[00:08] <junglejoe78> :)Hi, looking for openldap update doc?
[08:27] <dtscode> can someone tell me how to setup a mail server on an ubuntu 14.04 vps?
[08:28] <Sling> dtscode: dovecot, postfix, spamassassin, roundcube
[08:28] <Sling> plenty of guides around for that stack :)
[08:28] <dtscode> Sling, alright. so googling dovecot postfix spamassassin roundcube stack setup will get me a good guide?
[08:29] <Sling> dtscode: would you like a spoon with that? :)
[08:29] <Sling> (just use your creativity when googling)
[08:30] <dtscode> being creative has nothing to do with it. i can be the most creative googler ever and still be taught by a bad guide
[08:31] <Sling> still, you can usually see when the guide is any good or not, for example don't pick anything older than 2014
[08:31] <Sling> ubuntu wiki is also a good start
[08:39] <hxm> hello, is powerpc g4 still in develop?
[08:46] <dtscode> isnt powerpc the mac desktop?
[08:47] <dtscode> Sling, thanks :D found a great digitalocean link. it doesnt include roundcube, but thats ok, since i have no want or need to access it from my browser
[08:47] <Sling> ok :)
[08:58] <lordievader> Good morning.
[09:08] <lovetruth> hello
[09:08] <lovetruth> want to report a virus I have on my server...
[09:08] <lovetruth> or where can I report that?...
[09:10] <lovetruth> I knew about the vulnerability, delayed the update... and... voila: infected...
[09:10] <lordievader> lovetruth: Err, what? How do you know you have a virus?
[09:10] <lovetruth> well the server crashed
[09:10] <lovetruth> and then looked into the logs
[09:10] <lordievader> lovetruth: And?
[09:10] <lovetruth> and found some "steal.txt" file which was trying to install some irc bot on it
[09:11] <lovetruth> and few hours later, the server crashed
[09:11] <lordievader> Sounds more like you are hacked. Is it a known vunerability?
[09:11] <lovetruth> (few hours after the "steal.txt"...)
[09:11] <lovetruth> yes
[09:11] <lordievader> lovetruth: Is it patched?
[09:12] <lovetruth> not yet... in this Company I have to get some approvals before patching it...
[09:12] <lovetruth> I know it's not the best way, but this is how it works...
[09:12] <lovetruth> so I delayed the update because I didn't get permission to apply it and ... voila...
[09:12] <lordievader> Err, heh? Is it not part of the Ubuntu OS?
[09:12] <lovetruth> no, it's part of some software installed on the server
[09:13] <lovetruth> but right now I have some bad foreign files on it...
[09:13] <lordievader> lovetruth: Then file a bug at their bug tracker.
[09:13] <lovetruth> it's a known bug, it's there already... :)
[09:13] <lovetruth> I meant to report the IP that attacked my server...
[09:14] <lovetruth> and, eventually, somehow to get rid of any hidden thing he installed on my ubuntu server...
[09:16] <lovetruth> he has around thirty bots on it's irc bot net
[09:16] <lovetruth> so, wanted to report him and his ip...
[09:17] <lordievader> Send a mail to the abuse department of their isp?
[09:22] <lovetruth> yes... that was what I was thinking too... :)
[09:22] <lovetruth> just thought that there might be some #antivirus team which might do a little more... :)
[09:23] <lovetruth> at least, there it was, some time ago, on undernet IRC... :)
[09:24] <lordievader> I have no knowledge of such a channel.
[09:58] <dtscode> hey guys... i followed this page to setup a mail server: https://www.digitalocean.com/community/tutorials/how-to-configure-a-mail-server-using-postfix-dovecot-mysql-and-spamassasin and did everything it told me to (except install spamassassin which i dont need atm) but when i got to the end of step 4 it says connection refused when i telnet dtscode.io 994 and 995. how can i fix this?
[10:16] <devster31> try port 993?
[10:17] <devster31> or you didn't restart the services, also try looking at /var/log/mail.log
[10:47] <rbasak> kickinz1|afk: have you made any progress on bug 1412830 yet please?
[12:07] <MACscr> I hate to reask this question, but does ubuntu 14.04 generate 70-persistent-net.rules by default? I know it at least a release or so ago it didnt generate one. i have one on my system, but with ethX interface names versus biosdevnames. Trying to figure out if its an issue with my provision templates. cant spot anything though
[12:13] <lordievader> MACscr: Udev generates it.
[12:14] <MACscr> lordievader: any ideas why im getting ethX versus emX?
[12:14] <MACscr> etc
[12:14] <lordievader> Likely the biosdevnames, which imo is quite nice.
[12:14] <MACscr> i know what generates it, but i remember there not being a 70-persistent-net.rules file by default
[12:15] <lordievader> No longer nic's that decide to use a different name at every reboot.
[12:15] <MACscr> ok, so they removed it, then readded it?
[12:15] <MACscr> the file
[12:15] <lordievader> ?
[12:16] <MACscr> "i know what generates it, but i remember there not being a 70-persistent-net.rules file by default"
[12:16] <lordievader> For as far as I know, Ubuntu doesn't yet use bios dev names.
[12:16] <ogra_> it has always been generated
[12:16] <ogra_> for several years
[12:16] <MACscr> no it hasnt. unless im thinking of debian
[12:16] <ogra_> you probably do
[12:16] <ogra_> ubuntu does it since ages
[12:17] <lordievader> ogra_: Are there plans to switch to the bios names?
[12:17] <ogra_> and debian used to change udev a lot from upstream in the past afaik so it could well bee it was disabled there
[12:17] <ogra_> lordievader, i thought we use them since a while
[12:17] <ogra_> but i might be wrong
[12:17] <MACscr> hmm, some of my systems are using biosdevnames and are trusty systems
[12:18] <ogra_> ogra@wall2:~$ ifconfig |grep Link
[12:18] <ogra_> lo        Link encap:Local Loopback
[12:18] <ogra_> p4p1      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:0d:b9:35:86:6c
[12:18] <ogra_> p5p1      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:0d:b9:35:86:6d
[12:18] <ogra_> ppp0      Link encap:Point-to-Point Protocol
[12:18] <ogra_> my router definitely uses them
[12:18] <MACscr> actually a majority of mien are
[12:18] <MACscr> mine*
[12:19] <ogra_> might be an issue for upgraded systems though, not sure how this is handled there
[12:19] <ogra_> but i guess the generated rules are not wiped on upgrades, to not lose the names and break scripts
[12:19] <MACscr> i just did a brand new install and eth is used
[12:19] <lordievader> I suppose that is why I still see eth0 on my Trusty box.
[12:20] <MACscr> but another system i setup are using biosdevnames
[12:20] <MACscr> hence why im confused as hell
[12:23] <hxm> dtscode: mac is intel from 2007 or so
[12:23] <hxm> from=since
[12:24] <hxm> is know there is a ppc version but i wonder untill when since a powerpc can have 10 years
[12:29] <MACscr> forget it. im forcing biosdevnames off in grub so i can move on from this junk
[12:31] <MACscr> yep, just double checked one of my trusty systems and it doesnt even have any udev rules
[16:03] <hxm> guys i removed a cron and i still get messages from it
[16:04] <hxm> do i need do something else more?
[16:05] <hxm> ah found it in /etc/cron.d
[19:05] <hydrajump> i'm setting up a samba 4 file server to replace a windows server. Is it possible to set specific permissions on a directory within a share?
[19:38] <aandy> hi, any dropbear users? i'm wondering what the best approach for a "forward only" shell is. that is, i only need it to be an open connection from which i can do tunnels. if there was a non-timeout "echo hello" that'd be fine. permitopen doesn't seem to work in authorized_keys. any ideas are greatly appreciated :)
[19:39] <sarnold> aandy: sleep 999999999 ? :)
[19:41] <sarnold> hallyn: I'm missing too much context re: cgmanager in debian; I thought between the 0.33-3 debdiff we supplied them and the new tarball for upstream releases that they would have been well-covered
[19:57] <aandy> hi, any dropbear users? i'm wondering what the best approach for a "forward only" shell is. that is, i only need it to be an open connection from which i can do tunnels. if there was a non-timeout "echo hello" that'd be fine. permitopen doesn't seem to work in authorized_keys. any ideas are greatly appreciated :)
[19:58] <aandy> argh sorry, client messed up
[19:59] <aandy> sarnold: hehe well.. i guess :)
[20:00] <sarnold> aandy: yeah.. not the best, but it might do the trick in the meantime..
[21:14] <tgm4883> Anyone setup freeradius to auth against an LDAP DB and reply back with the groups that a user is in?
[22:00] <rberg_> I am looking into a openstack instance where /dev/disk/by-id is not being populated, while by-uuid is.. anybody ever have that problem?
[22:01] <rberg_> on 12.04 I should mention!
[22:04] <arcsky> how should i do if i want a clusterd Ubuntu server ?
[22:04] <hallyn> sarnold: yeah i dunno.  i just made them (and handed you) a new pkg that should cover both that CVE and the other could-be-security issues
[23:42] <devster31> can anyone here help me refine an init.d script?
[23:43] <devster31> http://pastebin.com/zb6NyRZC