[15:50] could someone please kill this spammer, please: https://bugs.launchpad.net/~c649199fe [16:11] mdeslaur: done [16:13] cjwatson: thanks! [20:06] there's no way to trick the ppa builders into building non-i386/non-amd64 packages is there? === reed_ is now known as reed [20:14] teward: request enblement of the other architecutre you're interested in via launchpad answers [20:54] dobey: i thought that was restricted to arm? [20:54] rather than $allarchs [21:07] teward: what arch do you want? arm isn't i386 or amd64 :) [21:08] dobey: good point. PPC came to mind, but meh. :P [21:08] ppc being evil as hell itself, though... probably best for me to not bother anyone about it [21:08] seeing the build farm for PPAs doesn't have ppc [21:09] anyways, done, I'll let it sit in the queue :) [23:50] dobey: armhf has been enabled now, thanks. are arm64 and armel requestable, or no? [23:50] wgrant: ^ if you're there (you processed the request) [23:50] teward: armel is dead; if you want armel you're confused. [23:50] I can do arm64, but qemu-user-arm64 isn't very reliable yet. [23:51] wgrant: was asking because there's one weirdo using armel >.< [23:51] Tell them they're confused :P [23:51] qemu is slow, I'd prefer not to enable an extra expensive arch because a single person is using a dead arch :) [23:51] wgrant: that's on my list :P [23:51] wgrant: should be fine with armhf [23:52] ooooo interesting... depwait in precise for this... o.o [23:52] wgrant: if arm64 becomes reliable in the future i might request it, but. [23:52] teward: Given qemu-user-arm64's unreliability, and the unavailability of any affordable usable hardware atm, I'd suggest holding off on it unless you really feel you need it. [23:52] Yep [23:52] wgrant: read my mind [23:52] hate depwaits though [23:53] oh well that explains it, FTBFS in armhf in precise