| === kadams54-away is now known as kadams54 | ||
| === kadams54 is now known as kadams54-away | ||
| === kadams54-away is now known as kadams54 | ||
| === kadams54 is now known as kadams54-away | ||
| === kadams54-away is now known as kadams54 | ||
| === kadams54 is now known as kadams54-away | ||
| === kadams54-away is now known as kadams54 | ||
| === kadams54 is now known as kadams54-away | ||
| === lazyPower is now known as lp|Metrics | ||
| hatch | lp|Metrics: The graphic titled 'Social Engagements' is pretty cool :) | 15:45 |
|---|---|---|
| === kadams54 is now known as kadams54-away | ||
| hatch | that small svg bug is really irritating | 16:57 |
| hatch | I can now reproduce it after updating chrome | 16:57 |
| hatch | :/ | 16:57 |
| hatch | annnnnd now I can't reproduce the export bug | 17:05 |
| hatch | ^ rick_h_ :/ | 17:05 |
| hatch | rick_h_: yeah nothing I can do will reproduce that bug any longer. I'm going to have to bench it, maybe it was some obscure caching issue? | 17:12 |
| hatch | jujugui anyone able to test a GUI bug for me? | 17:14 |
| hatch | frankban: any luck reproducing that bug? | 17:46 |
| === kadams54-away is now known as kadams54 | ||
| hatch | looks like it only happens when dragging a charm to the canvas from the charmbrowser | 18:30 |
| === lp|Metrics is now known as lazyPower | ||
| === kadams54 is now known as kadams54-away | ||
| === kadams54-away is now known as kadams54 | ||
| === kadams54 is now known as kadams54-away | ||
| === kadams54-away is now known as kadams54 | ||
| === kadams54 is now known as kadams54-away | ||
| mbruzek | hatch ping | 21:12 |
| mbruzek | Can anyone here explain the jujucharms.com injest process? | 21:16 |
| mbruzek | I am not seeing a different version of the charm. | 21:16 |
| hatch | mbruzek: it should take about 30m | 21:20 |
| hatch | assuming of course that it passes proof | 21:20 |
| mbruzek | hatch: this is a personal branch | 21:20 |
| mbruzek | hatch does it always run proof on those branches? | 21:20 |
| hatch | same rules apply | 21:20 |
| hatch | yup | 21:21 |
| mbruzek | hatch: so can you explain something to me? | 21:21 |
| hatch | sure, any topic in particular? | 21:22 |
| hatch | or should I just pick something :P | 21:22 |
| mbruzek | the code is on bzr revision 3. The jujucharms.com shows kubernetes-master-1, there should be a 2 in there too, but maybe it did not pass proof | 21:22 |
| mbruzek | How does jujucharms.com revision the charm? | 21:22 |
| === kadams54 is now known as kadams54-away | ||
| hatch | honestly I'm not too sure now that the revision file is no longer required | 21:23 |
| mbruzek | hatch: I pushed 3 almost 30 minutes ago, but I do/did not see the kubernetes-master-2 in jujucharms.com | 21:23 |
| hatch | in theory it could be up to an hour, if you pushed it just after the last ingestion started | 21:23 |
| mbruzek | bzr shows me 3 commits now, myself, whit, and myself. | 21:24 |
| mbruzek | But when I look at jujucharms.com I only see kubernets-master-1 I can not find kubernetes-master-2 | 21:24 |
| mbruzek | which would have been whit's version | 21:24 |
| hatch | that does look to be the case | 21:25 |
| hatch | I don't have access to the machine to view the logs | 21:25 |
| mbruzek | hatch: I see your point about ingestion that is fine. I can wait. | 21:25 |
| hatch | friday - everyone who does is gone :) | 21:25 |
| mbruzek | hatch: OK | 21:25 |
| hatch | but yeah maybe give it 15 more mins or so | 21:26 |
| hatch | Does it pass proof locally? | 21:26 |
| mbruzek | The thing is I have to build a bundle to point to the LATEST version of my charm. | 21:26 |
| === kadams54-away is now known as kadams54 | ||
| mbruzek | hatch: yes it does, just double checked | 21:26 |
| hatch | ok then yeah maybe just hold off another 15m or so and then fire an email to peeps | 21:27 |
| mbruzek | hatch: I don't see how proof is tied in here. People can push stuff in their namespace that does not pass proof | 21:27 |
| mbruzek | hatch: like if they are building a charm and don't know about proof | 21:27 |
| hatch | then it won't end up in the charmbrowser | 21:28 |
| mbruzek | hatch: If you say so. I didn't know that | 21:28 |
| mbruzek | hatch: whit's changes were not passing proof that is what I was fixing. his code was up there to the latest version | 21:29 |
| * mbruzek is confused | 21:29 | |
| hatch | this is under your namespace or charmers? | 21:30 |
| mbruzek | we created a group called ~kubernetes | 21:30 |
| hatch | ok yeah I see -1 | 21:31 |
| mbruzek | https://code.launchpad.net/~kubernetes/charms/trusty/kubernetes-master/trunk | 21:31 |
| mbruzek | You see 3 commits there right? | 21:31 |
| hatch | yeah | 21:32 |
| hatch | there were some issues with ingestion speed last week, I can't remember if those were resolved | 21:32 |
| mbruzek | when my old bundle was pulling cs:trusty/kubernetes-master-1 I was getting proof errors in whit's code | 21:32 |
| mbruzek | so I set out to fix the code, revision three and I want to know what number this will show up in for the charm store browser | 21:33 |
| mbruzek | so I can build the bundle to point to the right code | 21:33 |
| mbruzek | hatch what makes the charmstore increment the counter, I am aware it is not tied to bzr. | 21:35 |
| hatch | I don't know - I think that it does it on each ingestion where the code differs | 21:36 |
| hatch | mbruzek: yeah it still hasn't ingested - Your best bet would be to email peeps | 21:44 |
| mbruzek | who is peeps? | 21:45 |
| === kadams54 is now known as kadams54-away | ||
| mbruzek | your peeps? | 21:45 |
| hatch | sent ya a msg :) | 21:45 |
| hatch | you should have done this about 4 hours ago :P | 21:46 |
| === kadams54-away is now known as kadams54 | ||
| mbruzek | hatch: yeah | 21:48 |
| hatch | now if you had a GUI problem - i'd be able to help you out :D | 21:49 |
| mbruzek | doh | 21:51 |
| mbruzek | Now I see it is -2 | 21:51 |
| mbruzek | JUST after I checked in the damn bundle | 21:51 |
| mbruzek | argh | 21:51 |
| hatch | https://jujucharms.com/u/kubernetes/kubernetes-master/trusty/2 there it is :) | 21:52 |
| mbruzek | why is this one 2 and the other one was showing up as -1 when there are 3 bzr commits? | 21:53 |
| hatch | mbruzek: likely the reason I mentioned above - it didn't ingest the second commit | 21:53 |
| hatch | https://jujucharms.com/u/kubernetes/kubernetes-master/trusty/2#revisions | 21:54 |
| hatch | it's a little confusing, I agree | 21:54 |
| hatch | bug report? :) | 21:54 |
| mbruzek | no rick will just hulk smash me with his logic | 21:54 |
| mbruzek | and it might makes sense to him, I would believe that | 21:55 |
| mbruzek | I am happy now that I can see it, but I *JUST* checked in the code | 21:55 |
| hatch | lol | 21:56 |
| hatch | so yeah looks like you had just missed the previous ingestion | 21:57 |
| mbruzek | meaning I just checked in the bundle with the old -1 revision, so I have to check in 3 more bundles | 21:59 |
| hatch | good thing version control makes it easy :) | 22:00 |
| hatch | rebase ftw! | 22:00 |
| === kadams54 is now known as kadams54-away | ||
| hatch | mbruzek: so you're good now? | 22:09 |
| mbruzek | hatch: yes thank you | 22:09 |
| mbruzek | hatch: thanks for your help and sticking with my questions | 22:10 |
| mbruzek | hatch: happy Friday! | 22:10 |
| hatch | haha np, to you too | 22:10 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!