * Saviq back in a bit | 11:53 | |
| === MacSlow is now known as MacSlow|lunch | ||
| Mirv | Saviq: I wonder how that's possible. not even a reconfigure + build watch_only seems to help. I wonder if we need robru's help to debug it (https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-rtm-landing-007-1-build/90/console) | 12:12 |
| Mirv | the package is there and intact, QA could test it manually of course and it could be copied manually. | 12:12 |
| satoris | ping trainguards. Line 55 is tested and working but not marked done yet because it turned out that an updated version of qtubuntu-camera needs to land first. That is not on the sheet yet but should happen soon. What should I write on the sheet to make sure it lands ASAP after qtubuntu-camera but not before? | 12:17 |
| Mirv | satoris: it looks like the another landing is in silo 000 / line 70? just mark yours as tested and that comment it should land after silo 000's qtubuntu-camera. | 12:19 |
| Mirv | Saviq: I've done everything I can possibly think of... created a new line in the spreadsheet, copied the package first before assigning a silo and assigned silo only after the previous one was purged | 12:31 |
| satoris | Ack. | 12:31 |
| Mirv | Saviq: I just became Evil and resolved the issue! | 12:39 |
| Mirv | muahahaha | 12:39 |
| Mirv | so in the meta field in column P, I wrote "Packages built" and the rest of the spreadsheet took it from there :) | 12:40 |
| === MacSlow|lunch is now known as MacSlow | ||
| Saviq | Mirv, yeah, only question is if publishing will work ;) | 13:26 |
| Saviq | Mirv, thanks in any case | 13:26 |
| Mirv | Saviq: copy-package will, regardless :) | 13:30 |
| * Mirv switches to furniture building mode | 14:41 | |
| Mirv | ...after assigning a silo to jgdx | 14:42 |
| jgdx | :)):) | 14:42 |
| jgdx | IKEA? | 14:42 |
| Mirv | no, but a bit similar just with worse instructions ;) | 14:43 |
| josepht | I was envisioning saws and planes and such :) | 14:44 |
| cwayne | davmor2: heya, think I can get a custom tar through on monday? | 14:50 |
| davmor2 | cwayne: possibly :) | 14:51 |
| cwayne | davmor2: would it help my chances if i said please :) | 14:51 |
| davmor2 | cwayne: no as in I don't know what else is going to happen Monday but it shouldn't be an issue unless hell is released :) | 14:52 |
| davmor2 | cwayne: pencilled in :) | 14:53 |
| cwayne | davmor2: thanks :) and happy new year! | 14:55 |
| davmor2 | cwayne: happy new year dude :) | 14:55 |
| elopio | ev: ok, thanks for looking at it. cihelp: is somebody looking at http://s-jenkins.ubuntu-ci:8080/job/ubuntu-system-settings-ci/1889/console ? | 15:59 |
| retoaded | elopio, in a meeting atm but looking .... | 16:17 |
| elopio | retoaded: thanks! | 16:20 |
| kgunn | trainguards just need a vivid silo, line 83 | 17:05 |
| robru | kgunn: vivid 1 | 17:06 |
| robru | Mirv: I guess you figured out rtm 7 without me? | 17:06 |
| popey | davmor2: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-system-settings/+bug/1409069 | 17:18 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1409069 in ubuntu-system-settings (Ubuntu) "System Settings doesn't show updates until you visit updates screen" [Undecided,New] | 17:18 |
| Saviq | trainguards, reconfigure of vivid silo 001 please, added qtmir-gles there | 17:36 |
| robru | Saviq: what's the deal with the ongoing build? do you need that? it shouldn't be running during a reconfigure | 17:44 |
| Saviq | robru, it builds qtmir | 17:45 |
| Saviq | robru, now we're adding qtmir-gles | 17:45 |
| Saviq | which is the "twin" package | 17:45 |
| robru | Saviq: well the thing is, that ongoing build job holds the silo config in memory, so if I reconfigure while it's building, when the build finishes, it'll save it's state which will effectively undo the reconfigure. | 17:47 |
| Saviq | robru, we can abort the build then, it's still gonna build in the PPA and then another build will see that? | 17:48 |
| robru | Saviq: so we'd need to kill the build job (which won't actually kill the build in the PPA) and then reconfigure. yeah should work. | 17:48 |
| robru | Saviq: ok it's reconfigured, just make sure you specify 'qtmir-gles' in the new build job otherwise it'll upload a new qtmir | 17:50 |
| Saviq | robru, I know the drill, thanks :) | 17:51 |
| robru | Saviq: you're welcome! | 17:52 |
| bzoltan | robru: do you know when the next RTM image is going to be created? | 18:01 |
| robru | bzoltan: in about 10 hours as far as I know | 18:05 |
| === alan_g is now known as alan_g|EOW | ||
| elopio | fginther: ps-jenkins is now a member of canonical-platform-qa | 19:15 |
| elopio | sorry for the delay | 19:15 |
| elopio | fginther: plars: I got a run in ubuntu-sanity-tests \o/ | 19:45 |
| elopio | thanks. | 19:45 |
| plars | elopio: great! | 19:45 |
| elopio | these is for the self tests. Now we need to find a way to run the actual sanity tests in an actual device. But that will be in a future iteration. | 19:46 |
| robru | sergiusens: "The landing is small enough to not need testing and has been in vivid for a while." uhhhhh huhhhhhhh... ? do you have a bug reference with rtm approval for that? | 20:57 |
| sergiusens | robru: yeah, it's in the MP | 21:26 |
| sergiusens | robru: oh, last debian/changelog | 21:26 |
| sergiusens | and no, I don't have it handy ;) | 21:26 |
| sergiusens | rsalveti: ^ | 21:26 |
| robru | sergiusens: I don't see any bug reference at https://launchpadlibrarian.net/194113685/ciborium_0.2.12%2B14.10.20141008-0ubuntu1_0.2.12%2B15.04.20141201~rtm-0ubuntu1.diff.gz ? | 21:28 |
| rsalveti | sergiusens: everything needs Q | 21:28 |
| rsalveti | QA | 21:28 |
| rsalveti | if you test it on RTM, then just mark it as need QA | 21:29 |
| rsalveti | just changed QA sign off to required | 21:29 |
| rsalveti | QA should be able to validate this soon | 21:29 |
| rsalveti | sergiusens: can you update the testplan for it? | 21:30 |
| rsalveti | to include what is covered by this MR | 21:30 |
| sergiusens | rsalveti: robru I thought I wasn't supposed to do that | 21:33 |
| sergiusens | as in, someone else tags it | 21:33 |
| rsalveti | sergiusens: wasn't supposed to do what exactly? | 21:33 |
| robru | sergiusens: well yeah, somebody like pmcgowan needs to approve it for rtm. but he marks his approval by adding a task on your bug, and I just don't see any bug number listed anywhere. not in the spreadsheet, not in the changelog, etc. | 21:34 |
| rsalveti | just because the landing is under your name, we can take care of it if needed | 21:34 |
| rsalveti | but it would still be good if you could add the test case description in the wiki page | 21:34 |
| sergiusens | rsalveti: mark the QA field | 21:34 |
| rsalveti | so the QA team can validate by following what is available in there | 21:34 |
| rsalveti | sergiusens: oh, right, now everything RTM needs QA sign off | 21:35 |
| sergiusens | I missed the memo and that's not in the FAQ :-) | 21:35 |
| rsalveti | not sure if we indeed had one, just know because I did many landings over the past few days | 21:36 |
| rsalveti | or trying to at least | 21:36 |
| sergiusens | rsalveti: testplan updated | 21:37 |
| rsalveti | sergiusens: great, thanks! | 21:38 |
| sergiusens | rsalveti: this is the bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/camera-app/+bug/1392368 | 21:40 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1392368 in gallery-app (Ubuntu RTM) "Support storing and viewing photos on an SD card" [High,In progress] | 21:40 |
| rsalveti | cool, thanks | 21:41 |
| pmcgowan | sergiusens, rsalveti all set? | 21:50 |
| rsalveti | pmcgowan: yup | 21:50 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!