| robru | veebers: oh hey, what's up? | 00:43 |
|---|---|---|
| robru | he says, 2 hours later | 00:43 |
| veebers | robru: heh, I'm sure you're supposed to be off anyway right? So to follow up me asking about getting the autopilot in the spreadsheet landed, I have an email from Pat stating it's all cool to do so. Should I fwd to you so we can get this done? | 00:44 |
| robru | veebers: yeah sure. 5PM sunday here, but it's easy for me to click publish if you're ready to go ;-) | 00:46 |
| veebers | robru: yep, I ran the testing etc. and it's all good | 00:47 |
| robru | veebers: needs QA though | 00:47 |
| veebers | robru: have fwd the email | 00:47 |
| veebers | robru: surely that's me though right? :-) | 00:48 |
| robru | veebers: are you on the QA team? (honest question). typically for all landings in RTM we'd have the "upstream lander" (you) propose a landing, then QA (ToyKeeper or davmor2 among others) would verify that the silo doesn't make the phone explode, then I can publish it | 00:49 |
| veebers | robru: heh yes I am (QA Projects team). Autopilot is a little bit odd as it's not on the image, but used to test the image. | 00:50 |
| robru | veebers: why does it need to be in RTM if it's not in the image? | 00:50 |
| veebers | In the past we've normally done the gatekeeper job, presented a report on the runs and then approved or removed from there. I believe ToyKeeper stated that I just needed a managers sign off in this case. | 00:50 |
| robru | veebers: ToyKeeper is my go-to QA person so if she says it's ok then I'll allow it ;-) | 00:51 |
| veebers | robru: it's needed so that when the automated testing is done on it the right version is available (i.e. has features we're using in the sanity testing) | 00:51 |
| veebers | robru: I have no problem if you would like ToyKeeper to weigh in on this :-) | 00:51 |
| robru | veebers: I think she's NZ as well so maybe she's even around right now... | 00:52 |
| veebers | robru: heh, she doesn't live in NZ but seems to keep the hours (I'm not even sure she sleeps) :-) | 00:52 |
| robru | veebers: alright well, if I'm interpreting http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/9753224/ correctly it means there's no regressions caused by this landing? and I have no reason not to trust you, so if you say that in the past ToyKeeper gave you a blanket approval, and you got pat's approval, I guess I'll just publish it. | 00:53 |
| veebers | robru: right, that pastebin shows that I ran the smoke dash a couple of times and no new regressions popped up (failures were do to tests/apps not autopilot etc.) | 00:54 |
| robru | veebers: alright, I know you've been pushing for this for a while, I'm happy to just land it then. | 00:54 |
| veebers | robru: no worries, its something that needs to happen correctly :-) Awesome thanks | 00:55 |
| robru | veebers: cheers ^ ;-) | 01:50 |
| veebers | robru: ah, I didn't do anything ;-) Thank you for sorting that out | 01:53 |
| robru | veebers: you're welcome! (does 'cheers' mean your welcome? I meant it more along the lines of "you're welcome". heh) | 01:54 |
| veebers | robru: heh, cheers is used as in 'Thank you' :-) I see now. Cheers robru ;-) | 01:55 |
| robru | veebers: I'm learnding ;-) | 01:55 |
| thomi | robru: FWIW, I use "cheers" to mean many things, including "thanks", "you're welcome", "time to get another drink", and "can you take the dog for a walk please, only don't forget his collar, I think I left it on top of the fridge" | 01:58 |
| robru | thomi: oooh that's a tricky one. I've never heard anybody say it in Canada unless they were obviously british / australian / nz tourists. | 01:58 |
| thomi | heh | 01:59 |
| imgbot | === IMAGE 70 building (started: 20150119-02:10) === | 02:10 |
| imgbot | === IMAGE RTM 202 building (started: 20150119-03:10) === | 03:10 |
| imgbot | === IMAGE 70 DONE (finished: 20150119-03:20) === | 03:20 |
| imgbot | === changelog: http://people.canonical.com/~ogra/touch-image-stats/70.changes === | 03:20 |
| imgbot | === IMAGE RTM 202 DONE (finished: 20150119-04:15) === | 04:15 |
| imgbot | === changelog: http://people.canonical.com/~ogra/touch-image-stats/rtm/202.changes === | 04:15 |
| === seb128_ is now known as seb128 | ||
| abeato | trainguards, line 62 ready for a silo | 07:36 |
| pstolowski | jibel, good morning! can we give rtm silo 11 (row #29) a higher priority, we have another important fix in the queue for unity-scopes-api (row #63)? | 08:12 |
| pstolowski | qa ^ | 08:16 |
| jibel | pstolowski, good morning. looking. | 08:18 |
| brendand | pstolowski, it contains two fixes that have not been approved | 08:25 |
| brendand | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity-scopes-api/+bug/1398813 | 08:25 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1398813 in unity-scopes-api (Ubuntu RTM) "OnlineAccountClient::refresh_service_statuses() doesn't refresh known accounts" [Undecided,In progress] | 08:25 |
| brendand | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity-scopes-shell/+bug/1401860 | 08:25 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1401860 in unity-scopes-shell (Ubuntu RTM) "The dash freezes when I tap the "log-in" button in a scope" [Undecided,In progress] | 08:25 |
| pstolowski | dbarth, marcustomlinson, ^ | 08:27 |
| marcustomlinson | brendand: yeah, I guess we should technically mark those as duplicates of #1380914 | 08:29 |
| marcustomlinson | brendand: they are needed to solve the issues described in that bug's description | 08:30 |
| brendand | marcustomlinson, or get them milestoned | 08:31 |
| brendand | marcustomlinson, the fact they are needed to fix a milestoned bug will work in their favour | 08:32 |
| marcustomlinson | brendand: see, the thing is, removing the splashscreen from online-accounts causes that seemingly frozen UI bug. | 08:32 |
| dbarth | pstolowski: uh, why aren't those approved | 08:46 |
| dbarth | ? | 08:47 |
| dbarth | brendand: ah, but check the first one is a duplicate of an approved bug itself | 08:47 |
| dbarth | ie, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-system-settings-online-accounts/+bug/1380914 | 08:47 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1380914 in Online Accounts setup for Ubuntu Touch "OnlineAccountsClient::Setup::exec() should execute a signon auth session" [High,In progress] | 08:47 |
| dbarth | that explains one | 08:47 |
| brendand | dbarth, right - marcustomlinson just made that change | 08:48 |
| === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
| dbarth | the second one, is linked but we could put it on the product team radar real quick this morning | 08:48 |
| marcustomlinson | brendand, dbarth: we just need this one approved: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-rtm/+source/unity-scopes-shell/+bug/1401860 | 08:49 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1401860 in unity-scopes-shell (Ubuntu RTM) "The dash freezes when I tap the "log-in" button in a scope" [Undecided,In progress] | 08:49 |
| dbarth | brendand: can you hold the silo for a few hours? | 08:49 |
| marcustomlinson | dbarth: that bug is caused as a result of the splash screen not appearing now | 08:49 |
| marcustomlinson | dbarth: could you get that one milestoned for us? | 08:49 |
| dbarth | marcustomlinson: oh, a new bug? | 08:50 |
| dbarth | yes, sure | 08:50 |
| brendand | dbarth, yes | 08:50 |
| marcustomlinson | dbarth: 1401860 | 08:50 |
| dbarth | ah right, but fixed by the silo ! | 08:50 |
| * dbarth was starting to think he is getting crazy | 08:51 | |
| marcustomlinson | dbarth: yes thats fixed in the silo too. | 08:51 |
| dbarth | i did that test several times, so that's why i was surprised | 08:51 |
| marcustomlinson | :) | 08:51 |
| === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
| michi | ci-help: I need some help with Jenkins. | 09:39 |
| michi | Basically, a whole bunch of tests have started suddenly failing for us, both for CI in the build silos. | 09:39 |
| michi | The symptoms are consistent with either terribly slow machines, or possibly with a change in one of the libs we depend on. This started happening sometime over the weekend, possibly as early as Friday. | 09:40 |
| michi | Has anything changed in the Jenkins set-up? | 09:40 |
| michi | We are definitely seeing the problem for Vivid. Not totally sure about RTM right now. | 09:41 |
| === Guest67718 is now known as wgrant | ||
| === wgrant is now known as Guest24387 | ||
| === Guest24387 is now known as wgrant_ | ||
| oSoMoN | trainguards: can I please have a silo for line 63 ? | 10:38 |
| sil2100 | oSoMoN: o/ | 10:38 |
| oSoMoN | thanks sil2100 | 10:43 |
| === wgrant_ is now known as wgrant | ||
| === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
| dbarth | hey trainguards, can you help me land silo 007 (vivid) ? | 11:05 |
| sil2100 | dbarth: looking! | 11:09 |
| sil2100 | dbarth: is it ready already? It's still saying it's building | 11:12 |
| sil2100 | Ah, build-dep-wait | 11:12 |
| dbarth | sil2100: that's the dep wait | 11:12 |
| dbarth | right | 11:12 |
| dbarth | we were waiting for -proposed to be purged of the old package | 11:12 |
| dbarth | sil2100: and i confirmed with Colin last Friday that it was now good to go | 11:12 |
| sil2100 | hmm | 11:13 |
| sil2100 | Ok, let me try publishing, but the situation is a bit strange | 11:13 |
| sil2100 | I thought the powerpc-like packages have been removed from the archive | 11:14 |
| sil2100 | Well, let me publish anyway, we can see if it gets blocked in -proposed or not | 11:14 |
| sil2100 | :) | 11:14 |
| dbarth | ok | 11:14 |
| dbarth | i'll stay around as i need to prep the SRU now | 11:15 |
| sil2100 | geh | 11:20 |
| sil2100 | dbarth: so, looking at silo 007's unity-chromium-extension I really don't like the changelog | 11:21 |
| sil2100 | dbarth: I mean, I see that in the merge you have directly modified debian/changelog, but since the added entry had 'utopic' instead of UNRELEASED, it treated it as something already released | 11:22 |
| sil2100 | So the top-most version now only has "* New rebuild forced" | 11:22 |
| dbarth | sil2100: uh | 11:23 |
| dbarth | sil2100: how can we fix that? | 11:23 |
| cjwatson | I think it was probably Building before I removed those binaries, maybe | 11:23 |
| cjwatson | But you could check against the publication history | 11:23 |
| sil2100 | dbarth: we would have to rebuild and change the branch, but let me think if how it is there is good anyway | 11:24 |
| dbarth | let me know if i need to update the branch or do something special | 11:25 |
| cjwatson | Uh, hm, maybe my removal didn't stick | 11:27 |
| cjwatson | unity-chromium-extension | 3.2.0+14.10.20140626-0ubuntu1 | vivid/universe | source, amd64, arm64, armhf, i386, powerpc, ppc64el | 11:27 |
| cjwatson | I guess when p-m copied it from -proposed it copied all the old binaries again | 11:28 |
| sil2100 | cjwatson: yeah, that's what I meant by that the situation looked strange, since LP still had the binaries - strange | 11:28 |
| cjwatson | let me fix that | 11:28 |
| sil2100 | cjwatson: thanks! :) | 11:28 |
| cjwatson | done (leave it until rmadison agrees, though) | 11:28 |
| sil2100 | dbarth: ok, so I would say it like this - if some core dev +1's the packages, I'll publish | 11:30 |
| sil2100 | Since I'm not sure if such a changelog is super good | 11:31 |
| sil2100 | cjwatson: maybe you would have time to check 2 packaging diffs? ;) Since I need councelling, not sure if the changelog maddness is acceptable there | 11:32 |
| sil2100 | (and one of the packages is in main) | 11:32 |
| cjwatson | libunity-webapps seems fine, but I think unity-chromium-extension should be rebuilt with a fixed changelog. The changelog is an important part of the documentation of any delivery. | 11:37 |
| sil2100 | ogra_, cjwatson: if anyone of you could: https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-007-2-publish/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/packaging_changes_unity-chromium-extension_3.2.0+15.04.20141217-0ubuntu1.diff https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-007-2-publish/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/packaging_changes_libunity-webapps_2.5.0~+15.04.20141217.2-0ubuntu1.diff <- the changelogs are fishy | 11:37 |
| cjwatson | There's some junk in the libunity-webapps one, but it's at least informative. I don't particularly have a problem there. | 11:38 |
| cjwatson | But unity-chromium-extension's one is utterly uninformative. | 11:39 |
| sil2100 | Yeah | 11:41 |
| sil2100 | cjwatson: so, the debian/changelog does have an entry below the one in the diff that's a proper description, but that one is actually sparse as well | 11:45 |
| dbarth | sil2100, cjwatson: it should really say "+ * Support native messaging. (with Alberto Mardegan)", which was in the staging2 branch | 11:45 |
| sil2100 | dbarth: so, actually https://code.launchpad.net/~webapps/unity-chromium-extension/staging2/+merge/244966 has debian/changelog modified and this should be set to UNRELEASED | 11:46 |
| sil2100 | Then CI Train would pick it up and create the entry properly | 11:46 |
| sil2100 | dbarth: ah, and please approve merges from silo 14 | 11:48 |
| dbarth | brendand: victor marked the bug ok for this week, hope this let's you land more safely now (bug 1401860) | 11:56 |
| ubot5 | bug 1401860 in unity-scopes-shell (Ubuntu RTM) "The dash freezes when I tap the "log-in" button in a scope" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1401860 | 11:56 |
| dbarth | marcustomlinson: ^^ | 11:56 |
| sil2100 | pstolowski: hmm | 11:59 |
| sil2100 | pstolowski: in unity-scopes-api I see that you modify some existing symbols | 12:00 |
| sil2100 | Won't that cause breakage? | 12:00 |
| pstolowski | sil2100, hey, what are you looking at? | 12:01 |
| pstolowski | sil2100, add-logging branch? | 12:03 |
| sil2100 | pstolowski: silo 15, https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-015-2-publish/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/packaging_changes_unity-scopes-api_0.6.11+15.04.20150119-0ubuntu1.diff | 12:04 |
| pstolowski | sil2100, this is fine, these are all symbols from unity::scopes::internal namespace | 12:05 |
| brendand | dbarth, thanks | 12:05 |
| pstolowski | sil2100, no one links against them, except from us (binaries that we ship together with same package) | 12:06 |
| pstolowski | sil2100, and the only reason ::internal namespace is exposed at all in symbols is afair because our binaries (scoperegistry, smartscopesproxy) need them | 12:07 |
| sil2100 | ACK | 12:07 |
| sil2100 | pstolowski: thanks! | 12:07 |
| pstolowski | yw | 12:07 |
| cjwatson | Oh, nobody's mentioned it here. FYI, there's been a power issue in one datacentre which among other things means that all the non-virtualised armhf builders are currently down. | 12:08 |
| cjwatson | Hopefully will be back soon ... | 12:09 |
| sil2100 | ogra_: if you have a moment, could you sign off https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-013-2-publish/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/packaging_changes_dbus-test-runner_15.04.0+15.04.20150116-0ubuntu1.diff ? | 12:09 |
| sil2100 | cjwatson: uhh | 12:09 |
| sil2100 | Ok, good to know | 12:09 |
| === MacSlow is now known as MacSlow|lunch | ||
| jibel | Elleo, I'm verifying silo 2, and 2 autopilot tests fail: test_emoji_input and test_emoji_deletion http://paste.ubuntu.com/9784632/ | 12:29 |
| jibel | Elleo, it's on krillin #202, any idea what it is? | 12:29 |
| Elleo | jibel: is this on RTM? | 12:30 |
| jibel | Elleo, yes | 12:31 |
| Elleo | jibel: the emoji package might not be installed (they haven't been added to the RTM meta-package yet) | 12:31 |
| Elleo | jibel: so you might need to manually apt-get install ubuntu-keyboard-emoji before running the autopilot tests | 12:31 |
| jibel | Elleo, shouldn't it be a dependency of ubuntu-keyboard then? | 12:32 |
| Elleo | jibel: it should possible be a dependency of the autopilot package I guess, but not really of the keyboard (since there might be cases where people don't want an emoji keyboard installed) | 12:33 |
| Elleo | jibel: I can prepare an MR that adds it to the ubuntu-keyboard-autopilot package depends if you think that's best? | 12:34 |
| === alan_g is now known as alan_g|lunch | ||
| jibel | Elleo, yes, update the packages in the silo with a fix, and I'll continue testing when it's done. Thanks. | 12:35 |
| Elleo | jibel: okay, thanks | 12:35 |
| === alecu_ is now known as alecu | ||
| cjwatson | ARM builders are back. | 13:01 |
| alecu | hi trainguards! may I ask for an rtm silo for row 48 in the spreadsheet? | 13:02 |
| sil2100 | alecu: sure o/ | 13:05 |
| sil2100 | cjwatson: \o/ | 13:05 |
| alecu | thanks! | 13:08 |
| === alan_g|lunch is now known as alan_g | ||
| === MacSlow|lunch is now known as MacSlow | ||
| sil2100 | Chipaca: hey! We need your merges approved before release | 14:21 |
| Chipaca | sil2100: oh, qa approved? | 14:21 |
| sil2100 | Chipaca: https://code.launchpad.net/~chipaca/ubuntu-push/fix-1376282-for-rtm/+merge/246740 https://code.launchpad.net/~chipaca/ubuntu-push/fix-1380662-for-rtm/+merge/246754 | 14:21 |
| sil2100 | Yeah, now the merges need top-approval ;) | 14:21 |
| Chipaca | sil2100: thanks for the heads up; i'll get somebody else to top-approve those and get back to you | 14:22 |
| * sil2100 goes back to his bed | 14:49 | |
| om26er_ | camako, Hi! do you have the results for unity8 and webbrowser autopilot tests that you ran for Mir silo 3 ? | 14:52 |
| === om26er_ is now known as om26er | ||
| oSoMoN | trainguards: can silo 16 be published please? | 15:00 |
| sil2100 | o/ | 15:01 |
| sil2100 | oSoMoN: hmm, I see pstolowski commented on this silo, but I don't understand the rationale there | 15:02 |
| sil2100 | oSoMoN: pstolowski left: "pstolowski 19/01: needs to wait for rtm silo 11 (OA fix) to land" | 15:02 |
| sil2100 | Why does it need to wait for an RTM silo if it's a vivid silo | 15:03 |
| sil2100 | pstolowski: ^ | 15:03 |
| oSoMoN | sil2100, I’m not seeing the comment | 15:03 |
| sil2100 | oSoMoN: it's on the dashboard | 15:03 |
| sil2100 | oSoMoN: and the spreadsheet | 15:04 |
| sil2100 | In the comments field | 15:04 |
| oSoMoN | sil2100, not seeing it in the spreadsheet, but that looks like an error to me | 15:05 |
| sil2100 | oSoMoN: huh, even after a refresh? Since it's not possible that I'm seeing a broken state in 2 different places - the dashboard polls the spreadsheet directly, so it cannot be cached somewhere locally | 15:06 |
| sil2100 | Anyway, ok | 15:06 |
| sil2100 | The comment doesn't make much sense anyway | 15:06 |
| sil2100 | ogra_: heey! Need a packaging ACK https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-016-2-publish/51/artifact/packaging_changes_webbrowser-app_0.23+15.04.20150119-0ubuntu1.diff <- looks good | 15:08 |
| oSoMoN | sil2100, I hit refresh and now the spreasheet won’t load at all :/ | 15:11 |
| oSoMoN | sil2100, but I see the comment in the dashboard, and I don’t understand it | 15:11 |
| oSoMoN | sil2100, it looks like a mistake to me, probably commented on the wrong line | 15:11 |
| sil2100 | Yeah, I think so too | 15:11 |
| pstolowski | sil2100, that was mostly comment to myself to make sure i build after that other fix lands, cause both silos were scopes-api | 15:15 |
| ogra_ | sil2100, ACK | 15:17 |
| pstolowski | sil2100, ouch, wait, that comment is in wrong row | 15:18 |
| sil2100 | pstolowski: this silo didn't have scopes-api ;) | 15:18 |
| pstolowski | sil2100, now i undesrand the confusion | 15:18 |
| pstolowski | sil2100, so, either google messed something up, or somebody removed my landing request :/ | 15:19 |
| pstolowski | sil2100, or i messed something | 15:20 |
| pstolowski | sil2100, fixed. re-added my original request in #66 | 15:22 |
| sil2100 | Ok! | 15:24 |
| vila | ogra_: I'm searching for the canonical place where the packages used in a phone image are defined, is it http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-touch/daily-preinstalled/20150112/vivid-preinstalled-touch-armhf.manifest ? (context being boot testing for -proposed migration) | 15:28 |
| sil2100 | pstolowski: another silo with scopes-api? ;) | 15:40 |
| sil2100 | pstolowski: re: 65 | 15:40 |
| ogra_ | vila, lp:~ubuntu-core-dev/ubuntu-seeds/ubuntu-touch.vivid/ | 15:41 |
| pstolowski | sil2100, yes, but this is vivid | 15:41 |
| vila | ogra_: and there 'touch' ? | 15:42 |
| sil2100 | pstolowski: right but remember you have another silo with -scopes-api (21) | 15:42 |
| ogra_ | vila, right or the sdk ones | 15:43 |
| ogra_ | (most libs go into the sdk ... which is essentially our framework, touch is the "desktop apps" of teh phone) | 15:43 |
| pstolowski | sil2100, yes, 21 is for experimenting with some abi changes, we aren't going to land anything from it | 15:44 |
| pstolowski | sil2100, we should soon be able to give 21 back | 15:44 |
| vila | ogra_: hmm, but those are the high level packages and used as input to build the image right ? I was after 'dpkg -l' on the phone which is the extensive list (but slightly harder to get: you need a phone running the right image ;) | 15:46 |
| ogra_ | vila, well, the manifest is the ooutput, the seed is where the packages are defined ... you asked where we define them :) | 15:47 |
| ogra_ | so if you just want the list, yeah, go with the manifest | 15:47 |
| mandel | sergiusens, have you been able to reproduce bug 1387514 | 15:47 |
| ubot5 | Error: Launchpad bug 1387514 could not be found | 15:47 |
| vila | ogra_: sure, sorry, newbie question ;) And the manifest is http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-touch/daily-preinstalled/pending/vivid-preinstalled-touch-armhf.manifest right ? | 15:48 |
| mandel | sergiusens, I have been trying to reproduce it and so far I have had no luck | 15:48 |
| ogra_ | vila, right, thats the latest | 15:48 |
| vila | ogra_: perfect, so seed or manifest, got that. So seed is 'sdk' + 'touch' or should 'sdk-*' also be considered ? | 15:49 |
| sergiusens | mandel let me open the link | 15:51 |
| sergiusens | mandel: so you don't remove the sdcard after clicking that safely remove and try to format, right? | 15:52 |
| mandel | sergiusens, no, I dont | 15:52 |
| sergiusens | mandel: look at comment 3 please | 15:52 |
| sergiusens | mandel: you just need to grey out the format button | 15:52 |
| sergiusens | mandel: simplest bug fix ever :-P | 15:53 |
| mandel | sergiusens, the bug there states that it loads the formatting dialog, which is not the case | 15:53 |
| mandel | sergiusens, I can reproduce the safely remove and then format | 15:54 |
| mandel | sergiusens, but if I do, safely remove, the safetly remove buttons is gray out yet the format button is not | 15:54 |
| mandel | sergiusens, so, I can do a format while it was safetly removed (I don't know if I'm making any sense) | 15:55 |
| oSoMoN | trainguards: can I please get a silo for line 68 ? | 15:56 |
| === mardy_ is now known as mardy | ||
| sergiusens | mandel: ah, right | 16:06 |
| sil2100 | oSoMoN: sure | 16:13 |
| dbarth | trainguards: i approved the 2 branches in silo 014, it's good to go into vivid | 16:14 |
| sil2100 | dbarth: excellent, let me re-publish then | 16:16 |
| sil2100 | ogra_, jibel, robru, popey, davmor2, brendand: let me cancel today's meeting, I'm trying to rest today and besides we all know what to do anyway | 16:21 |
| ogra_ | ++ | 16:21 |
| davmor2 | sil2100: but then we can't pick on you, damn it ;) rest up dude and get better | 16:22 |
| jibel | sil2100, OK, get some rest and get well soon! | 16:24 |
| popey | sil2100: ok | 16:25 |
| dbarth | sil2100: ty | 16:26 |
| dbarth | sil2100: oh and is 007 ok now? do you need me for a changelog update? | 16:27 |
| dbarth | ie update it to says UNRELEASED, right? | 16:27 |
| sil2100 | dbarth: I would say it would be best to change it to UNRELEASED and rebuild, as even a core-dev was not happy with this changelog ;) | 16:28 |
| dbarth | sil2100: :) ok, i'll do that now | 16:32 |
| sil2100 | Ok everyone, robru should be up in ~30 minutes | 16:37 |
| brendand | pstolowski, https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlan/scopes says that remote scopes should *not* be visible in the manage dash view if there is no connectivity. is that right? | 16:38 |
| sil2100 | o/ | 16:38 |
| brendand | pstolowski, i recall there might have been a fix for that recently | 16:38 |
| Chipaca | sil2100: ready to go---noooooo! | 16:39 |
| Chipaca | i guess he was ready to go too :) | 16:39 |
| pstolowski | brendand, no, this is not right! thanks for catching | 16:40 |
| brendand | pstolowski, so the test plan should be updated? | 16:40 |
| pstolowski | brendand, yes. i'll take care of it | 16:43 |
| robru | jibel: sergiusens: hey I'm trying to use phablet-screenshot but it isn't working, can you help me troubleshoot? | 18:34 |
| jhodapp | robru, can I get a silo for line #69 please? | 18:41 |
| jhodapp | robru, crap, pasted the wrong thing...one sec | 18:42 |
| robru | k | 18:42 |
| jhodapp | robru, ok now it's readty | 18:43 |
| robru | jhodapp: ok you got silo 1, mind the conflict with media-hub in silo 11 | 18:44 |
| jhodapp | robru, oh thanks, didn't realize that yet | 18:44 |
| jhodapp | robru, I'll re-pull | 18:44 |
| robru | jhodapp: what do you mean re-pull? might you consider adding your fix to silo 11? | 18:44 |
| jhodapp | robru, didn't merge with trunk | 18:45 |
| robru | jhodapp: ok but silo 11 isn't published yet so it's not in trunk ;-) | 18:45 |
| jhodapp | robru, oh silo 11, sorry | 18:45 |
| jhodapp | robru, yes I'll be merging before that | 18:45 |
| jhodapp | robru, I'm working with tvoss on that other silo still | 18:45 |
| robru | jhodapp: ok | 18:46 |
| robru | Ursinha: slangasek: I vote we cancel the meeting since sil is off sick. and I don't think anything has changed since last week. | 18:49 |
| slangasek | robru: bank holiday here, I wasn't going to come anyway :) | 18:49 |
| robru | slangasek: and yet you're on IRC... ;-) | 18:50 |
| Ursinha | robru: fine by me :) | 18:50 |
| slangasek | big difference between "on IRC" and "working" | 18:50 |
| robru | slangasek: nahhhhh ;-) | 18:50 |
| jhodapp | robru, can you reconfigure silo 1 please (vivid) | 21:53 |
| robru | jhodapp: oops, sorry for the delay. Done, just be aware you now have two packages conflicting with silo 11 | 22:23 |
| jhodapp | thanks robru | 23:24 |
| robru | jhodapp: you're welcome! | 23:24 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!