| rsalveti | apw: mind taking care of https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-manta/+bug/1412543 ? | 00:40 |
|---|---|---|
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1412543 in Canonical System Image "udev bridge fails to get events from kernel (missing FHANDLE)" [High,Confirmed] | 00:40 |
| === gerald is now known as Guest3853 | ||
| apw | rsalveti, see it | 09:20 |
| === morgan is now known as yossarianuk | ||
| yossarianuk | chris112: you can use the 3.18.x kernels from mainline in 14.10 | 09:23 |
| yossarianuk | the kernels in mainline ppa use the version they are targeted for - however just because 3.18 doesn't have 'utopic' in the version names does't mean they don't work in utopic ... | 09:25 |
| === hugbot is now known as swordsmanz | ||
| chris112 | yossarianuk, thx for the info. is it save to use the btrfs tools of utopic? | 11:13 |
| yossarianuk | chris112: that I am not 100% sure of. | 11:19 |
| yossarianuk | (not used btrfs in ubuntu yet at all - only opensuse / neptuneos) | 11:20 |
| rsalveti | apw: thanks | 12:11 |
| apw | rsalveti, i am assuming the normal plan and uploading them to the CKT PPA | 12:11 |
| rsalveti | apw: yeah, just ping me once you get the packages in there | 12:11 |
| rsalveti | I'll validate and copy them around | 12:11 |
| apw | rsalveti, will do, mako is building, working on the otehrs now | 12:12 |
| rsalveti | great, thanks a lot | 12:12 |
| === spideyman is now known as Guest32025 | ||
| apw | rsalveti, ok it is all uploaded and building ... should be done in about an hour | 12:57 |
| Odd_Bloke | I'm running the kernel tests in an Azure instance and have got to: https://pastebin.canonical.com/123777/ | 13:09 |
| Odd_Bloke | Nothing has happened in almost 20 minutes. | 13:09 |
| Odd_Bloke | Is this a slow test, or has something broken? | 13:09 |
| apw | Odd_Bloke, is that the ASLR test, i think it has to try several thousand times to check the distribution is random | 13:13 |
| apw | Odd_Bloke, i cannot however say that i have run those recently to have a feel for how long | 13:13 |
| smb | Yeah that test runs ages | 13:17 |
| smb | ages being something of 40min+ depending on hw | 13:23 |
| rsalveti | apw: thanks | 13:28 |
| thell | Hello. After a year of having hardware that seemed to enjoy crashing (almost daily) I now have a stable (for a week) non crashing core i7 4700MQ with i915 video driver while running Utopic with 3.19rc4! Woohoo! | 15:00 |
| thell | My question is: What should I be monitoring for backporting of changes (I presume it was something in the drm-intel-next in Dec) to get back inline with Utopic kernels? | 15:00 |
| Odd_Bloke | apw: smb: Thanks for the info. | 15:33 |
| jsalisbury | ## | 15:36 |
| jsalisbury | ## Kernel team meeting today @ 17:00 UTC | 15:36 |
| jsalisbury | ## | 15:36 |
| trippeh | thell: there was just a bunch of intel gfx fixes that went into the upstream stable trees (not released yet) | 15:37 |
| * thell cheers! | 15:38 | |
| thell | trippeh: I assume I should watch the changes file in the utopic kernel releases. Do you have a link of where you saw this so I can have an idea of what to watch for? | 15:39 |
| dsmythies | I'll ask my questions after a few lines, they are related to (are exactly): | 16:28 |
| bjf | cmagina, can you verify LP: #1404335 ? | 16:28 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1404335 in linux (Ubuntu) "xgene: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 23s! [halt:2059] on poweroff" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1404335 | 16:28 |
| dsmythies | https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=765717 | 16:28 |
| ubot5 | Debian bug 765717 in src:linux "linux-image-3.16-2-amd64: High CPU load with linux-image-3.16-2-amd64" [Normal,Fixed] | 16:28 |
| dsmythies | https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/11/5/905 | 16:28 |
| dsmythies | The patch was submitted on Nov 6th, which I assume was in time for the 3.19 merge window, but it still doesn't appear in 3.19RC5. | 16:29 |
| dsmythies | I cannot find any other references for it, nor any "ACK". | 16:29 |
| dsmythies | Is there any to determine the status of the patch? Or might it be in limbo? | 16:29 |
| dsmythies | Should I enter a launchpad bug report to track the issue within the Ubuntu context? | 16:29 |
| apw | dsmythies, that sounds familiar | 16:32 |
| dsmythies | apw, I was helping someone on Ubuntu forums with this issue. I saw you made a post on another thread there yesterday. I am now wondering how to follow up to ensure this get resolved. | 16:34 |
| apw | dsmythies, ok the one i thought it was, it wasn't :) ... so ... yes please lets file a bug against "linux", using "ubuntu-bug linux" | 16:37 |
| dsmythies | O.K. thanks. | 16:37 |
| jsalisbury | ## | 16:50 |
| jsalisbury | ## Ubuntu Kernel Team Meeting - in 10 minutes - #ubuntu-meeting | 16:50 |
| jsalisbury | ## | 16:50 |
| jsalisbury | ## | 17:00 |
| jsalisbury | ## Meeting starting now | 17:00 |
| jsalisbury | ## | 17:00 |
| === jsalisbury changed the topic of #ubuntu-kernel to: Home: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/ || Ubuntu Kernel Team Meeting - Tues January 27th, 2015 - 17:00 UTC || If you have a question just ask, and do wait around for an answer! If the question is should I file a bug for something, likely you can assume yes. | ||
| Odd_Bloke | I'm beginning to think we may need to skip that stack collision test on (at least) Azure; about to hit the three hour mark. >.< | 17:42 |
| apw | Odd_Bloke, you may be able to change the iteration count on that one, though it is likely hard coded | 17:44 |
| Odd_Bloke | apw: It is hard-coded, regrettably. | 17:46 |
| apw | Odd_Bloke, well "patch" can fix it then | 17:46 |
| apw | if [ on hypervisor ]; then patch -p1 hyperv.patch | 17:47 |
| Odd_Bloke | Ah, good point. | 17:47 |
| apw | Odd_Bloke, it would be good to let one finish to find out how how long a "bazillion" iterations take, so you have a framework to work out a good "finish in 10m" number :) | 17:48 |
| Odd_Bloke | Will see how it does on GCE (currently running the full qa suite there) to decide how to go about it. | 17:48 |
| Odd_Bloke | Yeah, will definitely leave it going in to the evening. | 17:48 |
| apw | Odd_Bloke, though ... it would be a lot more sensible if the iterations stuff did somethign saner, liek "run for 5m" | 17:50 |
| apw | Odd_Bloke, and it would maek a lot of sense to tell #security that this is out of control slow, and get a recommendation | 17:50 |
| apw | Odd_Bloke, they may say ... if it isn't at least 10k iters its not worth doing sort of thing | 17:51 |
| Odd_Bloke | Yeah, good idea. | 17:52 |
| Odd_Bloke | I'll probably also look at splitting it out of the main run (in a downstream semi-hacky sort of a way) so it can get its own instance to run on. | 17:53 |
| Odd_Bloke | That'll let us run it in parallel with the other tests, so it taking X minutes will be slightly less painful. | 17:54 |
| apw | Odd_Bloke, a good plan, if you come up with a way to run the tests as groups or whatever "--not-aslr" "--not-all --aslr" or whatever, we should feed that back to the master | 17:55 |
| Odd_Bloke | Sounds like a problem for Tomorrodd_Bloke. | 18:01 |
| apw | Odd_Bloke, :) i know that man | 18:02 |
| soee | hi, gusy when 3.18.3 will make its way into Vivid ? | 19:45 |
| === pgraner is now known as pgraner-afk | ||
| apw | soee, after the freeze for A2 | 21:45 |
| soee | apw: thank you | 22:16 |
| * RAOF looks for a target to poor bees into. | 22:56 | |
| === SturmFlut is now known as SturmFlut|AFK | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!