[09:10] <alan_g> duflu: has one of us misread lp:1412492? AFAICS it is about real keyboard layout, not OSK. (I.e. switching ASERTY, QWERTY etc.)
[09:12] <duflu> alan_g: I will update and ask for clarification
[09:25] <seb128> alan_g, duflu, it is about real keyboard layout
[09:25] <seb128> e.g having keys on my laptop azerty keyboard do what they are supposed to do
[09:26] <seb128> atm when I press the "z" I get a "w", e.g the layout is qwerty
[09:26] <seb128> I commented on the bug
[11:14] <tsdgeos_> racarr: your patch for qtubuntu doesn't compile
[11:14]  * tsdgeos_ realizes racarr is probably sleeping
[12:37] <anpok_> alf_: we were causing that error with wrapper.c .. it overwrites LD_LIBRARY_PATH
[12:37] <alf_> anpok_: ack
[12:42] <anpok_> so with the mp it gets more robust
[12:42] <anpok_> because of the absolute path... but we should also change wrapper.c
[12:42] <anpok_> or come up with a better solution
[12:46]  * alan_g votes for a bet
[12:46] <alan_g> ter solution
[12:47]  * alan_g must learn to hit one key at a time
[13:06] <anpok_> hm how about not having a wrapper at all.. but search in ../lib/server-{modules,platforms}/ and in the configured MIR_SERVER_PALTFORM_PATH?
[13:08] <kdub> i'd much rather search and test than have a wrapper
[14:58] <greyback> alf_: hey, continuing from Friday - finding a gl config with pbuffer support - here is all the configs I'm getting with eglGetConfigs: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/9794951/
[14:58] <greyback> all the EGL_SURFACE_TYPE are set to EGL_WINDOW_BIT (4)
[14:59] <greyback> tried adding eglGetErrors everywhere, but all imply success
[15:00] <greyback> so think maybe I should use something other than pbuffer. FBO probably
[15:01] <greyback> just for context, I'm working on multimonitor support for Qt. On monitor removal, Qt wants to create a temporary offscreen surface so that it can clean up the gl resources associated with the removed monitor
[15:02] <alf_> greyback: I am not sure that makes much sense to me, but Qt knows best :)
[15:02] <greyback> well I won't be changing Qt,  I just want to make it happy
[15:03] <alf_> greyback: +1 for FBO
[15:04] <greyback> ack
[15:50] <racarr> Morning
[15:52] <racarr> tsdgeos: IT is still depending on unlanded changesI will mark WIP
[15:55] <tsdgeos> racarr: i see, tx!
[16:10] <greyback> alf_: FBO works nicely, thanks
[16:11] <attente_> hi, i saw that https://code.launchpad.net/~albaguirre/mir/add-menu-api/+merge/244632 was merged, thanks for that. is there any plan for adding support to the demo shell for it? also, is there any plan for just having a generic subsurface api?
[16:12] <anpok_> we decided to avoid a generic api when it comes to handling surface types
[16:15] <anpok_> or rather the team decided that the shell should be able to consistencly decide and implement the surface behavior.. instead of letting the client pick a combination of available semantics
[16:23] <attente_> anpok_: ok, thanks
[16:24] <anpok_> o_O s/c/t
[16:25] <anpok_> so it means if something is missing or not the way clients or shells prefer it we need complaints
[16:26] <racarr> there will be many kinds of child surfaces :)
[16:26] <racarr> there will not be "sub surfaces"
[16:26] <anpok_> all kids are different
[16:26] <racarr> at any point in the near future I guess
[16:26] <attente_> sorry, right, that's what i meant
[16:26] <racarr> maybe one day, specialized for video decoding orsome such
[16:26] <attente_> is anyone working on adding those menu surface semantics to the mir demo server?
[16:27] <attente_> i was trying to look through the codebase but couldn't figure things out
[16:28] <racarr> attente_: I guess AlbertA is going to add something to one of the example servers but its caught up in some
[16:28] <racarr> big refactorings aha
[16:32] <AlbertA> attente_: oh right...i will attempt to add it to the demo server later in the week....
[16:33] <AlbertA> attente_: the big refactoring is regarding window management and roles....so after that we can have a place where to put those semantics in mir by default (but over-ridable)
[16:39] <attente_> AlbertA: ah, cool. thanks!