/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2015/01/20/#ubuntu-meeting-2.txt

* slangasek waves17:00
pittio/17:00
slangasekwho's on for chairing?  I can't find any minutes that say17:01
pittipretty much zero agenda today, isn't it?17:01
pittilast meeting was scarcely attended, and also had zero topics17:01
pittiaside from clearing the second and third action review point17:02
pittislangasek: you come after me on https://launchpad.net/~techboard/+members17:02
pittislangasek: quick, take it before the next "real" meeting comes along :)17:02
slangasek#startmeeting17:03
meetingologyMeeting started Tue Jan 20 17:03:02 2015 UTC.  The chair is slangasek. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology.17:03
meetingologyAvailable commands: action commands idea info link nick17:03
pittislangasek: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/TechnicalBoardAgenda updated17:03
slangasek[LINK] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/TechnicalBoardAgenda17:03
slangasek[TOPIC] Apologies17:04
slangasekI think you said mdeslaur and infinity sent their apologies today17:04
slangasekstgraber seems to be here17:04
slangasekno sign of kees?17:04
stgraberyeah, I'm around17:05
pittiright, infinity apol'ed on IRC, mdeslaur on the ML17:05
slangasekok17:05
slangasek[TOPIC] Action review17:06
slangasek* infinity to review and respond to MAAS SRU thread17:06
slangasekI don't recall if this was still carried over from last time?17:06
slangasekI assume it is, without infinity here to tell us otherwise17:06
pittiit is, yes; he expressed is refreshed intent to reply two weeks ago17:07
pitti(sorry for lag, still in QA team meeting hangout)17:07
slangasekmailing list topics...17:08
slangasekthere's a docker question on the mailing list17:08
slangasekanything we should discuss on that?17:08
pittioh, you mean https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/technical-board/2014-December/002062.html17:09
slangasekyes17:10
pittiI'm not very happy about that, TBH17:11
slangasekshould we discuss it here? or follow up on the list?17:11
pittieither major versions do keep backwards compat, then a docker-latest package would be eaiser to maintain than letting intermediate major versions in -updats just bitrot17:11
pittiand if they don't keep backwards compat AND fixes are hard to backport, then it's even worse: it essentially means that we claim that we can't support that package at all17:12
pittiand then it shouldn't be in a stable release at all, but people should rather get it from a PPA, or charm, or whatever17:12
pitti(but I don't quite believe that just yet)17:12
slangasekthere are various well-known problems with using ppas as a distribution mechanism, particularly for servers17:14
slangasekyes, I think we are saying we can't support docker in the LTS according to our usual model17:14
pittiand the proposal in that above mail would combine the disadvantages17:15
slangasekbut as the package is already in the LTS, we should figure out what to do with this fast-moving, high-profile package17:15
pittia lot of packages to maintain, and users have to choose between "reproducability of installations but insecure" and "secure, latest release, breaks backwards compat"17:15
slangasek"a lot of packages to maintain" - I'm not sure that's the TB's problem, however?17:16
pittiwell, "LTS" -- it's in universe, so ceratinly not a 5 year support thing17:16
pittiit's not, but I don't quite see how it would help the problem17:16
slangasekthe maintenance (or lack thereof) falls on the team pushing for this; if the server team thinks this is the right tradeoff for them...17:16
pittiif they break compat, we can't obviously upgrade existing users automatically17:16
pittiso we'd have to backport fixes anyway17:16
slangasekok17:17
slangasekI think this probably warrants more discussion on the mailing list, then?17:17
pittiyeah, I think so17:17
slangasek[TOPIC] docker in 14.0417:17
slangasek[ACTION] pitti to follow up on the mailing list regarding his concerns about upgradeability17:18
meetingologyACTION: pitti to follow up on the mailing list regarding his concerns about upgradeability17:18
slangasekthere's also this on the mailing list: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/technical-board/2014-December/002061.html17:18
slangaseklooks like the ball is in the Kubuntu team's court however17:18
slangasekso probably nothing further needed on our side, except perhaps a gentle ping to Riddell / ScottK17:19
pittifrom my POV we are waiting for some SRU test plan?17:19
slangasekright17:19
slangasekI don't see anything else on the list17:20
slangasek[TOPIC] Check up on community bugs17:20
* pitti neither17:20
slangasekhttps://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-community/+bugs?field.assignee=techboard is empty17:20
slangasekthat seems to be everything, then17:21
slangasekchair for next meeting should be stgraber17:21
slangasek[TOPIC] Next meeting17:21
slangasek[INFO] Chair for next meeting is stgraber17:21
stgrabernote that I may not be available two weeks from now17:22
slangasekoh, indeed17:22
stgraberas slangasek, infinity and I will be at a sprint in Cape Town and may be in meetings or other social things at the time17:22
slangasek7pm, hopefully not in meetings :)17:22
pittislangasek: famous last words!17:23
pittianyway, I can do that17:23
slangasek[INFO] Next meeting date: 2015-02-03 @ 1700 UTC17:23
pittiI'll be back home from Brussels then17:23
slangasek[INFO] pitti possibly to chair in stgraber's place due to sprint17:23
slangasekanything else?17:23
slangasek#endmeeting17:24
meetingologyMeeting ended Tue Jan 20 17:24:54 2015 UTC.17:24
meetingologyMinutes:        http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting-2/2015/ubuntu-meeting-2.2015-01-20-17.03.moin.txt17:24
slangasekpitti, stgraber: thanks17:25
pittithanks!17:25

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!