[13:27] <LinDol> hi all
[15:02] <k_alam> Hi
[15:03] <k_alam> Can anyone please look into this bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/syncevolution/+bug/1406200 ?
[15:03] <k_alam> Thanks.
[19:11] <darkxst> octoquad, hi, does todays image work?
[19:14] <darkxst> a fix was uploaded in https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/casper/1.348
[19:23] <octoquad> I haven't tested, was monitoring the other bug report. Busy studying at the moment, but give it a try in an hour...
[19:23] <darkxst> octoquad, easy bug for you ;) bug  1406200
[19:23] <octoquad> darkxst, sorry, hi!
[19:24] <octoquad> so rude of me not to greet lol
[19:25] <octoquad> hmm, ok, not to sure where to start with that one, but i'll take a shot at it...
[19:26] <octoquad> is this more of a packaging fix such as depends?
[19:27] <octoquad> ah I see (read the mailing list)
[19:29] <octoquad> darkxst, what do you think of Rust: http://www.rust-lang.org/
[19:29] <octoquad> I have very little knowledge of C or C++, so just wanted to find out if it's worth looking into as a next-gen language
[19:30] <darkxst> octoquad, yeh just a packaging fix, probably go with the 2nd option syncevolution-provider-goa
[19:30] <darkxst> I've never looked at rust
[19:30] <darkxst> but most of GNOME is C, vala and some javascript
[19:31] <octoquad> Oh ok, there is a webcast for it if you are keen to take a look: http://www.oreilly.com/pub/e/3291
[19:33] <darkxst> octoquad, is rust even used anywhere outside of mozilla's 'servo' which is basically a research project
[19:35] <darkxst> from a quick glance it looks kinda like a mix of c++ and JS
[19:38] <octoquad> perhaps, it is a bit early for production use since it is still in alpha, but see this: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/17696798/rust-web-frameworks
[19:38] <octoquad> interesting stuff happening already
[19:39] <octoquad> btw, I only stumbled on it yesterday
[19:40] <octoquad> back to that goa packaging, debdiff or bzr branch for this type of thing?
[19:40] <darkxst> either is fine
[19:41] <darkxst> bzr branches are preferred when there is a packaging branch (if it Vcs-bzr line in debian/control)
[19:41] <darkxst> but apart from that its really up to what you find easier
[19:42] <octoquad> oh ok, that's pretty neat, I always thought bazaar was preferred (gauging from the wiki docs)
[19:42] <darkxst> octoquad, the whole UDD thing is kinda dead
[19:43] <darkxst> they discovered its incredibly hard to keep auto-generated branches for all packages in the archive ;)
[19:43] <darkxst> thus a great portion of lp:ubuntu/<package> branches are broken
[19:43] <octoquad> thanks for the update :)
[19:45] <darkxst> octoquad, and we are in the process of setting up our packaging branches on git ;)
[19:45] <darkxst> for ubuntu-gnome maintained stuff
[19:46] <darkxst> I'm still not a fan of bzr
[19:46] <octoquad> i'm not digging it either lol
[19:46] <octoquad> tried mercurial yesterday as well
[19:47] <octoquad> golly not a fan of that either
[19:47] <octoquad> git ftw
[19:48] <octoquad> and finally at the company we've finished converting all our SVN repos to Git as well
[19:49] <darkxst> yeh I do most everything in git, only use the others when forced to submit patches via them
[19:49] <octoquad> I had to use git-svn when I first started, then slowly showed the advantages, and then it became the norm yay!
[19:49] <octoquad> for me git feels right, and it's helpful along the way
[19:52] <darkxst> octoquad, are you subscribed to ubuntu-release?
[19:53] <darkxst> see https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/2015-January/003182.html
[19:54] <darkxst> and https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/2015-January/003184.html
[19:55] <darkxst> if your interested
[20:06] <octoquad> no not yet, but i'll sign up now.
[20:14] <octoquad> phew, it looks like a lot at the moment for me to take on. Is there nobody from Ubuntu GNOME doing this?
[20:14] <octoquad> I can maybe try take it on in the next cycle though
[20:17] <octoquad> I was referring to this btw: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MilestoneProcess
[21:04] <ceed^> Hi, I was going to install Ubuntu-GNOME 14.10,  but where there should be a wifi indicator in the notification area there is only a question mark. I seem to be connected but I can not see the strength of the signal. Any idea what's wrong?
[22:04] <ceed^> Hi, can someone help me with the wifi indicator being a question-mark in Ubuntu-GNOME 14.10?