[08:26] <DrManhattan> Is there an ETA for a fix on https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1257186
[08:26] <DrManhattan> I have upgraded my samba to version 4.1.6 but Im still getting the talloc memory leak error. Is there any way I can keep samba password sync to user accounts and get rid of this memory error? no talloc stackframe at ../source3/param/loadparm.c:4864, leaking memory
[08:57] <cjwatson> DrManhattan: This isn't a good channel to ask about that.  This channel is about launchpad.net, the project hosting site, itself.  Perhaps try #ubuntu-bugs.
[08:58] <DrManhattan> thanks
[11:21] <jonathon> Hi, I tried backporting the Vivid kernel to Trusty and it uploaded and built correctly in my PPA (~jonathonf/testing), but then errored with "Failed to upload", "Unable to find source publication" (https://launchpadlibrarian.net/195004995/upload_6719769_log.txt). Can I fix this?
[11:22] <jonathon> Searching the 'net for "launchpad unable to find source publication" returns no hits
[11:25] <wgrant> jonathon: Launchpad needs to be able to link back the binary package to the source package. It does that by a combination of the Source and Version fields in the binary package's control file.
[11:25] <wgrant> Normally, the binary version is the same as the source version. You'll get 'Source: $SOURCEPACKAGENAME' and 'Version: $SOURCEPACKAGEVERSION'
[11:26] <wgrant> A few packages override their binary versions to something different from the source version. In that case the binary's control file needs to say 'Version: $BINARYPACKAGEVERSION' and 'Source: $SOURCEPACKAGENAME ($SOURCEPACKAGEVERSION)', so the original source package can be found.
[11:26] <wgrant> It sounds like your source package is producing binaries with a different version from the source, but without encoding the original version in the Source field.
[11:27] <wgrant> linux packaging is somewhat special, and I don't know the ins and outs any more I'm afraid.
[11:27] <jonathon> no worries, that's already much more information than I had :)
[11:27] <jonathon> at least i know where to start looking
[11:28] <jonathon> i'm assuming it's because the linux source will be 3.18.2 but the ubuntu package version is 3.18.0-9
[11:28] <wgrant> Not quite so simple.
[11:29] <wgrant> The linux packaging is fairly magical.
[11:29] <wgrant> The version is treated specially for ABI checks and such.
[11:29] <wgrant> I have to reread all that code every time I try to do a patched version in my PPA...
[11:29] <jonathon> ah
[11:33] <jonathon> thank you anyway :)
[11:34] <jonathon> quite happy i got a response ;)
[11:40] <cjwatson> jonathon: I think your problem may be that your debian/changelog is out of sync with debian.master/changelog.  Normally the former is generated from the latter in the Ubuntu kernel packaging (which, as wgrant says, is weird and magical), but you may have made a mistake somewhere and broken that.
[11:40] <wgrant> ah yes, that could do it.
[11:40] <cjwatson> The kernel's "debian/rules clean" copies debian.master/changelog to debian/changelog, so perhaps you built the source package in a way that didn't clean it.
[11:40] <cjwatson> #ubuntu-kernel will probably have better advice on doing this properly.
[11:41] <jonathon> ah, nice
[11:42] <jonathon> I used the 'backportpackage' script which may not work well for linux
[11:49] <cjwatson> Indeed not.  And it uses debuild -nc, which would explain the lack of debian/rules clean.
[11:52] <jonathon> I _thought_ that script made things too easy :D
[11:59] <cjwatson> It's pretty good for just about anything that isn't the kernel.
[12:02] <jonathon> Trust me to find an edge-case...
[12:03] <jonathon> I am impressed with Launchpad now I've started actually using it
[12:03] <jonathon> love the source build recipe feature
[12:03] <wgrant> linux is a good guess for an edge case for just about everything :P
[12:03] <jonathon> though there are a number of packages that haven't got a recent import to their source branch
[12:03] <jonathon> :D
[12:11] <Mez> Are there any plans for launchpad to be able to have github issues as the upstream bug tracker?
[12:12] <wgrant> Mez: That's https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/848666, and it's on our todo list for the next few months.
[12:12] <wgrant> No guarantees, but it's likely to be done some time soon.
[12:13] <Mez> wgrant: awesome :)
[12:13] <Mez> wgrant: and openldap's bug tracker ? :)
[12:13] <wgrant> Mez: That one's unlikely.
[12:14] <Mez> wgrant: got any tags for wishlist features?
[12:14] <Mez> https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/1411634
[12:15] <wgrant> Mez: Done.
[12:15] <Mez> ty wgrant
[13:00] <marcoceppi_> I can't seem to log in to the staging instance of LP
[15:19] <silviu> anybody help me to creat a ppa?
[15:19] <silviu> pleasss
[15:19] <silviu> my linux its xubuntu
[15:29] <Salehi> Hi , I cp & paste finger print part of `$gpg --fingerprint` to launchpad, but I deal with "       Launchpad could not import your OpenPGP key       Did you enter your complete fingerprint correctly?         (Help with fingerprints)", Whats the problem?!
[15:32] <dobey> did you upload the key to the ubuntu keyserver?
[15:34] <Salehi> No! :D
[15:35] <Salehi> I got it, Thanks :)
[15:37] <cjwatson> silviu: https://help.launchpad.net/Packaging/PPA has documentation.
[19:04] <Salehi> Whats should be happened after uploading a package to luanchpad ? I uploaded rcssserver package : http://paste.ubuntu.com/9763124/ , But I can NOT see that on the launchpad
[19:05] <Salehi> Uh sorrty
[19:05] <Salehi> * Sorry
[19:05] <Salehi> An Email has been sent to me :)
[19:05] <teward> Salehi: yeah it takes a few minutes sometimes for the system to pick up the recent PPA upload - it'll eventually catch it.
[19:06] <teward> (I think it's a cron task?)
[19:19] <Salehi> "Rejected:
[19:19] <Salehi> Source/binary (i.e. mixed) uploads are not allowed."
[19:19] <Salehi> What is this problem? And what is the solution?
[19:33] <dobey> Salehi: you can only upload source packages to launchpad
[19:36] <Salehi> dobey: Means that, I have to build source only and  no binary files? -> "-S" option?
[19:36] <teward> yep
[19:36] <teward> Salehi: you have to `debuild -S` then upload to the ppas
[19:37] <Salehi> teward: dobey, Thanks :)
[19:50] <silviu> anybody help me to creat a ppa?
[19:50] <silviu> pleasss
[19:50] <silviu> pleasss!!!!!
[19:50] <silviu> my linux its xubuntu
[19:51] <dobey> silviu: 10:35 < cjwatson> silviu: https://help.launchpad.net/Packaging/PPA has documentation.
[19:56] <silviu> thenks!!
[20:02] <teward> how often do the PPA publishers actually publish, again?
[20:12] <dobey> teward: when they feel like it?
[20:12] <dobey> i think quite often though
[20:12] <dobey> but never as fast as you want
[20:13] <teward> well 10 minutes was slow
[20:14] <dobey> 30 seconds is slow if you're watching the pot and waiting for it to boil :)
[20:57] <Salehi> Can I see log of other builds?
[20:57] <teward> Salehi: 'other builds'?
[20:58] <Salehi> Means that builds which is not belongs to me
[20:58] <teward> Salehi: if they're in a ppa, then yes, you just have to expand the data under the "View Packages" section of the PPA
[20:59] <teward> assuming the ppa is publicly visible *and* the ppa belongs to a team and not an individual
[21:01] <dobey> teward: anyone can see the build logs for any public ppa or the ubuntu archive
[21:01] <teward> dobey: two of my lines crossed
[21:01]  * teward kicks his computer
[21:01] <teward> dobey: meant to say:
[21:01] <teward> if the PPA is public anyone can see it (includes the ubuntu archives)
[21:01] <teward> if it's private, you need to have team membership of some sort to see the logs for that ppa
[21:02]  * teward failed due to staring at command line the past couple hours
[21:02] <dobey> well, if it's private you probably won't even know the ppa exists unless you have permissions to see it already :)
[21:03] <teward> dobey: true, but without any inforamtion from Salehi it doesn't hurt to answer while covering all bases :)
[21:03] <teward> oh goody, in other news, non-deterministic build failure in a PPA...
[21:03] <teward> fun.
[21:03] <teward> >.>
[21:04] <dobey> also ubuntu archive isn't PPAs, so i try to be clear about that when answering such questions, by referring to them as separate things
[21:04] <teward> meh
[21:04]  * teward yawns
[23:10] <cjwatson> teward: The cron job fires every five minutes, but in practice it generally cycles about once every ten.
[23:12] <cjwatson> Maybe a bit slower, looks like it has a little more to do than it did last I checked.