[01:36] <wxl> 2 down, 2 to go
[01:37] <wxl> Riddell: you going to call Kubuntu ready anyways?
[01:38] <wxl> darkxst: what's the on GNOME? :(
[02:03] <darkxst> wxl, ready
[02:06] <wxl> thx darkxst
[09:01] <tseliot> any admins around?
[09:01] <wxl> tseliot: whatcha need?
[09:01] <tseliot> wxl: can you reject nvidia-graphics-drivers-346 and nvidia-graphics-drivers-346-updates from vivid NEW, please?
[09:02] <wxl> tseliot: sorry to say THAT is beyond my capacity
[09:02] <tseliot> np
[09:06] <Laney> wxl: looking good!
[09:07] <Riddell> tseliot: looking
[09:07] <Riddell> tseliot: all gone!
[09:07] <tseliot> Riddell: thanks!
[09:09] <Laney> Riddell: get those images signed off, slacker ;-)
[09:10] <Riddell> ooh we're the only flavour slacking
[10:15] <Riddell> Laney: marked as ready!
[10:17] <Laney> nice
[10:17] <Laney> thanks!
[10:22] <Laney> wxl: I'll start publishing soon, since all of the images I need are ready (still waiting for cloud images but they are done by a separate system which the cloud guys themselves drive)
[11:55] <sergiusens> can someone please trigger me a rebuild for https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nuntium/1.4-0ubuntu1/+build/6738207
[11:55] <sergiusens> ?
[11:56] <Laney> OK (FYI any developer who can upload the package can do that)
[12:09] <sergiusens> Laney: thanks, I'll upload a rebuild next time, I just didn't want to rebuild for the other arches
[12:10] <cjwatson> sergiusens: No, please don't upload a rebuild if you just need to retry
[12:10] <cjwatson> sergiusens: Laney meant that anybody who Launchpad thinks is entitled to upload the package has a retry button available to them for failures
[12:10] <cjwatson> sergiusens: Not that you should reupload
[12:11] <sergiusens> cjwatson: oh, sorry I didn't get that right
[12:11] <sergiusens> is there a way to tell it to use a different builder?
[12:11] <cjwatson> But if you're uploading via CI Train then that doesn't hold ...
[12:11] <cjwatson> Not really.  What is your theory?
[12:11] <Laney> Indeed, I was referring to your asking in #ubuntu-release instead of (for example) #ubuntu-devel.
[12:11] <sergiusens> cjwatson: not using ci train
[12:11] <cjwatson> The builders should be essentially identical
[12:12] <cjwatson> We can do tricks like putting all the other builders on manual to force a build onto a nominated builder, but I'd like to hear why
[12:12] <cjwatson> sergiusens: ah, right, you had a sponsor (who can retry)
[12:13] <sergiusens> cjwatson: I keep having this problem with gcc-go and power64; according to infinity it may be that gcc-go is saying it supports more (or less) than it really does and that the builders aren't all the same
[12:13] <cjwatson> sergiusens: Which builders are theorised to work differently?
[12:14] <cjwatson> denneed{03,04} have been down for a while, and I'd be surprised if fisher* weren't all the same ...
[12:15] <infinity> sergiusens: All ppc64el builders are identical.
[12:15] <infinity> sergiusens: When we had that discussion ages ago, it would have been about powerpc (the 32-bit arch), not ppc64el.
[12:16] <sergiusens> cjwatson: well I can't figure out why this arch any part that builds everywhere and built fine in the previous upload (oh and just saw it was fisher04) with no code changes there fails now
[12:16] <cjwatson> I don't know.  Perhaps gccgo changed in some relevant way?
[12:16] <cjwatson> Try diffing the build logs
[12:17] <sergiusens> cjwatson: do we get access to porter boxes for ppc64?
[12:17] <cjwatson> porter-ppc64el
[12:17] <cjwatson> https://wiki.canonical.com/InformationInfrastructure/ISO/BuildInfrastructure/PorterBoxes
[12:18] <sergiusens> thanks
[12:21] <infinity> There is a shiny new gcc-4.9 in -proposed, which may have a bunch of new ppc64 go patches.
[12:22] <sergiusens> oh goodie
[13:21] <mdeslaur> can someone please release mysql-5.5 in vivid, it's a security update
[13:21] <Laney> the freeze is going to be lifted shortly
[13:22] <Laney> Odd_Bloke: are you publishing the cloud images this time?
[13:22] <mdeslaur> Laney: ah, thanks
[13:29] <utlemming> Laney: nope, me this time
[13:32] <Laney> utlemming: ok, how are they looking? would like to unfreeze soonish if poss
[13:32] <utlemming> Laney: good to go, but the tracker for some reason isn't letting me push the bits.
[13:33] <Laney> hmm, they're on the manifest
[13:33] <Laney> we might need stgraber to help
[13:33] <Laney> back in a bit, lunch
[13:41] <infinity> utlemming: What bits are you having troubles pushing?
[13:42] <infinity> utlemming: And, perhaps more interestingly, does it matter?  Does your publishing machinery talk to the tracker?
[13:43] <infinity> Laney: If everyone's ready and utlemming claims he's set, except for tracker issues, you should probably lift the freeze.  Doesn't sound like anyone needs to rebuild anything.
[14:10] <Riddell> wxl: when do you expect to announce the release?
[14:13]  * cjwatson hits /~ubuntu-release/+leave
[14:27] <infinity> cjwatson: *sniff*
[14:27] <utlemming> infinity: my bits simply report stuff to the tracker
[14:27] <utlemming> infinity: but, no it doesn't matter
[14:27] <utlemming> infinity: afaic, all it good
[14:29] <infinity> utlemming: Check.
[14:29] <infinity> Laney: ^
[14:31] <Laney> infinity: Ya. I know.
[14:47] <wxl> miss you cjwatson :) (please fix sourceforge urls in launchpad) :)
[14:47] <wxl> Riddell: just woke up
[14:47] <wxl> Laney: what's the word?
[14:47] <Riddell> morning wxl
[14:47] <wxl> Laney: everything's ready
[14:48] <wxl> Laney: reading backlog i'm thinking we should publish some information on how to check on cloud's readiness.
[14:50] <Laney> wxl: They'd usually be in the tracker, apart from whatever problem there is this time
[14:51] <Laney> as for *publishing*, check with the person doing the release if the URL doesn't exist
[14:51] <Laney> and yes, everything should be ready
[14:51] <Laney> you might want to verify one of the torrents to see if they're hashed/seeding
[14:51] <wxl> so i'm good for the release announcement?
[14:54] <wxl> Laney: is it weird that cdimage lists Ubuntu GNOME as the daily build? url is right http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-gnome/releases/vivid/alpha-2/
[14:55] <Laney> I fixed that (and the frontend that served me had the change), might take a few minutes for it to sync out completely.
[14:55] <sil2100> Hello! I'm looking for an archive admin that could remove myspell-hr from ubuntu-rtm -proposed o/
[14:55] <wxl> well actually there may be a different url according to the release notes http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-gnome/releases/15.04/alpha-2/
[14:56] <Laney> that's a symlink
[14:56] <wxl> ah ok
[14:56] <wxl> then i won't sweat it
[14:58] <wxl> ok release announcement coming soon then :)
[14:59] <amjjawad> Laney, thanks for that ;)
[14:59] <wxl> and sent
[14:59] <amjjawad> http://ubuntugnome.org/vivid-ververt-alpha-2-has-arrived/
[14:59] <amjjawad> Too slow wxl ;)
[14:59] <Laney> thank wxl
[15:00] <wxl> thank you all
[15:00]  * wxl passes the checklist person torch to elfy 
[15:00] <wxl> oh didn't realize ubuntu-devel-announce was moderated
[15:01] <wxl> oh well hope that goes through soon enough
[15:01] <wxl> omg i made the subject still have alpha 1 in it
[15:01] <wxl> and there's a grammatical error in the first line
[15:01]  * wxl sighs
[15:02] <wxl> oh well, it's an alpha. you should expect some bugs.
[15:02] <Laney> that's a good thing about moderation
[15:02] <Laney> the link you got back lets you cancel the mail, so you can send it again
[15:02] <wxl> oh
[15:03] <wxl> still went to release
[15:03] <wxl> oh well
[15:03] <wxl> it's wiki hell time now too :/
[15:04] <wxl> there better
[15:06] <wxl> ok i'm going on with life
[15:06] <wxl> thanks all
[15:06] <Laney> thanks for helping
[15:06] <Laney> see you next cycle :P
[15:07] <Laney> cron back on
[15:07]  * cjwatson moderates u-d-a
[15:08] <cjwatson> sil2100: can you give me a reason message?
[15:08] <infinity> cjwatson: Beat me to it by a hair.
[15:09] <amjjawad> thanks everyone for everything :)
[15:09] <amjjawad> Cya next cycle ;)
[15:09] <sil2100> cjwatson: o/ "Existing version in the release pocket has a higher version number" would be enough I suppose
[15:10] <sil2100> cjwatson: since the lower upload is just CI Train not checking the destination during publishing after Robert's publisher changes...
[15:10] <sil2100> In the past it was actually checking if it makes sense to publish, but now it just does it
[15:10] <sil2100> (will have to fix that once we have the power to redeploy citrain code)
[15:11] <cjwatson> sil2100: done
[15:11] <sil2100> cjwatson: thank you!
[15:11] <pitti> wxl: congrats to alpha-2! how was your first-time release mgr experience?
[15:11] <Laney> the flavours were too well behaved
[15:13] <amjjawad> Laney, I had this note from darkxst "seems automated image tests havent run since early december, not sure if they are just broken or someone disabled
[15:13] <amjjawad> them"
[15:13] <stgraber> utlemming: good mroning
[15:13] <amjjawad> any idea Laney ?
[15:16] <Laney> amjjawad: no, which tests?
[15:17] <amjjawad> the automated image tests Laney
[15:17] <Laney> got a link?
[15:17] <amjjawad> not really
[15:17] <Laney> I'll ask him tomorrow
[15:17] <amjjawad> that was an email from darkxst and I was about to send an email to the list but couldn't due to real life stuff
[15:18] <amjjawad> no worries, thanks a lot anyway Laney :)
[15:22] <ochosi> woot, alpha 1 released: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/2015-January/003194.html
[15:22] <ochosi> :]
[15:22] <amjjawad> ochosi, you mean A2 ;)
[15:22] <mlankhorst> huzzah
[15:23] <ochosi> amjjawad: yeah, but read the subject of the email
[15:23] <amjjawad> I did ochosi
[15:23] <Laney> the one on devel-announce is right
[15:23] <amjjawad> it was a mistake and it happens :)
[15:23] <ochosi> and yeah, obviously i was just kidding :)
[15:23] <amjjawad> ochosi, sure, I got it ;)
[15:27] <wxl> pitti: i've been release manager for lubuntu for a whlie now, but this is the first time helping with community milestones
[15:28] <wxl> ochosi: jeez, you're so mean. :(
[15:28] <wxl> :)
[15:28] <ochosi> heh ;)
[15:28] <elfy> no - he really is mean wxl :D
[15:28] <ochosi> sorry, it was just too easy
[15:28] <wxl> hahahah
[15:29] <elfy> I'm saying nothing till after b1 :)
[15:29] <wxl> hahahah
[15:34] <wxl> Laney: i note that cron is set to build dailes for kubuntu and gnome right before we released. might want to manually trigger those for rebuild
[15:34] <Laney> wxl: if they want to, the flavour leads have access to do that
[15:34] <wxl> Riddell: darkxst amjjawad manually trigger your dailies
[16:14] <stgraber> can an AA pretty please binNEW LXC (adding lua-lxc for all arches)? thanks
[17:10] <wxl> um
[17:10] <wxl> so our daily rebuilt and supposedly removed old images but the tracker doesn't show http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/cd-build-logs/lubuntu/vivid/daily-20150122.log
[17:11] <infinity> stgraber: Done.
[17:12] <cjwatson> wxl: It shows on http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/326/builds
[17:12] <stgraber> infinity: yay, thanks!
[17:14] <wxl> cjwatson: nevermind. too impatient. didn't when i looked :)
[18:42] <sil2100> Hey! Could someone be so kind and copy-over golang-go-flags-dev from ubuntu to ubuntu-rtm? ;)
[18:44] <sil2100> ^ nevermind that, slangasek already agreed to help
[18:47] <slangasek> sil2100: I think it's done
[18:48] <sil2100> slangasek: thank you!
[19:36] <darkxst> Laney, wxl, manual rebuilds of dailies has never worked the few times I tried
[19:37] <darkxst> (and seems our images built today anyway)
[19:47] <wxl> darkxst: always worked fine for me! i doubt that's the answer you want. do you need me to do it?
[19:48] <darkxst> wxl, no, they seem to have built anyway somehow
[19:49] <wxl> darkxst: the thing you have to remember is it takes time :)
[19:49] <darkxst> wxl, when I have tried in the past they start but then get stuck
[19:50] <wxl> darkxst: that's when i would suggest bugging someone about it. i've seen issues like that in the past and cjwatson was always able to fix it. unfortunately, he's no longer part of the release team. he has imparted some small amount of his knowledge to me and i'm pretty sure i can help point you in the right direction if need be.
[19:58] <darkxst> wxl, its ok I guess, its pretty rare we need to rebuild dailies, so not much of hassle to bug someone here to bump them through
[20:01] <wxl> darkxst: certainly something to pay attention to when a release is out
[20:18] <darkxst> wxl, I would normally only force rebuild when they are broken, not a huge problem if it takes 1 extra day to rebuild after release!
[20:54] <stgraber> taking system-image importer offline for an index rebuild (some more version_detail fix)
[20:59] <stgraber> done and back online
[21:49] <cjwatson> darkxst: I'm not sure I ever recall you reporting this before, or if you did it was due to some specific problem that I fixed and not a fundamental failure to support this; best thing would be if you report it when it happens, but hard to say retrospectively
[21:50] <cjwatson> darkxst: "start but then get stuck" would be weird, but perhaps iso.qa reported that the rebuild was in progress and there was a lock held, that's at least somewhat likely
[22:08] <darkxst> cjwatson, yes something like that, I just know its required manual intervention, the few times I have tried