[04:10] <rbasak> [3.4.0-3ubuntu1 => 3.4.0-3ubuntu2.1]
[04:10] <rbasak> Oops. Never mind.
[04:11] <rbasak> It'd be nice to be able to automate SRU version number generation.
[04:11]  * rbasak wonders what the security team doess
[04:14] <jdstrand> rbasak: we use a tool called 'umt': http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security/ubuntu-security-tools/trunk/view/head:/build-tools/umt
[04:15] <jdstrand> rbasak: it does a quite good job, but it doesn't know about some corner cases
[04:15] <jdstrand> (eg, two releases with the same version that need an update)
[08:57] <mlankhorst> uh weird.. thought libepoxy was in trusty?
[08:57] <mlankhorst> oh damn, not in main..
[09:29] <didrocks> cjwatson: sorry to bother you for that one, but I'm unsure how this can work on the archive/launchpad side. Of course, trusty is frozen, so I can't promote it from the release pocket, and there has been no SRU for libepoxy. Consequence is that it can't find it in trusty-updates for instance? how would you deal with this? ^
[09:33] <mlankhorst> worst case we could SRU libepoxy from utopic, I don't think anything depends on it right now in trusty
[09:37] <mlankhorst> $ reverse-depends -b libepoxy-dev -r trusty
[09:37] <mlankhorst> No reverse dependencies found
[09:39] <didrocks> mlankhorst: I would think rather that we can do a non change rebuild
[09:39] <didrocks> "just" to get a new binary
[09:40] <mlankhorst> yeah probably
[10:01] <cjwatson> didrocks: copy it to trusty-proposed (or maybe trusty-updates) and promote the copy
[10:01] <cjwatson> didrocks: no need for a no-change rebuild
[10:02] <mlankhorst> ah
[10:02] <mlankhorst> didn't we have this in precise before? can't remember the package though
[10:03] <didrocks> cjwatson: gotcha, doing! thanks
[10:13] <mlankhorst> needs approval :P
[10:19] <cjwatson> lies
[10:20] <didrocks> mlankhorst: should pe published soon in main ^
[10:23] <mlankhorst> goodie
[10:23] <rbasak> jdstrand: neat. Thanks!
[12:25] <mlankhorst> \o/
[12:26] <mlankhorst> accept and the drivers should start building. :P
[14:42] <LocutusOfBorg1> hi folks, why virtualbox/precise is still in proposed since 12 days?  4.1.12-dfsg-2ubuntu0.8
[14:43] <LocutusOfBorg1> also virtualbox/trusty should have migrated today
[14:43] <LocutusOfBorg1> I would like to address the 6 CVES
[16:15] <LocutusOfBorg1> arges, can you please also push virtualbox-trusty?
[16:15] <LocutusOfBorg1> (thanks for the precise virtualbox move)
[16:16] <arges> LocutusOfBorg1: sure, going through the list slowly
[16:16] <LocutusOfBorg1> sorry for bothering, just there is bug 1413603 waiting for it ;)
[16:17] <LocutusOfBorg1> I just don't like having CVEs around my packages :)
[16:18] <arges> LocutusOfBorg1: ok done
[16:19] <LocutusOfBorg1> thanks!!!
[16:36] <bdmurray> arges: are you doing SRU work today?
[16:37] <bdmurray> arges: if so could you stop as I'll be training tjaalton later today.
[16:37] <arges> bdmurray: sure. thought today was my day?
[16:38] <bdmurray> arges: It is I just need training material. ;-)
[16:38] <arges> bdmurray: ah, no problemo. happy SRUing
[18:04] <infinity> Trying easy from adconrad: libcapi20-3/1:3.27-1 network-manager/0.9.10.0-4ubuntu2 network-manager-applet/0.9.10.1-0ubuntu1 gnome-control-center/1:3.14.2-2ubuntu2 ppp/2.4.6-3ubuntu1 isdnutils/1:3.25+dfsg1-3.5ubuntu1 network-manager-pptp/0.9.10.0-1ubuntu1 network-manager-iodine/0.0.5-1ubuntu1
[18:04] <infinity> leading: libcapi20-3,network-manager,network-manager-applet,gnome-control-center,ppp,isdnutils,network-manager-pptp,network-manager-iodine
[18:04] <infinity> failed: libcapi20-3
[18:04] <infinity> THANKS FOR YOUR EXTREME VERBOSITY, BRITNEY.
[18:08] <Laney> http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/log/vivid/2015-01-28/17:16:30.log you got it on the previous run
[18:08] <infinity> Laney: Oh, hah.  Check.
[18:08] <infinity> Laney: So, yeah.  "failed" is an entirely silly message.  Oh well.
[18:09] <infinity> I have no urge to fix it because I don't want a pointless delta with Debian.
[18:09] <infinity> And even less urge to fix it in Debian.
[18:12] <Laney> Maybe you can reward my powers of observation by moderating u-d-a. :)
[18:12] <Laney> I won't know if you do or don't though, because CTRL-A D BYEEEE
[18:13] <infinity> Laney: Done.
[22:14] <tjaalton> stgraber: was lxc 1.1.0~rc3-0ubuntu1 supposed to go to vivid instead?
[22:33] <stgraber> tjaalton: hmm, yeah, where did it end up? trusty? :)
[22:34] <stgraber> yeah, looks like it did... /me re-uploads to vivid
[22:35] <tjaalton> stgraber: hehe, cool
[22:36] <stgraber> looks like you beat me at rejecting it :)