[00:21] people around? [00:24] cprofitt, ping :) [00:30] I'm here. [00:30] that works ;) [00:30] no empty wall to talk to [00:31] so i'd like to get the teams feedback on a particular thing: [00:31] (this will take some time, wait patiently...) [00:32] some days ago, i made an edit to the PAE page on the community wiki to make the landing page for that clearer [00:32] the page: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/PAE [00:32] after the changed i made: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/PAE?action=recall&rev=43 [00:32] the page got reverted soon back to what it was (see ~the current format) shortly after [00:32] looking at first link now. [00:33] i've been in touch with the person who apparently created and worked on that page for the longest time [00:33] but we haven't reached any kind of agreement and i haven't got many arguments why we should keep the "original" formatting [00:34] note: in my version, the instructions itself would be under PentiumM, which i also slightly edited (that's partly different from my edit now as wel) [00:35] since the documentation team oversees the community wiki, what do people think about the two different approaches? [00:35] i guess i'd especially would like feedback from the wiki admins (other than me) [00:35] but any feedback would be appreciated [00:36] i'm feel like i'm kind of disqualified to drop any final decision on the issue as a participant in the argument... [00:36] I need some time (and am not a wiki admin). You might also want to ask on the e-mail list. [00:37] for completeness, the PentiumM page as it would appear on "my revision": https://help.ubuntu.com/community/PAE/PentiumM?action=recall&rev=10 [00:37] dsmythies, ack, i know you aren't, that's why i pinged those admins:) [00:38] and fwiw, i'm not in a hurry by any means, take your time [00:38] i'm an irc person (and not subbed to the list right now...), so i thought i'd check this one first [00:39] to see what the general opinion was and if there was any kind of consensus [00:42] knome: I didn't know you are not subbed to the list. In general I'm not an IRC person, I just didn't get off yet after the meeting earlier. I actually don't understand why IRC is so popluar, but accpet that it is. [00:43] heh, different people prefer different kind of communication methods :) [00:44] tbf, email is ok is the signal to noise ratio is good. on the docs list, it wasn't considering all the other noise i also have incoming :) [00:45] and i'm not exaggerating when i say that connecting on IRC was one of my first actions ever when we got our first broadband [00:45] after that, it's always just felt the natural choice for me [01:01] knome: I'm finding this a little difficult, as I observe good stuff in both approaches. I'm going to ponder, while I do something else that is pressing, then read them again. (I should'a kept quite earlier (just joking)) [01:01] heh. [01:01] probably. [01:01] i'm open to suggestions in merging those two as well [01:02] i mean... doing some kind of compromise. [01:08] the feedback and thought is very appreciated btw, it's too easy to get biased... i should've asked this earlier. [06:42] knome: Are you aware of the dicussion thread over on Ubuntu forums? http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2263647 [13:22] dsmythies, nope. [21:04] imnichol: I haven't forgotten about your issue, but have run into a bit of time crunch. What you want to do is trivial with GIT. I defer to what pmatulis said for BZR. [21:08] dsmythies, appreciated!