| dobey | fginther: hey. looks like lp:ubuntuone-credentials/rtm-14.09 is building on vivid? can you change it to build on rtm? | 00:27 |
|---|---|---|
| dobey | well, i need to go. later | 00:41 |
| ToyKeeper | mandel: You around? The pause-click-updates silo passed, but there's still a remaining bug in that UI flow... sometimes the "Update" button goes directly to "Resume" instead of "Pause". This happened before the silo though, so the silo can still land. | 00:46 |
| ToyKeeper | (tap "Update", progress bar starts to move, button label changes to "Resume"... tap it, the label changes to "Pause", and then afterward everything works as intended) | 00:47 |
| mandel | ToyKeeper, I am indeed around, yes, I did notice that without the silo too, very ugly indeed... but I'll have to fix that in next iteration | 00:47 |
| mandel | ToyKeeper, we need to re-do most of the logic there and did not want to add a huge delta so late | 00:48 |
| robru | dobey: building where? in a silo? | 00:48 |
| ToyKeeper | mandel: Okay, just wanted to make sure you were aware of it. :) | 00:48 |
| mandel | ToyKeeper, yes, AFAIK ken knows too | 00:48 |
| mandel | ToyKeeper, we are re-writting this little by little.. the last developer did a poor job | 00:49 |
| ToyKeeper | Sorry it took so long; has been a very busy day so far. | 00:49 |
| mandel | ToyKeeper, no problem, as long as it gets there :) | 00:49 |
| mandel | ToyKeeper, is 2 am here, do you mind setting it to QA approved? I think that is the only thing left, right? | 00:50 |
| * mandel is a little tired | 00:50 | |
| ToyKeeper | mandel: Already done. -queuebot/#ubuntu-ci-eng- trainguards, ubuntu-rtm/landing-019: Packages built. Testing pass. QA signed off. You can publish. | 00:50 |
| mandel | \o/ | 00:50 |
| mandel | ToyKeeper, thx! Then I'm off to bed | 00:50 |
| robru | mandel: yep, just hit publish on that | 00:51 |
| mandel | robru, thx! | 00:51 |
| robru | mandel: you're welcome | 00:51 |
| imgbot | === IMAGE 73 building (started: 20150122-02:10) === | 02:10 |
| fginther | dobey, oops, sorry about that. Fixed and retriggered the two MPs that had already executed | 02:18 |
| imgbot | === IMAGE RTM 208 building (started: 20150122-03:10) === | 03:10 |
| imgbot | === IMAGE 73 DONE (finished: 20150122-03:30) === | 03:30 |
| imgbot | === changelog: http://people.canonical.com/~ogra/touch-image-stats/73.changes === | 03:31 |
| imgbot | === IMAGE RTM 208 DONE (finished: 20150122-04:20) === | 04:20 |
| imgbot | === changelog: http://people.canonical.com/~ogra/touch-image-stats/rtm/208.changes === | 04:20 |
| === marcusto_ is now known as marcustomlinson_ | ||
| === marcustomlinson_ is now known as marcustomlinson | ||
| === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
| pstolowski | trainguards morning! can somebody review the packaging changes in silo 15? | 08:15 |
| pstolowski | trainguards sorry, nvm. i've just been told this change is on hold atm | 08:15 |
| === Guest54456 is now known as Laney | ||
| seb128 | sil2100, hey, how are you? | 09:19 |
| seb128 | sil2100, random question for you :-) | 09:20 |
| seb128 | sil2100, is http://people.canonical.com/~lzemczak/landing-team/ubuntu-rtm/ generated manually? just wondering why it's at 205 when current image is 208 | 09:20 |
| sil2100 | seb128: hey! It's generated automatically on my machine currently, but I think I need to increase the sync period ;) | 09:24 |
| sil2100 | seb128: should be all there now | 09:24 |
| seb128 | sil2100, thanks | 09:25 |
| seb128 | sil2100, just curious, why are some versions missing? | 09:25 |
| sil2100 | seb128: this usually means that the given image is a result of a tarball upload | 09:25 |
| seb128 | k | 09:25 |
| seb128 | do we have the details about those tarball changes somewhere? | 09:26 |
| sil2100 | For instance 206 was a new custom and 207 was a new device tarball | 09:26 |
| ogra_ | there should be mails about them | 09:26 |
| ogra_ | (not sure to which of the MLs ) | 09:26 |
| sil2100 | Sadly nowhere formalized... we and the testers usually get e-mails regarding the tarball changes | 09:26 |
| sil2100 | ogra_: yeah, but for instance cwayne1 sends it to a CC list, not a ML | 09:27 |
| sil2100 | Maybe we should think about changing that | 09:27 |
| ogra_ | we definitely should | 09:27 |
| brendand | ogra_, is there an easy way to reproduce the conditions for this? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-system-settings/+bug/1382767 | 09:35 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1382767 in ubuntu-system-settings (Ubuntu RTM) "Bluetooth device with no name leads to details page with no header, no way to go back" [High,In progress] | 09:35 |
| sil2100 | ogra_: just in case, meeting! ;) Not much for you though! | 09:36 |
| ogra_ | brendand, i think the name detection was fixed at some point ... | 09:36 |
| ogra_ | sil2100, ooops, sorry | 09:36 |
| brendand | ogra_, hmmm, that makes it hard to verify :) | 09:36 |
| sil2100 | satoris: once the thumbnailer migrates I'll assign the sync silo for you | 09:50 |
| satoris | sil2100: ack, thanks. | 09:51 |
| === psivaa_ changed the topic of #ubuntu-ci-eng to: Need a silo or CI Train support? ping trainguards | Need help with something else? ping psivaa | Train Dashboard: http://bit.ly/1mDv1FS | QA Signoffs: http://bit.ly/1qMAKYd | Known Issues: none | ||
| === Elleo_ is now known as Elleo | ||
| sil2100 | satoris: as for silo rtm/14 - just make sure that after you build the packages that they're the ones that you expect it to be | 10:47 |
| sil2100 | i.e. that it's the version from today | 10:47 |
| satoris | sil2100: ack, will check. | 10:49 |
| brendand | mzanetti, hey - i'm trying to test silo 16 for RTM | 10:57 |
| brendand | mzanetti, it's supposed to reduce the time before sending SIGSTOP | 10:57 |
| brendand | mzanetti, but i have to say it still feels like 3 seconds with the silo installed | 10:57 |
| bzoltan_ | ogra_: the ubuntu-sdk-qmake-extras is landed so the https://code.launchpad.net/~bzoltan/ubuntu-seeds/qmake_enablers/+merge/247148 is now safe to land too | 11:14 |
| brendand | mzanetti, ping | 11:20 |
| mzanetti | brendand: hey | 11:21 |
| mzanetti | is it? | 11:22 |
| mzanetti | let me check | 11:22 |
| brendand | mzanetti, i tested using video playback in browser and a game (pathwind) | 11:22 |
| mzanetti | mhm... reading the code it does set the timer to 1.5 secs | 11:23 |
| mzanetti | brendand: I'm installing the silo atm, to give it another try | 11:26 |
| mzanetti | brendand: hey, you sure you have installed the correct package? | 11:31 |
| mzanetti | brendand: seems the citrain tool fails to install the ppa | 11:31 |
| brendand | mzanetti, yeah | 11:31 |
| brendand | mzanetti, i just reflashed without the silo and it seems like it might be a bit quicker with the silo | 11:32 |
| mzanetti | brendand: I actually thought it was 5 secs before | 11:32 |
| mzanetti | reading the code I see that the interval was changed from 3 to 1.5 | 11:33 |
| brendand | mzanetti, yeah it feels like 5 secs without and 3 secs with | 11:33 |
| mzanetti | yeah | 11:33 |
| brendand | mzanetti, maybe there's some overhead which makes it feel a bit longer in reality | 11:33 |
| Chipaca | trainguards, could i have a silo for row 64? | 11:33 |
| mzanetti | yeah, loading the greeter and lockscreen images for sure does take some resources | 11:33 |
| mzanetti | (those images are dropped from ram when not needed) | 11:34 |
| sil2100 | Chipaca: on it | 11:34 |
| Chipaca | sil2100: cheers | 11:34 |
| Chipaca | sil2100: thanks | 11:36 |
| === barry` is now known as barry | ||
| === MacSlow is now known as MacSlow|lunch | ||
| Chipaca | is there something wrong with the builders? the build is getting killed :( | 12:25 |
| Chipaca | fatal error: unexpected signal during runtime execution | 12:26 |
| Chipaca | that's either something killing it explicitly, or possibly an OOM | 12:27 |
| sil2100 | In the PPA? | 12:27 |
| Chipaca | yep | 12:27 |
| Chipaca | https://launchpadlibrarian.net/195549325/buildlog_ubuntu-vivid-i386.ubuntu-push_0.67%2B15.04.20150122.1-0ubuntu1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz fwiw | 12:28 |
| Chipaca | that's i386; arm and amd64 built ok | 12:28 |
| Chipaca | armhf* :) | 12:28 |
| cjwatson | Chipaca: signal 0xb, that's SIGSEGV | 12:29 |
| cjwatson | not a builder problem | 12:29 |
| Chipaca | cjwatson: what is it then? | 12:29 |
| cjwatson | segmentation fault | 12:30 |
| brendand | mzanetti, yeah so with the silo it's about 3 seconds and without about 4.5 seconds | 12:30 |
| cjwatson | i.e. invalid memory access in your program | 12:30 |
| Chipaca | cjwatson: yes, but why? | 12:30 |
| brendand | mzanetti, exactly 1.5 seconds difference | 12:30 |
| cjwatson | you get to debug it, have fun | 12:30 |
| brendand | mzanetti, but quite difficult to tell apart without comparing side-by-side | 12:30 |
| cjwatson | any number of reasons for segfaults | 12:30 |
| mzanetti | brendand: yep, I've counted that too | 12:30 |
| brendand | mzanetti, hardly seems worth it :) | 12:31 |
| mzanetti | dunno... afaik there was a huge discussion about it | 12:31 |
| mzanetti | I wasn't part of it | 12:31 |
| * Chipaca grumbles | 12:31 | |
| mzanetti | brendand: in any case, this silo does more | 12:31 |
| brendand | mzanetti, i guess it can't be lowered too much or will cause some issues | 12:32 |
| mzanetti | brendand: the important part is to inhibit phone deep sleep while the app is "suspending" (not the -ing, not -ed) | 12:32 |
| cjwatson | Chipaca: since it would appear to be in malloc, perhaps native code somewhere has corrupted the malloc arena by way of a buffer overflow or similar. valgrind may help | 12:32 |
| mzanetti | narf... I really should re-read stuff before I press enter :D | 12:32 |
| mzanetti | brendand: the important part is to inhibit phone deep sleep while the app is "suspending" (note the -ing, not -ed) | 12:32 |
| mzanetti | forgetting one "e" kinda changes the whole thing :) | 12:33 |
| mzanetti | sil2100: please reconfig silo rtm/001, row 32 for me. We've added a telephony branch that should go together with the unity branch | 12:34 |
| Chipaca | cjwatson: yeah ... but that's golang, not me, doing the malloc | 12:34 |
| mzanetti | sil2100: I'll be syncing with boiko in order to queue telephony landings properly | 12:34 |
| Chipaca | cjwatson: that is, it's not _my_ native code :) | 12:34 |
| cjwatson | Chipaca: I know, but this kind of fault can cause a crash distant from the cause | 12:34 |
| Chipaca | cjwatson: and i've never seen it in testing here, hence why i suspected the builders | 12:35 |
| Chipaca | yeah | 12:35 |
| cjwatson | Chipaca: prior corruption in the malloc arena might only cause a crash somewhat later. that's why you use valgrind | 12:35 |
| cjwatson | Chipaca: and it can be somewhat non-deterministic. this is very unlikely to be a builder fault, you just need to look harder :) | 12:35 |
| cjwatson | Chipaca: I can assure you that we don't go around randomly SIGSEGVing stuff on builders for the fun of it | 12:36 |
| cjwatson | and OOMs don't cause SIGSEGV | 12:36 |
| * Chipaca looks into using valgrind with go | 12:36 | |
| cjwatson | (well, not the OOM killer at any rate, of course if you get NULL back from malloc and fail to handle it then that could be a problem, but I doubt that's the case here; the builders have plenty of memory) | 12:36 |
| Chipaca | cjwatson: yeah, i hadn't realised it was a sigsegv when i asked at start | 12:36 |
| sil2100 | mzanetti: ok | 12:39 |
| Chipaca | cjwatson: go doesn't play well with valgrind at all (dies with rt_sigaction nonesense) | 12:44 |
| mzanetti | ta | 12:45 |
| sil2100 | yw! | 12:47 |
| bzoltan_ | sil2100: have you seen ogra_ today? | 12:54 |
| ogra_ | bzoltan_, i'm working nearly fulltime on snappy nowadays, please be patient, i'll try to get to it before EOW | 12:55 |
| sil2100 | bzoltan_: yes, he's here | 12:55 |
| sil2100 | ^ ;) | 12:55 |
| bzoltan_ | ogra_: No pressure :) I just need this package in the chroots very badly. | 12:56 |
| ogra_ | well, any core-dev can help you | 12:56 |
| Chipaca | sil2100: is there an easy way to try a rebuild of a package from vivid? getting a weird error, and realising it hasn't been rebuilt since some rather big changes elsewhere in the stack. | 12:56 |
| === alan_g is now known as alan_g|lunch | ||
| === MacSlow|lunch is now known as MacSlow | ||
| sil2100 | Chipaca: you mean, like a no-change rebuild for one architecture? | 13:09 |
| Chipaca | sil2100: changed the mp to a dummy one, reconfigured silo, forced rebuild worked for me. hope i'm not breaking anythign. | 13:09 |
| Chipaca | sil2100: both 32 bit architectures actually | 13:10 |
| Chipaca | there might be a problem with go in vivid on 32 bits | 13:10 |
| Chipaca | we'll see | 13:10 |
| Chipaca | there also might be a bug in our code, but if so it's a nasty one | 13:10 |
| Chipaca | :) | 13:10 |
| sil2100 | In this case it should be ok if you just want to rebuild the existing package without any new changes ;) | 13:10 |
| Chipaca | yeah, just to establish whether it's sane | 13:11 |
| Chipaca | before i go digging :) | 13:11 |
| Chipaca | so, ubuntu-push FTBFS on 32-bit x86 (at least) on vivid | 13:18 |
| Chipaca | and now what? | 13:18 |
| Chipaca | :((( | 13:18 |
| * Chipaca gives up and goes to live on a farm | 13:19 | |
| sil2100 | Chipaca: when was the last time ubuntu-push was built in vivid? | 13:20 |
| Chipaca | sil2100: the day before golang 1.3 hit the archive | 13:20 |
| sil2100 | We need to check which dependencies changed and trying to triage what could be wrong | 13:20 |
| Chipaca | decemebr 11th | 13:20 |
| sil2100 | geh | 13:20 |
| Chipaca | indeedly | 13:20 |
| mzanetti | sil2100: I've approved that now ^. sorry, missed it before | 13:28 |
| sil2100 | mzanetti: uugh, I see some problems with publishing, one moment | 13:30 |
| mzanetti | err, wat? | 13:30 |
| sil2100 | Yeah... not sure what's wrong, need to dig deeper | 13:31 |
| mzanetti | ok. let me know if I can help | 13:32 |
| sil2100 | :| | 13:41 |
| sil2100 | Ok, the train again ate a whole directory, and with the new publisher just a watch-only rebuild doesn't help | 13:42 |
| sil2100 | And since I don't have access to the machine working around it would be the most painful thing ever | 13:42 |
| sil2100 | So let me try pushing it to the archive manually | 13:42 |
| sil2100 | Or wait, geh | 13:43 |
| sil2100 | mzanetti: ok, let me do all the merges and releases manually, since the only other way would be to re-built both packages | 13:46 |
| mzanetti | sil2100: did this break because of the not top-approved branch? | 13:47 |
| sil2100 | mzanetti: no, I doubt it, not sure what happened - something in the backend went really wrong | 13:47 |
| mzanetti | ok | 13:48 |
| sil2100 | Ah, I think I see the possible problem ;/ | 13:50 |
| sil2100 | mzanetti: so, it seems it wasn't the backend that broke it - you did a build once and aborted it half way when it was preparing the package, which is really really dangerous | 13:51 |
| sil2100 | mzanetti: https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-rtm-landing-016-1-build/75/console | 13:51 |
| mzanetti | ok | 13:52 |
| sil2100 | mzanetti: in this place it started branching the bzr qtmir branch but couldn't finish since it was aborted, and CI Train completely lost track of its state here | 13:52 |
| mzanetti | yes, I did that, I clicked build and noticed I forgot to reconfig first | 13:52 |
| mzanetti | ok, will be more careful with that | 13:52 |
| sil2100 | mzanetti: you should only abort the build job when the packages are created and pushed to the PPA, when it's waiting on them to finish building | 13:52 |
| mzanetti | ack | 13:52 |
| sil2100 | Since we can't make sure that we can abort at any place sadly ;) | 13:53 |
| sil2100 | Ok, anyway, let me try doing stuff manually | 13:53 |
| === alan_g|lunch is now known as alan_g | ||
| popey | cihelp: http://s-jenkins.ubuntu-ci:8080/job/calendar-app-click/ seems to build two clicks each time a merge lands. which is wrong/odd. | 14:02 |
| oSoMoN | trainguards: can I have a silo for line 68, please? | 14:06 |
| sil2100 | oSoMoN: sure! At lunch now, but let me try quicky assigning | 14:07 |
| oSoMoN | sil2100, no rush, have your lunch first! | 14:07 |
| fginther | popey, looking | 14:08 |
| === psivaa_ changed the topic of #ubuntu-ci-eng to: Need a silo or CI Train support? ping trainguards | Need help with something else? ping cihelp | Train Dashboard: http://bit.ly/1mDv1FS | QA Signoffs: http://bit.ly/1qMAKYd | Known Issues: none | ||
| popey | fginther: thanks | 14:20 |
| fginther | popey, it's fixed now. There was an older .click left in an old build directory. It just needed a proper cleanup. | 14:22 |
| popey | haha, ok :) | 14:22 |
| popey | thanks | 14:22 |
| Chipaca | sil2100: could you switch that silo over to rtm? i'd like to test this build against the rtm build deps | 14:36 |
| Chipaca | sil2100: this is a test build, not something for any archive | 14:36 |
| sil2100 | Chipaca: let me get you another test silo then | 14:39 |
| sil2100 | Since switching to rtm would mean I would have to free this one up and assign a new one | 14:39 |
| sil2100 | Chipaca: ok, created a new row - the other rtm row you have let's leave for the right RTM release | 14:41 |
| kenvandine | rsalveti, what's up with silo 18, the bluetooth agent stuff? | 14:44 |
| Chipaca | sil2100: thanks | 14:46 |
| kgunn | fginther: i feel bad bothering you again...but we are seeing between 50% and 100% of building before failing for reasons unrelated to build or tests | 14:47 |
| kgunn | e.g. http://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/mir-clang-vivid-amd64-build/1007/console | 14:48 |
| kgunn | failures on cloud-worker-10 and cloud-worker-11 | 14:48 |
| kenvandine | rsalveti, i have other branches to land, can i pass by your's ? | 14:49 |
| kgunn | ev: just a heads up i'm pestering francis again ^ | 14:50 |
| ev | kgunn: cihelp is preferable. We don't have a vanguard in this slot today because Ursula is on holibobs | 14:51 |
| kgunn | right | 14:53 |
| fginther | kgunn, I or someone from the team will have a look shortly. I didn't specifically make any modifications for mir-clang-vivid-amd64-build yesterday, but will have a closer look at this and the other mir jobs today | 15:03 |
| kenvandine | brendand, why is silo 4 blocked? do you need anything from jgdx or I? | 15:07 |
| brendand | kenvandine, there seems to be an issue with the manual operator selection | 15:08 |
| brendand | kenvandine, jgdx is looking at it | 15:08 |
| kenvandine | brendand, ok, thanks | 15:08 |
| kenvandine | as long as someone is on it ;) | 15:08 |
| ricmm | :D | 15:34 |
| ricmm | sil2100: could I get a silo for ^ | 15:35 |
| sil2100 | ricmm: sure! | 15:35 |
| sil2100 | ricmm: assigning, but it seems lool has platform-api also in silo 22 already | 15:36 |
| oSoMoN | trainguards: can silo 14 be published, please? | 15:39 |
| ricmm | sil2100: thank you | 15:43 |
| sil2100 | oSoMoN: sure, one moment! | 15:43 |
| sil2100 | mzanetti: ok, all bits landed manually - apologies if there are any mistakes | 15:44 |
| mzanetti | sil2100: ack, will check. thanks a lot | 15:44 |
| sil2100 | mzanetti: I already noticed a small typo in my commit-message, but I would call that a no-issue ;p | 15:45 |
| sil2100 | (sorry about that) | 15:45 |
| sil2100 | kenvandine: eek! | 15:51 |
| sil2100 | kenvandine: you need to rebuild silo 29 it seems | 15:51 |
| sil2100 | kenvandine: someone released something in the meantime from what CI Train says | 15:51 |
| kenvandine | what? | 15:51 |
| mzanetti | sil2100: don't worry about that :D | 15:51 |
| * kenvandine wonders how that could happen | 15:51 | |
| kenvandine | sil2100, where does it say that? | 15:52 |
| sil2100 | kenvandine: ^ | 15:52 |
| kenvandine | sil2100, it uploaded fine | 15:52 |
| sil2100 | Ah | 15:52 |
| sil2100 | kenvandine: ok! I know what happened! | 15:52 |
| sil2100 | kenvandine: I pushed publish after you published the silo yourself ;) | 15:52 |
| sil2100 | kenvandine: sorry, forgot that you do all your publishing yourself! | 15:53 |
| kenvandine | hehe | 15:53 |
| kenvandine | yeah... sorry :) | 15:53 |
| kenvandine | i wish that status updated quicker... | 15:53 |
| sil2100 | kenvandine: anyway, nevermind me ;p Apologies from my side, simply forgot about this! | 15:53 |
| kenvandine | fortunately no harm can be done there :) | 15:53 |
| kenvandine | rsalveti, i'll rebuild 18 after this is merged | 15:54 |
| kenvandine | rsalveti, i went ahead and passed you :) | 15:54 |
| === mvo_ is now known as mvo | ||
| lool | sil2100: ah thanks for the reminder, I'll push this | 16:01 |
| === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
| brendand | kenvandine, do you know a way to test https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/content-hub/+bug/1383732 ? | 16:15 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1383732 in Canonical System Image "E-book content type" [Undecided,In progress] | 16:15 |
| kenvandine | bfiller, ^^ mind passing on what Elleo gave you to brendand? | 16:17 |
| bfiller | brendand: it's in the test plan for content-hub, linked in the sheet | 16:17 |
| kenvandine | even better :) | 16:18 |
| dbarth_ | ogra_: hey, do you have time to seed that apparmor extension today? | 16:31 |
| rpadovani | cihelp : I need to switch the development focus of calculator to another branch, what steps are required to keep jenkins working? | 16:33 |
| fginther | rpadovani, we usually just need to know the branch name | 16:34 |
| rpadovani | fginther, lp:ubuntu-calculator-app: the actual focus is on trunk, we want to switch to reboot (lp:ubuntu-calculator-app/reboot) | 16:35 |
| fginther | rpadovani, that should be all we need, someone should be able to get this setup today | 16:38 |
| rpadovani | fginther, that's cool, thanks! Will you take care to change it on LP too or will you ping me and I'll change it? | 16:39 |
| fginther | rpadovani, hold on | 16:39 |
| fginther | rpadovani, switching branches around in LP is the project maintainer's responsibility... but it sounds like you want to completely switch lp:ubuntu-calculator-app to point to the reboot branch? | 16:40 |
| fginther | rpadovani, yes, it looks like I missunderstood | 16:42 |
| rpadovani | fginther, yes, isn't this what happen when you change the development focus on lp? | 16:42 |
| rpadovani | fginther, my only worry is about jenkins, it will need to take from lp:ubuntu-calculator-app and not lp:ubuntu-calculator-app/reboot anynore | 16:42 |
| rpadovani | *anymore | 16:42 |
| fginther | rpadovani, sorry about that. Yes, in this case, we just need to disable the jobs that look at the reboot branch | 16:43 |
| rpadovani | fginther, ok, great, so could I go or do I wait your ping? | 16:49 |
| mzanetti | trainguards: row 74 would be ready for a silo, but not in a hurry with it. so whenever some of you has some free minute | 16:50 |
| fginther | rpadovani, it's safe to switch now. I've disable the jobs so as not to result in double builds | 16:51 |
| sil2100 | mzanetti: o/ | 16:52 |
| mzanetti | thanks :) | 16:53 |
| rpadovani | fginther, thanks, done! | 16:54 |
| brendand | bfiller, thanks for silo 2 | 16:59 |
| fginther | kgunn, I've also moved the mir-clang and mir-android builds to the larger nodes. The clang job appeared to be hitting resource limitations | 17:03 |
| kgunn | alan_g: camako ^ fyi | 17:03 |
| fginther | kgunn, will keep monitoring those larger nodes to make sure there is enough to go around | 17:03 |
| alan_g | fginther: thanks | 17:05 |
| Chipaca | sil2100: I'm done with silo ubuntu-rtm/landing-015, thank you | 17:16 |
| sil2100 | Chipaca: excellent, let me free it up | 17:19 |
| Chipaca | confirmed the FTBFS is vivid-only, fwiw | 17:19 |
| Chipaca | sil2100: also if you want to clean up landing-016 (from row 64), i'm not going to use it | 17:30 |
| Chipaca | trainguards, could i have a silo for row 64 please? | 17:36 |
| sil2100 | o/ | 17:36 |
| Chipaca | *65* | 17:36 |
| Chipaca | sil2100: hi. I meant row 65; 64 is the one to nuke :) | 17:36 |
| Chipaca | because, ftbfs on vivid :( | 17:36 |
| sil2100 | Chipaca: hmmm, but we'll have to get this somehow to vivid anyway... | 17:37 |
| Chipaca | sil2100: yes, of course | 17:37 |
| sil2100 | One moment please, still OTP | 17:37 |
| sil2100 | ;) | 17:37 |
| Chipaca | sil2100: but for that we need to determine what in all that's changed in vivid has triggered the FTBFS (biggest candidate being golang 1.3) | 17:37 |
| sil2100 | robru: ping! | 17:51 |
| sil2100 | Chipaca: anyway, I'll leave this vivid silo assigned so that we don't forget that it needs to land for vivid as well | 17:52 |
| Chipaca | sil2100: ok ... i won't forget though, because it's already on our automatically-tested development "trunk", and that's all that gets pushed to vivid | 17:52 |
| Chipaca | sil2100: so as you wish. If you run short of silos, nuke it :) | 17:53 |
| sil2100 | Chipaca: yeah, let me leave a comment on that one ;) | 17:54 |
| sergiusens | sil2100: can I sync a package from vivid-proposed? | 18:04 |
| sil2100 | sergiusens: that's a good question - sadly I think not but let me do a quick check since I think we're copying it from the release pocket directly | 18:06 |
| sergiusens | sil2100: can you do a manual dput to a silo then? | 18:06 |
| sergiusens | sil2100: my problem is similar to Chipaca's but different, as I'm using gcc-go | 18:06 |
| sergiusens | sil2100: and the new gcc-go requires me to make packaging changes that will be bad for ubuntu-rtm as it doesn't have the latest gcc-go | 18:07 |
| sergiusens | sil2100: oh well, I guess I can setup an rtm branch too | 18:07 |
| sil2100 | sergiusens: yeah, if I confirm it cannot be done I'll do that for you then, will keep you updated | 18:07 |
| sil2100 | But an rtm branch might be a better solution in case this is a long-standing problem | 18:08 |
| sergiusens | sil2100: I don't expect ubuntu-rtm to survive that long :-P | 18:08 |
| sil2100 | hah ;) | 18:08 |
| sergiusens | sil2100: empty MP commits work fine still, right? | 18:08 |
| sil2100 | sergiusens: yeah | 18:09 |
| sergiusens | sil2100: ok, I'll give that a go | 18:09 |
| sil2100 | sergiusens: huh, it seems that it should be possible to do a sync from proposed | 18:23 |
| sergiusens | sil2100: hah, I just got the above setup | 18:23 |
| sergiusens | sil2100: line 58; but we can try do the sync | 18:24 |
| sil2100 | sergiusens: CI Train just uses getPublishedSources() without specifying the pocket argument, and in this case LP just returns everything | 18:24 |
| sil2100 | I don't have 100% guarantee, but it should just work since that's the only thing I see | 18:24 |
| sergiusens | sil2100: oh, needs code changes? | 18:24 |
| sergiusens | sil2100: then lets not experiment today :-) | 18:24 |
| sil2100 | No no, should just work ;) | 18:24 |
| sergiusens | sil2100: oh, what's the syntax? | 18:24 |
| sil2100 | Just saying that I can't say for 100% | 18:24 |
| sergiusens | sil2100: I already have everything staged the other way around, so it's easy to revert | 18:25 |
| sil2100 | Try simply writing in the source package name list: 'sync:ubuntu,vivid the_package_name' (nuntium I suppose?) | 18:25 |
| sergiusens | sil2100: let's give it a try | 18:25 |
| sil2100 | And at least we'll know for sure if this works ;) | 18:25 |
| sergiusens | sil2100: yup, nuntium, and it will sync from proposed? crazy :-) | 18:25 |
| sil2100 | Yeah ;p I think no one thought about the case that something might be stuck in proposed ;) | 18:25 |
| sergiusens | sil2100: if you want to setup line 58 we will know :-) | 18:26 |
| sil2100 | sergiusens: assigning, let's hope it works - at least there would be less additional work for everyone | 18:26 |
| sil2100 | At least for now | 18:26 |
| sil2100 | bfiller: could you top-approve https://code.launchpad.net/~renatofilho/address-book-app/fix-1411323-rtm/+merge/247142 ? | 18:27 |
| bfiller | sil2100: done | 18:28 |
| sergiusens | sil2100: at least it picked the right one :-) | 18:29 |
| sil2100 | sergiusens: oh, so it works? ;) | 18:30 |
| sil2100 | bfiller: thanks! | 18:30 |
| sergiusens | sil2100: I'll need to sync in a package dep (build time only) | 18:40 |
| sil2100 | sergiusens: ah, missing from the rtm archive? Or need a different version? | 18:41 |
| sergiusens | sil2100: missing from the rtm archive | 18:41 |
| sil2100 | sergiusens: ok, wait, what package do you need? We'll just copy it over | 18:41 |
| sergiusens | sil2100: golang-go-flags-dev | 18:41 |
| sergiusens | thanks | 18:42 |
| jhodapp | robru, can you please land vivid silo 1? | 18:44 |
| sil2100 | jhodapp: publishing o/ | 18:44 |
| jhodapp | thanks sil2100 | 18:44 |
| sil2100 | jhodapp: robru is sick today, cyphermox will be your US trainguard for today :) | 18:45 |
| jhodapp | awesome, good to know | 18:45 |
| sil2100 | (once I EOD) | 18:45 |
| cyphermox | howdy | 18:45 |
| sergiusens | sil2100: did you make the copy though? | 18:46 |
| sil2100 | sergiusens: slangasek is copying it now, since we need an archive admin for things like this | 18:46 |
| sil2100 | Should be in the archive soon | 18:46 |
| sergiusens | sil2100: thanks! | 18:46 |
| sergiusens | sil2100: I give you permission to leave then :-P LOL | 18:47 |
| sergiusens | enjoy | 18:47 |
| sil2100 | Hah! No worries, still a few e-mails to write ;) | 18:47 |
| sergiusens | sil2100: in case you didn't notice, I fixed the emulator last night | 18:47 |
| sil2100 | sergiusens: thanks! Noticed that, I just finished mentioning it in the landing e-mail even | 18:48 |
| sil2100 | Makes things much easier for QA | 18:48 |
| sil2100 | sergiusens: ok, looks good -> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu-rtm/+source/golang-go-flags | 18:49 |
| sil2100 | So far at least | 18:49 |
| sergiusens | sil2100: so should I retrigger from ci train or someone else from the ppa itself? | 19:01 |
| sil2100 | sergiusens: hm, it's best if I simply rebuild it in the PPA | 19:01 |
| sil2100 | We'll save some resources this way | 19:01 |
| sil2100 | One moment | 19:01 |
| sil2100 | sergiusens: I'll add this 'rebuild in PPA' feature to the train once we have power of redeploying it once again | 19:01 |
| sil2100 | cyphermox: ok, I need to go EOD now really as it's latish here, leaving the train in your hands | 19:04 |
| sil2100 | sergiusens: rebuilt and it succeeded \o/ | 19:04 |
| cyphermox | alright | 19:04 |
| sergiusens | sil2100: thanks | 19:04 |
| cyphermox | any thing I need to be aware of before I break things? | 19:04 |
| sil2100 | cyphermox: just don't get too much frustrated if things start blowing up ;) The train does that | 19:04 |
| sil2100 | No no, all is ok | 19:04 |
| cyphermox | ack | 19:04 |
| cyphermox | anything that absolutely must not be landed? | 19:05 |
| sil2100 | No, QA makes sure to only sign-off things that are wanted in ubuntu-rtm | 19:07 |
| sil2100 | So just land anything that they +1 | 19:07 |
| sil2100 | No breakages in sight | 19:07 |
| sil2100 | Ok, see you tomorrow and thanks again! | 19:08 |
| sil2100 | o/ | 19:08 |
| jhodapp | ricmm, reviewed your MR, 2 minor fixes needed | 19:12 |
| alecu | cyphermox: may I ask you for a silo for line 74? | 19:34 |
| kgunn | trainguards can someone publish rtm silo3 | 20:01 |
| cyphermox | sure | 20:02 |
| cyphermox | ricmm: need me to rebuild silo 8? | 20:05 |
| ricmm | cyphermox: yes please something weird happened to it | 20:30 |
| ricmm | or I can do it myself I guess | 20:30 |
| cyphermox | pushing buttons... | 20:30 |
| cyphermox | I think it should just work with a retry | 20:31 |
| kgunn | thanks queuebot | 20:55 |
| kgunn | cyphermox: actually...i see mzanetti has a vivid silo, i'll hop in that one, but it'll need a reconfig | 21:02 |
| cyphermox | too late ;) | 21:02 |
| cyphermox | well, not too late | 21:02 |
| cyphermox | which silo is that? | 21:02 |
| cyphermox | 14? | 21:03 |
| mzanetti | cyphermox: yes | 21:03 |
| cyphermox | trainguards: just testing my highlight | 21:03 |
| cyphermox | d'oh. | 21:03 |
| kgunn | mzanetti: oh my..you're still on | 21:04 |
| cyphermox | kgunn: just let me know when you're ready for the reconfig | 21:04 |
| kgunn | mzanetti: just fyi, gonna dump josh's screen shot fixes in there (usc included) | 21:04 |
| kgunn | cyphermox: yep...ready | 21:04 |
| cyphermox | ack | 21:04 |
| mzanetti | kgunn: did someone review that? | 21:07 |
| kgunn | mzanetti: usc branch yeah.... camako and kdub | 21:07 |
| mzanetti | kgunn: looking into the unity branch I'd say there is something to fix still... but should be easy (no architectural thing). lemme look if I can find him | 21:08 |
| kgunn | yeah josh is on | 21:08 |
| cyphermox | rsalveti: kenvandine: have you had a chance to test and confirm my agent fixes? | 21:50 |
| kenvandine | cyphermox, i don't have a way to test it, i think rsalveti was supposed to do that | 21:50 |
| rsalveti | I got a bunch of failures, which were also happening in pure vivid | 21:50 |
| rsalveti | so couldn't really test that silo | 21:50 |
| kenvandine | cyphermox, i'd really like to get that landed though | 21:50 |
| rsalveti | will give another shot later today, need to open bugs for the issues I had | 21:50 |
| rsalveti | yeah | 21:50 |
| kenvandine | i just rebuilt it since i landed another silo earlier | 21:50 |
| rsalveti | kenvandine: thanks for that | 21:51 |
| kenvandine | rsalveti, i think i'll want to do another landing tomorrow, so if we can get 18 published before then, great | 21:52 |
| rsalveti | kenvandine: yeah, will keep you posted | 21:53 |
| kenvandine | rsalveti, thx | 21:54 |
| pmcgowan | charles, can you build silo 12 | 22:07 |
| cyphermox | I'll be out for a bit to get dinner, I will process any changes as soon as I'm back | 22:40 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!