| igalic | hello happy people o/~ | 06:47 |
|---|---|---|
| igalic | i've been trying to upload a new release, and it's been hanging here for about 15 minutes now: https://gist.github.com/igalic/51382ff0dd7296670fe6 | 06:48 |
| igalic | pretty cool. i've restarted the upload, and now the first file is stalling at 7040k/7490k | 07:04 |
| igalic | sadness. | 07:04 |
| wgrant | igalic: Any better now? | 07:28 |
| igalic | wgrant: checking, but then it's gonna be hard to tell if it's because i've relocated to a different office ;) | 09:32 |
| igalic | Successfully uploaded packages. | 09:32 |
| wgrant | igalic: There was an issue with one of our upload servers that we discovered and fixed a few minutes after you asked. | 09:33 |
| igalic | wgrant: nice! thank you! | 09:34 |
| igalic | trafficserver_5.2.0-2ah1~trusty1.dsc: Version older than that in the archive. 5.2.0-2ah1~trusty1 <= 5.2.0-rc5-2ah1~trusty1 | 09:40 |
| igalic | duh. | 09:40 |
| igalic | now i have to delete those... | 09:40 |
| igalic | is there any commandline utility that lets me verify those versions *before* i punch them into debian/changelog and push them out? | 09:42 |
| igalic | cuz, i was totes convinced that rc5 < '' | 09:43 |
| wgrant | igalic: dpkg --compare-versions | 09:53 |
| igalic | wgrant: in retrospect, that now seems obvious._. | 09:54 |
| wgrant | igalic: One would generally use 5.2.0~rc5. '~' < '' | 09:54 |
| igalic | wgrant: ACK. | 09:54 |
| igalic | thank you! | 09:54 |
| igalic | hrm.. maybe we should put that in our makefile that way. | 09:55 |
| wgrant | igalic: https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html#s-f-Version | 09:55 |
| igalic | hhaaaahhhahaha | 09:56 |
| igalic | " The upstream_version may contain only alphanumerics[36] and the characters . + - : ~ (full stop, plus, hyphen, colon, tilde) and should start with a digit. If there is no debian_revision then hyphens are not allowed; if there is no epoch then colons are not allowed." | 09:56 |
| igalic | very optimistic ;) | 09:57 |
| igalic | (but works in this case for trafficserver ;) | 09:57 |
| cjwatson | igalic: It's not really optimism, it's enforced rules. If your upstream versions don't fit that format then the packager is expected to transform them into that format. | 10:13 |
| igalic | *nod* | 10:20 |
| igalic | :( | 10:21 |
| igalic | so, i just tried patching up our makefile.am, and now git is unhappy :( | 10:21 |
| igalic | fatal: '5.3.0~rc0' is not a valid tag name. | 10:21 |
| igalic | oh, great, apparently we dropped 32bit support and i didn't realize it... | 10:25 |
| cjwatson | debcommit transforms "~" to "." for the purposes of git tags. | 10:26 |
| igalic | cjwatson: thanks, ammended. | 10:30 |
| igalic | i wonder, should (can?) i configure the package to not build on 32bit? https://launchpad.net/~apache-helpdesk/+archive/ubuntu/trafficserver-ppa/+packages | 10:37 |
| igalic | makefile simplified: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-3298 | 10:37 |
| cjwatson | igalic: https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html#s-f-Architecture | 10:38 |
| igalic | so, right now it says any, but i'm pretty sure we don't build on sparc, or vax, or anything... other than arm and x86 | 10:40 |
| cjwatson | FWIW I don't think it's at all necessary to change upstream's RC naming; the ~ is quite Debian(family)-specific | 10:40 |
| cjwatson | You can do it if you like, but you don't need to | 10:40 |
| cjwatson | It's common enough to just rename for the purpose of packaging | 10:40 |
| igalic | cjwatson: that's just for our RC process.. | 10:40 |
| igalic | cjwatson: and we do rename ourselves when the rc is final. | 10:41 |
| igalic | but this would make rcs testable as packages of themselves. | 10:41 |
| igalic | without much fuzz. | 10:41 |
| cjwatson | Sure, I'm just saying that you don't need to switch from -rc to ~rc upstream in order to satisfy Debian-format packaging rules | 10:41 |
| cjwatson | Nothing stopping you if that's your primary target, either | 10:41 |
| igalic | yeah, it's not.... | 10:42 |
| igalic | cjwatson: added this above convo as comment to the issue. | 10:43 |
| === lazyPower is now known as lp|BagelRun | ||
| shadeslayer | wgrant: can I get more space re https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/260611 :3 | 14:28 |
| shadeslayer | apparently firefox is super fat package | 14:28 |
| === lp|BagelRun is now known as lazyPower | ||
| Saviq | hey folks, is there a process we would need to follow to get a ppa to build packages for rtm? we'd probably need it to be nonvirt, too, something akin to https://launchpad.net/~unity-team/+archive/ubuntu/phone-right-edge | 17:32 |
| cjwatson | Saviq: It's not possible through the web UI, but you can create the PPA using the Person.createPPA API call, which takes a distribution parameter. You'll then need to ask webops to make it non-virtualised and enable armhf, after making sure that the owning team has and will only ever have members who are Canonical employees. | 17:41 |
| Saviq | cjwatson, thanks! | 17:42 |
| cjwatson | Saviq: You'll need to be the owner or an admin of the team in question. | 17:42 |
| Saviq | "You indirectly own this team.", sounds good | 17:43 |
| === NikitaKonovalov2 is now known as NikitaKonovalov | ||
| === Ursinha_ is now known as Ursinha | ||
| === Saviq_ is now known as Saviq | ||
| === cprov_ is now known as cprov | ||
| === broder_ is now known as broder | ||
| === wallyworld__ is now known as wallyworld | ||
| === FourDollars_ is now known as FourDollars | ||
| === Vorpal is now known as Guest84511 | ||
| === maxb is now known as Guest47523 | ||
| === Pici is now known as Guest32967 | ||
| === charles_ is now known as Guest52246 | ||
| === elijah is now known as Guest92966 | ||
| === Tribaal_ is now known as Tribaal | ||
| === ctracey_ is now known as ctracey | ||
| === mwhudson_ is now known as mwhudson | ||
| === DalekSec_ is now known as DalekSec | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!