=== Lcawte is now known as Lcawte|Away [00:08] :)Hi, looking for openldap update doc? === NoobsFlyVFR is now known as Richthoffen === antix- is now known as antix === Guest33815 is now known as No_one_at_all === zz_DenBeiren is now known as DenBeiren === IdleOne- is now known as IdleOne === zz_DenBeiren is now known as DenBeiren === Guest83203 is now known as Tm_T [08:27] can someone tell me how to setup a mail server on an ubuntu 14.04 vps? === smb` is now known as smb [08:28] dtscode: dovecot, postfix, spamassassin, roundcube [08:28] plenty of guides around for that stack :) === Lcawte|Away is now known as Lcawte [08:28] Sling, alright. so googling dovecot postfix spamassassin roundcube stack setup will get me a good guide? [08:29] dtscode: would you like a spoon with that? :) [08:29] (just use your creativity when googling) [08:30] being creative has nothing to do with it. i can be the most creative googler ever and still be taught by a bad guide [08:31] still, you can usually see when the guide is any good or not, for example don't pick anything older than 2014 [08:31] ubuntu wiki is also a good start === klaas_ is now known as klaas [08:39] hello, is powerpc g4 still in develop? [08:46] isnt powerpc the mac desktop? [08:47] Sling, thanks :D found a great digitalocean link. it doesnt include roundcube, but thats ok, since i have no want or need to access it from my browser [08:47] ok :) [08:58] Good morning. [09:08] hello [09:08] want to report a virus I have on my server... [09:08] or where can I report that?... [09:10] I knew about the vulnerability, delayed the update... and... voila: infected... [09:10] lovetruth: Err, what? How do you know you have a virus? [09:10] well the server crashed [09:10] and then looked into the logs [09:10] lovetruth: And? [09:10] and found some "steal.txt" file which was trying to install some irc bot on it [09:11] and few hours later, the server crashed [09:11] Sounds more like you are hacked. Is it a known vunerability? [09:11] (few hours after the "steal.txt"...) [09:11] yes [09:11] lovetruth: Is it patched? [09:12] not yet... in this Company I have to get some approvals before patching it... [09:12] I know it's not the best way, but this is how it works... [09:12] so I delayed the update because I didn't get permission to apply it and ... voila... [09:12] Err, heh? Is it not part of the Ubuntu OS? [09:12] no, it's part of some software installed on the server [09:13] but right now I have some bad foreign files on it... [09:13] lovetruth: Then file a bug at their bug tracker. [09:13] it's a known bug, it's there already... :) [09:13] I meant to report the IP that attacked my server... [09:14] and, eventually, somehow to get rid of any hidden thing he installed on my ubuntu server... [09:16] he has around thirty bots on it's irc bot net [09:16] so, wanted to report him and his ip... [09:17] Send a mail to the abuse department of their isp? [09:22] yes... that was what I was thinking too... :) [09:22] just thought that there might be some #antivirus team which might do a little more... :) [09:23] at least, there it was, some time ago, on undernet IRC... :) [09:24] I have no knowledge of such a channel. [09:58] hey guys... i followed this page to setup a mail server: https://www.digitalocean.com/community/tutorials/how-to-configure-a-mail-server-using-postfix-dovecot-mysql-and-spamassasin and did everything it told me to (except install spamassassin which i dont need atm) but when i got to the end of step 4 it says connection refused when i telnet dtscode.io 994 and 995. how can i fix this? [10:16] try port 993? [10:17] or you didn't restart the services, also try looking at /var/log/mail.log === Lcawte is now known as Lcawte|Away === kickinz1` is now known as kickinz1|afk [10:47] kickinz1|afk: have you made any progress on bug 1412830 yet please? === Lcawte|Away is now known as Lcawte [12:07] I hate to reask this question, but does ubuntu 14.04 generate 70-persistent-net.rules by default? I know it at least a release or so ago it didnt generate one. i have one on my system, but with ethX interface names versus biosdevnames. Trying to figure out if its an issue with my provision templates. cant spot anything though [12:13] MACscr: Udev generates it. [12:14] lordievader: any ideas why im getting ethX versus emX? [12:14] etc [12:14] Likely the biosdevnames, which imo is quite nice. [12:14] i know what generates it, but i remember there not being a 70-persistent-net.rules file by default [12:15] No longer nic's that decide to use a different name at every reboot. [12:15] ok, so they removed it, then readded it? [12:15] the file [12:15] ? [12:16] "i know what generates it, but i remember there not being a 70-persistent-net.rules file by default" [12:16] For as far as I know, Ubuntu doesn't yet use bios dev names. [12:16] it has always been generated [12:16] for several years [12:16] no it hasnt. unless im thinking of debian [12:16] you probably do [12:16] ubuntu does it since ages [12:17] ogra_: Are there plans to switch to the bios names? [12:17] and debian used to change udev a lot from upstream in the past afaik so it could well bee it was disabled there [12:17] lordievader, i thought we use them since a while [12:17] but i might be wrong [12:17] hmm, some of my systems are using biosdevnames and are trusty systems [12:18] ogra@wall2:~$ ifconfig |grep Link [12:18] lo Link encap:Local Loopback [12:18] p4p1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:0d:b9:35:86:6c [12:18] p5p1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:0d:b9:35:86:6d [12:18] ppp0 Link encap:Point-to-Point Protocol [12:18] my router definitely uses them [12:18] actually a majority of mien are [12:18] mine* [12:19] might be an issue for upgraded systems though, not sure how this is handled there [12:19] but i guess the generated rules are not wiped on upgrades, to not lose the names and break scripts [12:19] i just did a brand new install and eth is used [12:19] I suppose that is why I still see eth0 on my Trusty box. [12:20] but another system i setup are using biosdevnames [12:20] hence why im confused as hell [12:23] dtscode: mac is intel from 2007 or so [12:23] from=since [12:24] is know there is a ppc version but i wonder untill when since a powerpc can have 10 years [12:29] forget it. im forcing biosdevnames off in grub so i can move on from this junk [12:31] yep, just double checked one of my trusty systems and it doesnt even have any udev rules === Lcawte is now known as Lcawte|Away === Lcawte|Away is now known as Lcawte === martinst is now known as martins-afk === txspud|away is now known as txspud === Lcawte is now known as Lcawte|Away === lool- is now known as lool === martins-afk is now known as martinst === Guest99704 is now known as balloons === balloons is now known as Guest37568 === Guest37568 is now known as balloons_ === jdstrand_ is now known as jdstrand === bilde2910|away is now known as bilde2910 === hamnstar_ is now known as hamnstar [16:03] guys i removed a cron and i still get messages from it [16:04] do i need do something else more? [16:05] ah found it in /etc/cron.d === Lcawte|Away is now known as Lcawte === sarnold_ is now known as sarnold === pgraner-afk is now known as pgraner-food === pgraner-food is now known as pgraner === balloons_ is now known as balloons === paralle21_ is now known as parallel21 [19:05] i'm setting up a samba 4 file server to replace a windows server. Is it possible to set specific permissions on a directory within a share? [19:38] hi, any dropbear users? i'm wondering what the best approach for a "forward only" shell is. that is, i only need it to be an open connection from which i can do tunnels. if there was a non-timeout "echo hello" that'd be fine. permitopen doesn't seem to work in authorized_keys. any ideas are greatly appreciated :) [19:39] aandy: sleep 999999999 ? :) [19:41] hallyn: I'm missing too much context re: cgmanager in debian; I thought between the 0.33-3 debdiff we supplied them and the new tarball for upstream releases that they would have been well-covered === chmurifree is now known as chmuri [19:57] hi, any dropbear users? i'm wondering what the best approach for a "forward only" shell is. that is, i only need it to be an open connection from which i can do tunnels. if there was a non-timeout "echo hello" that'd be fine. permitopen doesn't seem to work in authorized_keys. any ideas are greatly appreciated :) [19:58] argh sorry, client messed up [19:59] sarnold: hehe well.. i guess :) [20:00] aandy: yeah.. not the best, but it might do the trick in the meantime.. === keithzg_ is now known as keithzg === bilde2910 is now known as bilde2910|away === martins-afk is now known as martinst === martinst is now known as martins-afk === jeremy_carroll_ is now known as jeremy_carroll [21:14] Anyone setup freeradius to auth against an LDAP DB and reply back with the groups that a user is in? === pgraner is now known as pgraner-gym === martins-afk is now known as martinst [22:00] I am looking into a openstack instance where /dev/disk/by-id is not being populated, while by-uuid is.. anybody ever have that problem? [22:01] on 12.04 I should mention! [22:04] how should i do if i want a clusterd Ubuntu server ? === Fun is now known as Guest39284 [22:04] sarnold: yeah i dunno. i just made them (and handed you) a new pkg that should cover both that CVE and the other could-be-security issues === RoyK is now known as DrStrangeRoy === exekias is now known as Guest97851 [23:42] can anyone here help me refine an init.d script? [23:43] http://pastebin.com/zb6NyRZC