=== wgrant_ is now known as wgrant === _salem is now known as salem_ === salem_ is now known as _salem === work_alkisg is now known as alkisg [07:16] Good morning [07:47] good morning [08:21] hi developers! [08:31] @pilot in === udevbot_ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support or app devel) | build failures -> http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of lucid -> utopic | #ubuntu-app-devel for app development on Ubuntu http://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment | See #ubuntu-bugs for http://bit.ly/lv8soi | Patch Pilots: seb128 === dholbach_ is now known as dholbach [09:56] @pilot out === udevbot_ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support or app devel) | build failures -> http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of lucid -> utopic | #ubuntu-app-devel for app development on Ubuntu http://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment | See #ubuntu-bugs for http://bit.ly/lv8soi | Patch Pilots: === sunweave1 is now known as sunweaver [10:43] doko_: can we sync a package openjdk8 from unstable? there is only new thing in Debian: "Remove CACAO packaging bits." [11:02] * dholbach hugs seb128 === _salem is now known as salem_ === alkisg is now known as work_alkisg === Malsasa_ is now known as Malsasa === MacSlow is now known as MacSlow|lunch === liam_ is now known as Guest51703 [12:51] * seb128 hugs dholbach back [12:52] :) [12:54] Hi, where can I request the deletion of a binary package for a specific arch? (LP: #1403494) [12:54] Launchpad bug 1403494 in libqt4pas (Ubuntu) "Please remove arm64 binaries" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1403494 [12:56] ginggs: I see you've already subscribed ~ubuntu-archive? They will review their bugs some time this cycle. [12:59] rbasak: ok, I was just worried this bug had fallen through the cracks [13:01] ginggs: AIUI, they don't process their bugs that frequently, since it's only really needed to happen by release. [13:01] So they batch them all together. [13:02] Wel, that bug is causing something to back up in proposed. [13:07] mvo: poke poke [13:07] mvo: re @ synaptic [13:13] hey shadeslayer, let me check that rejection mail [13:14] :) [13:35] Laney: right, so who can i bug about it, or should i just wait? === MacSlow|lunch is now known as MacSlow [13:48] ginggs: if you can wait then wait, if it blocks your work then try to ping someone from the ubuntu-archive team (https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-archive/+members#active) [13:54] geser: thanks, i was hoping someone from ubuntu-archive might have been hanging around here [14:06] ginggs: . [14:17] cjwatson: thanks! === ochosi is now known as ochsoi === ochsoi is now known as ochosi === roadmr is now known as roadmr_afk === roadmr_afk is now known as roadmr [16:19] cyphermox, Do you have a sec? [16:20] flexiondotorg: sure, what's up? [16:28] I;ll PM. === iulian is now known as Guest35768 === roadmr_afk is now known as roadmr === salem_ is now known as _salem [21:39] hi there, i am trying to make an sru to update-manager but i have confused. Should upload sru to https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/update-manager/main or to https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-branches/ubuntu/vivid/update-manager/vivid; [21:43] i notice that in the second url the version stops to "1:0.196.3" but the developent version from the first url is 1:15.04.1 (the actual package delivered in vivid daily builds)