| cjohnston | hey edrz | 12:45 |
|---|---|---|
| edrz | hi | 13:21 |
| cjohnston | edrz: how goes the work with summit? | 15:03 |
| cate | cjohnston: it goes well. Especially because vorlon did most of the work for last DebConf. Now we are mostly improving things to DebConf ways | 15:31 |
| cate | One of the invasive change, would be to add a new summit.status = Done, to block editing a past conference | 15:34 |
| cate | But the most urgent change is to inhibit displayng the attendee list on ProposeMeeting (and other *Meeting forms), for privacy reasons. | 15:35 |
| cjohnston | mhall119, daker ^ | 15:48 |
| cjohnston | cate: we use that because certain meetings require certain people to attend, so if I am creating a meeting and I know that mhall119 and daker need to be there, I'd add them... do you guys not have meetings like that? | 15:49 |
| cate | cjohnston: we don't use very much the "attend", and people are not so "dutiful" to complete it. | 15:51 |
| cjohnston | I see | 15:51 |
| cate | OTOH an other change [but probably could be made only in DebConf part] is to add multi-speakers | 15:52 |
| cjohnston | hmm.. I'm not sure how speaker was implemented, but it doesn't look to be like ours | 15:53 |
| cjohnston | (we don't have that notion) | 15:53 |
| cate | we interpreted someshing between drafter ans assignee | 15:54 |
| cjohnston | gotcha | 15:54 |
| mhall119 | cate: can you use the "required to attend" for speaker? | 15:56 |
| mhall119 | also, what is the privacy reason for not displaying attendees? Is the attendee list not public information? | 15:57 |
| cate | mhall119: it seems no. We had a lot of complain last year | 15:57 |
| mhall119 | cate: that's going to be a much more difficult task then, we always considered info on who is attending to be public, so it's used in a lot of places | 15:58 |
| cate | but multi-speaker could be set only by content-team/track-leads | 15:58 |
| cate | mhall119: yes, we noticed that | 15:59 |
| mhall119 | cate: is it an option for those people who don't want their name listed as attending to simply not register as attending? | 16:00 |
| cate | mhall119: I don't know yet. We use the registration system for many logistic parts [sponros, food, accommodation, t-shirts, ...], so maybe we can have something like attend = visible and really_attend | 16:05 |
| cate | But i should check the code, if it is feasible | 16:05 |
| === nottrobin_ is now known as nottrobin | ||
| edrz | we already hid the list of participants from meeting displays by making them only visible to organziers (in the templates) | 21:07 |
| edrz | now we're looking at the ProposeMeeting form. | 21:08 |
| edrz | and, we did use require_attendees for multiple "speakers" last year. | 21:08 |
| edrz | but, that doesn't allow 2 or more persons to own an event, i.e. 2 speakers each able to edit the talk they are giving together. | 21:10 |
| edrz | only drafter and organizer can do that. | 21:10 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!