[00:06] <sil2100> hm
[00:21] <sil2100> bfiller: I'll be going to sleep soon as I see no new landings/actions needed from me
[00:21] <sil2100> bfiller: if you could prepare everything so that we can get the camera-app click released tomorrow it would be great
[00:21] <sil2100> We would then build a new image
[00:31] <sil2100> If anything urgent pops up, feel free to call me on my mobile - or at least send a few signals
[00:32] <sil2100> o/
[00:32] <sil2100> See you tomorrow
[01:39] <bfiller> I will push the camera-app click to the store now
[01:47] <bfiller> popey: when you have a chance please review/approve new camera-app in store, version 3.0.0.478
[02:10] <imgbot> [03:10] <imgbot> [03:30] <imgbot> [03:30] <imgbot> [04:15] <imgbot> [04:15] <imgbot> [08:23] <Kaleo> bfiller, thanks!
[08:34] <popey> bfiller: dont
[08:34] <popey> bfiller: *done :)
[08:42] <sil2100> jibel, davmor2: hey! Once you guys are online, if you could pick up silo 004 with priority it would be awesome
[08:42] <sil2100> We would upload it to the store and kick a new image
[08:43] <jibel> sil2100, Ill do it this morning. I'm playing with SD cards and to make the scopes crash ATM
[08:46] <sil2100> jibel: thanks! btw. scopes crashing? Is there any problem with those?
[08:46] <sil2100> Ah, as per e-mail
[08:48] <jibel> sil2100, and now mtp server crashed :(
[08:50] <jibel> bug 1414570
[08:50] <jibel> cyphermox, ^
[08:54] <bzoltan> sil2100:  in the"Archive" tab of the CI sheet the line number 2428 says that the MR is landed .. but is not marked as merged. What could be the reason?
[08:54] <sil2100> bzoltan: let me check the line - you mean the merge is not marked as merged?
[08:54] <bzoltan> sil2100: and it is merged
[08:55] <ogra_> hmm, still no smoketests
[08:56] <ogra_> subprocess.CalledProcessError: Command '['bzr', 'checkout', '--lightweight', u'lp:ubuntu-calculator-app', '-r', u'339', 'work']' returned non-zero exit status 3
[08:56] <ogra_> hmm, i wonder if that "u" should be in front of the lp url
[08:56] <sil2100> bzoltan: hm, I see the merge has the 'Merged' status
[08:56] <bzoltan> sil2100:  I flipped it manually. It is OK
[08:57] <bzoltan> ogra_:  I hit the same yesterday ... the command fails when you try in terminal. It works if you do not force the revision
[08:58] <ogra_> well,, thats from the smoke test log
[08:58] <ogra_> seems something underneath changed
[09:00] <ogra_> cihelp, so while adb seems to work fine again in krillin rtm smoke tests now fetching of the tests fails in phablet-click-test-setup
[09:03] <vila> ogra_: sorry, I'm a bit lost, job url ?
[09:04] <ogra_> http://dev-jenkins.ubuntu-ci:8080/job/utopic-touch_stable-krillin-smoke-daily/778/consoleFull
[09:04] <ogra_> vila, heh, i though i'd highligth psivaa_ with cihelp :) he was on the adb case with me on the weekend
[09:05] <vila> ogra_: np, he will probably be around very soon now
[09:05] <psivaa_> ogra_:  bzr: ERROR: Requested revision: 'latest' does not exist in branch: bzr+ssh://bazaar.launchpad.net/+branch/ubuntu-terminal-app/
[09:06] <psivaa_> is the error that I see in all the runs
[09:06] <vila> psivaa_: hmpf, where do you see that in the url above ?
[09:06] <ogra_> bzr: ERROR: Server sent an unexpected error: ('error', 'ValueError', 'requested revno (339) is later than given known revno (77)')
[09:06] <ogra_> thats what i see above
[09:06] <vila> ha, damn, looked too far
[09:07] <ogra_> (install-and-boot Console log from last krillin rtm smoke run)
[09:07] <sil2100> bzoltan: what might have happened is that not all revisions from the merge branch got merged
[09:07] <psivaa_> vila: ogra_: sorry, bad cache in my browser.. that was an old error
[09:08] <ogra_> it looks like it passes the image revision to bzr for whatever reason
[09:08] <sil2100> bzoltan: it's hard to see that and find proof, but probably what happened is that CI Train built a package out of revision 330 of the branch, the package was tested and then someone pushed rev 331 (a mark commit) to the same branch which wasn't built
[09:08] <ogra_> hmm, no, it is 77 in the former testrun too
[09:08] <davmor2> sil2100: NO!
[09:08] <sil2100> bzoltan: so even after releasing the package and pushing the changes to trunk, LP doesn't think the merge is merged because it has commit 331 and it only merged up to 330
[09:09] <sil2100> davmor2: I take that as a yes
[09:09] <sil2100> :D
[09:09] <sil2100> bzoltan: anyway, nothing to be worried about in this case, it happened once for a different project (but to a bigger extreme)
[09:10] <davmor2> sil2100: NOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!
[09:11] <sil2100> davmor2: geez Dave don't be so eager on doing it!
[09:12] <jibel> sil2100, the new gallery app is a huge improvement.
[09:12] <davmor2> people used up all their favours over the weekend no more favours now till next year :P
[09:12] <sil2100> jibel: from silo 4 you mean?
[09:12] <jibel> sil2100, yes
[09:13] <ogra_> jibel, hmm, hangs for me
[09:13] <ogra_> ah, now it moves
[09:13] <ogra_> that was a ~30sec hang
[09:13] <jibel> ogra_, how many photos/videos did you try to load?
[09:13] <satoris> For some reason mediascanner2's rtm branch has gone out of sync. lp:mediascanner2/rtm-14.09 does not have a commit that is on the device, which seems to be lp:~ps-jenkins/mediascanner2/ubuntu-vivid-proposed. How should I go about getting that fixed?
[09:15] <sil2100> satoris: let me look, maybe the bot was unable to push it there
[09:15] <ogra_> jibel, it had all my photos cached, the thumbnails were visible ... seems it scanned the videos though (but thats only ~6 short test trailers in ~/Videos)
[09:15] <sil2100> satoris: hm, wait, strange
[09:16]  * ogra_ checks his Videos dir
[09:16] <satoris> sil2100: thanks, if you need anything further just let me know.
[09:16] <jibel> ogra_, I tried with 3000 photos and 15 videos on the SD card, it takes a moment to start (few seconds) then the gallery starts displaying the thumbnails.
[09:17] <sil2100> satoris: ok, all is clear
[09:17] <ogra_> jibel, i dont have any video or photo files on the SD
[09:17] <ogra_> all local
[09:17] <sil2100> satoris: the rtm-14.09 branch is out of sync because thostr_ released the last ubuntu-rtm mediascanner2 package as a sync from vivid
[09:18] <ogra_> but i just noticed i have a *.3gp video there, could be that it choked on that
[09:18] <sil2100> satoris: so in other words it just released the vivid version of mediascanner to ubuntu-rtm - and whenever that happens, no merges are merged (bzr is not used, just the source package copied)
[09:18] <bzoltan> ogra_:  is there a chance to push out the new ubuntu-sdk-libs-tools to Vivid? Very important SDK updates are blocked by that change
[09:19] <satoris> ogra_: what does .cache/upstart/mediascanner-2.0.log say.
[09:19] <ogra_> bzoltan, yeah, sorry to much rtm stuff going on, we all worked through the weekend ... i'll get to it today
[09:19] <sil2100> satoris: to get the branch back up-to-date you would have to probably have to copy once again trunk to the 14.09 branch all up to the 0.105+15.04.20141030.1 version commit (as this is the state of the package in rtm)
[09:20] <bzoltan> ogra_: Sorry to be pushy, but can we get it now? Like not sometimes later today... I am really sorry, but I have key features collecting dust in MRs
[09:21] <ogra_> bzoltan, after the meeting, but i told you already, every core-dev can do that,. i'm not the only one
[09:21] <ogra_> there are ~100 others
[09:21] <satoris> sil2100: so if I had a new patch to put in, the correct way would be to make a branch from trunk that starts from that particular point in time, add the new commit and then MR that to trunk?
[09:21] <Kaleo> heeeeeeeeeeko
[09:21] <Kaleo> helpppppppp :)
[09:22] <nerochiaro> what Kaleo means is that we have an unit test failing with an exception in a silo, but running ok on devices and on the desktop
[09:22] <satoris> Trunk of 14/09 that is.
[09:22] <Kaleo> what he said :)
[09:22] <ogra_> satoris, funny, i dont have .cache/upstart/mediascanner-2.0.log ... only compressed files there
[09:23] <popey> ogra_: looks like calculator focus was switched to reboot from trunk...]
[09:23] <popey> which may have caused the bzr issue you linked above
[09:23] <sil2100> satoris: something like that (if I understand you correctly) - what I think needs doing is: creating a new rtm-specific branch that is based from trunk from the specyfic point of time (the version I pasted in), creating a merge with your patch for that branch and submitting it to CI Train
[09:23] <ogra_> popey, oh
[09:23] <popey> I _think_
[09:23] <ogra_> popey, can we get that fixed ?
[09:23] <satoris> sil2100: yes, exactly. Will do. Thanks.
[09:23] <popey> well, jenkins needs fixing I think...
[09:24] <satoris> ogra_: yeah sometimes that happens but nobody knows why. Maybe upstart is caching it? Do verify that the process is running, though.
[09:24] <ogra_> yup, running
[09:25] <ogra_> lots of errors in the 1.gz file
[09:25] <ogra_> and as i thought, it couldnt decode the .3gp video file
[09:25] <ogra_> oh
[09:25] <ogra_> and i seem ot have a bunch of .ts files on the SD card ... where do these come from
[09:26] <ogra_> ok, myth solved, there are broken movie files on the SD ... not sure how i got them there though
[09:39] <Chipaca> davmor2: i consider myself pung
[09:40] <davmor2> Chipaca: yeah I can't remember why though
[09:40] <Chipaca> davmor2: something about verifying silo 7?
[09:41] <davmor2> Chipaca: ah yes om26er has some logs he needs you to look at so we can pass it.
[09:41] <Chipaca> ok
[09:42] <psivaa_> ogra_: sil2100: just to make sure that you're not waiting on us on the version mismatches for calculator app, during phablet-click-test-setup
[09:42] <psivaa_> none of them are under our control
[09:42] <ogra_> psivaa_, right, see what popey said above
[09:43] <ogra_> seems the branch focus for it changed to -reboot
[09:43] <sil2100> psivaa_: I think jenkins needs to somehow stop looking for a different revision in the current trunk
[09:43] <Chipaca> davmor2: i guess i wait for om26er
[09:45] <davmor2> Chipaca: yeah I did clock that he had the logs already just that it was blocked on you.
[09:45] <psivaa_> sil2100: ogra_: ok, if that's on us, i'd like to see the job url :)
[09:45]  * Chipaca hopes it's the "are these logs ok?" "yes" kind of deal
[09:45] <psivaa_> popey: ^
[09:46] <popey> the what what?
[09:54] <popey> davmor2: http://pad.ubuntu.com/MusicAppManualTesting & http://pad.ubuntu.com/MusicAppReadMe updated with click - 2.0.814
[09:55] <davmor2> popey: ta
[10:09] <sil2100> popey: psivaa_ wanted to get the job url of the jenkins failure to fetch the right revision of calculator I think
[10:16] <popey> sil2100: I didnt find the failure, ogra_ did.
[10:25] <sil2100> pstolowski, thostr_: the rtm branch needs to have the MRs changed
[10:25] <sil2100> So that they're not the same as in the vivid landing
[10:26] <thostr_> sil2100: yes, just noticed
[10:26] <thostr_> working on it
[10:26] <sil2100> Thanks
[10:27] <nerochiaro> sil2100: not sure if you are the right person to ask to, but we need help with a package which has unit tests failing with exceptions when built by CI, but working fine when built on desktop or device
[10:28] <nerochiaro> sil2100: it is in silo 7: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/195797645/buildlog_ubuntu-vivid-armhf.camera-app_3.0.0%2B15.04.20150125.1-0ubuntu1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz
[10:29] <sil2100> nerochiaro: you saying that it builds fine locally and on the devices?
[10:29] <nerochiaro> sil2100: yes
[10:34] <sil2100> nerochiaro: out of curiosity - did you try rebuilding it in the PPA to see if it's something transient?
[10:35] <sil2100> Anyway, strange, since the builders run non-virtualized hardware
[10:35] <jibel> sil2100, Kaleo bfiller gallery-app crashes if it's open and the user removes the SD Card.
[10:35] <sil2100> So it should be more or less same as with building on a device
[10:35] <sil2100> jibel: crap...
[10:36] <nerochiaro> sil2100: i am going to test this again on the device. the build has been ran twice in the jenkins MR
[10:36] <Kaleo> jibel, excellent
[10:36] <Kaleo> jibel, that will teach these users
[10:36] <Kaleo> jibel, :)
[10:41] <nerochiaro> sil2100: hmm, retying now the build on devices with the latest image generates the same crash. I will look into it.
[10:45] <sil2100> nerochiaro: maybe something landed inbetween that started causing those issues (just a possibility)
[10:57] <jibel> bfiller, bug 1414601
[10:59] <sil2100> popey: did the reboot of the calculator get published to the store already? I mean, which calculator is the one on the devices now?
[11:00] <sil2100> Looks like the old one for me
[11:06] <popey> sil2100: the old one, the new one is "Calculator Reboot" as it's not done yet
[11:07] <sil2100> popey: so I think the switch of ubuntu-calculator-app's trunk to the reboot happened too soon
[11:07] <popey> rpadovani: ^
[11:07] <popey> rpadovani: was that a switch you flipped?
[11:07] <sil2100> popey: I think we'd need trunk to be back to the old branch for now, as otherwise phablet-click-test-setup won't work
[11:07] <popey> right.
[11:09] <nerochiaro> sil2100: it was an error in the unittest itself. i pushed to the branch a fix. the silo should pick the changes up automatically, and rebuild, right ?
[11:09] <rpadovani> sil2100, popey oh, ok. I asked to fginther and he said that was ok, but probably I didn't say we haven't published the app yet - sorry!
[11:09] <rpadovani> sil2100, do I revert the change or do you do it?
[11:10] <popey> rpadovani: could you revert for now, and we'll plan for it when we switch the app in the store.
[11:11] <rpadovani> popey, sil2100 done! sorry for the inconvenience
[11:11] <popey> thanks rpadovani :)
[11:12] <sil2100> nerochiaro: you need to rebuild the silo - let me do that for you in a moment
[11:12] <nerochiaro> sil2100: thank you
[11:12] <sil2100> rpadovani, popey: thanks, this will fix the world :)
[11:12] <rpadovani> \o/
[11:22] <mzanetti> sil2100: so seems there is still an issue with silo 14. I've tested and acked it, but it seems to still believe that some packages failed to build
[11:22] <sil2100> mzanetti: I'll look at it in a moment
[11:23] <mzanetti> sil2100: cool, thanks. no rush...
[11:38] <sil2100> Kaleo: you looking at bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/gallery-app/+bug/1414601 by any chance? :)
[11:38] <Kaleo> sil2100, a little
[11:38] <Kaleo> sil2100, but the official dev (arthur) will be on it shortly
[11:39] <Kaleo> sil2100, he needs to be awake :)
[11:46] <sil2100> ACK
[11:50] <brendand> sil2100, i just realised that i need the request_id as a dictionary key :/
[11:50] <brendand> sil2100, or some alternative
[11:50] <brendand> sil2100, which obviously needs to be unique
[11:51] <sil2100> hmmm, ok, then I'll have to make it more complicated
[11:52] <brendand> sil2100, what about assigned-silo? will click packages have one?
[11:52] <brendand> sil2100, they won't need one so i'd be surprised
[11:53] <sil2100> brendand: no they won't, and that's the problem
[11:53] <brendand> sil2100, well i need a key of some kind
[11:53] <sil2100> brendand: since all machinery in the spreadsheet assumes that is an entry has an UID and no silo assigned, it will clear out the UID after a timeout
[11:53] <sil2100> brendand: I can change that, but you know how risky it is to touch the spreadsheet mechanics ;)
[11:54] <brendand> sil2100, i do
[11:54] <sil2100> brendand: let's continue looking at this after this milestone, I don't want the train to drop dead
[11:55] <brendand> sil2100, ok any time just let me know
[12:02] <sil2100> mzanetti: eh, the silo must be busted somehow
[12:02] <sil2100> mzanetti: I mean, CI Train-wise
[12:02] <sil2100> Let my try fixing that
[12:02] <mzanetti> sil2100: that means? cleaning it and start again?
[12:03] <sil2100> mzanetti: no no, I'll try to hack it with hacks
[12:03] <mzanetti> ok. let me know if there's something I can/should do
[12:06] <sil2100> mzanetti: not sure why but the main reconfigure job no longer removes unneeded .project files, which is bad
[12:06] <sil2100> mzanetti: but I fixed it in the silo and maybe now it should be all ok
[12:06] <mzanetti> sil2100: ok, thanks. let's see how that build goes
[12:11] <pstolowski> trainguards hey, may i ask for a silo for row #55?
[12:12] <sil2100> pstolowski: ah, proper merges added? SUre
[12:12] <sil2100> jibel: since Victor went missing, after lunch someone else from the PT should be around and I'll discuss with them closing the gates
[12:13] <sil2100> And we'll announce it proper
[12:29]  * sil2100 off to lunch
[14:13] <pstolowski> trainguards hey, may i ask for a silo for #42?
[14:22] <sil2100> pstolowski: sure!
[14:33] <pstolowski> sil2100, thanks!
[14:42] <om26er> Chipaca, Hi!
[14:42] <om26er> Chipaca, I sent you the logs on friday, with the config flags you suggested. Here is the link again: https://pastebin.canonical.com/124147/
[14:43] <Chipaca> om26er: \o/ !
[14:43] <tedg> davmor2, So the url-dispatcher branch adds the feature there. There are other branches that need to land from the maps app itself.
[14:44] <tedg> davmor2, Trying to land what can land early to avoid the end of the week rush.
[14:45] <davmor2> tedg: right unfortunately there is no way to currently test it so it fails on the description of the bug alone :(
[14:45] <sil2100> bfiller: hey! Any news on bug LP: #1414601?
[14:45] <tedg> davmor2, It has automated tests included.
[14:45] <tedg> davmor2, There's no way to *manually* test it, but it is tested.
[14:46] <davmor2> jibel: ^ whats the best course of action with this ?
[14:46] <bfiller> sil2100: working on a fix, don't have an eta yet
[14:47] <Chipaca> om26er: and by that i mean: those logs are of a working client
[14:48] <om26er> Chipaca, oh, didn't get that. That sounds super cool
[14:48] <jibel> davmor2, which silo?
[14:48] <sil2100> bfiller: thanks :)
[14:48] <davmor2> jibel: silo 002
[14:49] <om26er> Chipaca, I'll make sure to run the TestPlan now and if that works ok then we can probably land it.
[14:49] <bfiller> sil2100: will keep you posted artmello working on the fix
[14:51] <jibel> davmor2, it's medium importance, no way to manually test it and the diff is not trivial. Don't land it
[14:52] <davmor2> jibel: so hold it back till the other bits land to test it manually?
[14:52] <jibel> davmor2, yes
[14:52] <davmor2> jibel: thanks
[15:00] <john-mcaleely> sil2100, just a heads up, I should have a device tarball later today (RTM)
[15:03] <om26er> Chipaca, Hey! Is this the TestPlan for push ? https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlan/ubuntu-push
[15:03] <om26er> only have two testcases...
[15:04] <tedg> Okay, I'll just deallocate silo 2 then: "Too much automated testing"
[15:12] <pmcgowan> john-mcaleely, whats in it?
[15:15] <john-mcaleely> factory version string changes. pmcgowan
[15:15] <john-mcaleely> (those are run-time, sadly, not just constants)
[15:15] <sil2100> john-mcaleely: hey, will we get a changelog for that?
[15:16] <sil2100> john-mcaleely: I suppose it's important to have before release, right?
[15:23] <john-mcaleely> sil2100, you will, and yes, it is
[15:24] <sil2100> jibel, davmor2: ^
[15:26] <davmor2> sil2100: I don't care :P I'm not listening, LALALALALALALALALA! I can't hear you ;)
[15:26] <sil2100> ;p
[15:26] <davmor2> john-mcaleely: when is it landing?
[15:27] <davmor2> john-mcaleely: I am knocking off at 18:00 today
[15:28] <john-mcaleely> davmor2, pushing hard to get in the next hour or so
[15:29] <davmor2> john-mcaleely: oh that'll be tight but doable
[15:35] <sil2100> jibel, pmcgowan: since the gallery-app silo still needs some love (same for camera-app), I would propose building a new image now
[15:36] <elopio> ping plars: I'm wondering why jenkins has not run for https://code.launchpad.net/~canonical-platform-qa/autopilot/unskipping_ci_test_1384957/+merge/247543
[15:36] <elopio> do you know?
[15:36] <sil2100> jibel, pmcgowan: we didn't have smoketesting results for the last images, so this would at least give us some understanding how automation fares
[15:36] <pmcgowan> sil2100, ok, did camera land in the store
[15:37] <sil2100> pmcgowan: right, but not with the low-disk-space fix, as that one is still in testing for vivis
[15:37] <plars> elopio: let me look into it, I know we have a bunch of devices down right now, so there could be a delay from that
[15:37] <sil2100> *vivid
[15:37] <sil2100> I suppose this might still take some time
[15:37] <elopio> ok, thanks.
[15:40] <jibel> sil2100, can you wait until we have an answer for location-service and may be revert it
[15:40] <sil2100> jibel: ok
[15:41] <pmcgowan> sil2100, is that music app likely to land soon?
[15:41] <pmcgowan> just wondering if we wait a few
[15:41] <sil2100> pmcgowan: it will land tomorrow, since only tomorrow it would have the translations imported
[15:41] <pmcgowan> sil2100, ok so then its just gallery in silo 4
[15:42] <sil2100> pmcgowan: yeah, gallery for today and maybe that revert of location-service (or other) as per the location problems
[15:51] <pmcgowan> jibel, I will add silo 0 to approved list as it seems it fixes a usability issue with the scopes independent of the security issues
[15:52] <pmcgowan> per innput from thostr_
[15:52] <pmcgowan> sil2100, so you will kick an image for the dashboard then?
[15:53] <sil2100> pmcgowan: I'm still waiting for some more info regarding the location-regression
[15:53] <sil2100> But if get no additional info about a possible revert I'll just request an image in ~30 minutes
[15:54] <pmcgowan> sil2100, ack
[15:54] <jibel> pmcgowan, sil2100 bug 1414610
[15:55] <jibel> pmcgowan, sil2100 it's a regression introduced by location-service, was silo 17
[15:55] <pmcgowan> jibel, question is whether there is a proper fix to the indicator thats better than a revert?
[15:56] <jibel> pmcgowan, inded
[15:56] <jibel> indeed*
[15:56] <sil2100> jibel: did brendand confirm that reverting location-service fixes the bug?
[15:57] <jibel> a revert would reintroduce the bug where the states are not remembered on reboot
[15:57] <brendand> sil2100, yeah it works
[15:57] <brendand> sil2100, but as jibel said we lose a bug fix
[15:57] <jibel> sil2100, I did, but didn't revert lxc-android-config. So the state is correct in the wizard, but the shell doesn't start
[16:01] <Chipaca> om26er: looks like the right one yes
[16:02] <plars> elopio: The job is back on and I forced it to go ahead and run now
[16:02] <elopio> plars: thank you very much.
[16:02] <plars> elopio: anytime!
[16:02] <rhuddie> popey, davmor2, I tested music-app 2.0.814, no issues from testing
[16:15] <bfiller> sil2100: can you please reconfigure ubuntu silo 7, had to add a package
[16:15] <sil2100> bfiller: sure
[16:24] <sil2100> ogra_: hey! Could you kick a new ubuntu-rtm image for us?
[16:25] <ogra_> sure
[16:25] <sil2100> It seems I still don't have the power
[16:25] <ogra_> did you talk to cjwatson ?
[16:25] <ogra_> kicked
[16:27] <popey> rhuddie: awesome, thank you!
[16:27] <sil2100> ogra_: thanks!
[16:30] <imgbot> [16:34] <om26er> Chipaca, I send the message to myself from the testplan and it says ":ERROR: invalid"
[16:34] <om26er> whats up with that ?
[16:35] <Chipaca> om26er: wrong token?
[16:36] <om26er> Chipaca, oh it worked now, I had to send it like "nickname:message" the testplan was not clear :)
[16:36] <Chipaca> om26er: ah!
[16:55] <ogra_> om26er, happy birthday !!
[16:56] <om26er> aaah, Thanks ogra_ :-)
[17:01] <bfiller> sil2100: can you reconfigure rtm silo 4. It's not longer going to be a sync silo instead we added an MR so we can land in rtm first. then I'll land it in vivid
[17:02] <popey> no landing call?
[17:03] <sil2100> bfiller: sure
[17:03] <sil2100> hmm
[17:03] <sil2100> Ok
[17:03] <ogra_> popey, we're all in
[17:04] <sil2100> bfiller: just make sure to release it on vivid after that instantly
[17:04] <popey> odd
[17:04] <bfiller> sil2100: will do, the deb is not even used so it's not too important but will make sure
[17:04] <bfiller> sil2100: only relevant for desktop
[17:05] <sil2100> ogra_, jibel: internet problems still...
[17:16] <pmcgowan> jibel, this one needs to land with other camera disk fixes https://bugs.launchpad.net/canonical-devices-system-image/+bug/1385302
[17:20] <jibel> pmcgowan, OK
[17:23] <sil2100> plars: hey! Did you just erase my topic? ;)
[17:23] <plars> sil2100: doh, sorry about that, I didn't see the change
[17:24] <sil2100> plars: how cruel!
[17:24] <sil2100> ;)
[17:24] <plars> sil2100: I'll fix it, sorry about that :)
[17:24] <plars> sil2100: better? :)
[17:24] <sil2100> Much better, phew, thanks!
[17:24] <sil2100> ;p
[17:25] <plars> sil2100: I was just trying to change the vanguard and didn't see someone changed the topic in the middle.
[17:45] <imgbot> [17:45] <imgbot> [17:47] <sil2100> robru: how are you feeling today?
[17:48] <robru> sil2100: oh not bad. just eating some breakfast and waking up
[17:48] <robru> thanks
[17:49] <robru> sil2100: managed to have a restful weekend somehow
[17:49] <kenvandine> wait times for ppc builds keep increasing :/
[17:52] <sil2100> robru: good to hear :)
[18:23] <john-mcaleely> http://people.canonical.com/~jhm/barajas/ubuntu-rtm-14.09/device_krillin-20150126-cb82dc1.tar.xz
[18:23] <john-mcaleely> http://people.canonical.com/~jhm/barajas/ubuntu-rtm-14.09/device_krillin-20150126-cb82dc1.changes
[18:23] <john-mcaleely> http://people.canonical.com/~jhm/barajas/ubuntu-rtm-14.09/device_krillin-testresults-20150126-cb82dc1.ods
[18:23] <john-mcaleely> sil2100, pmcgowan ^ device tarball
[18:23] <john-mcaleely> (rtm)
[18:24] <pmcgowan> okedoke
[18:24] <john-mcaleely> changes permit factory line tools to read the expected ubuntu release version via android properties
[18:32] <Chipaca> om26er: any news?
[18:33] <om26er> Chipaca, approved it on the trello board.
[18:33] <om26er> Chipaca, I was asked by jibel to no approve further landings unless they are super "critical"
[18:40] <Chipaca> pmcgowan: is the fix for push getting stuck "super critical"?
[18:59] <pmcgowan> Chipaca, I was not considering it so, but perhaps I misunderstand the symptom
[19:01] <pmcgowan> Chipaca, from your last comment I would say no
[19:01] <pmcgowan> we can ota
[19:03] <Chipaca> drat. but ok.
[19:04] <pmcgowan> Chipaca, whats the status of your silo?
[19:04] <Chipaca> that is: i don't disagree, but i would've liked to have realised it wasn't going to make it before, because this was a rush job for it to make it, which we're going to throw away for the "real" fix as soon as we've finished working on this one
[19:04] <pmcgowan> Chipaca, oh its approved
[19:05] <pmcgowan> Chipaca, what would you recommend given its not the "real" fix
[19:05] <Chipaca> pmcgowan: i think this is better than what's there already
[19:05] <Chipaca> pmcgowan: and i also think it's a safe diff
[19:05] <pmcgowan> Chipaca, got an mr?
[19:05] <Chipaca> that is, i consider it fairly low risk
[19:05] <Chipaca> pmcgowan: https://code.launchpad.net/~chipaca/ubuntu-push/fix-1390663-for-rtm/+merge/247328
[19:06] <pmcgowan> btw it needs approval or it wont publish
[19:06] <Chipaca> pmcgowan: it's not approved on the board afaik
[19:07] <pmcgowan> Chipaca, qa passed it but your MR is not approved
[19:08] <Chipaca> I've asked noise to +1 the MR, 1 sec
[19:08] <Chipaca> pmcgowan: done
[19:08] <Chipaca> *top* approve
[19:08] <Chipaca> 1 sec more
[19:09] <Chipaca> my mouse pointer is clicking 8 pixesl to the right today
[19:09] <Chipaca> anyway, pmcgowan, done
[19:09] <pmcgowan> jibel, ok to publish silo 7 as approved by om26er ?
[19:14] <pmcgowan> Chipaca, I expect it should land, we agreed this morning the queued highs could do so
[19:14] <Chipaca> pmcgowan: ok, thank you
[19:20] <tvoss> trainguards, can I get a silo for line 59?
[19:21] <robru> tvoss: vivid 30
[19:21] <tvoss> robru, ack & thx
[19:21] <robru> tvoss: you're welcome
[19:22] <tvoss> robru, and for line 60, please?
[19:23] <robru> tvoss: well, that was the last one. let me see if there's any idle ones I can free up
[19:24] <tvoss> robru, 60 is for rtm
[19:24] <robru> oh, heh
[19:24] <tvoss> robru, 59 is vivid, 60 is sync to rtm
[19:25] <robru> tvoss: ok rtm 2
[19:25] <jibel> pmcgowan, +1 to publish 7
[19:27] <pmcgowan> jibel, very good, seems it needs to be marked as passed
[19:28] <robru> bfiller: what's up with silo 9? hasn't moved since december 17.
[19:29] <jibel> done
[19:31] <robru> pmcgowan: k, publishing
[19:32] <pmcgowan> thanks
[19:32] <bfiller> robru: it's on hold
[19:32] <bfiller> robru: will be looking back at it soon as rtm is out
[19:33] <robru> bfiller: ah, k. thought maybe you forgot about it.
[19:33] <bfiller> pmcgowan, jibel: silo 4 is ready for testing again, fixes the SD card crash
[19:33] <bfiller> robru: you can delete if need the space
[19:33] <robru> bfiller: ah, thanks. yeah we're right out, I won' free it just now, but if anybody asks for one that'll be first on the chopping block.
[19:36] <jibel> bfiller, are you sure the link to the click package is correct? The version is the same than previous build.
[19:36] <jibel> 2.9.1.1134
[19:36] <bfiller> jibel: yeah, it's not the final click (which we won't build until the changes land on trunk) but it has the fix
[19:37] <jibel> bfiller, OK thanks.
[20:20] <rsalveti> oh, no silos left for vivid
[20:20] <rsalveti> let me free the system-settings one for now
[20:33] <camako> fginther, I made a small change to : ~mir-team/+junk/mir-medium-test-runner-for-jenkins . Is this the authoritative location for it, or does it need to be deployed/copied somewhere?
[20:34] <fginther> camako, that branch is currently the authoritative location
[20:44] <robru> bfiller: once silo 7 merges I can assign it back to you for line 62.
[20:45] <bfiller> robru: ack, line 62 is for rtm though
[20:45] <bfiller> 7 was vivid
[20:45] <robru> bfiller: bah, gotta check these things before talking ;-)
[20:46] <robru> bfiller: ok, you got rtm 6
[20:46] <bfiller> robru: thank you sir :)
[20:46] <robru> bfiller: you're welcome
[21:11] <ricmm> robru: hey, could I get one for ^
[21:12] <robru> ricmm: there aren't any ;-) but there's one I can free up for you, hang on
[21:12] <ricmm> wow :) busy days
[21:12] <ricmm> thakns
[22:03] <tedg> trainguards, could I get a vivid silo for line 65 please?
[22:04] <robru> tedg: silo 27
[22:05] <tedg> robru, Great, thank you.
[22:05] <robru> tedg: you're welcome
[22:23] <jhodapp> robru, can I get a silo for line 120 please?
[22:24] <robru> jhodapp: sure can't! we are right out.
[22:24] <jhodapp> robru, bummer
[22:24] <robru> jhodapp: oh sorry, looks like one freed up. hang on
[22:24] <jhodapp> lol
[22:24] <jhodapp> :)
[22:25] <jhodapp> robru, actually line 66, my spreadsheet view was out of date
[22:25] <robru> jhodapp: k, it'll be silo 29
[22:25] <jhodapp> thanks
[22:25] <robru> jhodapp: you're welcome
[22:42] <cyphermox> oh, good :)
[22:43] <pmcgowan> awesome