/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2015/01/15/#ubuntu-ci-eng.txt

ToyKeeperSaviq: However, apt-get upgrade wants to update ubuntu-system-settings; maybe the archive rev is newer than the silo?00:00
SaviqToyKeeper, `apt-cache policy ubuntu-system-settings` then?00:01
ToyKeeperSaviq: I'm trying to make sense of it...  something doesn't add up.00:01
ToyKeeperLooks like the silo URLs changed since I last updated my scripts.00:02
ToyKeeperMay be a local issue, this DNS server is acting really weird.00:06
ToyKeeperOr perhaps something got corrupted here after a few shorts cut the power unexpectedly.  This notebook started having physical problems about a week after the warranty expired.  :(00:13
ToyKeeperSome programs are resolving hosts just fine, others can't do it at all today.  This is new as of like half an hour ago.  :(00:13
robruToyKeeper: yeah silo URLs haven't changed during the life of ci train as far as I know. except maybe when RTM was introduced, but not other than that00:35
robruToyKeeper: I had some DNS issues today myself, try uninstalling dnsmasq ;-)00:36
ToyKeeperThis is really odd.  I can resolve hosts with 'ping' but not 'telnet' or a bunch of other programs.00:37
ToyKeeperIt seems like everything checks nsswitch, but some programs might be ignoring resolv.conf.00:40
ToyKeeperNope, both are using resolv.conf.  Nearly identical system calls, too.00:44
ToyKeeperIn any case...00:50
ToyKeeperThe Updates page works if I manually "apt-get install ubuntu-system-settings" with the archive enabled.00:50
ToyKeeperUnpacking ubuntu-system-settings (0.3+15.04.20150114.1~rtm-0ubuntu1) over (0.3+15.04.20150114~rtm-0ubuntu1) ...00:50
ToyKeeperWith my dns issues I'm having some difficulty checking the revs against upstream though.00:51
ToyKeeperIt seems to match what's in the PPA.00:52
ToyKeeperrobru: I *think* everything is in order for the dep fix in the next rtm build.00:53
robruToyKeeper: I thought RTM was closed?00:55
ToyKeeperrobru: Sanity failed due to the OTA issue, so we're trying to get a build with that fixed.00:58
robruToyKeeper: so nobody will yell at me if I publish this? ;-)00:58
ToyKeeper195, 196, and 197 are all fail due to the same issue, and silo 3 appears to fix it.00:58
ToyKeeperWe can't fully verify without a new build though, since it's just a dep change and the citrain tools don't handle that well.00:59
ToyKeeperEr, the silo tools, rather.00:59
ToyKeeperrobru: So, 198 should end up being the promotion candidate.01:00
robruToyKeeper: ok, I published it. I guess we'll find out!01:00
ToyKeeperrobru: If anyone yells at you, send them to me.  QA is blocked until silo 3 is included in a build.01:00
robruToyKeeper: will do!01:00
ToyKeeperWould have been ready an hour ago, but my work notebook is having issues and I haven't had time to replace or fix it yet.01:01
robrursalveti: is rtm image building disabled in cron? if so can you kick an image build?01:31
veebersrobru / trainguards: I set testing to OK for the autopilot sync, but I had the silo created last week, I presume that it's still good to land but I've been told I might need pmcgowan to ack it (as the gates are closed)01:50
robruveebers: well it definitely needs qa ;-)01:51
veebersrobru: ah ok, will check that out now01:51
robruveebers: but yeah i won't publish it without an ack from management01:51
veebersrobru: ack, for the record, it's a sync for what's in vivid (i.e. no extra fixes or features from vivid). I have included a test report in the comments of that spreadsheet line01:52
robruveebers: ack01:53
veebersrobru: sweet FYI I've emailed pmcgowan (I spoke to him last week about getting it started, just need the final ack from him http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/9753260/)02:02
robruveebers: right. Once you get that and a qa ack i can publish it.02:04
imgbot=== IMAGE 66 building (started: 20150115-02:10) ===02:10
kenvandinerobru, so now that silo 3 landed, when will a new rtm image build?02:15
robrukenvandine: i don't know ;-) i guess cron is disabled, asked rsalveti to kick one but he didn't respond. Can you kick it?02:16
rsalvetirobru: I'm here now02:17
rsalvetiit seems RTM build just started02:17
rsalvetifrom imgbot02:17
kenvandinei don't think 66 is rtm02:17
kenvandinesounds like vivid02:17
rsalvetioh, right, this is vivid02:17
kenvandineSaviq, was that dep removed from vivid too?02:17
rsalvetiwell, RTM is still in cron02:18
kenvandinei thought it would be disabled since it's frozen02:18
ToyKeeperIn that case, it won't be built for ... ~3 more hours?02:18
rsalveti02 3 * * *DIST=ubuntu-rtm/14.09 for-project ubuntu-touch cron.daily-preinstalled --live02:18
kenvandinedoes anyone know if vivid had the same package dropped?02:18
rsalvetikenvandine: sorry, which package?02:19
kenvandineqml-module-ubuntu-connectivity02:19
kenvandineunity8 dropped the depends02:19
kenvandinewhich dropped it from the rtm image02:19
robrukenvandine: don't know for sure, but it should have... If somebody is landing things in rtm without landing in vivid first, that's naughty02:19
kenvandinewhich broke updates in settings and the telegram app02:19
rsalvetiI'd expect the unity8 guys to land first on vivid, but yeah, would need to check02:20
kenvandinethe real fix is to seed that package02:20
kenvandinethat's what i'm worried about02:20
kenvandinei fear that image 66 building is going to break updates for people02:20
rsalvetikenvandine: qml-module-ubuntu-connectivity:armhf still installed on 6502:20
kenvandineyeah...02:20
kenvandinebut will it be in 66 :)02:20
rsalvetiyup, just trying to understand :-)02:21
rsalvetikenvandine: system-settings depends on it02:22
* kenvandine checks rdepends02:22
kenvandinein vivid?02:23
kenvandinei just added the depends tonight in rtm02:23
kenvandineto fix this situation02:23
rsalvetiyeah, checking vivid02:23
kenvandinei have a branch adding the depends for vivid too02:23
robrukenvandine: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/194911742/unity8_8.02%2B15.04.20150109.2-0ubuntu1_8.02%2B15.04.20150113.1-0ubuntu1.diff.gz seems fine?02:23
robruUnless it was dropped in a previous diff02:24
rsalvetikenvandine: but system setting is already depending on it on vivid02:24
rsalvetihm, cron is still enabled but it didn't trigger the image02:25
rsalvetilet me try one by hand02:25
kenvandineoh... great02:25
kenvandineand weird02:25
kenvandinein vivid settings has the depends02:25
kenvandinebut rtm didn't02:25
kenvandinewhew02:26
kenvandinevivid is safe02:26
rsalvetiyeah :-)02:26
kenvandinewe still need that package seeded instead of relying on this02:26
rsalvetirobru: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu-rtm/14.09/ubuntu-touch/02:26
kenvandineclick packages need it02:26
rsalvetinew build in progress02:26
rsalvetiyeah, usually recommended for qml-modules02:26
kenvandineit's part of the platform, so we need to seed it02:27
kenvandinersalveti, when was the rtm image build started02:27
kenvandine?02:27
rsalvetikenvandine: now02:27
rsalvetishould I have waited?02:27
kenvandinenope... that's good02:27
rsalvetialright, should be done in ~1h02:28
kenvandinethe package was just published less than an hour ago02:28
kenvandineso was worried the image started before that02:28
rsalvetigreat02:28
kenvandinethanks!02:28
kenvandinei'm off then... whew02:28
kenvandinegood night all02:28
rsalvetigood night!02:28
robrursalveti: thanks!02:29
rsalvetinp02:29
robrukenvandine: good night02:29
imgbot=== IMAGE RTM 198 building (started: 20150115-02:30) ===02:30
rsalvetithere you go02:31
imgbot=== IMAGE 66 DONE (finished: 20150115-03:35) ===03:35
imgbot=== changelog: http://people.canonical.com/~ogra/touch-image-stats/66.changes ===03:35
imgbot=== IMAGE RTM 198 DONE (finished: 20150115-03:50) ===03:50
imgbot=== changelog: http://people.canonical.com/~ogra/touch-image-stats/rtm/198.changes ===03:50
ToyKeeper... and there it goes.04:13
robruToyKeeper: any luck?06:11
ToyKeeperrobru: Er, I had a couple interruptions, but sanity on 198 is going well so far and the issue we tried to fix seems to be fixed.06:12
ToyKeeperWhatever the reduced-battery-life thing is though, I think it's still present.06:13
ToyKeeperThat's the only big thing I expect to come up during testing.06:13
robruToyKeeper: ah ok, glad to hear the dep issue is fixed06:13
ToyKeeperTBH, I still think 184 was probably better, since it had the battery life thing fixed and was thus generally more reliable.06:23
sil2100davmor2: what's the problem with the new RTM images?08:45
davmor2sil2100: I've been online for 2 seconds I've not seen the new one, 195 unity8 drop a communication dependency that some of the rest of the system actually depended on which meant ota was broken as far as I know 198 passed sanity on krillin08:46
jibelsil2100, there is no problem with 198 AFAIK. Did you hear of any problem?08:47
sil2100davmor2, jibel: no no, I was just wondering if the 'do not upgrade' message is still valid08:49
jibelsil2100, I didn't try an upgrade from the UI with 198 but at least the page is not blank anymore08:50
sil2100davmor2, jibel: if all is fine, I guess sending an e-mail to the ML would be a good idea08:58
sil2100Since people might still think that upgrading to the latest RTM image is a bad idea08:59
sil2100Saviq: thanks for sending the update e-mail09:03
Saviqsil2100, sure09:03
vilaHi there, any CI issue to report ?09:06
Saviqdavmor2, your MTA hates me: <davmor2@davmor2.ddns.net>:    Relay access denied09:06
davmor2Saviq: that doesn't surprise me :D09:08
Saviqdavmor2, you configured it to hate me?!09:11
popeydammit, i have the broken image on my krillin.09:11
Saviqpopey, if rw, just apt-get install qml-module-ubuntu-connectivity09:16
Saviqpopey, otherwise ubuntu-device-flash09:16
popeyi dont have rw09:16
popeyyeah, using u-d-f09:16
popeythanks09:16
jibelpopey, system-image-cli from the command line works too09:16
popeyjibel: nope, it didnt here09:20
popeytried twice09:20
jibelpopey, oh really, that's how I upgraded. What doesn't work?09:20
popeyit didnt upgrade09:20
jibelpopey, and what does system-image-cli -n says?09:21
popeytoo late now, I'm running u-d-f09:21
jibelk09:21
davmor2Saviq: update of a bunch of low level stuff on my server09:22
popeymy krillin is taking a loooong time to u-d-f09:22
popeyunxz taking a while.09:23
popey</patience>09:23
davmor2Saviq: it should like you again now :)09:26
jibelpopey, when was last update of the clock app?09:28
popeybefore xmas09:28
popeyWe should push a new version to the store as there's updated translations which could go in09:30
jibelthere is a problem wth repeating alarms; not sure it is the clock app or something else09:30
jibeldavmor2 just confirmed it09:31
jibeldavmor2, I'm filing a bug09:31
popeyok09:31
dbarthgood morning09:38
dbarthtrainguards, i need help reconfiguring silo rtm-011 (line 36) which i took over from pstolowski to add the missing OA branch09:38
=== greyback__ is now known as greyback
jibelsil2100, davmor2 bug 141117109:47
ubot5bug 1411171 in Ubuntu Clock App "Repeating alarm disabled after it went off once" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/141117109:47
jibeldavmor2, can you confirm it.09:47
davmor2jibel: technically we'd need to keep it up till tomorrow to see if an alarm goes off would be nice if we could repeat minutely somehow even if it was mocked I'll have a word with charles when he gets on09:51
popeycan you not fake the date on the device?09:51
jibeldavmor2, you're technically right but the fact that it's disabled is wrong09:51
popeydate -s09:51
davmor2popey: hmm09:52
davmor2popey: would that do time too as It would need to be set again before the alarm09:53
popeyphablet@ubuntu-phablet:~$ date09:53
popeyThu Jan 15 09:52:38 GMT 201509:53
popeyphablet@ubuntu-phablet:~$ sudo date -s "Tue Jan 13 09:00:00 2015"09:53
popey[sudo] password for phablet:09:53
popeyTue Jan 13 09:00:00 GMT 201509:53
popeyphablet@ubuntu-phablet:~$ date09:53
popeyTue Jan 13 09:00:05 GMT 201509:53
popeyyes :)09:53
davmor2popey: that might be the way to do it then09:53
popeyand the clock just jumped to 9am http://people.canonical.com/~alan/screenshots/device-2015-01-15-095247.png09:53
davmor2I'll give it a go in a minute09:55
popeyk09:55
popeydavmor2: also need to switch off network time updates in system settings of course!10:06
popey:)10:06
davmor2popey: or set it a minute before10:06
davmor2jibel: popey: alarm 1 pass10:09
=== chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk
dbarthhey trainguards, can you help me with line 36? ^^10:09
sil2100dbarth: hey! What's up?10:09
davmor2jibel, popey: alarm 2 goes off too so it is just disabled in the clock app10:10
sil2100Ah10:10
sil2100dbarth: on it!10:10
sil2100dbarth: done10:13
* sil2100 needs to fix his irssi highlights10:13
sil2100brb10:19
dbarthsil2100: ty10:21
jibeldavmor2, yes I did that test too. *Just* the status in the clock app is wrong10:38
popeyjibel: davmor2 indeed, I can't reproduce here, added comment and screenshots to the bug 141117110:40
ubot5bug 1411171 in Ubuntu Clock App "Repeating alarm disabled after it went off once" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/141117110:40
davmor2popey: let the date and time reset and try it again after the first none modded time it is disabled in the alarms page but the next alarm goes off as expected10:48
popeyhow are you defining "disabled"?10:51
popeyaha, now it's flipped to disabled.10:52
davmor2popey: instead of the alarm tab being green tick in the alarm page it is grey cross instead10:52
popeyok, updated bug10:52
popeyhttp://people.canonical.com/~alan/screenshots/device-2015-01-15-105126.png10:52
popeylike that?10:52
davmor2popey: yeap10:53
popeykk10:53
davmor2popey: the concern then is if you turn that back does it then disable it in EDS10:53
=== chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun
alecufginther: hi! any news regarding the lp:pay-ui autopilot tests in jenkins?12:03
=== MacSlow is now known as MacSlow|lunch
=== chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk
=== chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun
=== alan_g is now known as alan_g|lunch
=== chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk
=== MacSlow|lunch is now known as MacSlow
=== alan_g|lunch is now known as alan_g
=== chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun
popeycihelp: can someone see why jenkins didn't trigger on https://code.launchpad.net/~pkunal-parmar/ubuntu-calendar-app/Default-View/+merge/246564 ?13:33
fgintheralecu, My first attempt at enabling the pay-ui tests ran into a problem where the existing test runner can't find the tests. So we need to figure out what's going on. I don't expect it to be a big problem, just need to dig at it.13:51
fgintheralecu, I'll make a note in the request to keep you updated on progress13:51
alecufginther: great13:51
alecufginther: btw, where is the test runner expecting the tests to be?13:52
alecufginther: I use "make autopilot" when running them from my working branch13:52
alecufginther: so perhaps the test runner uses a different mechanism?13:53
fgintheralecu, it looks under tests/autopilot which matches pay-ui. So maybe I'm mis-interpretting the error. We'll just need to investigate what's actually going on here. This is still using the 'old custom' test runner and not the adt-run method so it's a bit clunky to get it working sometimes13:57
fgintheralecu, In the future when things get switched over to using adt-run, these issues should no longer occur13:57
alecufginther: ack. So thanks for working on that, and please let me know if I can be of any help (ie, by taking a look at those errors too).13:59
=== chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk
fgintherpopey, looks like jenkins was running that MP while you we're asking the question :-)14:00
popeyfginther: awesome14:02
=== seb128_ is now known as seb128
=== alan_g is now known as alan_g|afk
sil2100o/ Will publish once I'm back from lunch14:26
camakotrainguards ^^ Can you spare a silo please?14:27
dbarthtrainguards: sorry i need a reconfig again (missed a branch) for silo rtm-011 (line 36)14:34
Saviqtrainguards, silo for line 88 please :)14:37
=== chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun
=== chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk
dbarthany trainguards around?14:52
davmor2bfiller: for the reject with a message dialogue is the calling phone meant to be hung up on or redirected to answering machine?  From the description it sounds like hung up not redirected?14:57
dbarthsil2100: you back maybe?15:05
sil2100dbarth: yeah, but having ISP problems15:12
sil2100dbarth: give me 5 more minutes15:12
dbarthsil2100: uh, sorry15:12
dbarthsil2100: sure, nw15:12
dbarthi'm sorry for the multiple reconfig requests; we didn't get all our ducks in a row in the first place15:13
sil2100Ok, finally I have my DNS back15:14
sil2100Saviq: assigned, but be aware that 000 already has qtmir in it!15:17
Saviqsil2100, ack15:17
sil2100dbarth: Im still having internet problems, might have to reboot my modem once again15:19
sil2100Let me reconfigure for you when Im able15:19
sil2100Phew, ok, nevermind, seems to be good now again15:21
dbarth:)15:21
* sil2100 hates his ISP15:21
sil2100dbarth: ok, should be reconfigured now - is there anything else I can help with? :)15:22
sil2100davmor2, jibel: how are things looking so far?15:23
davmor2sil2100: like a giant spread sheet15:23
sil2100...badly?15:24
davmor2sil2100: no just a giant spread sheet ;) looks to be on par with the last image I think at least with the tests I've covered15:25
dbarthsil2100: thanks! it rebuilds now15:25
Saviqsil2100, vivid/018 reconfigure please, added -gles15:27
sil2100Saviq: sure ;)15:28
Saviqsil2100, I try and remember to add it to Sources to start with, but as evidenced, try != do15:29
sil2100davmor2: how about the power-dialog-on-resume bug?15:30
sil2100davmor2: does it seem fixed?15:30
davmor2sil2100: I've not seen it but I haven't tested for it jibel ^15:30
sil2100Saviq: ah, nifty hack! Well, we could actually make the train more aware of the -gles counterparts and maybe allow the addition of such without a reconfigure15:31
Saviqsil2100, TBH not sure why landers can't just reconfigure as they please (at least for non-conflicting changes)15:34
jibelsil2100, I didn't reproduce with 198 for the moment.15:44
alex-abreutrainguards can you retry publishing L52 (silo 12)16:09
sil2100alex-abreu: looking16:09
sil2100Doing!16:10
alex-abreusil2100, thx16:10
sil2100alex-abreu: hm, https://code.launchpad.net/~dbarth/ubuntu-html5-theme/remove-cordova-2.8/+merge/242515 seems superseeded16:10
sil2100I think you'll have to reconfigure the silo, rebuild and retest16:10
alex-abreusil2100, I rebuilt the silo w/ the new MR (there was a resubmit)16:11
sil2100Since it's built against this older branch which doesn't seem valid16:11
sil2100hmmm16:11
sil2100The train is confused then16:11
alex-abreusil2100, yeah seems like it16:11
alex-abreusil2100, so I just updated the previously listed MR (the one superseded) w/ the new MR (for which the content hasn't changed), and triggered a rebuild which seems to have completed16:13
sil2100alex-abreu: did you reconfigure after adding the new MRs?16:13
alex-abreusil2100, ah no sorry16:14
sil2100alex-abreu: since I see CI Train is not aware of the branches and it didn't build those because of that16:14
sil2100alex-abreu: ok, reconfigure the silo then and rebuild/retest (sadly...)16:14
alex-abreusil2100, right, doing it now :)16:15
robruSaviq: I agree, we should consider loosening the restrictions on silo reconfigurations. I honestly don't recall a time when somebody asked me to reconfigure something and I had to say no because it was a problem. seems fine to just let people reconfigure as they please16:20
Saviqrobru, we try to be reasonable after all :)16:21
SaviqI know there's reasons why you can block publishing, maybe even assignment, but once we have a silo...16:22
robruSaviq: yeah I think we should loosen the restrictions on assignment, too ;-) Like I think conflicts should just be a warning, not to actually fail the assignment over that.16:23
Saviq+116:23
sil2100In the airline things like that will be completely automated anyway, so anyone will be able to build anything anyway16:28
robrusil2100: slangasek: can you guys confirm you now have access to stg-ue-ci-train as per https://rt.admin.canonical.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=77996 ?16:28
robrusil2100: yes but how long do we have to wait for that? ;-)16:28
bfillerdavmor2: declining the call from the quick reply will make the calling phone go straight to voicemail16:30
davmor2bfiller: thanks for the confirm16:30
sil2100robru: not sure, I expected the airline to fly my packages half a year ago!16:31
sil2100robru: yep, got all the access I need16:34
slangasekrobru: confirmed, I have access16:36
robrusil2100: slangasek: great, thanks for checking16:37
alex-abreusil2100, are you checking silo 12?16:54
sil2100alex-abreu: it's done ^16:55
alex-abreusil2100, oh thank you16:56
sil2100;)16:56
robruholy spit, 28 silos in use17:23
sil2100It's over 9000!!17:32
sil2100charles: ping18:03
charlessil2100, pong18:03
sil2100charles: hey, how's the work going on #1411171 ? You think we can get a fix for that pretty soon?18:03
charlessil2100, I should know more in about half an hour18:04
charlessil2100, it's top of my list right now18:04
sil2100Thanks!18:06
Saviqtrainguards silo 018 ↑ please18:29
sil2100o/18:29
sil2100Saviq: please approve gles branch!18:30
sil2100;)18:30
Saviqoh crap18:30
Saviqwill I never learn18:30
Saviqsil2100, done18:31
charlessil2100, jibel, wrt 1411171: can reproduce it, found the bug, working on a fix18:38
sil2100charles: good news!18:39
robrusil2100: slangasek: Ursinha: are we on for the meeting today? I wouldn't mind a bit of a sync up18:49
slangasekrobru: yep.  is sil2100's Internet any better now?18:50
Ursinharobru: I can do that, nothing special to report though18:50
=== alan_g|afk is now known as alan_g
sil2100slangasek: I might try, but still getting waves of internet18:51
slangasekUrsinha: I would like to talk about next steps for the ticket system transition, and figure out if we can drive this from the Foundations side18:52
slangaseksil2100: probably preferable to particles of Internet18:52
robrulol18:53
robruslangasek: you well know the internet is a wave/particle duality!18:54
evslangasek: can you elaborate? I don't think we're just talking about a deployment here for the ticket system transition to consider that work complete18:55
robruev: join the meeting perhaps? I think that's exactly what we want to discuss.18:55
slangasekev: ok, so what are we talking about?  As I understand it this project has been sidelined now mid-effort; I want to know what's required to get it done18:56
evah, that can definitely be established by looking at the backlog for the FO01 tasks18:56
evhttps://trello.com/b/PrlDYfxX/ci-engineering-team-backlog18:56
robruev: that board is hard to read for the uninitiated. all I gather from that is that "spreadsheet replacement" is "ready"18:58
robruoh, there's a huge scrolling list of stuff. hm18:59
Ursinharobru: I can fix that :)18:59
evslangasek: I need to venture in the direction of home and make dinner, but I'll be back online after. Let me know if there's anything more you need to understand the state of this and what can be done to bring it to completion.18:59
Ursinhaby explaining what is what18:59
robruUrsinha: explain in the meeting so we all benefit ;-)18:59
Ursinha:)18:59
sil2100Waave19:07
sil2100Ok, phew, back19:07
sil2100Aw come ooon...19:09
sil2100bregma: ping! Please approve your unity branch: https://code.launchpad.net/~3v1n0/unity/lim-visibility-fixes/+merge/24518919:33
sil2100(I suspect it's already reviewed)19:33
bregmasil2100, done19:36
sil2100jibel: hey, just a quick question - did you check if a revert helps with fixing the alarm bug? Or we'll do that after testing finishes?19:37
jibelsil2100, I did, and it is not reproducible with previous version. it's on the buig report.19:37
jibelbug*19:37
sil2100jibel: thanks!19:38
nik90_sil2100: will be waiting for the i-dt fix for the alarm bug? or reverting?19:42
nik90_I would hate to hear a revert since it brought in a lot of critical bug fixes19:42
sil2100nik90_: a revert would re-introduce bug LP: #1362341, which the product team also thinks is a serious issue19:43
ubot5Launchpad bug 1362341 in Ubuntu Clock App "OneTime alarms are not automatically dismissed or delete after they are triggered" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/136234119:43
sil2100Which we would not like as well19:43
nik90_sil2100: it would also bring back https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-clock-app/+bug/138723119:43
ubot5Launchpad bug 1387231 in Canonical System Image "[regression][clock] alarm still rings once it's been disabled or deleted" [High,Confirmed]19:43
nik90_which is very critical19:43
sil2100So it's either whitelisting (bleh) or waiting for the fix19:44
sil2100charles is on it already, but not sure how much more work will be needed here19:44
nik90_yeah19:46
nik90_sil2100: I will help him out in any way I can and coordinate with him19:46
charlessil2100, MP'ing now19:46
charlessil2100, jibel, nik90_, davmor2: https://code.launchpad.net/~charlesk/indicator-datetime/lp-1411171-strengthen-recurrence-rule-test-rtm-14.0919:53
jibelcharles, nice, tell me when it's in a silo, I'll help with the verification if it's not too late.19:57
charlesack19:57
robrucharles: column F needs to be a merge proposal20:12
charlesrobru, ack20:12
robrucharles: unless you're just no-change syncing from vivid, then that's something else20:12
nik90_charles: waiting on a deb package to be built by jenkins. I can then install it to test20:13
davmor2yay low battery not cropped done :)20:14
charlesrobru, no, MP added20:14
charlesdavmor2, nice. when did that get fixed?20:15
davmor2no idea but I see a battery here :)20:15
robrucharles: alright, rtm 1520:16
charlesjibel: ^20:17
jibelsilo 15 will never start to build or what :(20:45
pmcgowanjibel, doesnt someone need to tell it  to20:49
pmcgowancharles, ^^20:49
jibelno idea20:50
charlesrobru, ^20:55
robrucharles: just leave 'packages to build' blank on the build job. your input was invalid20:55
charlesrobru, ok20:56
charlesrtm 15 wfm, both on repeating and nonrepeating alarms21:34
nik90_charles, sil2100, pmcgowan, jibel, popey: silo 15 fixes the alarm regression spotted early this morning. I just tested and confirmed the fix on N4. Jibel, feel free to test and approve as well.21:35
pmcgowannik90_, awesome thanks21:36
robrupmcgowan: should I publish that then?21:47
pmcgowanrobru, we should really get a qa signoff was trying to find someone21:48
jibelpmcgowan, robru I just did21:48
pmcgowanaha21:48
pmcgowanthere he is21:48
jibelrobru, you can publish. I verified non repeating and repeating alarms and it's OK21:48
pmcgowanthanks jibel21:49
robrujibel: pmcgowan nik90_ charles: great thanks, will publish21:49
charles\o/21:49
pmcgowanthen we would like an image I suspect21:49
jibelyes21:49
nik90_yay!21:49
pmcgowanbest image ever21:49
jibel:)21:49
jibelbest clock ever21:50
nik90_:P21:50
jibelrobru, pmcgowan ^ rmadison agrees with the bot. Now we need someone to build an image21:58
pmcgowanI dont have those powers21:59
cyphermoxjibel: robru: I may kick off an image if necesary21:59
jibelsergiusens, ^21:59
robruwhoa whoa21:59
robruit's just in proposed!21:59
cyphermoxthat's the usual image kick on the tracker?21:59
robrucyphermox: wait for it to land first? ;-)21:59
cyphermoxrobru: of course21:59
cyphermoxI know ;)21:59
jibelah, it's slow :)21:59
cyphermoxI'm just saying that I'm there to push the buttons if necessary22:00
jibelor maybe it's late and I want to sleep22:00
jibelah now it is published22:03
jibelrobru, ^ I think it's okay now?22:07
cyphermoxlooks that way to me too22:07
robrujibel: cyphermox yep looks good in rmadison22:09
cyphermoxk then I'll trigger it as soon as I'm logged in22:10
cyphermox*rtm* image, right22:10
robrucyphermox: yeah22:11
cyphermoxok, I don't see any other that looks like touch anyway22:12
cyphermoxactually, wait22:12
cyphermoxI don't think I have access for RTM builds, I don't see any here in the tracker22:13
cyphermoxsergiusens: rsalveti: ^22:13
rsalvetiyeah, needs to use nusakan22:14
rsalvetiwant me to trigger a new RTM image?22:15
jibelrsalveti, yes please22:15
rsalveticyphermox: will trigger then22:15
rsalvetidone22:16
rsalvetino imgbot?22:23
rsalvetihttps://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu-rtm/14.09/ubuntu-touch/22:24
imgbot=== IMAGE RTM 199 building (started: 20150115-22:25) ===22:25
pmcgowanyay22:36
=== tedg` is now known as tedg
imgbot=== IMAGE RTM 199 DONE (finished: 20150115-23:30) ===23:30
imgbot=== changelog: http://people.canonical.com/~ogra/touch-image-stats/rtm/199.changes ===23:30
ToyKeeperWeird, not sure how I got disconnected.23:31
ToyKeeperBut it looks like I'm just in time for the image I was looking for.23:31
=== robru_ is now known as robru

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!