=== elfy is now known as Guest54311
=== elfy is now known as Guest77157
=== Guest52375 is now known as forestpiskie
=== forestpiskie is now known as elfy
=== cking_ is now known as cking
=== qwebirc681520 is now known as slickymasterWork
[13:40] <paulliu> charles_: Can I get the rotation_lock by dbus methods from /com/canonical/indicator/rotation_lock ?
[14:46] <paulliu> charles_: the rotation_lock seems to be a gsettings. Can you also export it to the dbus interface so we can access it?
[14:46] <paulliu> charles_: For testing.
=== charles_ is now known as charles
[14:49] <charles> paulliu, I can do that, but I think you may be able to pull directly from the gsettings if you're wanting to test it in qml
[14:49] <paulliu> charles: no. I'm writing the autopilot test.
[14:50] <paulliu> charles: we want to use the autopilot to turn on/off the indicators rotation lock. And see if it did changes the real gsettings.
[14:50] <charles> paulliu, ack
[14:53] <charles> paulliu, I don't mind adding that to the rotation indiator, but just to make sure it's the right thing, why are you wanting to query this via dbus?
[14:53] <charles> eg if you want to verify the gsettings independently you can do it from the command line with "gsettings get com.ubuntu.touch.system rotation-lock"
[14:54] <elopio> Good morning team.
[14:59] <paulliu> charles: ok. I'll use the command line.
[15:01] <charles> paulliu, ack
[15:29] <paulliu> charles: when I turn on/off the Rotation Lock, it didn't change the value of com.ubuntu.touch.system rotation-lock value.
[15:30]  * charles looks
[15:31] <charles> paulliu, wfm
[15:32] <charles> paulliu, I pulled down the rotation lock indicator's menu and toggled the "Rotation Lock" menuitem
[15:32] <charles> paulliu, repeatedly doing that + querying "gsettings get com.ubuntu.touch.system rotation-lock" gives me true, false, true, false as expected
[15:33] <paulliu> charles: ok. Maybe something weird on my phone.
[15:33] <charles> paulliu, you're running "gsettings get" in the phablet-shell session? :)
[15:34] <paulliu> charles: yes
[15:42] <paulliu> elopio: can you test if the fixtures works?
[15:42] <paulliu> elopio: my phone dies.
[15:43] <elopio> paulliu: sure. Same branch?
[15:43] <paulliu> elopio: yes
[15:43] <paulliu> elopio:  just pull
[15:46] <elopio> paulliu: I get self.assertEqual(fixture._is_rotation_lock_enabled(), True)
[15:46] <elopio> testtools.matchers._impl.MismatchError: False != True
[15:47] <paulliu> elopio: yeah. I got the same. So if you turn on/off the rotation lock, is "gsettings get com.ubuntu.touch.system rotation-lock" shows the same value?
[15:48] <paulliu> elopio: before my phone dies, I cannot get the correct value by gsettings. But charles can.
[15:49] <elopio> paulliu: no, it doesn't matter the state of the checkbox, it always returns false
[15:49] <paulliu> charles: ^
[15:49] <elopio> also, the indicator icon is not being shown when I click the checkbox. Something stoped working.
[15:50] <charles> ...?
[15:50]  * charles re-tests
[15:50] <elopio> gsettings set com.ubuntu.touch.system rotation-lock true does work.
[15:52] <charles> okay so score 1 for testing
[15:53] <elopio> \o/
[15:53] <charles> this is working for me on 14.10 (krillin r191), but when I switch to 15.04 (mako r64) I get a consistent 'false'
[15:53] <paulliu> charles: it's weird.. Just gsettings..
[15:54] <charles> my first guess is that an indicator-display branch landed in 14.10 but not 15.04; if so that's an oversight
[15:54] <charles> previously uss had a different key and then went with 'rotation-lock' in the gsettings, there was a branch to switch to that in indicator-display. maybe that didn't land in trunk for the 15.04 images
[15:54] <charles> checking
[15:55] <elopio> I can use the checkbox to disable the lock. Not to enable it.
[15:56] <charles> no... no code changes between the two branches
[15:56] <paulliu> elopio: so for the test we might want to do that twice..
[15:57] <paulliu> elopio: if we change to test in the reverse order, I wonder the code will pass.
[15:57] <elopio> paulliu: we can't automate at this level if there is an error.
[15:57] <charles> no, this is broken, we shouldn't write the test to work around that
[15:57] <elopio> what we do is report a bug, and put a skip with a link to that bug.
[15:57] <charles> +1
[15:58] <paulliu> ok.
[15:58] <elopio> and make a comment on the bug report to reenable the test once it's fixed.
[15:58] <elopio> paulliu: your fixture looks awesome.
[15:58] <elopio> a couple of details.
[15:58] <elopio> paulliu: for the moment, we should make the helpers compatible also with py2.
[15:58] <paulliu> elopio: ok
[15:59] <elopio> so when calling super, you need to use the old style. like super(IndicatorDisplayRotationLock, self).__init__()
[15:59] <charles> paulliu, elopio, I have a meeting right now but I'll triage this right afterwards
[15:59] <elopio> charles: thanks.
[15:59] <charles> paulliu, elopio, please paste the bug url here
[16:00] <elopio> paulliu: second, I think that we should have only one fixture_setup class. I would move the unity8/shell/fixture_setup.py to unity8/fixture_setup.py and put the one you added new there.
[16:00] <elopio> what do you think about that?
[16:01] <paulliu> elopio: ok.
[16:04] <paulliu> elopio: btw, are you testing that on rtm?
[16:05] <elopio> paulliu: no, I'm on vivid, krillin.
=== roadmr is now known as roadmr_afk
=== roadmr_afk is now known as roadmr
[16:58] <alesage> elopio, I'm reviewing the make qmltest, might need you to lead me into this a little
[16:59] <elopio> alesage: sure
[16:59] <elopio> the easiest way to test it that I have found is bzr bd. Then install the built packages and open qtcreator to make projects with the templates.
[16:59] <alesage> elopio, ok sure
[17:00] <alesage> elopio, so this is a dumb question but how do I see the existing template?  it's just the default dummy project, yes?
[17:00] <elopio> alesage: I don't get your question. How to create a project from the template?
[17:01] <alesage> elopio, more like "what is a template"
[17:01] <elopio> alesage: when you open qtcreator, you will see a page called ubuntu-sdk
[17:02] <elopio> from that page click the link create a new project
[17:02] <elopio> there you will see the templates, in the Ubuntu section.
[17:02] <alesage> elopio, k I see
[17:02] <elopio> alesage: on the branch, you will see many wizard.xml files
[17:03] <elopio> that's what makes the templates appear here, and what tells qtcreator which files to copy into the new project.
[17:04] <alesage> elopio, so you modified "App with Simple UI"?
[17:05] <elopio> alesage: I modified many.
[17:05] <elopio> I changed the default main file from main.qml to Main.qml in all templates.
[17:06] <alesage> elopio, ok slowly dawning on self over here
[17:14] <elfy> balloons: \o/ thanks for talking to IS
[17:16] <balloons> elfy, no problem.. all appears well now
[17:18] <elfy> yep
[17:31] <elopio> rhuddie: ping, meeting.
[17:47] <elopio> paulliu: have you filed the bug, or do you want me to do it?
[18:02] <paulliu> elopio: I'll do it.
[18:03] <elopio> paulliu: thanks.
[18:03] <elopio> balloons: if you want to review the template branch, feel free. The more the merrier.
[18:04] <elopio> I'm going for lunch.
[18:11] <paulliu> elopio: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/indicator-display/+bug/1410915
[18:11] <ubot5> Launchpad bug 1410915 in indicator-display (Ubuntu) "com.ubuntu.touch.system rotation-lock can't be changed by the checkbox in indicators" [Undecided,New]
[18:12] <paulliu> charles: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/indicator-display/+bug/1410915
[18:12] <charles> paulliu, ty
[18:26] <dkessel> good evening. looks like half the ubuntu world is subscribed to bug 1268257 :D I have never seen a bug with a heat of > 10000
[18:26] <ubot5> bug 1268257 in nvidia-graphics-drivers-331-updates (Ubuntu) "nvidia-331-updates 331.38-0ubuntu3: nvidia-331-updates kernel module failed to build, with only error: "objdump: '... .tmp_nv.o': No such file"" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1268257
[18:49] <balloons> dkessel, ;-)
[18:49] <balloons> evening to you as well
[18:53] <dkessel> evening balloons :) Let me motivate myself by telling you that I will be looking at the qa tracker code again in a few minutes
[18:54] <dkessel> lightdm in vivid is still failing for me BTW :p
[18:54] <balloons> dkessel, oO. I think we nailed the last snafu of the rebuild yesterday by getting bug numbers showing again
[18:54] <balloons> and yea, vivid is having some fun. There's a keyboard input install bug as well
=== chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun
[20:25] <Letozaf_> balloons, hi, did you see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UtopicUnicorn/ReleaseSchedule  is still on Ubuntu 14.10 schedule ?
[20:25] <balloons> Letozaf_, ? what do you mean?
[20:26] <Letozaf_> balloons, shouldn't there be the release schedule of 15.04 ?
[20:26] <balloons> Letozaf_, yes. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/VividVervet/ReleaseSchedule
[20:26] <Letozaf_> balloons, this one ends October 2014
[20:26] <balloons> let me fix the wiki too
[20:32] <balloons> Letozaf_, wiki and calendar all fixed, thanks for noticing :-)
[20:32] <Letozaf_> balloons, yw :)
[20:56] <dkessel> balloons, knome: here is some progress on the qa tracker changes after two months of no progress: https://imgur.com/9561kt0
[20:56] <dkessel> (a bit hacky)
[20:59]  * balloons looks
[20:59] <elfy> so did elfy
[20:59] <balloons> nice
[20:59] <elfy> I like
[20:59] <balloons> ^^ me too
[21:00] <elfy> ha - that'll be snap then :)
[21:00] <elfy> anything that means people don't have to mouseover 70 little icons to find a bug works for me
[21:00] <elfy> though it is likely to make the test page looooong I guess
[21:03] <elfy> it needs more than critical bugs imo
[21:03] <elfy> and is status/importance.assignee of any interest at this point
[21:04] <elfy> maybe a table with bug number and title and perhaps a repeated column so
[21:04] <elfy> bug - title | bug - title | bug - title
[21:04] <elfy> just a thought :)
[21:53]  * dkessel keeps elfy's suggestions for the next tracker hack evening
[21:58] <knome> elfy, that'd make it harder to read, i prefer one bug per line
[21:58] <knome> could have checkboxes to filter out different statues though
[21:58] <elfy> knome: yes - but would you like the testcase page to be really looooooooooooooong
[21:58] <knome> sure, but with filters, it's doable
[21:59] <knome> and we can work on the listing to make each row less tall
[21:59] <elfy> you'd have to page down past 30 or more bugs - then lines and lines of text - and then finally somewhere to report
[22:00] <elfy> filter out kylin